Arthroscopic Allograft Bone Block Procedure with Remplissage For Bipolar Lesions

Document Type : TECHNICAL NOTE


1 The Rowley Bristow Unit, Ashford & St. Peter’s NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK

2 University College London, UK

3 University of Manchester, UK

4 1 The Rowley Bristow Unit, Ashford & St. Peter’s NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK- 4 Smart Health Unit, University of East London, London, UK


Anterior shoulder instability with bone loss is a challenging condition. The two most performed procedures, Bankart
repair & Latarjet, are not without issues. We describe a technique where arthroscopic free bone grafting was performed
in conjunction with remplissage. We feel that this combined arthroscopic procedure offers advantages that include
reduced risk of conventional Latarjet complications, including neurological deficits and metal hardware complications
while preserving subscapularis and coracoid. Furthermore, these advantages may not come at the cost of compromised
outcomes, particularly recurrence rate, as the remplissage may compensate for the possible lack of “sling effect” with
free bone graft reconstruction.
Level of evidence: V


1. Rashid MS, Arner JW, Millett PJ, Sugaya H, Emery
R. The Bankart repair: past, present, and future. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(12):e491-8. doi:
2. Imam MA, Shehata MS, Martin A, et al. Bankart repair
versus latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior
shoulder instability: a systematic review and metaanalysis
of 3275 shoulders. Am J Sports Med. 2021;
49(7):1945-53. doi: 10.1177/0363546520962082.
3. Di Giacomo G, Itoi E, Burkhart SS. Evolving concept
of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from
“engaging/non-engaging” lesion to “on-track/offtrack”
lesion. Arthroscopy: Arthroscopy. 2014;
30(1):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.004.
4. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF, Barth JR, Criswell T,
Roberts C, Richards DP. Results of modified Latarjet
reconstruction in patients with anteroinferior
instability and significant bone loss. Arthroscopy:
Arthroscopy. 2007; 23(10):1033-41. doi: 10.1016/j.
5. Hendy BA, Padegimas EM, Kane L, et al. Early
postoperative complications after Latarjet procedure:
a single-institution experience over 10 years. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021; 30(6):e300-8. doi:
6. Domos P, Lunini E, Walch G. Contraindications
and complications of the Latarjet procedure.
Shoulder Elbow. 2018; 10(1):15-24. doi:
7. Griesser MJ, Harris JD, McCoy BW, Hussain WM, Jones
MH, Miniaci A. Complications and re-operations after
Bristow-Latarjet shoulder stabilization: a systematic
review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(2):286-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.009.
8. Hurley ET, Matache BA, Wong I, et al. Anterior shoulder
instability part II-Latarjet, remplissage, and glenoid
bone-grafting-an international consensus statement.
Arthroscopy 2022; 38(2):224-233.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.
9. Wolf EM, Pollack ME. Hill-Sachs “Remplissage”: an
arthroscopic solution for the engaging Hill-Sachs
lesion (SS-32). Arthroscopy. 2004;20:e14-5. doi:
10. Koo SS, Burkhart SS, Ochoa E. Arthroscopic doublepulley
remplissage technique for engaging Hill-
Sachs lesions in anterior shoulder instability repairs.
Arthroscopy: Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(11):1343-8. doi:
11. Purchase RJ, Wolf EM, Hobgood ER, Pollock ME,
Smalley CC. Hill-Sachs “remplissage”: an arthroscopic
solution for the engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.
Arthroscopy: Arthroscopy. 2008; 24(6):723-6. doi:
12. Zhu YM, Lu Y, Zhang J, Shen JW, Jiang CY. Arthroscopic
Bankart repair combined with remplissage technique
for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with
engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: a report of 49 cases with
a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med.2011;
39(8):1640-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546511400018.
13. Auffarth A, Schauer J, Matis N, Kofier B, Hitzl W,
Resch H. The J-bone graft for anatomical glenoid
reconstruction in recurrent posttraumatic anterior
shoulder dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2008;
36(4):638-47. doi: 10.1177/0363546507309672.
14. Moroder P, Plachel F, Becker J, et al. A. Clinical
and radiological long-term results after implantfree,
autologous, iliac crest bone graft procedure
for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability.
