Defining the Era of Shoulder Arthroscopy 2.0: A Perspective on Integrating Precision, Biology, and Smart Technology

Document Type : SHORT COMMUNICATION

Authors

Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China - Shoulder Research Institute, Academy of Orthopedics·Guangdong Province, China

10.22038/abjs.2025.90032.4084

Abstract

Over the past four decades, shoulder arthroscopy has advanced from diagnostic exploration to sophisticated therapeutic procedures. However, current techniques remain limited in addressing complex pathologies. We propose the concept of the Era of Shoulder Arthroscopy 2.0 (ESA2.0)—defined by surgical precision, biological integration, and digital innovation. Technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) imaging, augmented reality, and robotics are being explored to enhance accuracy and reproducibility. Concurrently, biological strategies, including platelet-rich plasma, stem cells, and scaffold-based techniques, may improve healing. Smart systems, including AI-assisted diagnosis and wearable rehabilitation tools, support more personalized treatment and optimize outcomes. This paradigm may define a future standard in arthroscopic care, offering solutions to challenges previously deemed intractable.
        Level of evidence: N/A

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Huri G, Popescu IA, Rinaldi VG, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM. The Evolution of Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med. 2025;14(7):2405. doi:10.3390/jcm14072405.
  2. Gregory TM, Gregory J, Sledge J, Allard R, Mir O. Surgery guided by mixed reality: presentation of a proof of concept. Acta Orthop. 2018;89(5):480-3. doi:10.1080/17453674.2018.1506974.
  3. Bozkurt M, Apaydin N, Işik Ç, Bilgetekin YG, Acar HI, Elhan A. Robotic arthroscopic surgery: a new challenge in arthroscopic surgery Part-I: Robotic shoulder arthroscopy; a cadaveric feasibility study. Int J Med Robot. 2011; 7:496-500. doi: 10.1002/rcs.436.
  4. Kunze KN, Ferguson D, Pareek A, Colyvas N. Robotic-Assisted Arthroscopy Promises Enhanced Procedural Efficiency, Visualization, and Control but Must Overcome Barriers to Adoption. Hss j. 2025:15563316251340983. doi: 10.1177/15563316251340983.
  5. Solomon DJ. Editorial Commentary: Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma Decreases Retear Rate in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Platelet-Rich Plasma Type Matters. Arthroscopy. 2021; 37:2625-2626. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.028.
  6. Wang HN, Rong X, Yang LM, Hua WZ, Ni GX. Advances in Stem Cell Therapies for Rotator Cuff Injuries. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:866195. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.866195.
  7. Lundeen M, Hurd JL, Hayes M, et al. Management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells is safe and more effective than injection of corticosteroid. Sci Rep. 2023; 13:19348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46653-4.
  8. Russo M, Dirkx GK, Rosso C. Patch Augmentation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery-Review of Current Evidence and Newest Trends. J Clin Med. 2024;13(17). doi:10.3390/jcm13175066.
  9. Rodriguez HC, Rust B, Hansen PY, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Rotator Cuff Tears. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2023; 31:67-72. doi: 10.1097/jsa.0000000000000371.
  10. Sassi M, Carnevale A, Mancuso M, Schena E, Pecchia L, Longo UG. Machine-learning models for shoulder rehabilitation exercises classification using a wearable system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025; 33:1452-1458. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12431.
  11. Correia FD, Molinos M, Luís S, et al. Digitally Assisted Versus Conventional Home-Based Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 101:237-249. http://10.1097/phm.0000000000001780.