Shoulder Imbalance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review of the Current State of the Art

Document Type : SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Shoulder imbalance (SI) is among the most rated manifestations of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)
pointed to by patients and spine surgeons. It serves as a criterion to assess the outcome of scoliosis surgery and is
also a cause of dissatisfaction for the patients postoperatively. Despite the availability of multiple studies on this issue,
a comprehensive survey of the risk factors and preventive measures has yet to be elucidated. The present study aimed
to highlight the most recent approach to the evaluation and management of SI, as well as medical counseling about the
expectations and limitations of the surgery.
Methods: A systematic literature review using electric databases was conducted, including PubMed, Embase, the
Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, with a well-defined search strategy on SI definition, risk factors, and preventive
and surgical recommendations.
Results: A total of 69 articles were identified; SI > 2 cm was the most used cut-off, and its risk factors included the main
thoracic Cobb angle > 80˚, preoperative level shoulder, high left shoulder, and higher Risser grade. The most stated
strategies to preclude SI were the sufficient correction of the proximal thoracic curve, and moderate correction of the
main thoracic and lumbar curve (LC).
Conclusion: Shoulder imbalance should be prevented not only for appearance or satisfaction but also for possible
complications such as distal adding-on, new LC progression, or trunk shift postoperatively in AIS patients.
Level of evidence: V

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee CS, et al. Indications of proximal
thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis: recognition and treatment of double
thoracic curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis treated with segmental instrumentation.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(18):2342-2349.
doi:10.1097/00007632-200009150-00012
2. Matamalas A, Bagó J, D’Agata E, Pellisé F. Does patient
perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical
balance? Eur Spine J. 2016;25(11):3560-3567.
doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3971-5
3. Lee SY, Ch’ng PY, Wong TS, et al. Patients’
Perception and Satisfaction on Neck and Shoulder
Imbalance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
.Global Spine J. 2021; 21925682211007795.
doi:10.1177/21925682211007795
4. Maurice B, Jean-Marie G, Jean-Michel T. Taking the
shoulders and pelvis into account in the preoperative
classification of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents and
young adults (a constructive critique of King’s and Lenke’s
systems of classification). Eur Spine J. 2011;20(10):1780-
1787. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1899-y
5. Chang DG, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lim DJ, Ha KY, Suk SI. How
to improve shoulder balance in the surgical correction
of double thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(23):E1359-E1367.
doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000578
6. Zhang S, Zhang L, Feng X, Yang H. Incidence and risk
factors for postoperative shoulder imbalance in scoliosis:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J.
2018;27(2):358-369. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5289-y
7. Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Newton PO; Harms Study Group.
Should Shoulder Balance Determine Proximal Fusion
Levels in Patients With Lenke 5 Curves? Spine Deform.
2013;1(6):447-451. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2013.08.003
8. Luhmann SJ, Sucato DJ, Johnston CE, Richards BS, Karol
LA. Radiographic Assessment of Shoulder Position in
619 Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: Can T1 Tilt Be Used
as an Intraoperative Proxy to Determine Postoperative
Shoulder Balance?. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(7):691-
694. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000519
9. Amir D, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton
PO. Does Leveling the Upper Thoracic Spine Have
Any Impact on Postoperative Clinical Shoulder
Balance in Lenke 1 and 2 Patients?. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976). 2016;41(14):1122-1127. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0000000000001497
10. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, et
al. Postoperative distal adding-on and related
factors in Lenke type 1A curve. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976). 2013;38(9):737-744. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0b013e318279b666
11. Jiang J, Zhu ZZ, Qiu Y, Wang B, Yu Y. Postoperative
Lumbar Curve Progression Deteriorates Shoulder
Imbalance in Patients with Lenke Type 2B/C
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Who Underwent
Selective Thoracic Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2019;
125:e175-e182. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.032
12. Wang Y, Bünger CE, Wu C, Zhang Y, Hansen ES.
Postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1C scoliosis: what
causes it? How can it be prevented? Spine (Phila
Pa 1976). 2012;37(19):1676-1682. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0b013e318255a053
13. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ, et al. Correlation
of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of
shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of
the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(18):2013-
2020. doi:10.1097/00007632-200209150-0000
14. Akel I, Pekmezci M, Hayran M, et al. Evaluation of
shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population
and its correlation with radiological parameters. Eur
Spine J. 2008;17(3):348-354. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-
0546-0
15. Clement RC, Anari J, Bartley CE, et al. What are
normal radiographic spine and shoulder balance
parameters among adolescent patients? Spine Deform.
