The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

Outcomes of Meniscal Repairs in Patients Aged 40 Years or Older: A Retrospective Case Series Comparing Failure and Successful Repair

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors
1 OrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, US -OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, US -Atrium Health – Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, US
2 Atrium Health – Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, US
3 Indiana University Health Physicians, Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, US - Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indianapolis, Indiana, US
4 Indiana University Health Physicians, Indianapolis, IN, US
10.22038/abjs.2026.93091.4215
Abstract
Objectives: Meniscal repair has become common as meniscectomies have fallen out of favor, yet the growing body of literature has not fully assessed outcomes in older patients. The purpose of this study is to report outcomes among patients aged 40 years or older following meniscus repair.
Methods: An administrative database from a single academic institution was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients who underwent meniscal repair between 2010 and 2018. Patients aged 40 years or older with a minimum two-year follow-up after primary meniscal repair were included. Complications, repair failure, and patient-reported outcomes were collected.
Results: Of the 179 included patients, 68 (38%) experienced meniscal repair failure, 41 (22.9%) underwent reoperation, and 9 (5%) were converted to total knee arthroplasty. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life subscale was lower in the repair failure cohort (odds ratio (OR) -14.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) -28.06 to -0.61; P=0.041). Patients with meniscal repair failure had higher complication rates (48 (70%)) than patients without meniscal failure (28 (18%)) (OR 7.11; 95% CI 3.62 to 13.97; P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, postoperative complications were significantly associated with meniscal repair failure (OR 6.22; 95% CI 3.1 to 12.47; P<0.001), and a cumulative effect analysis revealed a stepwise relationship between the risk of repair failure and the number of complications.
Conclusion: Patients aged 40 years or older experienced a 38% meniscal repair failure rate, with a significant association between postoperative complications and repair failure. Surgeons can anticipate that at least one-third of patients in this demographic will experience repair failure and consider the number of complications associated with repair failure risk.
Level of evidence: IV
Keywords
Subjects

1.    van der Esch M, Knoop J, Hunter DJ, et al. The association between reduced knee joint proprioception and medial meniscal abnormalities using MRI in knee osteoarthritis: results from the Amsterdam osteoarthritis cohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(5):676-681. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.02.002.
2.    Paxton ES, Stock MV, Brophy RH. Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(9):1275-1288. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.088.
3.    Beaufils P, Pujol N. Management of traumatic meniscal tear and degenerative meniscal lesions. Save the meniscus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2017;103(8S):S237-S244. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.003.
4.    Tsujii A, Nakamura N, Horibe S. Age-related changes in the knee meniscus. Knee. 2017;24(6):1262-1270. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2017.08.001.
5.    Englund M, Guermazi A, Gale D, et al. Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1108-1115. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0800777.
6.    Bansal S, Floyd ER, A Kowalski M, et al. Meniscal repair: The current state and recent advances in augmentation. J Orthop Res. 2021;39(7):1368-1382. doi:10.1002/jor.25021.
7.    Jacquet C, Mouton C, Becker R, et al. Does practice of meniscus surgery change over time? A report of the 2021 ‘THE MENISCUS’ Webinar. J Exp Orthop. 2021;8(1):46. doi:10.1186/s40634-021-00365-8.
8.    Abrams GD, Frank RM, Gupta AK, Harris JD, McCormick FM, Cole BJ. Trends in meniscus repair and meniscectomy in the United States, 2005-2011. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(10):2333-2339. doi:10.1177/0363546513495641.
9.    Parker BR, Hurwitz S, Spang J, Creighton R, Kamath G. Surgical Trends in the Treatment of Meniscal Tears: Analysis of Data From the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Certification Examination Database. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1717-1723. doi:10.1177/0363546516638082.
10.  Boyd KT, Myers PT. Meniscus preservation; rationale, repair techniques and results. Knee. 2003;10(1):1-11. doi:10.1016/s0968-0160(02)00147-3.
11.  Buseck MS, Noyes FR. Arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal repairs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and immediate motion. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(5):489-494. doi:10.1177/036354659101900512.
12.  Eggli S, Wegmüller H, Kosina J, Huckell C, Jakob RP. Long-term results of arthroscopic meniscal repair. An analysis of isolated tears. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(6):715-720. doi:10.1177/036354659502300614.
13.  Everhart JS, Higgins JD, Poland SG, Abouljoud MM, Flanigan DC. Meniscal repair in patients age 40 years and older: A systematic review of 11 studies and 148 patients. Knee. 2018;25(6):1142-1150. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2018.09.009.
14.  Everhart JS, Magnussen RA, Poland S, et al. Meniscus repair five-year results are influenced by patient pre-injury activity level but not age group. Knee. 2020;27(1):157-164. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.005.
15.  Noyes FR, Mooar PA, Matthews DS, Butler DL. The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part I: the long-term functional disability in athletically active individuals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(2):154-162. doi:10.2106/00004623-198365020-00003.
16.  Rothermel SD, Smuin D, Dhawan A. Are Outcomes After Meniscal Repair Age Dependent? A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(3):979-987. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.287.
17.  Barrett GR, Field MH, Treacy SH, Ruff CG. Clinical results of
 
