The Impact of Post-reduction Radiographs of Distal Radius Fractures on Treatment Decisions among Fellowship-trained Orthopedic Hand Surgeons and General Orthopedic Surgeons

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Orthopedics, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

3 Musculoskeletal Translational Innovation Initiative, Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yerevan State Medical University. Yerevan, Armenia

4 Musculoskeletal Translational Innovation Initiative, Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

5 Department of plastic and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Göttingen University of Medical Sciences, Bremen Germany

6 Rothman Orthopaedics Florida at AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA - Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

10.22038/abjs.2025.81032.3696

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to assess the impact of post-reduction radiographic evaluation on treatment decisions by fellowship-trained hand and general orthopedic surgeons. We also evaluated the trend in distal radius fracture treatment between hand surgeons and general orthopedic surgeons.
Methods: We collected postero-anterior (PA) and lateral radiographs of a consecutive series of 72 patients with six potential treatment options to be reviewed by the surgeons in three steps. First, they reviewed the patients' age, sex, laterality, hand dominance, and pre-reduction radiographs. Two weeks later, they reviewed the same patients’ post-reduction PA and lateral radiographs in different order. Finally, after another two weeks, they reviewed the patients' pre-reduction and post-reduction PA and lateral radiographs simultaneously.
Results: A total of 1,080 responses were analyzed without missing data. Treatment plans remained consistent across pre-reduction, post-reduction, and simultaneous presentations, indicating that post-reduction radiographs did not improve treatment agreement. Fellowship-trained hand surgeons were significantly more likely to select internal fixation than general orthopedic surgeons (P < 0.001). Within-group agreement was low (Kappa = 0.2), reflecting substantial variability in treatment choices. Intra-observer reliability between pre- and post-reduction presentations was nearly perfect (Kappa = 0.9, P = 0.402). Treatment decisions remained unchanged for 70% of hand surgeons and 72% of general orthopedic surgeons, while 13% opted for more invasive and 16% for less invasive approaches. The final treatment decisions in simultaneous presentations closely resembled those in post-reduction presentations for general orthopedic surgeons and pre-reduction presentations for hand surgeons, though the differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Although there is a significant trend among hand surgeons toward internal fixation for distal radius fractures, there is great variance among hand surgeons and general orthopedic surgeons about the recommended treatment method for distal radius fractures. Additionally, post-reduction radiographs did not improve variation among surgeons. 
        Level of evidence: II

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ohsfeldt RL, Borisov NN, Sheer RL. Fragility fracture-related direct medical costs in the first year following a nonvertebral fracture in a managed care setting. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17(2):252-258. doi:10.1007/s00198-005-1993-2.
  2. Ray NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, Melton III LJ. Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12(1):24-35. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.24.
  3. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(8):1868-1873. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01297.
  4. Nazar MA, Mansingh R, Bassi RS, Waseem M. Is there a Consensus in the Management of Distal Radial Fractures?. Open Orthop J. 22009:3:96-9. doi:10.2174/1874325000903010096.
  5. Koval K, Haidukewych GJ, Service B, Zirgibel BJ. Controversies in the management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22(9):566-575. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-566.
  6. Tang JB. Distal radius fracture: diagnosis, treatment, and controversies. Clin Plast Surg. 2014; 41(3):481-499. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2014.04.001.
  7. Bruce KK, Merenstein DJ, Narvaez MV, et al. Lack of Agreement on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016; 29(2):218-225. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150233.
  8. Andermahr J, Lozano-Calderon S, Trafton T, Crisco JJ, Ring D. The volar extension of the lunate facet of the distal radius: a quantitative anatomic study. J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31(6):892-895. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.03.010.
  9. Woolnough T, Axelrod D, Bozzo A, et al. What Is the Relative Effectiveness of the Various Surgical Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021; 479(2):348-362. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000001524.
  10. Kural C, Sungur I, Kaya I, Ugras A, Ertürk A, Cetinus E. Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(11):801.. doi:10.3928/01477447-20100924-14.
  11. Lichtman DM, Bindra RR, Boyer MI, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the treatment of distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(8):775-778. doi:10.2106/JBJS.938ebo.
  12. Arealis G, Galanopoulos I, Nikolaou VS, Lacon A, Ashwood N, Kitsis C. Does the CT improve inter- and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures?. Injury. 2014; 45(10):1579-1584. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.017.
  13. Katz MA, Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR. Computed tomography scanning of intra-articular distal radius fractures: does it influence treatment?. J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26(3):415-421. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2001.22930a.
  14. Avery DM 3rd, Matullo KS. Distal radial traction radiographs: interobserver and intraobserver reliability compared with computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(7):582-588. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00134.
  15. Goldwyn E, Pensy R, O'Toole RV, et al. Do traction radiographs of distal radial fractures influence fracture characterization and treatment?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(22):2055-2062. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01207.
  16. Kraus M, Röderer G, Max M, Krischak G, Gebhard F, Riepl C. Influence of fracture type and surgeon experience on the emission of radiation in distal radius fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133(7):941-946. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1739-0.
  17. Waljee JF, Zhong L, Shauver MJ, Chung KC. The influence of surgeon age on distal radius fracture treatment in the United States: a population-based study. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39(5):844-851. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.035.
  18. Neuhaus V, Bot AG, Guitton TG, Ring DC. Influence of surgeon, patient and radiographic factors on distal radius fracture treatment. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015; 40(8):796-804. doi:10.1177/1753193414555284.
  19. Fanuele J, Koval KJ, Lurie J, Zhou W, Tosteson A, Ring D. Distal radial fracture treatment: what you get may depend on your age and address. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(6):1313-1319. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00448.
  20. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Yin H. The relationship between ASSH membership and the treatment of distal radius fracture in the United States Medicare population. J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36(8):1288-1293. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.05.028.
  21. Fleiss JL, Nee JC, Landis JR. Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters. Psychological bulletin. 1979; 86(5):974. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.974.
  22. Durkalski VL, Palesch YY, Lipsitz SR, Rust PF. Analysis of clustered matched-pair data. Stat Med. 2003; 22(15):2417-2428. doi:10.1002/sim.1438.
  23. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Yin H, Kim HM, Baser O, Birkmeyer JD. Variations in the use of internal fixation for distal radial fracture in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(23):2154-2162. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.012802.
  24. Jupiter JB. Complex Articular Fractures of the Distal Radius: Classification and Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997; 5(3):119-129. doi:10.5435/00124635-199705000-00001.
  25. Nana AD, Joshi A, Lichtman DM. Plating of the distal radius. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005; 13(3):159-171. doi:10.5435/00124635-200505000-00003.
  26. Simic PM, Weiland AJ. Fractures of the distal aspect of the radius: changes in treatment over the past two decades. Instr Course Lect. 2003; 52:185-195.
  27. Jupiter JB. Fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(3):461-469.
  28. Machado DG, Cerqueira SA, Lima AF, Mathias MB, Aramburu JP, Rodarte RR. Statistical analysis on the concordance of the radiological evaluation of fractures of the distal radius subjected to traction. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016; 51(1):11-15. doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2014.12.010.
  29. Ghafoori H, Kazemi M, Ghorbani S. Investigation of the History of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 55 Years Old Suffering from Hip Fractures. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(6):418-422. doi:10.22038/ABJS.2023.75188.3477.
  30. Mullikin I, Dela Cruz JA, Srinivasan RC, et al. Relative Increase in Distal Radius Exposure with Extension of the FCR Approach. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(11):690-695. doi:10.22038/ABJS.2023.71179.3326.