2020;8(4):621-627. doi:10.1007/s43390-020-00074-9
16. Ohrt-Nissen S, Kamath VHD, Samartzis D, Luk KDK,
Cheung JPY. Fulcrum flexibility of the main curve
predicts postoperative shoulder imbalance in selective
thoracic fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Eur Spine J. 2018;27(9):2251-2261. doi:10.1007/
s00586-018-5669-y
17. Hadgaonkar S, Shah S, Bhilare P, et al. Clinical and
radiological factors associated with postoperative
shoulder imbalance and correlation with patientreported
outcomes following scoliosis surgery. J Orthop.
2020;21:465-472. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2020. 08.036
18. Okada E, Suzuki T, Demura S, et al. Excessive correction
impacts postoperative shoulder imbalance in lenke
type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Sci.
2020;25(5):757-762. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2019.10.001
19. Miyanji F, Fields MW, Murphy J, et al. Shoulder
balance in patients with Lenke type 1 and 2 idiopathic
scoliosis appears satisfactory at 2 years following
anterior vertebral body tethering of the spine. Spine
Deform. 2021;9(6):1591-1599. doi:10.1007/s43390-
021-00374-8
20. Yagi M, Takemitsu M, Machida M. Clavicle chest
cage angle difference (CCAD): a novel predictor
of postoperative shoulder imbalance in patients
with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976). 2013;38(12):E705-E712. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0b013e31828f0bcd
21. Cao K, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, et al. Association
of postoperative shoulder balance with adding-on
in Lenke Type II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(12):E705-E712.
doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000325
22. Imrie M, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Wenger DR, Newton
PO. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: should 100%
correction be the goal? J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(1
Suppl):S9-S13. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181fd8a24
23. Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lim EJ, Lee DH, Cho JH. A
retrospective study to reveal factors associated with postoperative shoulder imbalance in patients with
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with double thoracic
curve. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;25(6):744-752.
doi:10.3171/2016.6.PEDS16162
24. Isogai N, Yagi M, Otomo N, et al. Upper End Vertebra
of Proximal Thoracic Curve At T1 is a Novel Risk
Factor of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in
Lenke Type 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
.Global Spine J. 2021;21925682211023049. doi:
10.1177/21925682211023049
25. Yang Y, Yang M, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Yang C, Li M.
Postoperative shoulder imbalance in adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and predictive index.
Eur Spine J. 2019;28(6):1331-1341. doi:10.1007/
s00586-019-05933-2
26. Brooks JT, Bastrom TP, Bartley CE, et al. In Search of
the Ever-Elusive Postoperative Shoulder Balance: Is
the T2 UIV the Key? Spine Deform. 2018;6(6):707-
711. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2018.03.010
27. Chung WH, Chiu CK, Ng SJ, Goh SH, Chan CYW,
Kwan MK. How Common Is Medial and Lateral
Shoulder Discordance in Lenke 1 and 2 Curves?
A Preoperative Analysis of Medial and Lateral
Shoulder Balance Among 151 Lenke 1 and 2
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976). 2019;44(8):E480-E486. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0000000000002890
28. Yang H, Im GH, Hu B, et al. Shoulder balance in Lenke
type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Should we
fuse to the second thoracic vertebra? Clin Neurol
Neurosurg. 2017;163:156-162. doi:10.1016/j.
clineuro.2017.10.036
29. Bjerke BT, Cheung ZB, Shifflett GD, Iyer S, Derman
PB, Cunningham ME. Do Current Recommendations
for Upper Instrumented Vertebra Predict Shoulder
Imbalance? An Attempted Validation of Level
Selection for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. HSS J.
2015;11(3):216-222. doi:10.1007/s11420-015-9451-y
30. Hong JY, Suh SW, Yang JH, Park SY, Han JH. Reliability
analysis of shoulder balance measures: comparison
of the 4 available methods. Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 2013;38(26):E1684-E1690. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0b013e3182a18486
31. Qiu XS, Ma WW, Li WG, et al. Discrepancy between
radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder
balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with
double thoracic curve. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(1):45-51.
doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0833-4
32. Yang S, Feuchtbaum E, Werner BC, Cho W, Reddi V,
Arlet V. Does anterior shoulder balance in adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis correlate with posterior shoulder
balance clinically and radiographically? Eur Spine J.
2012;21(10):1978-1983. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-
2434-5
33. Gotfryd A, Avanzi O. Current methods for the evaluation
of shoulder balance in idiopathic adolescent
scoliosis: a literature review. JSM Neurosurg Spine.
