Comparison of Double and Single Leg Weight-Bearing Radiography in Determining Knee Alignment

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Orthopedics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Research Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran


Background: Knee malalignment is an important modifiable cause of osteoarthritis (OA). Surgical therapeutic procedures depend on proper knee alignment assessment. The purpose of this study was to compare knee alignment parameters between double and single leg weight-bearing radiographs and to evaluate the reproducibility of inter- and intra-observer measurements.
Methods: One hundred eight patients (59 male and 49 female) with knee deformity visited at Kerman Knee Clinic were selected. Full limb anteroposterior (AP) Radiographs were taken for each participant in double and single leg weight-bearing positions. Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKAA), Medial-Proximal-Tibial Angle (MPTA), Lateral-Distal-Femoral Angle (LDFA) and Joint-Line-Convergence Angle (JLCA) measured. Images stored on PC were examined by three observers to assess inter and intra observer reproducibility. Data analysis was done by SPSS software.
Results: The mean age of patients was 48.4 (±6.84) years, mean BMI was 26.55 (±1.94) Kg/m2. The mean HKAA and JLCA were significantly different between double and single leg weight-bearing radiographs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test showed high (0.99) inter-reproducibility between three observers in all cases, except one (ICC=0.92). Intra-observer reproducibility indicated a strong correlation between the observer’s measurements at different times (ICC > 0.99).
Conclusion: HKAA and JLCA were affected by the patient’s position. Observer and time interval had no effect on either of HKAA, MPTA, LDFA, and JLCA. Also the measurement of knee alignment parameters was not dependent on observer’s experience. In conclusion single leg weight-bearing radiography is more representative of knee alignment and is inter and intra-observer reproducible.


Main Subjects

1. Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, Branco J, Santos RA,
Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on
prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic
review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19(11):1270-85.
2. Murphy L, Helmick CG. The impact of osteoarthritis
in the United States: a population-health perspective.
Am J Nurs. 2012; 112(3 Suppl 1):S13-9.
3. Brouwer GM, van Tol AW, Bergink AP, Belo JN,
Bernsen RM, Reijman M, et al. Association between
valgus and varus alignment and the development
and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the
knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 56(4):1204-11.
4. Cerejo R, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, Channin D, Song J,
Sharma L. The influence of alignment on risk of knee
osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage
of disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 46(10):2632-6.
5. Cicuttini F, Wluka A, Hankin J, Wang Y. Longitudinal
study of the relationship between knee angle and
tibiofemoral cartilage volume in subjects with
knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;
6. Felson DT, Nevitt MC, Yang M, Clancy M, Niu J,
Torner JC, et al. A new approach yields high rates of
radiographic progression in knee osteoarthritis. J
Rheumatol. 2008; 35(10):2047-54.
7. Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh
E, Dunlop DD. The role of knee alignment in
disease progression and functional decline in knee
osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2001; 286(2):188-95.
8. Teichtahl AJ, Davies-Tuck ML, Wluka AE, Jones G,
Cicuttini FM. Change in knee angle influences the rate of
medial tibial cartilage volume loss in knee osteoarthritis.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17(1):8-11.
9. Virolainen P, Aro HT. High tibial osteotomy for the
treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a review of the
literature and a meta-analysis of follow-up studies.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124(4):258-61.
10. Karachalios T, Sarangi PP, Newman JH. Severe varus and
valgus deformities treated by total knee arthroplasty. J
Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76(6):938-42.
11. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic 
analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69(5):745-9.
12. Cooke TD, Sled EA, Scudamore RA. Frontal plane knee
alignment: a call for standardized measurement. J
Rheumatol. 2007; 34(9):1796-801.
13. Matos LF, Giordano M, Cardoso GN, Farias RB, E
Albuquerque RP. Comparative radiographic analysis
on the anatomical axis in knee osteoarthritis cases:
inter and intraobserver evaluation. Rev Bras Ortop.
2015; 50(3):283-9.
14. van Raaij TM, Brouwer RW, Reijman M, Bierma-
Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA. Conventional knee films
hamper accurate knee alignment determination in
patients with varus osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee.
2009; 16(2):109-11.
15. Tetsworth K, Paley D. Malalignment and degenerative
arthropathy. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994; 25(3):367-77.
16. Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T, Costigan
P. Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee
geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis
patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997; 5(1):39-47.
17. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal
axial alignment of the lower extremity and loadbearing
distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat
Res. 1990; 255(1):215-27.
18. Colebatch AN, Hart DJ, Zhai G, Williams FM, Spector
TD, Arden NK. Effective measurement of knee
alignment using AP knee radiographs. Knee. 2009;
19. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD. The anatomy and
functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1987; 69(6):873-80.
20. Chao EY, Neluheni EV, Hsu RW, Paley D. Biomechanics
of malalignment. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;
21. Pornrattanamaneewong C, Narkbunnam R,
Chareancholvanich K. Medial proximal tibial angle
after medial opening wedge HTO: A retrospective
diagnostic test study. Indian J Orthop. 2012;
22. Matsumoto T, Hashimura M, Takayama K, Ishida K,
Kawakami Y, Matsuzaki T, et al. A radiographic analysis
of alignment of the lower extremities--initiation
and progression of varus-type knee osteoarthritis.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015; 23(2):217-23.
23. Vaughan CL. Theories of bipedal walking: an odyssey.
J Biomech. 2003; 36(4):513-23.
24. Specogna AV, Birmingham TB, Hunt MA, Jones IC, Jenkyn
TR, Fowler PJ, et al. Radiographic measures of knee
alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: effect
of weightbearing status and associations with dynamic
joint load. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(1):65-70.
25. McDaniel G, Mitchell KL, Charles C, Kraus VB. A
comparison of five approaches to measurement
of anatomic knee alignment from radiographs.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18(2):273-7.
26. Durandet A, Ricci PL, Saveh AH, Vanat Q, Wang B,
Esat I, et al. Radiographic analysis of lower limb
axial alignments. Proc World Cong Engin. 2013;
27. Sheehy L, Felson D, Zhang Y, Niu J, Lam YM, Segal
N, et al. Does measurement of the anatomic axis
consistently predict hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) for
knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis
of long limb radiographs from the multicenter
osteoarthritis (MOST) study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage.
2011; 19(1):58-64.
28. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 6th ed. New
York, USA: Thomson; 2006.
29. Gudbergsen H, Boesen M, Lohmander LS, Christensen
R, Henriksen M, Bartels EM, et al. Weight loss is
effective for symptomatic relief in obese subjects with
knee osteoarthritis independently of joint damage
severity assessed by high-field MRI and radiography.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20(6):495-502.
30. Osteoarthritis. American Academy of Orthopedic
Surgeons. Available at: URL: http://orthoinfo.aaos.
org/topic.cfm?topic=a00227; 2014.
31. Nourbakhsh M, Motififard M, Shemshaki H, Etemadifar
M, Zarezade A, Farajzadegan Z, et al. Efficacy of tibial
proximal osteotomy in correction of lower limb
alignment indexes in patients with osteoarthritis
in medial compartment of knee. Med Arh. 2012;
32. Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint Structure and Function.
5th ed. New York: Davis Company; 2011.