The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

Effects of Prosthesis Shape and Material on the Contact Mechanics of Elbow Joints Following Radial Head Arthroplasty: An In-Silico Investigation

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors
Faezeh Naghdbishi 1
Azadeh Ghouchani 1
Farzaneh Safshekan 2
Kassem Ghayyad 3
Amir R. Kachooei 3
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahrar Institute of Higher Education, Iran
3 Rothman Orthopaedics Florida at AdventHealth, Orlando, USA
10.22038/abjs.2025.86429.3931
Abstract
Objectives: Radial head fractures often require prosthetic replacement, but post-surgical complications like radial neck osteolysis, capitellum osteopenia, and ulnohumeral osteoarthritis can arise due to altered elbow biomechanics. This study used the finite element method to evaluate how radial head prostheses (RHPs) shape and material affect elbow joint biomechanics.
Methods: A 3D elbow model was developed, including bones, ligaments, and cartilage. Implants featuring two geometries (anatomical vs. axisymmetric) and three materials (polymethylmethacrylate [PMMA], polyether ether ketone [PEEK], and Cobalt) were tested. Bones were considered isotropic and heterogeneous, ligaments and implants linear elastic, and cartilages were considered hyperplastic materials. Stress distributions, contact stresses, and contact areas were assessed during elbow flexion and forearm rotation.
Results: During forearm rotation, Cobalt RHPs exhibited lower stresses in the radial neck, indicating higher stress shielding, and all axisymmetric implants showed increased edge loadings. In rotation, only the PMMA anatomic RHP showed close contact stresses to the intact model, while all other models resulted in lower stress levels. In flexion, anatomical designs produced more uniform stress distributions in the radial neck that resembled intact conditions and matched intact capitellum contact stresses, in contrast to axisymmetric designs. The reduction in the contact area in the ulnohumeral cartilage was most noticeable with all axisymmetric RHPs in flexion.
Conclusion: The lower contact areas, higher contact stresses, and lower stresses at the radial neck observed in the presence of most axisymmetric RHPs and anatomic Cobalt RHP can be correlated to postoperative complications. The findings suggest that polymeric anatomical RHPs may be superior to conventional metallic axisymmetric options in preserving elbow biomechanics and reducing postoperative complications. However, their long-term effects need to be further explored.
        Level of evidence: VI
Keywords
Cobalt
Contact mechanics
Finite element method
PEEK
PMMA
Radial head prosthesis
Subjects
  1. Ghayyad K, Osbahr DC. Elbow Injuries in Baseball Players: An Orthopedic Perspective. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(11):742-745. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.82871.3772. PMID: 39850921; PMCID: PMC11756539.
  2. Kaur MN, MacDermid JC, Grewal RR, Stratford PW, Woodhouse LJ. Functional outcomes post-radial head arthroplasty: a systematic review of literature. Shoulder Elbow. 2014; 6(2):108-18. doi: 10.1177/1758573214524934.
  3. Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, King GJ. Comminuted radial head fractures treated with a modular metallic radial head arthroplasty: study of outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(10):2192-200. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00962.
  4. Krukhaug Y, Hallan G, Dybvik E, Lie SA, Furnes ON. A survivorship study of 838 total elbow replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2016. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(2):260-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.018.
  5. Langohr GDG, Willing RT. A narrative review of the biomechanical consequences of prosthesis reconstruction of the elbow. Annals of Joint. 2021; 6
  6. Speed K. Ferrule caps for the head of the radius. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1941; 73:845-850.
  7. Kim S. Contact stress analysis of the native radial head and radial head implants. University of Pittsburgh; 2014. 8. Berkmortel C, Langohr GDG, King G, Johnson J. Hemiarthroplasty implants should have very low stiffness to optimize cartilage contact stress. J Orthop Res. 2020; 38(8):1719-1726. doi: 10.1002/jor.24610.
  8. Yu Y-H, Liu S-J. Polyetheretherketone for orthopedic applications: A review. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2021; 32:100687.
  9. Capomassi MA, Clembosky GA. Use of a polymethacrylate radial head spacer in temporary reconstruction of complex radial head fracture with associated elbow instability. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2010; 14(4):252-8. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0b013e3182020d1f.
  10. Ghasemi, F. , Jahani, A. , Moradi, A. , Ebrahimzadeh, M. H. and Jirofti, N. (2023). Different Modification Methods of Poly Methyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement for Orthopedic Surgery Applications. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 11(8), 485-492. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2023.71289.3330

 

