Reliability of Routine Radiographs for Conservatively Treated Metacarpal Shaft and Neck Fractures

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: To investigate the reliability of orthopedic hand surgeons to evaluate radiographic healing in initial and
follow-up radiographs of the conservatively treated metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. The rationale for this study
was to reduce the rate of unnecessary, routine radiographs when treating metacarpal fractures.
Methods: Forty sets of digital x-rays, twenty at the initial visit and twenty at the 4-week follow-up, were randomly
selected and reviewed. Three hand surgeons evaluated the x-rays for (1) fracture location, (2) radiograph timing,
(3) healing status, (4) percentage healed, (5) angulation, and (6) confidence in healing status. Observers reviewed
studies in random order and evaluated the same set of radiographs one month after the initial review. Intra- and
interobserver agreements were analyzed using Fleiss’ kappa (κ) for all parameters and all possible observer
pairings.
Results: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was highest when evaluating fracture location and lowest when
assessing the percentage healed. The interobserver reliability was fair for radiograph timing and healing status and
fair-to-moderate for angulation. The intraobserver reliability was moderate for radiograph timing and healing status and
moderate-to-substantial for angulation. Observers correctly differentiated initial vs. follow-up images 62% of the time
and reported to feel somewhat certain in their evaluation of healing status.
Conclusion: When evaluating initial and 4-week follow-up radiographs, hand surgeons were somewhat confident
in their assessment of healing but had less than substantial intra- and interobserver reliability following radiographic
evaluation. Due to their poor reproducibility, routine radiographs may be unnecessary when evaluating conservatively
treated metacarpal fractures. Further studies and guidelines that identify clear indications for the use of routine imaging
in metacarpal fracture care are warranted.
Level of evidence: II

Keywords


  1. Karl JW, Olson PR, Rosenwasser MP. The Epidemiology of Upper Extremity Fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(8):e242. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000312
  2. Hooper RC, Chen JS, Kuo CF, Chung KC. Closed Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Review of Resource Use in Operative and Nonoperative Management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146(3):572-579. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007056
  3. Heckmann N, Dusch MN, Pannell WC, et al. The Utility of Plain Films for Nonoperative Fifth Metacarpal Fractures: Are Follow-up Radiographs Necessary? HAND. 2018; 13(6):646-651. doi: 10.1177/1558944717733278
  4. Poolman RW, Goslings JC, Lee J, Muller MS, Steller EP, Struijs PA. Conservative treatment for closed fifth (small finger) metacarpal neck fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3):CD003210. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003210.pub3
  5. Bansal R, Craigen MA. Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures: Is Follow-Up Required? J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007;32(1):69-73. doi:10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.09.021
  6. Kollitz KM, Hammert WC, Vedder NB, Huang JI. Metacarpal fractures: treatment and complications. Hand (N Y). 2014;9(1):16-23. doi:10.1007/s11552-013-9562-1
  7. Taha RH, Grindlay D, Deshmukh S, Montgomery A, Davis TR, Karantana A. A systematic review of treatment interventions for metacarpal shaft fractures in adults. Hand. 2022;17(5):869-78.. doi:10.1177/1558944720974363
  8. Wong VW, Higgins JP. Evidence-Based Medicine: Management of Metacarpal Fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(1):140e-151e. doi:10.1097/PRS.000 0000000003470
  9. Boeckstyns MEH. Current methods, outcomes and challenges for the treatment of hand fractures. J Hand Surg (Eur Vol). 2020;45(6):547-559. doi:10.1177/1753193420928820
  10. Braakman M, Verburg AD, Oderwald EE. Are routine radiographs during conservative treatment of fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpals useful? Acta Orthop Belg. 1996;62(3):151-155.
  11. Abdelmalek A, Harrison E, Scott S. Closed fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Do they need to be seen in fracture clinic? An emergency department pathway for assessment, management and criteria for fracture clinic referral. Trauma. 2015;17(1):47-51. doi:10.1177/1460408614545253
  12. Braakman M. Are lateral X-rays useful in the treatment of fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpals? Injury. 1998;29(1):1-3. doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(97) 00101-0
  13. Sletten IN, Nordsletten L, Hjorthaug GA, Hellund JC, Holme I, Kvernmo HD. Assessment of volar angulation and shortening in 5th metacarpal neck fractures: an inter- and intra-observer validity and reliability study. J Hand Surg (Eur Vol). 2013;38(6):658-666. doi:10.1177/1753193412461582
  14. Leung YL, Beredjiklian PK, Monaghan BA, Bozentka DJ. Radiographic assessment of small finger metacarpal neck fractures. J Hand Surg. 2002;27(3):443-448. doi:10.1053/S0363-5023(06)90001-X
  15. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Medica. 2012;22(3):276-282.
  16. Matzon JL, Lutsky KF, Tulipan JE, Beredjiklian PK. Reliability of Radiographs and Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Scaphoid Union After Internal Fixation. J Hand Surg. 2021;46(7):539-543. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.004
  17. Donner A, Rotondi MA. Sample Size Requirements for Interval Estimation of the Kappa Statistic for Interobserver Agreement Studies with a Binary Outcome and Multiple Raters. Int J Biostat. 2010;6(1). doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1275
  18. Chaudhry S, DelSole EM, Egol KA. Post-splinting radiographs of minimally displaced fractures: good medicine or medicolegal protection? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(17):e128. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00944
  19. Beals C, Lin J, Holstine JB, Samora JB. Reducing Healthcare Costs in the Management of Pediatric Metacarpal Neck Fractures. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019;4(5):e212. doi:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000212
  20. van Gerven P, El Moumni M, Zuidema WP, et al. Omitting Routine Radiography of Traumatic Distal Radial Fractures After Initial 2-Week Follow-up Does Not Affect Outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(15):1342-1350. doi:10.2106/JBJS.18.01160
  21. van Gerven P, van Dongen JM, Rubinstein SM, et al. Is reduction of routine radiograph use in patients with distal radius fractures cost effective? Analysis of data from the multicentre, randomised controlled WARRIOR trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035370. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035370
  22. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/American Society for Surgery of the Hand Management of Distal Radius Fractures Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Available at: www.aaos.org/drfcp. Accessed December 5, 2020.
  23. Tantigate D, Salentijn D, Lin JD, Freibott CE, Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP. Sequential Radiographic Evaluation During Closed Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34(1):e26. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001606