The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Persian Translation of the Merle d’Aubigné-Postel Score

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors
Mohammadreza Razzaghof 1
Sina Esmaeili 1
Mehdi Rezaee 2
Masoud Kazemifard 1
Ghasem Daneshgar 1
SM Javad Mortazavi 2
1 Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
10.22038/abjs.2026.90335.4097
Abstract
Objectives: The Merle d’Aubigné–Postel (MDP) score is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessing hip function for pain, walking ability, and mobility. Despite its widespread international use, no validated Persian version has been available to date. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the MDP score into Persian and evaluate its reliability and validity in Persian-speaking patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Methods: Following Guillemin et al. guidelines, Persian translation was done using a forward–backward process, followed by expert review and pretesting with 20 patients to ensure clarity and cultural relevance. The adapted instrument was validated in 103 Persian-speaking patients who had undergone THA with at least one year of follow-up. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), construct validity (correlation with the Harris Hip Score [HHS]), criterion validity (correlation with HHS and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]), and content validity (floor and ceiling effects) were evaluated. Inter-rater reliability for mobility was assessed by three orthopedic residents.
Results: The Persian MDP score demonstrated high internal consistency (α= 0.74) and excellent test–retest reliability (ICC= 0.95; 95%CI: 0.91–0.98). Inter-rater reliability for mobility was excellent (ICC= 0.89; 95%CI: 0.82–0.94). Construct validity was supported by strong domain-specific correlations (e.g., MDP pain vs. HHS pain: r= 0.73; 95%CI: 0.62–0.81). Criterion validity was confirmed by strong correlations with WOMAC (r= 0.745; 95%CI: 0.65–0.82) and HHS (r= 0.753; 95%CI: 0.66–0.83). Content validity showed no floor effect (0%) and an acceptable ceiling effect (14.5%).
Conclusion: The Persian MDP score is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing outcomes after THA in Persian-speaking patients. Its simplicity and strong psychometric properties support its use in clinical and research settings. However, the observed ceiling effect should be considered for excellent postoperative outcomes.
Level of evidence: III
Keywords
Cultural adaptation, Merle d'Aubigné
-Postel score, Patient-reported outcome measures, Total hip arthroplasty
Subjects
1.   Dailiana ZH, Papakostidou I, Varitimidis S, et al. Patient-reported quality of life after primary major joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:366. doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0814-9.
2.   Lindner M, Nosseir O, Keller-Pliessnig A, Teigelack P, Teufel M, Tagay S. Psychosocial predictors for outcome after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):159. doi:10.1186/s12891-018-2058-y.
3.   Varacallo M, Chakravarty R, Denehy K, Star A. Joint perception and patient perceived satisfaction after total hip and knee arthroplasty in the American population. J Orthop. 2018;15(2):495-499. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.018.
4.   Samei M, Mortazavi SJ, Sahebi M, et al. Complications Rate and Hip Function After Revision of Infected Hip Arthroplasty with Bone Defects using Bone Allografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2025;13(9):537.
5.   Kheradmand E, Rahimi SM, Nakhaei Amroodi M, Nejati P, Griffin S. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023;18(1):174.
6.   Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737-755. Published 1969/06/01.
7.   Klässbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol. 2003;32(1):46-51. doi:10.1080/03009740310000409.
8.   Christensen CP, Althausen PL, Mittleman MA, Lee JA, McCarthy JC. The nonarthritic hip score: reliable and validated. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003(406):75-83. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000043047.84315.4b.
9.   Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(2):185-190. Published 1996/03/01.
10. Thorborg K, Hölmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM. The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(6):478-491. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.080937.
11. Mohtadi NG, Griffin DR, Pedersen ME, et al. The Development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Arthroscopy. 2012;28(5):595-605; quiz 606-510.e591. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.013.
12. D'Aubigne RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954;36-a(3):451-475. Published 1954/06/01.
13. Kumar D, Kushwaha NS, Mahendra M, et al. Assessment of radiological and functional outcomes of complex acetabulum fracture managed with combined anterior and posterior approach in a single anaesthetic setting: a retrospective study. Hip Int. 2024:11207000241280571. doi:10.1177/11207000241280571.
14. Fontanellas-Fes A, Lizano-Díez X, León-García A, et al. Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Management and Functional Outcomes. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024. doi:10.1007/s00068-024-02636-2.
15. Ziebarth K, Lerch TD, Kaim T, et al. Low Rate of AVN and Complications in Unstable SCFE With Epiphyseal-metaphyseal Discontinuity After Treatment With a Modified Dunn Procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024;482(9):1598-1610. doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000003123.
16. Umpierres CS, Ribeiro TA, Marchisio  E, et al. Rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty evaluation over short follow-up time: randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(10):1567-1578. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2014.05.0132.
17. Milenkovic S, Mitkovic M, Mitkovic M, Stojiljković P. Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture surgery. Int Orthop. 2021;45(4):871-876. doi:10.1007/s00264-020-04676-w.
18. Pynsent PB. Choosing an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(6):792-794. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.83b6.11973.
19. Jamshidi K, Mostafavi K, Kargar Shooroki K, Latifi M, Sharifi Dalooei SMA, Mohammadi M. Cross-cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability of the Persian version of the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) for Lower Extremity. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(8):509-516. doi:10.22038/abjs.2025.80920.3691.
20. Windfuhr G. The Iranian Languages. Routledge London; 2009.
21. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-1432. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.
22. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268-274. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x.
23. Nadrian H, Moghimi N, Nadrian E, et al. Validity and reliability of the Persian versions of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31(7):1097-1102. doi:10.1007/s10067-012-1983-7.
24. Mirghaderi P, Ghaseminejad-Raeini A, Azarboo A, Mirghaderi R, Ravanbod H, Mortazavi SJ. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the harris hip score. Arthroplasty Today. 2023;23:101180.
25. Heo M, Kim N, Faith MS. Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:86. doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0070-6.
26. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-240. doi:10.1519/15184.1.
27. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
28. Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman, 1904. Am J Psychol. 1987;100(3-4):441-471. Published 1987/01/01.
29. Ugino FK, Righetti CM, Alves DP, Guimarães RP, Honda EK, Ono NK. Evaluation of the reliability of the modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel Method. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(4):213-217. doi:10.1590/s1413-78522012000400004.
30. Roos EM, Engelhart L, Ranstam J, et al. ICRS Recommendation Document: Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects. Cartilage. 2011;2(2):122-136. doi:10.1177/1947603510391084.
31. Shi HY, Mau LW, Chang JK, Wang JW, Chiu HC. Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1053-1060. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9512-0.
32. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(8):730-735. doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00084-2.
33. Shields RK, Enloe LJ, Evans RE, Smith KB, Steckel SD. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of functional tests in patients with total joint replacement. Phys Ther. 1995;75(3):169-176; discussion 176-169. doi:10.1093/ptj/75.3.169.
34. Øvre S, Sandvik L, Madsen JE, Røise O. Comparison of distribution, agreement and correlation between the original and modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel Score and the Harris Hip Score after acetabular fracture treatment: moderate agreement, high ceiling effect and excellent correlation in 450 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(6):796-802. doi:10.1080/17453670510045390.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 8
August 2026
Pages 518-526

  • Receive Date 18 September 2025
  • Revise Date 02 January 2026
  • Accept Date 04 January 2026