The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon vs Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Mean Follow-up of 15 Years

Document Type : SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors
Connor G. Hoge 1
Robert N. Matar 1
Lafi S. Khalil 2
John A. Buchan 1
Cole M. Johnson 1
Brian M. Grawe 1
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
10.22038/abjs.2021.53662.2668
Abstract
Background: The two most common surgical treatment modalities for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction 
(ACL), patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring tendon (HS) autografts, have been shown to have outcomes that are both 
similar and favorable; however, many of these are short or intermediate-term. The objective of this systematic review 
is to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum 10-year follow-up data to compare the long-term 
outcomes of ACL reconstructions performed using PT and HS autografts.
Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses) guidelines. A search of three databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) was performed to identify RCTs 
with a minimum of 10-year follow-up that compared clinical and/or functional outcomes between PT and HS autografts. 
Results: Four RCTs with a total of 299 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up ranged from 10.2 to 17 
years (mean, 14.79 years). No significant differences in knee laxity or clinical outcome scores were demonstrated in 
any of the studies. One study found that PT autografts were significantly more likely to have osteoarthritis identified by 
radiographic findings. Two studies found that patients with PT autografts reported increase kneeling pain, while none of 
the four studies reported a difference in anterior knee pain. There were no significant differences in graft failure rates.
Conclusion: This review demonstrates no long-term difference in clinical or functional outcomes between PT and HS 
autografts. However, radiographic and subjective outcomes indicate that patients with PT autografts may experience 
greater kneeling pain and osteoarthritis. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons should consider patient-centric factors when 
discussing graft options with patients.
Level of evidence: II
Keywords
Anterior cruciate ligament
Autografts
Hamstring tendon autograft
Patellar tendon autograft
  1. Mall NA, Chalmers PN, Moric M, Tanaka MJ, Cole BJ, Bach Jr BR, et al. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. The American journal of sports medicine. 2014;42(10):2363-70.
  2. Gifstad T, Sole A, Strand T, Uppheim G, Grontvedt T, Drogset JO. Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(3):576-83.
  3. Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ. A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):384-94.
  4. Mohtadi N, Chan D, Barber R, Oddone Paolucci E. A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Tendon, Hamstring Tendon, and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions: Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes at a Minimal 2-Year Follow-up. Clin J Sport Med. 2015;25(4):321-31.
  5. Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind M. Comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a nationwide population-based cohort study: results from the danish registry of knee ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):278-84.
  6. Dhammi IK, Rehan Ul H, Kumar S. Graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(2):127-8.
  7. Magnussen RA, Carey JL, Spindler KP. Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(3):462-72.
  8. Poehling-Monaghan KL, Salem H, Ross KE, Secrist E, Ciccotti MC, Tjoumakaris F, et al. Long-Term Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Autografts. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(6):2325967117709735.
  9. Sajovic M, Vengust V, Komadina R, Tavcar R, Skaza K. A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):1933-40.
  10. Sajovic M, Strahovnik A, Dernovsek MZ, Skaza K. Quality of life and clinical outcome comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2161-9.
  11. Holm I, Oiestad BE, Risberg MA, Aune AK. No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(3):448-54.
  12. Webster KE, Feller JA, Hartnett N, Leigh WB, Richmond AK. Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 15-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):83-90.
  13. Sajovic M, Stropnik D, Skaza K. Long-term Comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 17-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(8):1800-8.
  14. Bjornsson H, Samuelsson K, Sundemo D, Desai N, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial With Mean 16-Year Follow-up Comparing Hamstring and Patellar Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(9):2304-13.
  15. Harris JD, Quatman CE, Manring MM, Siston RA, Flanigan DC. How to write a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2761-8.
  16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41.
  17. Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD. Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000;10(1):2-11.
  18. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Lattermann C, Ma CB. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(6):821-30.
  19. Sanders TL, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, Fruth KM, Larson DR, Pareek A, et al. Is Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Effective in Preventing Secondary Meniscal Tears and Osteoarthritis? Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1699-707.
  20. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Kannus P, Kaplan M, Samani J, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(9):1503-13.
  21. Cristiani R, Sarakatsianos V, Engstrom B, Samuelsson K, Forssblad M, Stalman A. Increased knee laxity with hamstring tendon autograft compared to patellar tendon autograft: a cohort study of 5462 patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(2):381-8.
  22. Thompson SM, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Linklater J, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA. Twenty-Year Outcome of a Longitudinal Prospective Evaluation of Isolated Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon or Hamstring Autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(12):3083-94.
  23. Barenius B, Nordlander M, Ponzer S, Tidermark J, Eriksson K. Quality of life and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft or quadrupled semitendinosus graft: an 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(8):1533-41.
  24. Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):890-7.
  25. Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, et al. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74(6):594-9.
  26. Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Ferraro RA, Schairer WW, Steinhaus ME, Allen AA. How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(12):2325967116673971.
  27. Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton JE, Keays AC, Newcombe PA, Bullock MI. A 6-year follow-up of the effect of graft site on strength, stability, range of motion, function, and joint degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and Gracilis tendon graft. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(5):729-39.
  28. Ibrahim SA, Al-Kussary IM, Al-Misfer AR, Al-Mutairi HQ, Ghafar SA, El Noor TA. Clinical evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus gracilis and semitendinosus autograft. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(4):412-7.
  29. Wipfler B, Donner S, Zechmann CM, Springer J, Siebold R, Paessler HH. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(5):653-65.
  30. Laboute E, James-Belin E, Puig PL, Trouve P, Verhaeghe E. Graft failure is more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(12):3537-46.
  31. Persson A, Fjeldsgaard K, Gjertsen JE, Kjellsen AB, Engebretsen L, Hole RM, et al. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):285-91.
  32. Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2015;22(2):100-10.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 10, Issue 4
April 2022
Pages 311-319

  • Receive Date 10 December 2020
  • Accept Date 24 July 2021