The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

Understanding Orthopedic Knowledge Through Bibliometrics: Promises, Pitfalls, and Practical Applications

Document Type : EDITORIAL

Authors
Raju Vaishya 1
Abhishek Raju Vaish 1
Mohammad H. Ebrahimzadeh 2
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, India
2 Orthopedics Research Center, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
10.22038/abjs.2026.97469.4364
Abstract
Bibliometrics offers valuable insights into orthopedic research by identifying publication trends, collaboration networks, knowledge gaps, and global disparities. While complementing evidence-based practice, its limitations include citation bias and overreliance on metrics, which must be recognized. Used responsibly, bibliometric analyses can support strategic research, education, editorial decisions, and equitable advancement of orthopedic scholarship.
Keywords
Bibliometrics
Orthopedics
Research trends
Scientometrics
Evidence-based medicine
Subjects
1.    Li Y, Xu G, Long X, Ho YS. A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):227.. doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1247-1.
2.    Vaishya R, Gopinathan P, Gupta BM, Mamdapur GMN, Vaish A. Scholarly trends in global orthopedics research published through the journal of orthopaedics: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2024. J Orthop. 2024;60:35-43. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.013.
3.    Manoj Kumar L, George RJ, P S A. Bibliometric Analysis for Medical Research. Indian J Psychol Med. 2023;45(3):277-282. doi:10.1177/02537176221103617.
4.    Vaishya R, Vaish A. Global trend of publications in orthopaedics and sports medicine: 1996 - 2021. Chin J Traumatol. 2024;27(6):368-371. doi:10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.10.006.
5.    Sun J, Mavrogenis AF, Scarlat MM. The growth of scientific publications in 2020: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications, keywords, and citations in orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop. 2021;45(8):1905-1910. doi:10.1007/s00264-021-05171-6.
6.    Puia D, Ivanuta M, Pricop C. A Bibliometric Analysis of COVID-19 Publications Between January 2019 and February 2025 by Romanian Authors. Cureus. 2025;17(4):e82339. doi:10.7759/cureus.82339.
7.    Li C, Ojeda-Thies C, Xu C, Trampuz A. Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):251.doi:10.1186/s13018-020-01757-9.
8.    Zhang L, Li F, Zhao D, Duan L, Bai W, Yan B. Research trends and focus of prosthetic joint infections from 2013 to 2023: bibliometric and visualization studies. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1507340. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1507340.
9.    Graham SM, Brennan C, Laubscher M, et al. Orthopaedic research in low-income countries: A bibliometric analysis of the current literature. SICOT J. 2019;5:41. doi:10.1051/sicotj/2019038.
10.  Ninkov A, Frank JR, Maggio LA. Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing. Perspect Med Educ. 2022;11(3):173-176. doi:10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 9
September 2026
Pages 558-560

  • Receive Date 19 July 2026
  • Accept Date 21 July 2026