       meniscus repair in patients 40 years and older. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(8):824-829. doi:10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70018-0.
18.  Zhu S, Li X, Lu Z, et al. Arthroscopic repair of degenerative medial meniscus tears in patients aged over 45 years resulted in favorable clinical outcomes and low clinical failure rates at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(5):1815-1823. doi:10.1007/s00167-022-07133-w.
19.  Nakayama H, Kanto R, Kambara S, Iseki T, Onishi S, Yoshiya S. Successful treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears in well-aligned knees with fibrin clot implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(11):3466-3473. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05758-y.
20.  Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
21.  Reed JL, De Souza MJ, Williams NI. Effects of exercise combined with caloric restriction on inflammatory cytokines. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab.2010;35(5):573-582. doi:10.1139/H10-046.
22.  Laurendon L, Neri T, Farizon F, Philippot R. Prognostic factors for all-inside meniscal repair. A 87-case series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.2017;103(7):1017-1020. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.025.
23.  Sommerfeldt MF, Magnussen RA, Randall KL, et al. The Relationship between Body Mass Index and Risk of Failure following Meniscus Repair. J Knee Surg. 2016;29(08):645-648. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1569480.
24.  Hiranaka T, Furumatsu T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Weight loss enhances meniscal healing following transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024;32(1):143-150. doi:10.1002/ksa.12037.
25.  Jiang EX, Abouljoud MM, Everhart JS, et al. Clinical factors associated with successful meniscal root repairs: A systematic review. Knee. 2019;26(2):285-291. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2019.01.005.
26.  Nie S, Li H, Liao X, Liu Q, Lan M. Younger patients, lower BMI, complete meniscus root healing, lower HKA degree and shorter preoperative symptom duration were the independent risk factors correlated with the good correction of MME in patients with repaired MMPRTs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(9):3775-3783. doi:10.1007/s00167-023-07330-1.
27.  Korpershoek JV, de Windt TS, Vonk LA, Krych AJ, Saris DB. Does anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction protect the meniscus and its repair? A systematic review. O Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(7):2325967120933895. doi: 10.1177/2325967120933895.
28.  Rodríguez-Roiz JM, Sastre-Solsona S, Popescu D, Montañana-Burillo J, Combalia-Aleu A. The relationship between ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair: quality of life, sports return, and meniscal failure rate—2- to 12-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg. 2020;15:361. doi:10.1186/s13018-020-01878-1.
29.  Ronnblad E, Barenius B, Engstrom B, Eriksson K. Predictive Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair: A Retrospective Dual-Center Analysis of 918 Consecutive Cases. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(3):2325967120905529. doi:10.1177/2325967120905529.
30.  Poland S, Everhart JS, Kim W, Axcell K, Magnussen RA, Flanigan DC. Age of 40 Years or Older Does Not Affect Meniscal Repair Failure Risk at 5 Years. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(5):1527-1532. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.061.
31.  Steadman JR, Matheny LM, Singleton SB, et al. Meniscus Suture Repair: Minimum 10-Year Outcomes in Patients Younger Than 40 Years Compared With Patients 40 and Older. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(9):2222-2227. doi:10.1177/0363546515591260.
32.  Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Arthroscopic repair of meniscus tears extending into the avascular zone with or without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients 40 years of age and older. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(8):822-829. doi:10.1053/jars.2000.19434.
33.  Luvsannyam E, Jain MS, Leitao AR, Maikawa N, Leitao AE. Meniscus Tear: Pathology, Incidence, and Management. Cureus. 2022;14(5):e25121. doi:10.7759/cureus.25121.
Volume 14, Issue 11
November 2026
Pages 711-721

  • Receive Date 06 December 2025
  • Revise Date 14 May 2026
  • Accept Date 11 July 2026