Comparing the Results of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Vs Tibio-talar Fusion (Ankle Arthrodesis) in Patients with Ankle Osteoarthritis since 2006- A Systematic Review

Document Type : SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

1 University of Oxford NHS Foundation Trust. Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Rd, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK

2 University of Oxford NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

3 Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Surrey Hospital, Canada Ave, Redhill RH1 5RH, UK

4 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 7LD, UK

5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Background: This study compares the outcomes of patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and tibiotalar 
fusion (ankle arthrodesis) in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis. The primary outcome assessed was Patient 
Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS); secondary outcomes included the incidence of revision, re-operation, and 
complications.
Methods: A systematic review of studies examining the outcomes of patients undergoing TAA and/or tibiotalar fusion 
from 2006 to 2020 was conducted. Individual cohort studies and randomized control trials were included. Outcomes 
were assessed at two and five years.
Results: 21 studies were included: 16 arthroplasty (2,016 patients) and 5 arthrodesis (256 patients) studies. No 
significant difference in PROMS was evident two years post-surgery – American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society 
(AOFAS) scores were 78.8 (95% CI-confidence interval: 76.6-80.8; n=1548) and 80.8 (95% CI: 80.1-81.5; n=206 
patients) for the arthroplasty and arthrodesis groups respectively. Two years post-surgery the revision rates for the 
arthroplasty and arthrodesis groups were similar – 3.5% (n=9) and 3.7% (n=61) respectively (OR-odds ratio: 1.05; 95% 
CI: 0.51-2.13); however, the re-operation rate was 2.5 times higher for the arthroplasty group (12.2%) in comparison to 
the arthrodesis group (5.1%) (OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.43-4.62). Documented complications in the arthroplasty group were 
half those documented in the arthrodesis group two years post-surgery (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.77). No arthrodesis 
studies were found which contained mean 5-year follow-up data within the study period.
Conclusion: Despite recent developments in TAA design, we found no clear evidence as to their superiority over ankle 
arthrodesis when considering patient outcomes two years postoperatively. However, this conclusion could be debatable 
in some types of patients such as diabetic patients, posttraumatic patients and patients with stiff hindfoot and midfoot.
Level of Evidence: III

Keywords

References

  1. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1899-905.
  2. Bianchi A, Martinelli N, Hosseinzadeh M, Flore J, Minoli C, Malerba F, et al. Early clinical and radiological evaluation in patients with total ankle replacement performed by lateral approach and peroneal osteotomy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):1-8.
  3. Gaudot F, Colombier JA, Bonnin M, Judet T. A controlled, comparative study of a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 35(2):131–40.
  4. Summers JC, Bedi HS. Reoperation and patient satisfaction after the Mobility total ankle arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(5):371–5.
  5. Gross C, Erickson BJ, Adams SB, Parekh SG. Ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement: a systematic review of the literature. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8(2):143–51.
  6. Rosello Anon A, Martinez Garrido I, Cervera Deval J, Herrero Mediavilla D, Sanchez Gonzalez M, Vicent Carsi V. Total ankle replacement in patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: Clinical results and kinetic gait analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20(3):195–200.
  7. Usuelli FG, Di Silvestri CA, D’Ambrosi R, Orenti A, Randelli F. Total ankle replacement: is pre-operative varus deformity a predictor of poor survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes? Int Orthop. 2019;43(1):243–9.
  8. Kerkhoff YR, Kosse NM, Metsaars WP, Louwerens JW. Long-term functional and radiographic outcome of a mobile bearing ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(12):1292–302.
  9. Tan JA, Bajuri MY, Leong JF, Levin KB, Alias A. Total ankle replacement for treatment of avascular necrosis of the talus. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2018;11(8):1–2.
  10. King A, Bali N, Kassam AA, Hughes A, Talbot N, Sharpe I. Early outcomes and radiographic alignment of the Infinity total ankle replacement with a minimum of two year follow-up data. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019; 25(6):826-33.
  11. Cottom JM, Plemmons BS, Douthett SM. Relationship between body mass index and complications in total ankle arthroplasty: A single surgeon’s experience in ninety-seven replacements. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019; 58(4):687-91.
  12. Queen RM, Sparling TL, Butler RJ, Adams Jr SB, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, et al. Patient-reported outcomes, function, and gait mechanics after fixed and mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(12):987–93.
  13. Ramaskandhan JR, Kakwani R, Kometa S, Bettinson K, Siddique MS. Two-year outcomes of MOBILITY total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(7):e53.
  14. Lampley A, Gross CE, Green CL, DeOrio JK, Easley M, Adams S, et al. Association of Cigarette Use and Complication Rates and Outcomes Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37(10):1052-9.
  15. Duan X, Yang L, Yin L. Arthroscopic arthrodesis for ankle arthritis without bone graft. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11(1):154.
  16. Morasiewicz P, Dejnek M, Orzechowski W, Urbanski W, Kulej M, Dragan SL, et al. Clinical evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation and internal fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):167.
  17. Harston A, Lazarides AL, Adams Jr. SB, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley 2nd JA. Midterm outcomes of a fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty with deformity analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(12):1295-300.
  18. Johnson-Lynn SE, Ramaskandhan J, Siddique MS. The effect of patient age and diagnosis on the 5-year outcomes of mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. Foot. 2018;36:1–5.
  19. Gramlich Y, Neun O, Klug A, Buckup J, Stein T, Neumann A, et al. Total ankle replacement leads to high revision rates in post-traumatic end-stage arthrosis. Int Orthop. 2018;42(10):2375–81.
  20. Lawton CD, Butler BA, Dekker 2nd RG, Prescott A, Kadakia AR. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis-a comparison of outcomes over the last decade. J Orthop Surg. 2017;12(1):76.
  21. Hunt KJ, Lakey E. Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2018; 49(2):277-89.
  22. Kitaoka HB, Meeker JE, Phisitkul P, Adams SB, Kaplan JR, Wagner E. AOFAS position statement regarding patient-reported outcome measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2018; 39(12):1389-93.
  23. Ho B, Houck JR, Flemister AS, Ketz J, Oh I, Digiovanni BF, et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37(9):911-8.
  24. Liebs TR, Splietker F, Hassenpflug J. Is a revision a revision? An analysis of National Arthroplasty Registries’ definitions of revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473(11):3421-30.
  25. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2143–9.
  26. Sangeorzan BJ. Comparing ankle fusion to ankle replacement - No Study Results Posted - ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. [cited 2020 Oct 21]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01620541
  27. Muller P, Skene SS, Chowdhury K, Cro S, Goldberg AJ, Doré CJ, et al. A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): Statistical analysis plan. Trials. 2020; 21(1):197.
  28. Schuh R, Hofstaetter JG, Hofstaetter SG, Adams SB Jr, Kristen KH, Trnka HJ. Plantar pressure distribution after tibiotalar arthrodesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011;26(6):620-5.
  29. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis. Comparison of sports, recreational activities and functional outcome. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(6):1207-14.
  30. Ross BJ, Savage-Elliott I, Wu VJ, Rodriguez RF. Complications following total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for primary ankle osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Spec. 2021:1938640020987741.
  31. Sanders AE, Kraszewski AP, Ellis SJ, Queen R, Backus SI, Hillstrom H, et al. Differences in gait and stair ascent after total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42(3):347-55.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 10, Issue 6
June 2022
Pages 40-479

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 February 2021
  • Revise Date: 08 September 2021
  • Accept Date: 15 September 2021
  • First Publish Date: 16 September 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics