Brand Videos among Orthopedic Surgery Residency Programs

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 Jefferson Health New Jersey; Stratford, NJ, USA

2 Rothman Orthopedic Institute; Egg Harbor Township, NJ, USA

Abstract

Objectives: The use of brand videos has provided residency programs with another platform to 
showcase themselves and attract potential applicants. Despite the rise in brand videos following the 
COVID-19 pandemic, not all orthopedic surgery residency programs have developed one. This study 
aimed to determine the prevalence of brand videos on orthopedic surgery residency program websites 
and evaluate their contents.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of all orthopedic surgery residencies participating in the National 
Resident Matching Program (NRMP) in November 2022. The presence of a brand video was reviewed on each 
program's website and data was collected from the contents of existing videos.
Results: Forty-seven percent (90/192) of programs had a brand video with an average length of 6 minutes and 13 
seconds. The top two program qualities highlighted were a family friendly atmosphere with camaraderie (83%; 
75/90) and early hands-on surgical experience (72%; 65/90). Despite brand videos being tailored to an audience of 
prospective residents, only 9% (8/90) of programs noted qualities they look for in prospective residents. Furthermore, 
only 19% (17/90) of programs displayed a closing slide containing contact information or links to social media 
accounts.
Conclusion: Only 47% of orthopedic surgery residency programs have established a brand video. The absence of 
a brand video may be due to programs not perceiving them as important, shortage of resources, or unfamiliarity with 
video marketing. Based on our findings, we propose recommendations to assist programs in their development of 
a brand video.
 Level of evidence: IV

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. O'Donnell SW, Drolet BC, Brower JP, LaPorte D, Eberson CP. Orthopedic surgery residency: Perspectives of applicants and program directors on medical student away rotations.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg.  2017; 25(1):61–68. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00099.00124635-201701000-00009.
  2. Raman T, Alrabaa R, Sood A, Maloof P, Benevenia J, Berberian W. Does residency selection criteria predict performance in orthopedic surgery residency? Clin Orthop Relat Res.  2016; 474(4):908–914. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4317-7. 
  3. Rynecki N, Para A, Gantz O, Coban D, Gala Z, Gupta R, Adeeb N, Ippolito JA, Ruskin J, Beebe KS. An analysis of trends in National Residency Matching Program match data for orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics.  2020; 43(6):e616–e622. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200910-03.
  4. Schrock J, Kraeutler M, Dayton M, McCarty E. A comparison of matched and unmatched orthopedic surgery residency applicants from 2006 to 2014: Data from the National Resident Matching Program. J Bone Joint Surg Am.  2017; 99(1):e1.  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00293.00004623-201701040-00011.
  5. Yong TM, Austin DC, Molloy IB, Torchia MT, Coe MP. Online information and mentorship: Perspectives from orthopedic surgery residency applicants. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.  2021; 29(14):616–623. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00512.00124635-202107150-00009.
  6. Brown CA, Jewell C, Haidar DA, et al. Best Practices for Video-Based Branding During Virtual Residency Recruitment. Journal of graduate medical education. 2021; 13(1):6-10. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-20-00750.1.
  7. Chu LF, Young CA, Zamora AK, et al. Self-reported information needs of anesthesia residency applicants and analysis of applicant-related web sites resources at 131 United States training programs.  Anesth Analg.  2011;112(2):430–439. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182027a94.ANE.0b013e3182027a94.
  8. Embi PJ, Desai S, Cooney TG. Use and utility of web-based residency program information: A survey of residency applicants. J Med Internet Res.  2003; 5(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e22.
  9. Gaeta TJ, Birkhahn RH, Lamont D, Banga N, Bove JJ. Aspects of residency programs' web sites important to student applicants. Acad Emerg Med.  2005; 12(1):89–92. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.047.
  10. Mahler SA, Wagner M, Church A, Sokolosky M, Cline DM. Importance of residency program web sites to emergency medicine applicants. J Emerg Med.  2009; 36(1):83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.055.S0736-4679(08)00008-5.
  11. Rai R, Sabharwal S. Availability and quality of online information on sub-internships in US orthopedic residency programs. JBJS Open Access.  2019; 4(1):e0036. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00036. 
  12. Reilly EF, Leibrandt TJ, Zonno AJ, Simpson MC, Morris JB. General surgery residency program websites: Usefulness and usability for resident applicants. Curr Surg.  2004; 61(2):236–240. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2003.10.006.S014979440300271X.
  13. Walk CT, Gerardo R, Parikh PP. Increasing Social Media Presence for Graduate Medical Education Programs. Am Surg. doi: 10.1177/00031348211031848.
  14. Kapferer JN. The New Strategic Brand Management. 3rd ed. London, England: Kogan Pages 31-45; 2004.
  15. Shappell E, Shakeri N, Fant A, et al. Branding and Recruitment: A Primer for Residency Program Leadership. J Grad Med Educ. 2018; 10(3):249-252. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-17-00602.1.
  16. El Shatanofy M, Brown L, Berger P, et al. Orthopedic Surgery Residency Program Website Content and Accessibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2021; 7(3):e30821. doi: 10.2196/30821.
  17. Bixby EC, Danford NC, Desai SS, Paskey TL, Levine WN. Instagram Use among Orthopedic Surgery Residency Programs. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022; 30(14):648-657. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00089.
  18. Farag M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Use of YouTube as a Resource for Surgical Education-Clarity or Confusion. Eur