  1. Maydanshahi MR, Nazarian A, Eygendaal D, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Kachooei AR, Shaegh SAM. 3D printing-assisted fabrication of a patient-specific antibacterial radial head prosthesis with high periprosthetic bone preservation. Biomed Mater. 2021; 16(3). doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/abe217.
  2. Samra I, Kwaees TA, Mati W, et al. Anatomic Monopolar Press-fit Radial Head Arthroplasty; High Rate of Loosening at Mid-Term Follow Up. Shoulder Elbow. 2023; 15(2):207-217. doi: 10.1177/17585732221080768.
  3. Luenam S, Bantuchai T, Kosiyatrakul A, Chanpoo M, Phakdeewisetkul K, Puncreobutr C. Precision of computed tomography and cartilage-reproducing image reconstruction method in generating digital model for potential use in 3D printing of patient-specific radial head prosthesis: a human cadaver study. 3D Print Med. 2021; 7(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41205-021-00093-w.
  4. Yeung C, Deluce S, Willing R, Johnson M, King GJ, Athwal GS. Regional variations in cartilage thickness of the radial head: implications for prosthesis design. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40(12):2364-71.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.09.005.
  5. Giannicola G, Sedati P, Polimanti D, Cinotti G, Bullitta G. Contribution of cartilage to size and shape of radial head circumference: magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 78 elbows. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(1):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.003.
  6. Kachooei, A. (2025). Discovery of Posterior Oblique Ligament (POL) within the Distal Forearm Cruciate Complex (DFCC). The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 13(3), 134-137. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2025.85035.3872
  7. Gupta S, Dan P. Bone geometry and mechanical properties of the human scapula using computed tomography data. Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs. 2004; 17(2):61-71.
  8. Khan S, Warkhedkar R, Shyam A. Analysis of Hounsfield unit of human bones for strength evaluation. Procedia Materials Science. 2014; 6:512-519.
  9. Langohr GDG, Willing R, Medley JB, King GJ, Johnson JA. Contact analysis of the native radiocapitellar joint compared with axisymmetric and nonaxisymmetric radial head hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(5):787-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.011.
  10. Goh J, eds. The 15th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering: ICBME 2013, 4th to 7th December 2013, Singapore. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
  11. Rahman M, Cil A, Bogener JW, Stylianou AP. Lateral collateral ligament deficiency of the elbow joint: A modeling approach. J Orthop Res. 2016; 34(9):1645-55. doi: 10.1002/jor.23165.
  12. Matuszewski Ł, Olchowik G, Mazurkiewicz T, et al. Biomechanical parameters of the BP-enriched bone cement. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24(4):435-41. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1230-1.
  13. Schwitalla A, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Müller W. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech. 2015; 48(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017.
  14. Antoni M, Ginot G, Mereb T, et al. Post-traumatic elbow osteoarthritis after radial head arthroplasty: prevalence and risk factors. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021; 107(2):102814. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102814.
  15. Chanlalit C, Shukla DR, Fitzsimmons JS, An K-N, O'Driscoll SW. Stress shielding around radial head prostheses. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(10):2118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.020.
  16. Chytas I, Antonopoulos C, Cheva A, Givissis P. Capitellar erosion after radial head arthroplasty: a comparative biomechanical study of operated radial head fractures on cadaveric specimens. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104(6):853-857. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.02.007.
  17. Sun Y, Hong H, Adikrishna A, Kim Y-J, Jeon I-H. Contact mechanics of anatomic radial head prosthesis: comparison between native radial head and anatomic radial head prostheses in the dynamic mode. J Hand Surg Am. 2019; 44(6):517.e1-517.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.08.005.
  18. Sahu D, Holmes DM, Fitzsimmons JS, et al. Influence of radial head prosthetic design on radiocapitellar joint contact mechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(4):456-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.028.
  19. Shannon HL, Deluce SR, Lalone EA, Willing R, King GJ, Johnson JA. Effect of radial head implant shape on joint contact area and location during static loading. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40(4):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.12.017.
  20. Lalone EA, Shannon HL, Deluce SR, Giles JW, King GJ, Johnson JA. Effect of radial head implant shape on radiocapitellar joint congruency. J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42(6):476.e1-476.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.009.
  21. Gupta GG, Lucas G, Hahn DL. Biomechanical and computer analysis of radial head prostheses. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997; 6(1):37-48. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(97)90069-0.
  22. Abdullah MR, Goharian A, Abdul Kadir MR, Wahit MU. Biomechanical and bioactivity concepts of polyetheretherketone composites for use in orthopedic implants—a review. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015; 103(11):3689-702. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35480.
  23. DeDecker S. The efficacy of Bionate as an articulating surface for joint hemiarthroplasty (Master's thesis). The University of Western Ontario (Canada); 2016
  24. Willing RT, Lalone EA, Shannon H, Johnson JA, King GJ. Validation of a finite element model of the human elbow for determining cartilage contact mechanics. J Biomech. 2013; 46(10):1767-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.04.001.
  25. Takatori K, Hashizume H, Wake H, Inoue H, Nagayama N. Analysis of stress distribution in the humeroradial joint. J Orthop Sci. 2002; 7(6):650-7. doi: 10.1007/s007760200116.
  26. Morrey B, An K, Stormont T. Force transmission through the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70(2):250-6.

 

 



 

 

 

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 8
August 2025
Pages 497-508

  • Receive Date 10 January 2025
  • Revise Date 06 March 2025
  • Accept Date 12 April 2025