Effects of Innovative Aquatic Proprioceptive Training on Knee Proprioception in Athletes with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran - Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Proprioceptive training in the aquatic environment is more beneficial owing to water properties. The
primary goal of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of the incorporation of innovative aquatic
proprioceptive training into conventional accelerated land-based rehabilitation protocol in knee function and joint
position sense in male athletes after anterior cruciate ligamen t reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods: A total of 38 athlete male athletes with ACLR were randomly assigned to two rehabilitation groups. The
conventional therapy group (CT) (n=19) received conventional rehabilitation for 6 weeks, while the hydrotherapy
group (HT) (n=19) received the same conventional rehabilitation, in addition to 12 sessions of innovative aquatic
proprioceptive training. The outcomes included the joint position sense (JPS) errors, visual analog scale (VAS), and
international knee documentation committee (IKDC). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used
to compare the means between the two groups. Cohen’s d from an independent t-test was used to calculate the
effect sizes for all variables after the intervention for both gr oups.
Results: Base on the results, there were a significant difference in absolute errors (AE) (FAE=56.231, p <0.001)
and variable errors (VE) (FVE=60.245, p <0.001) between the two groups. No significant differences were detected
in constant error (CE), VAS, and IKDC between the two groups (P>0.05). Both groups displayed a significant
difference in terms of AE, VE, VAS, and IKDC after the intervention (p <0.05). Percent changes after the intervention
for AE(69.19%), VE (68.20%), CE (65.20%), VAS37.50%, and IKDC (38.61%) were greater in the HT group,
compared to the CT group.
Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, innovative aquatic proprioceptive training incorporate into the
conventional rehabilitation accelerated protocol offers the improvement of proprioception efficiency for individuals
with ACL reconstruction. Therefore, it could be useful to clinicians when designing rehabilitation protocol to ensure
the optimal engagement of proprioception.
Level of evidence: I

Keywords


1. Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson
DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA, et al. Incidence of Anterior
Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-
Year Population-Based Study. Am J Sports Med2016
Jun;44(6):1502-7.
2. Solomonow M, Krogsgaard M. Sensorimotor control
of knee stability. A review. Scand J Med Sci Sports2001
Apr;11(2):64-80.
3. Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Giraldo JL, Fu FH. The
role of proprioception in the management and
rehabilitation of athletic injuries. Am J Sports
Med1997 Jan-Feb;25(1):130-7.
4. Beasley LS WD, Vidal AF, Chhabra A, Herzka AS, Feng
MT, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:
a literature review of the anatomy, biomechanics,
surgical considerations, and clinical outcomes. Oper
Tech Orthop2005;15: 5-19.
5. Bonfim TR, Jansen Paccola CA, Barela JA. Proprioceptive
and behavior impairments in individuals with
anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil2003 Aug;84(8):1217-23.
6. Barrack RLL, P.J. & Skinner, H.B. Knee joint
proprioception revisited. Journal of Sports
Medicine1994;3(1):18-43.
7. Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The Sensorimotor System,
Part II: The Role of Proprioception in Motor Control
and Functional Joint Stability. J Athl Train2002
Jan;37(1):80-4.
8. Jiang L, Wang Y, Huang W. The effect of proprioception
training on knee kinematics after anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction. Research Square; 2020.
9. Becker BE. Aquatic therapy: scientific foundations
and clinical rehabilitation applications. PM R2009
Sep;1(9):859-72.
10. Genuario SE, Vegso JJ. The use of a swimming pool
in the rehabilitation and reconditioning of athletic
injuries. Contemp Orthop1990 Apr;20(4):381-7.
11. Ross CA, Clifford A, Louw QA. Factors informing
fear of reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction. Physiother Theory Pract2017 Feb;
33(2):103-14.
12. Peultier-Celli LM, D. Wein, F. Paris, N. Boisseau, P.
Ferry, A. Gueguen, R. Chary-Valckenaere, I. Paysant, J.
Perrin, P. Comparison of an Innovative Rehabilitation,
Combining Reduced Conventional Rehabilitation with
Balneotherapy, and a Conventional Rehabilitation
after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in
Athletes. Front Surg2017;4:61.
13. Zamarioli A, Pezolato, A., Mieli, E., & Shimano, A.
The significance of water rehabilitation in patients
with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Physiotherapy2008;16(2).
14. Momberg BL, Louw, C., & Crous, L. Accelerated
hydrotherapy and land-based rehabilitation in
soccer players after anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction: a series of three single subject
case studies. South African Journal of Sports
Medicine2008;20(4):109-14.
15. Boca IC, and Mirela Dan. The effectiveness of
proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques
and hidrotherapy to improve knee stability after
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports
Med2013;47(10 ):e3-e.
16. Tovin BJ, Wolf SL, Greenfield BH, Crouse J, Woodfin
BA. Comparison of the effects of exercise in water and
on land on the rehabilitation of patients with intraarticular
anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
Phys Ther1994 Aug;74(8):710-9.
17. van Grinsven SvC, R. E. Holla, C. J. van Loon, C. J.
Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports
Traumatol Arthrosc2010 Aug;18(8):1128-44.
18. Beynnon BD, Renstrom, P. A., Konradsen, L., Elmqvist,
L. G., Gottlieb, D., & Dirks, M. (2000). Validation of
Techniques to Measure Knee Proprioception. In S.
M. Lephart & F. H. Fu (Eds.), Proprioception and
Neuromuscular Control in Joint Stability (pp. 127-
138). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
19. Pawlak D, Wysota A, Furmanek M, Ficek K, Juras G.
Knee joint position sense in physically active patients
after ACL reconstruction. Central European Journal of
Sport Sciences and Medicine2014;7(3):65-72.
20. Olsson L, H. LUND, M. HENRIKSEN,, H. ROGIND HB, B.
DANNESKIOLD. Test/retest Reliability of a Knee Joint
PositionSense Measurement Method in Sitting and
Prone Position. Advances in Physiotherapy2004;6(1).
21. Von Korff M, Jensen MP, Karoly P. Assessing global
pain severity by self-report in clinical and health
services research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2000 Dec
15;25(24):3140-51.
22. Anderson AF, C. F. Federspiel, and R. B. Snyder.
Evaluation of knee ligament rating systems. Am J
Knee Surg 621993:67-73.
23. Ebrahimzadeh MHM, H. Golhasani-Keshtan, F.
Rabani, S. Birjandinejad, A. The International Knee
Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Short
Form: a validity and reliability study. Knee Surg Sports
Traumatol Arthrosc2015 Nov;23(11):3163-7.
24. Geigle PR, Cheek, W. L., Gould, M. L., Hunt, H. C., and
Shafiq, B. Aquatic physical therapy for balance: the
interaction of somatosensory and hydrodynamic
principles. The Journal of Aquatic Physical
Therapy1997;5(1):4-10.
25. Benfield RD, Herman J, Katz VL, Wilson SP, Davis
JM. Hydrotherapy in labor. Res Nurs Health2001
Feb;24(1):57-67.
Volume 9, Issue 5
September and October 2021
Pages 519-526
  • Receive Date: 01 July 2020
  • Revise Date: 13 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 19 November 2020