 

Urol Focus. 2020; 6(3):445-449. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.017.

  1. Snelson C. YouTube across the disciplines: A review of the literature. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching.2011; 7 (1):159-169.
  2. Sell NM, Cassidy DJ, McKinley SK, Petrusa E, Gee DW, Antonoff MB, Phitayakorn R. A Needs Assessment of Video-based Education Resources among General Surgery Residents. J Surg Res. 2021; 263:116-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.035.
  3. Guo PJ, Kim J, Rubin R. How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos Guo PJ, Kim J, Rubin R. How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2014; 106(1):1-13. doi:10.1037/a0033890.
  4. Vafeiadis M, Han JA, Shen F. News storytelling through images: Examining the effects of narratives and visuals in news coverage of issues. International Journal of Communication. 2020; 14:21.
  5. Gupta H, Singh S, Sinha P. Multimedia tool as a predictor for social media advertising-a YouTube way. Multimedia tools and applications. 2017; 76:18557-68.doi:10.1007/s11042-016-4249-6.
  6. Huntington WP, Haines N, Patt JC. What Factors Influence Applicants' Rankings of Orthopedic Surgery Residency Programs in the National Resident Matching Program? Clin Orthop. 2014; 472(9):2859-2866. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3692-9.
  7. Strosberg DS, Quinn KM, Abdel-Misih SR, Harzman AE. An analysis of operative experiences of junior general surgical residents and correlation with the SCORE curriculum. J Surg Educ. 2016; 73(6):e9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.003.
  8. Day MA, Owens JM, Caldwell LS. Breaking Barriers: A Brief Overview of Diversity in Orthopedic Surgery. Iowa Orthop J. 2019; 39(1):1-5.
  9. Poon S, Kiridly D, Mutawakkil M, et al. Current Trends in Sex, Race, and Ethnic Diversity in Orthopedic Surgery Residency. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019; 27 (16): e725-e733. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00131.
  10. Soliman L, Spake C, Rao V, Sobti N, Liu P, Woo AS. Diversity and inclusion initiatives are infrequently featured among integrated plastic surgery residency program promotional YouTube videos. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022; 75(10):3877-3903. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.049.

 

 

 

 

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 12, Issue 9
September 2024
Pages 652-659

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 November 2023
  • Revise Date: 18 June 2024
  • Accept Date: 08 May 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics