Minimally Invasive vs Open First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Cheilectomy: Radiographic Outcomes and Early Complications

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 1 Foot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA

2 Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

3 Foot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

4 1 Foot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA 3 Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

10.22038/abjs.2024.81570.3715

Abstract

Objectives: Current literature on surgical techniques has evaluated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cheilectomy and its efficacy in comparison to the open technique. However, no study to date has evaluated MIS-Moberg in relation to open and MIS cheilectomy. This study assessed radiological outcomes and early healing and complications of patients who underwent open, MIS, and MIS-Moberg cheilectomies.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort review of 134 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) cheilectomy at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2024. Success of cheilectomy was determined radiographically. Postoperative complications were identified through medical record review.
Results: 73 open and 61 MIS cheilectomies were performed on 134 patients with a primary diagnosis of hallux rigidus. The pre-operative versus post-operative differences in dorsal cortical length (3.7±1.4) and sagittal articular P1 angle (7.3±4.8) were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05) for the MIS-Moberg group. Ten patients in the open cheilectomy were found to have dorsiflexion and plantarflexion stiffness compared to zero patients in the MIS and MIS-Moberg groups (P<0.01).
Conclusion: We showed a significantly greater rate of plantar- and dorsiflexion stiffness in open surgeries compared to MIS and MIS-Moberg. No other differences in healing rates or radiologic outcomes were observed. Based on preliminary results, the MIS-Moberg can successfully alter the radiographic alignment of the great toe and does not increase complications as compared to open or MIS cheilectomy alone.
        Level of evidence: III

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Bejarano-Pineda L, Cody EA, Nunley JA. Prevalence of Hallux Rigidus in Patients with End-Stage Ankle Arthritis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021; 60(1):21-24. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2020.04.004.
  2. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus. Grading and long-term results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(11):2072-2088.
  3. Grady JF, Axe TM, Zager EJ, Sheldon LA. A retrospective analysis of 772 patients with hallux limitus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002; 92(2):102-108. doi:10.7547/87507315-92-2-102.
  4. Kon Kam King C, Loh Sy J, Zheng Q, Mehta KV. Comprehensive Review of Non-Operative Management of Hallux Rigidus. Cureus. 2017; 9(1):e987. doi:10.7759/cureus.987.
  5. Sidon E, Rogero R, Bell T, et al. Long-term Follow-up of Cheilectomy for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40(10):1114-1121. doi:10.1177/1071100719859236.
  6. Galois L, Hemmer J, Ray V, Sirveaux F. Surgical options for hallux rigidus: state of the art and review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol.2020; 30(1):57-65. doi:10.1007/s00590-019-02528-x.
  7. Restuccia G, Lippi A, Shytaj S, Sacchetti F, Cosseddu F. Percutaneous foot surgery without osteosynthesis in hallux valgus and outcomes. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021; 9(2):211-216. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.47336.2319.
  8. Lausé GE, Miller CP, Smith JT. Minimally Invasive Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Primer for Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023; 31(3):122-131. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00608.
  9. Jowett CRJ, Bedi HS. Preliminary Results and Learning Curve of the Minimally Invasive Chevron Akin Operation for Hallux Valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 56(3):445-452. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.002.
  10. Lee M, Walsh J, Smith MM, Ling J, Wines A, Lam P. Hallux Valgus Correction Comparing Percutaneous Chevron/Akin (PECA) and Open Scarf/Akin Osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38(8):838-846. doi:10.1177/1071100717704941.
  11. Mesa-Ramos M, Mesa-Ramos F, Carpintero P. Evaluation of the treatment of hallux rigidus by percutaneous surgery. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008; 74(2):222-226.
  12. Glenn RL, Gonzalez TA, Peterson AB, Kaplan J. Minimally Invasive Dorsal Cheilectomy and Hallux Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021; 6(1):2473011421993103. doi:10.1177/2473011421993103.
  13. Teoh KH, Tan WT, Atiyah Z, Ahmad A, Tanaka H, Hariharan K. Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Dorsal Cheilectomy for Hallux Rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40(2):195-201. doi:10.1177/1071100718803131.
  14. Bauer T. Percutaneous forefoot surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.2014; 100(1 Suppl):S191-204. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.017.
  15. Stevens R, Bursnall M, Chadwick C, et al. Comparison of Complication and Reoperation Rates for Minimally Invasive Versus Open Cheilectomy of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint. Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 41(1):31-36. doi:10.1177/1071100719873846.