Is Only Peripheral Hip Arthroscopy Enough for Selected Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome?

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bezmialem Vakif University School of Medicine, Vatan Cd, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey

2 Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, Medical Teaching Institue, Hayatabad Medical Complex Pashawar, Pakistan


Background: Peripheral compartment hip arthroscopy has gained popularity over central compartment hip arthroscopy
as peripheral compartment arthroscopy does not cause perineal post compression, prolonged lower extremity traction
and thus complications such as acetabular labrum and articular cartilage injuries. The study, in essence, aims to
emphasize that peripheral hip arthroscopy (OPHA) alone is sufficient without an additional surgical method in the
treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI).
Methods: A total of 35 patients, being 21 female and 14 male, among a group of patients who were suffering from
FAI syndrome and applied to private hip conservatory centers and has undergone hip arthroscopy at a later stage
by a senior surgeon (I.T.) were selected from the medical-based software of the hospital. Patients with intra-articular
pathology as a result of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were excluded from the study. The group had a mean
age of 40.6, youngest being 17 and oldest 69, while the mean observation period was 26.6 months, varying between
shortest 6 months and longest 63. In order to assess the patient satisfaction as well as clinical outcomes, Postel Merle
d’Aubigné (PMA) score was used.
Results: When patient satisfaction was evaluated, overall decrease in pain was found and when gait characteristics
were evaluated together with movement, an increase in overall satisfaction was found (P<0.05). Secondary arthroscopic
procedures was not required in any of the patients included in this study. A group of three patients only needed some
additional surgical interventions like stem cell therapy, hip arthroplasty and pelvic osteotomy.
Conclusion: OPHA can provide adequate treatment in selected FAI patients as it allows us to avoid critical complications
such as damage to the cartilage, avascular necrosis, complications caused by traction and prolonged operation times
seen in central compartment arthroscopy.
Level of evidence: III


1. Martin RL, Kivlan BR, Christoforetti JJ, et al. Minimal
Clinically Important Difference and Substantial
Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International
Hip Outcome Tool. Arthroscopy.2019; 35(2):411-416.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.028.
2. Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, Leunig M, Ito K. The
acetabular labrum seal: A poroelastic finite element
model. Clin Biomech.2000; 15(6): 463-68. doi:
3. Nasser R, Domb B. Hip arthroscopy for
femoroacetabular impingement. EFORT Open
Rev.2018; 26;3(4):121-129. doi: 10.1302/2058-
4. Hartmann A, Günther KP. Arthroscopically assisted
anterior decompression for femoroacetabular
impingement: technique and early clinical results.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 129(8):1001-9. doi:
5. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Arthroscopic management of
femoroacetabular impingement: minimum 2-year
follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(10):1379-1388.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.018.
6. Leunig M, Beaulé PE, Ganz R. The concept of
femoroacetabular impingement: Current status and
future perspectives. Clin Orthop Relat Res.2009;
467(3):616-622. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0646-0.
7. Merle D’Aubigné R. Numerical classification of the
function of the hip. 1970. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice
Appar Mot.1990; 76 (6):371-4.
8. Ross JR, Larson CM, Bedi A. Indication for hip
arthroscopy. Sports Health.2017; 9(5): 402-413. doi:
9. Nwachukwu BU, Rebolledo BJ, McCormick F, Rosas
S, Harris JD, Kelly BT. Arthroscopic versus open
treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a
systemic review of medium to long term outcomes.
Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(4): 1062-68. doi:
10. Diaz-Ledezma C, Parvizi J. Surgical approaches for
cam femoroacetabular impingement: The use of
multicriteria decision analysis. Clin Orthop Relat
Res.2013; 471(8):2509–16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-
11. Dienst M, Gödde S, Seil R, Hammer D, Kohn D. Hip
arthroscopy without traction: in vivo anatomy of the
peripheral hip joint cavity. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17(9):
924-931. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.25342.
12. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H,
Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement:
a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop
Relat Res.2003;(417):112-120. doi: 10.1097/01.
13. Mella C, Villalón IE, Núñez Á􀆵 , Paccot D, Dí􀆴az-Ledezma
C. Hip arthroscopy and osteoarthritis: where are
the limits and indications? SICOT J.2015; 1: 27. doi:
14. Nepple JJ, Clohisy JC; ANCHOR Study Group Members.
Evolution of Femoroacetabular Impingement
Treatment: The ANCHOR Experience. Am J Orthop
(Belle Mead NJ).2017; 46(1):28-34.
15. Papavasiliou A.V, Bardakos NV. Complications of
arthroscopic surgery of the hip. Bone Joint Res.2012;
1(7): 131-144. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.17.2000108.
16. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Berlemann
U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip: a technique
with full access to the femoral head without the risk of
avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br.2001; 83(8):
1119-1124. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b8.11964.
Volume 10, Issue 12
December 2022
Pages 1044-1048
  • Receive Date: 08 December 2020
  • Revise Date: 07 April 2022
  • Accept Date: 09 April 2022
  • First Publish Date: 02 November 2022