Subspecialties and Characteristics of Leadership Position in Orthopaedic Surgery

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 Rothman Institute/Thomas Jefferson Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Panorama City, CA, USA

10.22038/abjs.2024.80029.3654

Abstract

Objectives: The composition of department leadership, notably the Department Chair and Program Director, plays a pivotal role in “Match” decision making and further residency training. This study aims to examine the current landscape of subspecialties and other demographic characteristics of the Department Chairs and Program Directors of orthopaedic surgery residency programs across the United States.
Methods: A list of Department Chairs and Program Directors of all 201 ACGME orthopaedic surgery residency programs was generated from the Orthopaedic Residency Information Network (ORIN) website. Demographic information, years of practice, research productivity (H-Index), and subspecialty for both Chairpersons and Program Directors were gathered. Information was available on 163/201 department chairs and 199/201 program directors.
Results: Among the 163 Department Chairs, Sports (24.5%), Adult Reconstruction (16.6%), and Trauma (13.5%) emerged as the most prevalent subspecialties, while Shoulder and Elbow (5.5%), Pediatrics (3.7%), and General Orthopedics (1.8%) were the least represented. Among the 199 Program Directors, Trauma (22.1%), Sports (17.1%), and Hand and Upper Extremity (14.1%) were the most common, while Shoulder and Elbow (6.0%), Foot and Ankle (5.5%), and General Orthopedics (1.0%) were the least represented. Chairpersons exhibited notably higher mean years of practice, mean H-index, and were more commonly male compared to Program Directors. However, in the multivariable regression model predicting leadership position, only years of practice and H-index were found to be significant predictors.
Conclusion: Sports, trauma, joint reconstruction, and hand were the most common subspecialities among those in positions of leadership explained by their higher prevalence among American-board orthopedic surgeons. Furthermore, H-index and years of practice were both predictors of being a chairperson.
        Level of evidence: III

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Gehrig LMB. Orthopedic surgery. Am J Surg. 2011; 202(3):364-368. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.007.
  2. Brook EM, Hu CH, Li X, Smith EL, Matzkin EG. The Influence of Mentors in Orthopedic Surgery. Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1). doi:10.3928/01477447-20191122-02.
  3. Ebrahimpour A, Razi M, Mortazavi SJ, et al. Job satisfaction, Career Burnout, and Work-Related Well-Being Prevalence among Orthopedic Surgeons: A Nationwide Study. Arch bone Jt Surg. 2023; 11(4):293-300. doi:10.22038/ABJS.2022.66683.3180.
  4. Syed S, Mirza AH, Ali A. A Brief Comparison of Orthopaedic Training in English-Speaking Countries. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009; 91(3):226-231. doi:10.1308/003588409X359303.
  5. Butler BA, Johnson D, Christian RA, Bigach SD, Beal MD, Peabody TD. Factors Influencing Subspecialty Choice of Orthopedic Residents: Effect of Gender, Year in Residency, and

 

        Presumptive Subspecialty. Iowa Orthop J. 2020; 40(1):19-23.

  1. Daniels AH, DiGiovanni CW. Is Subspecialty Fellowship Training Emerging as a Necessary Component of Contemporary Orthopaedic Surgery Education? J Grad Med Educ. 2014; 6(2):218-221. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-14-00120.1.
  2. Karnes JM, Mayerson JL, Scharschmidt TJ. Is Orthopedics More Competitive Today Than When My Attending Matched? An Analysis of National Resident Matching Program Data for Orthopedic PGY1 Applicants from 1984 to 2011. J Surg Educ. 2014; 71(4):530-542. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.003.
  3. Arciero EJ, Stelzer JW, Geaney LE. Characterization of Social Media Presence among Orthopedic Residency Programs. Arch bone Jt Surg. 2022; 10(11):986-988. doi:10.22038/ABJS.2022.66317.3172
  4. Nagarkar PA, Janis JE. Fixing the Match. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(3):711-719. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad2bb.
  5. Cummings PE, Alder KD, Marigi EM, Hidden KA, Kakar S, Barlow JD. Demographics and Characteristics of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program Directors. JBJS Open Access. 2023; 8(1). doi:10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00128.
  6. Bi AS, Fisher ND, Singh SK, Strauss EJ, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA. The Current State of Orthopaedic Educational Leadership. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(4):167-175. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00279.
  7. Belk JW, Littlefield CP, Mulcahey MK, McCarty TA, Schlegel TF, McCarty EC. Characteristics of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Directors. Orthop J Sport Med. 2021; 9(2):232596712098525. doi:10.1177/2325967120985257.
  8. Quality & Practice Resources / Practice Management. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.Available at: https://www.aaos.org/quality/practice-management/
  9. Clark SC, Miskimin C, Mulcahey MK. Educational demographics of orthopaedic surgery department chairs. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022; 14(1). doi:10.52965/001C.31917.
  10. Mayfield CK, Bolia IK, Ihn H, et al. Evaluation of Sports Medicine Fellowships in the United States Based on Academic Productivity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021; 5(10):1-7. doi:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00165.
  11. Khan AZ, Kelley B V., Patel AD, McAllister DR, Leong NL. Academic productivity among fellowship associated adult total joint reconstruction surgeons. Arthroplast Today. 2017; 3(4):298-302. doi:10.1016/j.artd.2017.05.007.
  12. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(46):16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
  13. Gast KM, Kuzon WM, Waljee JF. Bibliometric Indices and Academic Promotion within Plastic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134(5):838e-844e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000594.
  14. Stidham RW, Sauder K, Higgins PDR. Using Bibliometrics to Advance Your Academic Career. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(3):520-523. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.024.
  15. Alsoof D, Balmaceno-Criss M, Kovoor M, et al. Does Research Training lead to Academic Success in Orthopedic Surgery? An Analysis of U.S Academic Orthopedic Surgeons. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022; 14(4):38655. doi:10.52965/001c.38655.
  16. Bastian S, Ippolito JA, Lopez SA, Eloy JA, Beebe KS. The Use of the h-Index in Academic Orthopaedic Surgery. J Bone Jt Surg. 2017; 99(4):e14. doi:10.2106/JBJS.15.01354.
  17. Peterman NJ, Macinnis B, Stauffer K, Mann R, Yeo EG, Carpenter K. Gender Representation in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Geospatial Analysis From 2015 to 2022. Cureus. 2022; 14(7):e27305. doi:10.7759/cureus.27305.
  18. Bennett CL, Baker O, Rangel EL, Marsh RH. The Gender Gap in Surgical Residencies. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155(9):893-894. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2171.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 1
January 2025
Pages 39-46

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 May 2024
  • Revise Date: 21 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 10 July 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics