Coracoacromial Ligament Release Improves Internal Rotation in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty; a Cadaver Study

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Milwaukee, WI, USA

2 Division of Genomics and Precision Medicine, College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar

10.22038/abjs.2025.84191.3827

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate the effect of Coracoacromial Ligament (CAL) release after Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) on range of motion (ROM), particularly on internal rotation (IR).
Methods: Ten Fresh Frozen cadavers underwent RSA followed by CAL release by a fellowship-trained surgeon. Shoulder ROM was measured by a goniometer pre- and post-CAL release. The IR to the back was measured as the distance between the posterior-lateral acromion and the highest point of thumb elevation behind the back. Measurements of ROM before and after CAL release were compared using a paired sample t-test.
Results: CAL release after RSA significantly increased ROM in all planes. The IR to the back improved by an average of four cm. Internal rotation in abduction, external rotation in abduction, external rotation at the side, forward elevation, abduction, and extension increased by 7°, 8°, 9°, 10°, 6°, 11°, respectively.
Conclusion: The CAL release following RSA significantly improved IR to the back and all other ROM. CAL release post-RSA could be a potential solution to the ROM deficits, particularly IR, post-RSA. Clinical studies are needed to assess the clinical application of this technique.
        Level of evidence: IV

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Harjula JNE, Paloneva J, Haapakoski J, et al. Increasing incidence of primary shoulder arthroplasty in Finland - A nationwide registry study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19(1). doi:10.1186/s12891-018-2150-3.
  2. Rojas J, Joseph J, Srikumaran U, McFarland EG. How internal rotation is measured in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. JSES Int. 2020; 4(1). doi:10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.109.
  3. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y, Bicknell RT, Rochet N, Trojani C. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with a modified latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for shoulder pseudoparalysis associated with dropping arm. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(3):584-93. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0114-x.
  4. Boughebri O, Kilinc A, Valenti P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with a latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer for a deficit of both active elevation and external rotation. Results of 15 cases with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(2):131-137. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.014.
  5. Elzanie A, Varacallo M, eds. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Deltoid Muscle. 1st ed. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
  6. Gruber MD, Kirloskar KM, Werner BC, Lädermann A, Denard PJ. Factors Associated with Internal Rotation After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022; 2(2):117-124. doi:10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.12.007.
  7. Franceschi F, Giovannetti de Sanctis E, Gupta A, Athwal GS, Di Giacomo G. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: State-of-the-art. J ISAKOS. 2023; 8(5):306-317. doi:10.1016/j.jisako.2023.05.007.
  8. Qawasmi F, Andryk LM, Roge S, Wang M, Yassin M, Grindel SI. Conjoint tendon lengthening improves internal rotation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024; 33(10):2230-2235. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.023.
  9. Assenmacher AT, Alentorn-Geli E, Aronowitz J, et al. Patient-reported activities after bilateral reverse total shoulder arthoplasties. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019; 27(1):2309499018816771. doi: 10.1177/2309499018816771.
  10. Barco R, Savvidou OD, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH. Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2016; 1(3):72-80. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.1.160003.
  11. Baek, MD CH, Kim, MD JG, Lee, MD DH, Baek GR. Does Preservation of Coracoacromial Ligament Reduce the Acromial Stress Pathology Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2021; 5:247154922110221. doi:10.1177/24715492211022171.
  12. Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L. Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(8):887-894. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.008.
  13. Langohr GDG, Giles JW, Athwal GS, Johnson JA. The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(6):972-979. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.018.
  14. Werner BS, Chaoui J, Walch G. Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100B (9). doi:10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0264.R1.
  15. Haislup BD, Ashmyan R, Johnston PS, Wright MA, Abbasi P, Murthi AM. Effect of glenosphere lateralization with and without coracoacromial ligament transection on acromial and scapular spine strain in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int. 2022; 6(6):884-888. doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.010.
  16. Hochreiter B, Wyss S, Gerber C. Extension of the shoulder is essential for functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022; 31(6):1166-1174. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.006.
  17. Budge M, Lewis G, Vanname J. The effect of glenoid version on internal and external rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES. 2021; 31(3):502-509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2021.02.005.
  18. Keener JD, Patterson BM, Orvets N, Aleem AW, Chamberlain AM. Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(2):339-349. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.011.
  19. Friedman RJ, Flurin PH, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Roche CP. Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26(4). doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.027.
  20. Vourazeris JD, Wright TW, Struk AM, King JJ, Farmer KW. Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes in patients with subscapularis repair versus tenotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26(3). doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.017.

 

 

 

 

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 5
May 2026
Pages 337-342

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 December 2024
  • Revise Date: 21 January 2025
  • Accept Date: 07 January 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics