1. Zhang K, Chen Y, Qiang M, Hao Y. Effects of five hindfoot arthrodeses on foot and ankle motion: Measurements in cadaver specimens. Sci Rep.2016; 6:35493. doi: 10.1038/srep35493.
2. Wu WL, Su FC, Cheng YM, Huang PJ, Chou YL, Chou CK. Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis. Gait Posture.2000; 11(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00049-1.
3. Joveniaux P, Harisboure A, Ohl X, Dehoux E. Long-term results of in situ subtalar arthrodesis. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(8):1199-1205. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1041-5.
4. Stevens J, Wiltox A, Meijer K, Bijnens W, Poeze M. Gait analysis after first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: where does the foot compensate. Bone Joint J. 2017:35-35. doi.org/10.1177/1071100716674310.
5. Ota Y, Nakasa T, Sawa M, et al. Gait analysis using the Oxford Foot Model for ankle arthrodesis compared with normal control. J Foot Ankle Int. 2018; 3(3):1-2. doi: 10.1177/2473011418S00373.
6. Singer S, Klejman S, Pinsker E, Houck J, Daniels TL. Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2013; 95(24):e191 (1-10). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00465.
7. Trouillier H, Hänsel L, Schaff P, Rosemeyer B, Refior H. Long-term results after ankle arthrodesis: clinical, radiological, gait analytical aspects. J Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(12):1081-1090. doi: 10.1177/107110070202301202.
8. Ogrodzka K, Żuka K, Niedźwiedzki T. Effects of ankle arthrodesis on functioning of the knee and hip joints during walking at natural velocity. Medical Rehabilitation. 2007; 11(3):6-11.
9. Weiss R, Broström E, Stark A, Wick M, Wretenberg P. Ankle/hindfoot arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis improves kinematics and kinetics of the knee and hip: a prospective gait analysis study. Rheumatology. 2007; 46(6):1024–1028. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem017.
10. Abdo RV, Wasilewski SA. Ankle arthrodesis: a long-term study. Foot Ankle Int. 1992; 13(6):307-312. doi: 10.1177/107110079201300602.
11. Beischer AD, Brodsky JW, Polio FE, Peereboom J. Functional outcome and gait analysis after triple or double arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20(9):545-553. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000902.
12. Berlet GC, Hyer CF, Scott RT, Galli MM. Medial Double Arthrodesis With Lateral Column Sparing and Arthrodiastasis: A Radiographic and Medical Record Review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(3):441-444. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.10.012.
13. Segal AD, Cyr KM, Stender CJ, et al. A three-year prospective comparative gait study between patients with ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty. Clin Biomech. 2018; 54:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.02.018.
14. Jeevika AS, Tewari R. An Electromyography analysis of lower limb muscles for different locomotion activities. Int J Eng Res Techno. 2012; 1(3):1-3. doi: 10.17577/IJERTV1IS3125.
15. Mishra AK, Srivastava A, Tewari R, Mathur R. EMG analysis of lower limb muscles for developing robotic exoskeleton orthotic device. Procedia Engineering. 2012; 41:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.139.
16. Hejazi S, Rouhi G, Rasmussen J. The effects of gastrocnemius–soleus muscle forces on ankle biomechanics during triple arthrodesis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016; 20(2):130-141. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1206531.
17. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan H, Wootten M. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990; 8(3):383-392. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100080310.
18. Perry J, Burnfield J,eds. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. 1st ed. SLACK Incorporated, New Jersey; 1992.
19. Perry J, Burnfield J,eds. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. 2st ed. SLACK Incorporated, New Jersey; 2010.
20. De Luca CJ. Surface electromyography: Detection and recording. Avaliable at: https://www.premus2004.ethz.ch/NDSAG/Tutorial%20Delsys%20Surface%20EMG%20intro.pdf. Accessed, 2002.
21. Perotto AO,eds. Anatomical guide for the electromyographer: the limbs and trunk. 5 st ed. Charles C Thomas Publisher Ltd; 2011. 22. Robertson DGE, Dowling JJ. Design and responses of Butterworth and critically damped digital filters. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13(6):569-573. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00080-4.
23. McCaw ST, Gardner JK, Stafford LN, Torry MR. filtering ground reaction force data affects the calculation and interpretation of joint kinetics and energetics during drop landings. J Appl Biomech. 2013; 29(6):804-809. doi: 10.1123/jab.29.6.804.
24. Southgate DF, Cleather DJ, Weinert-Aplin RA, Bull AM. The sensitivity of a lower limb model to axial rotation offsets and muscle bounds at the knee. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012; 226(9):660-669. doi: 10.1177/0954411912439284.
25. Winter D, Yack H. EMG profiles during normal human walking: stride-to-stride and inter-subject variability. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987; 67(5):402-411. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90003-4.
26. Vicon Motion System Ltd. Plug-in Gait Reference Guide. Lower Body Modeling With Plug-in Gait. Avaliable at: https://docs.vicon.com/download/attachments/42696722/Plug-in%20Gait%20Reference%20Guide.pdf. Accessed 2017.
27. Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F. Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion. J Physiol. 2004; 556(1):267–282. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.057174.
28. Mündermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP. Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 52(9):2835-2844. doi:10.1002/ART.21262
29. Haq I, Murphy E, Dacre J. Osteoarthritis. Postgrad Med J.2003; 79(933):377-83. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.933.377.