Preliminary Results of a Consecutive Series of Large & Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Treated with Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs Augmented with Extracellular Matrix

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Rowley Bristow Orthopaedic Unit, Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS FT, Chertsey, Surrey, UK

2 The Reading Shoulder Unit, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Berkshire, UK


Background: Recurrence rate of rotator cuff tears is still high despite the improvements of surgical techniques, materials used and a better knowledge of the healing process of the rotator cuff tendons. Large to massive rotator cuff tears are particularly associated with a high failure rate, especially in elderly.
Augmentation of rotator cuff repairs with extracellular matrix or synthetic patches has gained popularity in recent years with the aim of reducing failure.The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of rotator cuff repairs augmented with denatured extracellular matrix in a series of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for large to massive tears.
Methods: Ten consecutive patients, undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with extracellular matrix augment for large and massive tears, were prospectively enrolled into this single surgeon study. All repairs were performed arthroscopically with a double row technique augmented with extracellular matrix.
Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant Score and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to monitor the shoulder function and outcome pre-operatively and at three, six and 12-month follow-up. Minimum follow up was tree months. Mean follow up was 7 months.
Results: Mean Constant score improved from 53 (SD=4) pre-operatively to 75 (SD=11) at final follow up. Mean Oxford score also increased from 30 (SD=8) pre-operatively to 47 (SD=10) at the final follow up. The visual analogue scale (VAS) improved from seven out of 10 (SD=2) preoperatively to 0.6 (SD=0.8) at final follow up. Additionally, there was significant improvement at three months mark in Constant score.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic repair and augmentation of large and massive rotator cuff tears with extracellular matrix patch has good early outcome.


