The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

Clinical Outcome of Proximal Femoral Osteoid Osteoma: Radiofrequency (RF) and Ablation Surgical Resection

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors
1 Children’s Medical Center, Orthopedic Ward, Medical School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Besat Hospital, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Orthopedic Subspeciality Research Center (OSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
10.22038/abjs.2025.83833.3813
Abstract
Objectives: Osteoid osteoma (OO) is one of the most common benign bone tumors and can occur in various skeletal structures. It often presents with symptoms, such as nocturnal pain, which may mimic constitutional conditions, and it is characterized by a distinct radiological appearance that allows for easy differentiation from other lesions. Over the past decade, numerous studies have evaluated the efficacy of both surgical and radiological interventions for treating OO. While several treatment methods are available, each carries distinct advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to report the outcomes of surgical resection for ocular (OO) lesions.
Methods: A total of 29 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 14 patients chose surgical resection as their primary treatment, while 15 patients opted for radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Three patients who exhibited a lack of response to RF ablation subsequently underwent surgical resection, bringing the total number of patients in the surgery group to 17. This study specifically focused on lesions located in the peritrochanteric region. For lesions that recurred at the same site, whether due to recurrence or lack of response to initial treatment, the same treatment modality used in the first instance was applied.
Results: Among the 17 individuals who initially underwent surgical resection, 11 had extracapsular lesions, and 6 had intracapsular lesions. All patients who underwent surgical resection became symptom-free, and no complications were observed during the procedure. Furthermore, all cases that received surgical resection were confirmed through pathological assessment. Additionally, three patients with extracapsular lesions had previously been treated with RF thermoablation but had not fully recovered from their symptoms, necessitating surgical resection.
Conclusion: Based on the results, although RF is the first choice of treatment for OO, surgical resection could be a vital and safe option for peritrochanteric OO.
        Level of evidence: IV
Keywords
Subjects

  1. DC D. General aspects and data on 8542 cases: Giant cell tumor. Bone tumors. 1986:119-40. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61914-4.
  2. May CJ, Bixby SD, Anderson ME, et al. Osteoid osteoma about the hip in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(6):486-493. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00888.
  3. Campanacci M, eds. Bone and soft tissue tumors: clinical features, imaging, pathology and treatment. 2nd ed. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
  4. Rinzler ES, Shivaram GM, Shaw DW, Monroe EJ, Koo KS. Microwave ablation of osteoid osteoma: initial experience and efficacy. Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49(4):566-570. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4327-1.
  5. Matthies L, Rolvien T, Pakusa TJ, et al. Osteoid osteoma of the mandible–clinical and histological findings. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(1):291-296. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13110.
  6. Harirchian MH, Mohammadpour Z, Fatehi F, Firoozeh N, Bitarafan S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluating the trend of cytokines to vitamin A supplementation in autoimmune diseases. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(5):2038-2044. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.10.026.
  7. Canella C. Osteoid osteoma: diagnosis and treatment. Radiol Bras. 2015;48(4):v. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.48.4e1.
  8. Lin N, Ye Zm, Qu H, et al. Open surgery for osteoid osteoma with three dimensional C‐arm scan under the guidance of computer navigation. Orthop Surg. 2016;8(2):205-11. doi: 10.1111/os.12233.
  9. Shariatzadeh H, Bahrabadi M, Amiri S, Jahanshahi F, Joudi S, Bahrabadi M. Intra‐articular osteoid osteoma of the capitulum: A diagnostic challenge. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10(5):e05796. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5796.
  10. Bahrami S, Baheiraei N, Shahrezaee M. Biomimetic reduced graphene oxide coated collagen scaffold for in situ bone regeneration. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96271-1.
  11. Mansoori B, Kosaraju V, Yoon J, et al. Incidental osseous lesions on chest CT: an algorithmic approach for radiologists. Clin Imaging. 2022:91:69-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.08.015.
  12. Spiker AM, Rotter B-Z, Chang B, Mintz DN, Kelly BT. Clinical presentation of intra-articular osteoid osteoma of the hip and preliminary outcomes after arthroscopic resection: a case series. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017;5(1):88-99. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnx042.
  13. Kneisl J, Simon M. Medical management compared with operative treatment for osteoid-osteoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(2):179-85.
  14. Yildiz Y, Bayrakci K, Altay M, Saglik Y. Osteoid osteoma: the results of surgical treatment. Int Orthop. 2001;25(2):119-22. doi: 10.1007/s002640100231.
  15. Neumann D, Berka H, Dorn U, Neureiter D, Thaler C. Follow-up of thirty-three computed-tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency thermoablations of osteoid osteoma. Int Orthop. 2012;36(4):811-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1402-8.
  16. Hoffmann R-T, Jakobs TF, Kubisch CH, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of osteoid osteoma—5-year experience. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73(2):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.018.
  17. Rosenthal DI, Hornicek FJ, Wolfe MW, Jennings LC, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma compared with operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(6):815-21. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00005.
  18. Gangi A, Alizadeh H, Wong L, Buy X, Dietemann J-L, Roy C. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous laser ablation and follow-up in 114 patients. Radiology. 2007;242(1):293-301. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2421041404.
  19. Roqueplan F, Porcher R, Hamzé B, et al. Long-term results of percutaneous resection and interstitial laser ablation of osteoid osteomas. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(1):209-17. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1537-9.
  20. Etienne A, Waynberger É, Druon J. Interstitial laser photocoagulation for the treatment of osteoid osteoma: retrospective study on 35 cases. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(3):300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2012.11.002.
  21. Oc Y, Kilinc BE, Cennet S, Boyacioglu MM, Ertugrul R, Varol A. Complications of computer tomography-assisted radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of osteoid osteoma.         Biomed Res Int. 2019:2019:4376851. doi: 10.1155/2019/4376851.
  22. Rosenthal DI, Hornicek FJ, Torriani M, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous treatment with radiofrequency energy. Radiology. 2003;229(1):171-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2291021053.
  23. Cribb G, Goude W, Cool P, Tins B, Cassar-Pullicino V, Mangham D. Percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation of osteoid osteomas: factors affecting therapeutic outcome. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(11):702-6. doi: 10.1007/s00256-005-0947-2.
  24. Wang B, Han SB, Jiang L, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for spinal osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(7):1884-1892. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5080-0.
  25. Haghighizadeh E, Shahrezaee M, Sharifzadeh SR, Momeni M. Transforming growth factor-β3 relation with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. J Res Med Sci. 2019:24:46. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1062_18.
  26. Rajasekaran S, Karthik K, Chandra VR, Rajkumar N, Dheenadhayalan J. Role of intraoperative 3D C-arm-based navigation in percutaneous excision of osteoid osteoma of long bones in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2010;19(2):195-200. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328333997a.

 

 

 

 

Volume 14, Issue 7
July 2026
Pages 471-477

  • Receive Date 30 November 2024
  • Revise Date 18 March 2025
  • Accept Date 25 May 2025