2018;6:1096.
34. Gotfryd AO, Silber Caffaro MF, Meves R, Avanzi O.
Predictors for Postoperative Shoulder Balance in
Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective
Cohort Study. Spine Deform. 2017;5(1):66-71.
doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2016.09.046
35. Menon KV, Tahasildar NS. What Constitutes Shoulder
Imbalance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?
Aesthetic Threshold for Surgical Correction. World
Neurosurg. 2020;138:e827-e838. doi:10.1016/j.
wneu.2020.03.106
36. Ono T, Bastrom TP, Newton PO. Defining 2
components of shoulder imbalance: clavicle
tilt and trapezial prominence. Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 2012;37(24):E1511-E1516. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0b013e31826e2bbb
37. Bagó J, Carrera L, March B, Villanueva C. Four
radiological measures to estimate shoulder balance
in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5(1):31-34.
doi:10.1097/01202412-199605010-00006
38. Kwan MK, Wong KA, Lee CK, Chan CY. Is neck tilt
and shoulder imbalance the same phenomenon?
A prospective analysis of 89 adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis patients (Lenke type 1 and 2). Eur Spine J.
2016;25(2):401-408. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4016-9
39. Elfiky TA, Samartzis D, Cheung WY, Wong YW, Luk
KD, Cheung KM. The proximal thoracic curve in
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: surgical strategy and
management outcomes. Global Spine J. 2011;1(1):27-
36. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1296054
40. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Kawakami N, et al.
Postoperative shoulder imbalance in Lenke Type
1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and related
factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:366.
doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-366
41. Sakai Y, Takenaka S, Makino T, Yoshikawa H, Kaito T.
Postoperative T1 tilt is a risk factor for postoperative
distal adding-on in Lenke type 1 adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis: A preliminary report. Medicine
(Baltimore). 2020;99(21):e19983. doi:10.1097/MD.
0000000000019983
42. Qiu Y, Qiu XS, Ma WW, et al. How well do radiological
measurements correlate with cosmetic indices in
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 5, 6 curve
types? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(18):E882-E888.
doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181d6fdd7
43. Chiu CK, Chan CYW, Tan PH, et al. Conformity and
Changes in the Radiological Neck and Shoulder
Balance Parameters Throughout 3-Year Follow-up
Period: Do They Remain the Same? Spine (Phila
Pa 1976). 2020;45(6):E319-E328. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0000000000003275
44. Sharma S, Andersen T, Wu C, et al. How well do
Radiologic Assessments of Truncal and Shoulder
Balance Correlate With Cosmetic Assessment Indices
in Lenke 1C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? Clin
Spine Surg. 2016;29(8):341-351. doi:10.1097/
BSD.0000000000000134
45. Chan CYW, Ch’ng PY, Lee SY, Chung WH, Chiu CK, Kwan
MK. Preoperative “Cervical Axis” Deviation Increases
the Risk of Distal Adding-On Following Surgery
in Lenke 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Patients .Global Spine J. 2021;2192568221998642.
doi:10.1177/2192568221998642
46. Yang Y, Yang M, Yang Z, et al. Postoperative neck tilt in
Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients after correction surgery:
a novel predictive index. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):405.. doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2792-9
47. Arlet V, Marchesi D, Papin P, Aebi M. Decompensation
following scoliosis surgery: treatment by decreasing
the correction of the main thoracic curve or “letting
the spine go”. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(2):156-160.
doi:10.1007/s005860050227
48. Jiang J, Qian BP, Qiu Y, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu ZZ. Full
fusion of proximal thoracic curve helps to prevent
postoperative cervical tilt in Lenke type 2 adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis patients with right-elevated
shoulder. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):362.
doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1730-y
49. Terheyden JH, Wetterkamp M, Gosheger G, et al. Predictors
of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(2):370-380.
doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5210-8.
50. Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN, Yang JH, Park SY. Analysis
of factors that affect shoulder balance after correction
surgery in scoliosis: a global analysis of all the
curvature types. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(6):1273-1285.
doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2697-5
51. Ghandhari H, Sabbaghan S, Nikouei F, Rahbarian F,
Tayebi H, Ameri E. Determinants of Pre-Operative
Shoulder Imbalance in Patients with Adolescent
Idiopathic Scoliosis. J. Res. Orthop. Sci. 2017;4 (1).
doi: 10.17795/soj-9614
52. Bram JT, Mehta N, Flynn JM, et al. Sinister! The high pre-op
left shoulder is less likely to be radiographically balanced
at 2 years post-op. Spine Deform. 2021;9(2):451-460.
doi:10.1007/s43390-020-00236-9
53. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Won DS, et al. Spontaneous
proximal thoracic curve correction after isolated fusion
of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(18):1966-
1975. doi:10.1097/00007632-200109150-00006
54. Zang L, Fan N, Hai Y, et al. Evaluation of the predictors
of postoperative aggravation of shoulder imbalance in
severe and rigid thoracic or thoracolumbar scoliosis.
