1.. Kelmers E, Szuba A, King SW, et al. Smart knee implants: an
overview of current technologies and future possibilities.
Indian J Orthop. 2022; 57(5):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s43465-
022-00810-5.
2. Chen JL, Huang TY, Hsu WB, et al. Characterization of
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from
periprosthetic joint infections. Pathogens. 2022; 11(7):719.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070719.
3. Tsikopoulos K, Christofilos SI, Kitridis D,et al. Is sonication
superior to dithiothreitol in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint
infections? A meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2022; 46(6):1215-
1224. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05350-z.
4. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. The function of sonication in the
diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee
arthroplasty. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022; 10(9): 735-740. doi:
10.22038/abjs.2020.44329.2212.
5. Fisher CR, Salmons HI, Mandrekar J, Greenwood-Quaintance
KE, Abdel MP, Patel R. A 92 protein inflammation panel
performed on sonicate fluid differentiates periprosthetic joint
infection from non-infectious causes of arthroplasty failure.
Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-
20444-9.
6. Azad MA, Wolf MJ, Strasburg AP, et al. Comparison of the
BioFire Joint Infection Panel to 16S ribosomal RNA genebased targeted metagenomic sequencing for testing synovial
fluid from patients with knee arthroplasty failure. J Clin
Microbiol. 2022; 60(12):e0112622. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01126-
22.
7. Flurin L, Hemenway JJ, Fisher CR, et al. Clinical use of a 16S
ribosomal RNA gene-based Sanger and/or next generation
sequencing assay to test preoperative synovial fluid for
periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis. mBio. 2022;
13(6):e0132222. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01322-22.
8. Hong HL, Flurin L, Thoendel MJ, et al. Targeted versus shotgun
metagenomic sequencing-based detection of microorganisms
in sonicate fluid for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis.
Clin Infect Dis. 2023; 76(3):e1456-e1462. doi:
10.1093/cid/ciac646.
9. Brooks JR, Chonko DJ, Pigott M, Sullivan AC, Moore K, Stoodley
P. Mapping bacterial biofilm on explanted orthopedic
hardware: An analysis of 14 consecutive cases. APMIS. 2023;
131(4):170-179. doi: 10.1111/apm.13295.
10. Drago L, Romanò D, Fidanza A, et al. Dithiotreitol pretreatment of synovial fluid samples improves microbiological
counts in peri-prosthetic joint infection. Int Orthop. 2023;
47(5):1147-1152. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05714-z.
11. Fisher CR, Mangalaparthi KK, Greenwood-Quaintance KE,
Abdel MP, Pandey A, Patel R. Mass spectrometry-based
proteomic profiling of sonicate fluid differentiates Staphylococcus aureus periprosthetic joint infection from non-infectious failure: a pilot study. Proteomics Clin Appl.
2023; 17(5):e2200071. doi: 10.1002/prca.202200071.
12. Roitzsch C, Apolle R, Jan Baldus C, et al. Ultrasonic bone
cement removal efficiency in total joint arthroplasty revision:
A computer tomographic-based cadaver study. J Orthop Res.
2023; 41(6):1365-1375. doi: 10.1002/jor.25465.
13. Indelli PF, Ghirardelli S, Valpiana P, Bini L, Festini M, Iannotti,
F. Debridement, antibiotic pearls, and retention of the
implant (DAPRI) in the treatment of early periprosthetic joint
infections: a consecutive series. Pathogens. 2023; 12(4):605.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens12040605.
14. Ji B, Li G, Zhang X, et al. Effective single-stage revision using
intra-articular antibiotic infusion after multiple failed surgery
for periprosthetic joint infection: a mean seven years' followup. Bone Joint J. 2022; 104-B (7):867-874. doi:
10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1704.R1.
15. Shichman I, Ward SA, Lu L, et al. Failed 2-stage revision knee
arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection-patient
characteristics and outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2023;
38(10):2177-2182. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.063.
16. Miyake Y, Takagi T. Treatment experience with continuous
local antibiotic perfusion for periprosthetic joint infection. J
Orthop Sci. 2023:S0949-2658(23)00331-7. doi:
10.1016/j.jos.2023.12.001.
17.Turner AB, Gerner E, Firdaus R, et al. Role of sodium salicylate
in Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing, virulence, biofilm
formation and antimicrobial susceptibility. Front Microbiol.
2022:13:931839. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.931839.
18. Kruse CC, Ekhtiari S, Oral I, et al. The use of rifampin in total
joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of
comparative studies. J Arthroplasty. 2022; 37(8):1650-1657.
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.072.
19. Laperche J, Barrett CC, Boduch A, et al. Mechanically stable
rifampin antibiotic cement inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa
biofilm surface growth. J Orthop Res. 2024; 42(3):547-554.
doi: 10.1002/jor.25720.
20. Charalambous LT, Kim BI, Schwartz AM, et al. Prosthetic knee
infection with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus: a
harbinger of poor outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2022;
37(6S):S313-S320. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.050.
)