Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing and Locked Plating for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femur Fractures: A Meta-Analysis and Quantitative Review



1 University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston UTMB John Sealy School of Medicine, Texas, USA

2 Boston VA Medical center, Boston, MA, USA

3 Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

4 All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India

5 Marshall Health, Huntington, USA


Background: As the prevalence of Total Knee Arthroplasty increases, there is still debate over the preferred method of 
treatment of supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures. The aim of this study was to compare two of the common 
methods of fixation: Locked Plating and Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing with respect to nonunion, delayed union and 
surgical revision rate.
Methods: A comprehensive database search via Pubmed was conducted, yielding 16 eligible studies. Six of those 
studies were comparative and were used in the meta-analysis section. All 16 studies were used in the pooled sample 
analysis section. The primary outcome analyzed was nonunion and delayed union rate while the secondary outcome 
was the surgical revision rate. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by 
comparing incidences of nonunion and delayed union, and surgical revision rates among the studies.
Results: The meta-analysis showed that there is no statistically significant difference among the two groups in terms of 
nonunion and delayed union rate (OR = 1.43, CI = 0.74, 2.74, P=0.28), but there is a significant difference in the surgical 
revision rate favoring locked plating over retrograde intramedullary nailing (OR = 2.71, CI = 1.42, 5.17, P=0.003). 
The pooled sample analysis showed that there is no significant difference in the nonunion and delayed union rates 
(P=0.210) or the surgical revision rates (P=0.038). 
Conclusion: Both locked plating and Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing are reliable options for treating supracondylar 
femoral fractures around Total Knee Arthroplasty. Locked plating demonstrated a trend towards decreased nonunion 
and delayed union rates and a significantly lower surgical revision rate in the meta-analysis. 
Level of evidence: IV


  1. Fingar KR SC. Most Frequent Operating Room Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2003–2012. Healthc Cost Util Proj HCUP Stat Briefs Internet Agency Healthc Res Qual US. 2014;
  2. Inacio MC, Paxton EW, Graves SE, Namba RS, Nemes S. Projected increase in total knee arthroplasty in the United States–an alternative projection model. Osteoarthritis and cartilage. 2017;25(11):1797-803.
  3. Yoo JD, Kim NK. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery & Related Research. 2015;27(1):1.
  4. Dennis DA. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:379–89.
  5. Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH, Kim TY. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the locking and non-locking plating methods. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014;22(11):2690-7.
  6. Wahnert D, Hoffmeier K, Frober R, Hofmann GO, Muckley T. Distal femur fractures of the elderly--different treatment options in a biomechanical comparison. Injury. 2011;42(7):655–9.
  7. Strauss EJ, Schwarzkopf R, Kummer F, Egol KA. The current status of locked plating: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2008;22(7):479-86.
  8. Herrera DA, Kregor PJ, Cole PA, Levy BA, Jönsson A, Zlowodzki M. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: systematic review of 415 cases (1981–2006). Acta Orthopaedica. 2008;79(1):22-7.
  9. Gliatis J, Megas P, Panagiotopoulos E, Lambiris E. Midterm results of treatment with a retrograde nail for supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the femur following total knee arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2005;19(3):164-70.
  10. Matlovich NF, Lanting BA, Vasarhelyi EM, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, Howard JL. Outcomes of surgical management of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. The journal of arthroplasty. 2017;32(1):189-92.
  11. Meneghini RM, Keyes BJ, Reddy KK, Maar DC. Modern retrograde intramedullary nails versus periarticular locked plates for supracondylar femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2014;29(7):1478-81.
  12. Ebraheim NA, Liu J, Hashmi SZ, Sochacki KR, Moral MZ, Hirschfeld AG. High complication rate in locking plate fixation of lower periprosthetic distal femur fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2012;27(5):809-13.
  13. Eschbach D, Buecking B, Kivioja H, Fischer M, Wiesmann T, Zettl R, et al. One year after proximal or distal periprosthetic fracture of the femur -two conditions with divergent outcomes? Injury. 2018;49(6):1176-82.
  14. Gavaskar AS, Tummala NC, Subramanian M. The outcome and complications of the locked plating management for the periprosthetic distal femur fractures after a total knee arthroplasty. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2013;5(2):124-8.
  15. Gondalia V, Choi DH, Lee SC, Nam CH, Hwang BH, Ahn HS, et al. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty: clinical comparison and related complications of the femur plate system and retrograde-inserted supracondylar nail. Vol. 15, J Orthop Traumatol. 2014;15(3):201-7.
  16. Han HS, Oh KW, Kang SB. Retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. Clinics in orthopedic surgery. 2009;1(4):201-6.
  17. Hoellwarth JS, Fourman MS, Crossett L, Goodman M, Siska P, Moloney GB, et al. Equivalent mortality and complication rates following periprosthetic distal femur fractures managed with either lateral locked plating or a distal femoral replacement. Injury. 2018;49(2):392-7.
  18. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Koenig SJ, Tornetta III P. Outcome of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty. Injury. 2012;43(7):1084-9..
  19. Horneff III JG, ScolAro JA, JAfArI SM, MIrzA A, PArvIzI J, MehtA S. Intramedullary nailing versus locked plate for treating supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. Orthopedics. 2013;36(5):e561-6.
  20. Hou Z, Bowen TR, Irgit K, Strohecker K, Matzko ME, Widmaier J, Smith WR. Locked plating of periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2012;26(7):427-32.
  21. Large TM, Kellam JF, Bosse MJ, Sims SH, Althausen P, Masonis JL. Locked plating of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2008;23(6):115-20.
  22. Lee SS, Lim SJ, Moon YW, Seo JG. Outcomes of long retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2014;134(1):47-52.
  23. Lotzien S, Hoberg C, Hoffmann MF, Schildhauer TA. Clinical outcome and quality of life of patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures and retained total knee arthroplasty treated with polyaxial locking plates: a single-center experience. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2019;29(1):189-96.
  24. Ebraheim NA, Kelley LH, Liu X, Thomas IS, Steiner RB, Liu J. Periprosthetic distal femur fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthopaedic surgery. 2015;7(4):297-305.
  25. Aldrian S, Schuster R, Haas N, Erhart J, Strickner M, Blutsch B, et al. Fixation of supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty: is there any difference comparing angular stable plate fixation versus rigid interlocking nail fixation?. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2013;133(7):921-7.