Am J Sports Med.2018; 46(12):2975-80. doi:
15. Gilat R, Haunschild ED, Lavoie-Gagne OZ, et al.
Outcomes of the Latarjet procedure versus free
bone block procedures for anterior shoulder
instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49(3):805-16. doi:
16. Taverna E, Garavaglia G, Perfetti C, Ufenast H,
Sconfienza LM, Guarrella V. An arthroscopic bone
block procedure is effective in restoring stability,
allowing return to sports in cases of glenohumeral
instability with glenoid bone deficiency. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(12):3780-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4921-7.
17. Giles JW, Boons HW, Elkinson I, et al. Does the dynamic
sling effect of the Latarjet procedure improve shoulder
stability? A biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(6):821-7. doi: 10.1016/j.
18. Yamamoto N, Muraki T, An KN, et al. The stabilizing
mechanism of the Latarjet procedure: a cadaveric
study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(15):1390-7. doi:
19. Consigliere P, Morrissey N, Imam M, Narvani AA. The
tripod-pulley technique for arthroscopic remplissage
in engaging Hill-Sachs lesions. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;
6(5):e1675-84. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.038.
20. Taverna E, D’Ambrosi R, Perfetti C, Garavaglia G.
Arthroscopic bone graft procedure for anterior
inferior glenohumeral instability. Arthrosc Tech.
2014; 3(6):e653-60. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2014.08.002.
21. Murphy AI, Hurley ET, Hurley DJ, Pauzenberger L,
Mullett H. Long-term outcomes of the arthroscopic
Bankart repair: a systematic review of studies at
10-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;
28(11):2084-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.057.
22. Latarjet M. Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the
shoulder. Lyon Chir 1954; 49: 994–997.
23. Ekhtiari S, Horner NS, Bedi A, Ayeni OR,
Khan M. The learning curve for the Latarjet
procedure: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports
Med. 2018; 6(7):2325967118786930. doi:
24. Domos P, Lunini E, Walch G. Contraindications
and complications of the Latarjet procedure.
Shoulder Elbow. 2018; 10(1):15-24. doi:
25. Delaney RA, Freehill MT, Janfaza DR, Vlassakov KV,
Higgins LD, Warner JJ. 2014 Neer Award paper:
neuromonitoring the Latarjet procedure. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(10):1473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.
26. Siegert P, Plachel F, Akgün D, et al. Comparison of
Structural Subscapularis Integrity After Latarjet
Procedure Versus Iliac Crest Bone Graft Transfer.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8(10):2325967120958007.
doi: 10.1177/2325967120958007.
27. Eden R. Zur Operation der habituellen Schulterluxation
unter Mitteilung eines neuen Verfahrens bei Abriss
am inneren Pfannenrande. Deutsche Zeitschrift
für Chirurgie. 1918; 144(3):269-80. https://doi.
28. Hybbinette SR. De la transplantation d’un fragment
osseux pour remédier aux luxations récidivantes de
l’épaule: Constatations et résultats opératoires. Acta
Chir Scand. 1932; 71(411-445):26.
29. Kwapisz A, Fitzpatrick K, Cook JB, Athwal GS,
Tokish JM. Distal clavicular osteochondral autograft
augmentation for glenoid bone loss: a comparison
of radius of restoration versus Latarjet graft.
Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46(5):1046-52. doi:
30. Frank RM, Romeo AA, Richardson C, et al. Outcomes
of Latarjet versus distal tibia allograft for anterior
shoulder instability repair: a matched cohort
analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46(5):1030-8. doi:
31. Avramidis G, Kokkineli S, Trellopoulos A, et al.
Excellent clinical and radiological midterm outcomes
for the management of recurrent anterior shoulder
instability by all-arthroscopic modified Eden-
Hybinette procedure using iliac crest autograft and
double-pair button fixation system: 3-year clinical case
series with no loss to follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2021;
37(3):795-803. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.036.
32. Bhatia S, Van Thiel GS, Gupta D, et al. Comparison of
glenohumeral contact pressures and contact areas
after glenoid reconstruction with Latarjet or distal
tibial osteochondral allografts. Am J Sports Med. 2013;
41(8):1900-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546513490646.
Volume 10, Issue 10
October 2022
Pages 899-910
  • Receive Date: 18 March 2022
  • Revise Date: 31 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 13 August 2022
  • First Publish Date: 18 September 2022