Eur Spine J. 2016;25(10):3353-3365. doi:10.1007/
s00586-015-4313-3
55. Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee DH, Cho JH. Does fusion to T2
compared with T3/T4 lead to improved shoulder
balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a double
thoracic curve? J Pediatr Orthop B. 2019;28(1):32-39.
doi:10.1097/BPB.0000000000000520
56. Wei Chan CY, Chiu CK, Ng YH, et al. An analysis
of preoperative shoulder and neck balance and
surgical outcome in 111 adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis patients with two subtypes of Lenke
1 curves. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;34(1):37-44.
doi:10.3171/2020.5.SPINE20397
57. Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y, et al. How to
determine the upper level of instrumentation
in Lenke types 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis: a prospective study of 132 patients. J
Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(7):733-739. doi:10.1097/
BPO.0b013e318185a36b
58. Menon KV, Tahasildar N, Pillay HM, Anbuselvam
M, Jayachandran RK. Patterns of shoulder
imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:
a retrospective observational study. J Spinal
Disord Tech. 2014;27(7):401-408. doi:10.1097/
BSD.0000000000000166
59. Sielatycki JA, Cerpa M, Beauchamp EC, et al. The Amount
of Relative Curve Correction Is More Important Than
Upper Instrumented Vertebra Selection for Ensuring
Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Lenke Type 1 and
Type 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976). 2019;44(17):E1031-E1037. doi:10.1097/
BRS.0000000000003088
60. Yagi M, Takemitsu M, Machida M. Chest cage angle
difference and rotation of main thoracic curve are
independent risk factors of postoperative shoulder
imbalance in surgically treated patients with
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 2013;38(19):E1209-E1215. doi:10.1097/BRS.
0b013e31829e0309
61. Akazawa T, Kuroya S, Kotani T, et al. Anchor type at
upper instrumented vertebra and postoperative
shoulder imbalance in patients with Lenke type 1
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur J Orthop Surg
Traumatol. 2021;31(2):245-251. doi:10.1007/
s00590-020-02766-4
62. Trobisch PD, Ducoffe AR, Lonner BS, Errico TJ.
Choosing fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(9):519-
528. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-519
63. Rose PS, Lenke LG. Classification of operative
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment guidelines.
Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38(4):521-vi. doi:
10.1016/j.ocl.2007.06.001
64. Hiett A, Tung R, Emanuelli E, Sherman A, Anderson JT,
Schwend RM. The amount of surgical correction of the
main thoracic curve is the best predictor of postoperative
clinical shoulder balance in patients with Adolescent
Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020;8(6):1279-
1286. doi:10.1007/s43390-020-00147-9
65. Tang X, Luo X, Liu C, et al. The Spontaneous Development
of Cosmetic Shoulder Balance and Shorter Segment
Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With Lenke
I Curve: A Consecutive Study Followed Up for 2 to
5 Years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(12):1028-
1035. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001442
66. Jian YM, Yang SH, Hu MH. Assessment of Change
of Shoulder Balance in Patients with Adolescent
Idiopathic Scoliosis after Correctional Surgery. Orthop
Surg. 2018;10(3):198-204. doi:10.1111/os.12399
67. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee CS, et al. Indications of proximal
thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis: recognition and treatment of double
thoracic curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis treated with segmental instrumentation.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(18):2342-2349.
doi:10.1097/00007632-200009150-00012
68. Wang Y, Hansen ES, Høy K, Wu C, Bünger CE. Distal
adding-on phenomenon in Lenke 1A scoliosis:
risk factor identification and treatment strategy
comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(14):1113-
1122. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f51e95
69. Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton
PO. Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest
risk for adding-on... and why? Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 2012;37(16):1384-1390. doi:10.1097/BRS.
0b013e31824bac7a
Volume 10, Issue 12
December 2022
Pages 992-1003
  • Receive Date: 13 March 2022
  • Revise Date: 01 October 2022
  • Accept Date: 02 October 2022
  • First Publish Date: 14 November 2022