Main Subjects

1. Ruiz-Moneo P, Molano-Muñoz J, Prieto E, Algora J.
Plasma rich in growth factors in arthroscopic rotator
cuff repair: A randomized, double-blind, controlled
clinical trial. Arthroscopy 2013;29(1):2-9.
2. Derwin KA, Badylak SF, Steinmann SP, Iannotti JP.
Extracellular matrix scaffold devices for rotator cuff
repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19 (3):467-476.
3. Neyton L, Godeneche A, Nove-Josserand L, et al.
Arthroscopic suture-bridge repair for small to
medium size supraspinatus tear: Healing rate and
retear, pattern. Arthroscopy 2013;29(1):10-17.
4. Rodeo SA, Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, et al. Tendonhealing
in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and
histological study in the dog, J Bone Joint Surg Am
1993;75 (12):1795–1803.
5. Gilot GJ, Attia AK, Alvarez AM. Arthroscopic Repair of
Rotator Cuff Tears Using Extracellular Matrix Graft.
Arthroscopy Techniques, 2014; 4;3(4):e487-9.
6. Omae H, Yamamoto S, Mochizuki Y, Ochi M. An
Augmentation Suture Technique for Arthroscopic
Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy Techniques, 2014;
7. Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA,
Arciero RA. Arthroscopic single-row versus doublerow
suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports
Med, 2005; 33(12):1861-8.
8. Millett PJ, Mazzocca A, Guanche CA. Mattress double
anchor footprint repair: a novel, arthroscopic rotator
cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 2004; 20(8):875-9.
9. Hein J, Reilly JM, Chae J, Maerz T, Anderson K. Re-tear
Rates After Arthroscopic Single-Row, Double-Row,
and Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair at a Minimum
of 1 Year of Imaging Follow-up: A Systematic Review.
Arthroscopy. 2015; 31(11):2274-8.
10. Barber FA. Triple-Loaded Single-Row Versus Suture-
Bridge Double-Row Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair With
Platelet-Rich Plasma Fibrin Membrane: A Randomized
Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy 2016; 32(5):753-61.
11. Bergeson AG, Tashjian RZ, Greis PE, Crim J, Stoddard
GJ, Burks RT. Effects of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix on
Repair Integrity of At-Risk Rotator Cuff Tears. Am J
Sports Med 2012; 40(2):286-93.
12. Weber SC, Kauffman JI, Parise C, Weber SJ and Katz
SD. Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix in the Management of
Arthroscopic Repair of the Rotator Cuff: A Prospective,
Randomized, Double-Blinded Study. Am J Sports Med
2013; 41(2):263-70.
13. Castricini R, Longo UG, De Benedetto M, Panfoli N,
Pirani P, Zini R et al: Platelet-rich plasma augmentation
for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomized
controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39(2):258-265.
14. Greenspoon J.A., Petri M., Warth R.J., Millett P.J.,
Massive rotator cuff tears: pathomechanics, current
treatment options, and clinical outcomes. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg 2015; 24(9):1493-505.
15. Shea KP, Obopilwe E, Sperling JW, Iannotti JP. A
biomechanical analysis of gap formation and failure
mechanics of a xenograft- reinforced rotator cuff
repair in a cadaveric model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg
2012; 21(8):1072-9.
16. Ely EE, Figueroa NM, Gilot GJ. Biomechanical Analysis
of Rotator Cuff Repairs With Extracellular Matrix
Graft Augmentation. Orthopedics, the cutting edge.
2014; 37(9):608-14.
17. Omae H, Steinmann SP, Zhao C, Zobitz ME,
Wongtriratanachai P, Sperling JW et al. An.
Biomechanical effect of rotator cuff augmentation
with an acellular dermal matrix graft: A cadaver study.
Clinical Biomechanics 2012; 27(8):789-92.
18. Wong I, Burns J, Snyder S. Arthroscopic GraftJacket
repair of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2010; 19(2 Suppl):104-9.
19. Ciampi P, Scotti C, Nonis A, Vitali M, Di Serio C, Peretti
GM et al. The benefit of synthetic versus biological
patch augmentation in the repair of posterosuperior
massive rotator cuff tears: a 3-year follow-up study.
Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(5):1169-75.
20. Burkhart SS, Barth JR, Richards DP, Zlatkin MB, Larsen
M. Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears
with stage 3 and 4 fatty degeneration. Arthroscopy
2007; 23(4):347-54.
21. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin
MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Preand
postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop.
1994; (304):78-83.
22. Narvani A, Consigliere P, Polyzois I, Sarkhel T, Gupta R, Levy
O. “Owl” Technique for All-Arthroscopic Augmentation of
a Massive or Large Rotator Cuff Tear With Extracellular
Matrix Graft. Arthroscopy 2016. In press.
23. Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim MH, Kim SH, Oh JH.
Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears:
outcome and analysis of factors. Am J Sports Med.
2013; 41(7):1674-83.
24. Zumstein MA, Jost B, Hempel J, Hodler J, Gerber C. The
clinical and structural long term results of open repair
of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg
Am 90(11):2423-31.
25. Miller BS, Downie BK, Kohen RB, Kijek T, Lesniak B,
Jacobson JA, et al. When do rotator cuff repairs fail?
Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic
repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Am J
Sports Med 2011; 39(10):2064-70.
26. Kim JR, Cho YS, Ryu KJ, Kim JH. Clinical and radiographic
outcomes after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator
cuff tears using a suture bridge technique: assessment
of repair integrity on magnetic resonance imaging.Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(4):786-93.
27. Park JY, Lhee SH, Oh KS, Moon SG, Hwang JT. Clinical
and ultrasonographic outcomes of arthroscopic
suture bridge repair for massive rotator cuff tear.
Arthroscopy 2013; 29(2):280-9.
28. Barber FA, Burns JP, Deutsch A, Labbé MR, Litchfield
RB. A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular
human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic
rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2012; 28(1):8-15.
29. Gupta AK, Hug K, Boggess B, Gavigan M, Toth AP.
Massive or 2-tendon rotator cuff tears in active
patients with minimal glenohumeral arthritis: clinical
and radiographic outcomes of reconstruction using
dermal tissue matrix xenograft. Am J Sports Med.
2013; 41(4):872-9.
30. Giannotti S, Ghilardi M, Dell’osso G, Magistrelli L,
Bugelli G, Di Rollo F et al. Study of the porcine dermal
collagen repair patch in morpho-functional recovery
of the rotator cuff after minimum follow-up of 2.5
years. Surg Technol Int. 2014; 24:348-52.
31. Proctor CS. Long-term successful arthroscopic
repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears with a
functional and degradable reinforcement device. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(10):1508-13.