The Use of Calcium Sulphate Beads in the Management of Osteomyelitis of Femur and Tibia: A Systematic Review

Document Type : SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

1 ja Krkovic PhD FRCS1 1 Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom

2 School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom

3 Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Calcium sulphate is a recent alternative for delayed antibiotic elution in infected bones and joints. The 
purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of antibiotic impregnated calcium sulphate (AICS) beads in the management 
of infected tibia and femur, with regards to patient outcomes and complication rates (including reinfection rate, remission 
rate and union rate).
Methods: Searches of AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted 
in June 2020, with the mesh terms: “Calcium sulphate beads” or “Calcium sulfate beads” or “antibiotic beads” or 
“Stimulan” AND “Bone infection” or “Osteomyelitis” or “Debridement” AND “Tibia” or “Femur”. Risk of bias was assessed 
using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of interventions (ROBINS-i) tool, and quality assessed via the 
Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.
Results: Out of 104 relevant papers, 10 met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. Total infection remission was 
6.8%, which was greater than that of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA, 21.2%). Complication rates varied. The main 
issue regarding AICS use was wound drainage, which was considerably higher in studies involving treatment of tibia 
alone. Studies using PMMA did not experience this issue, but there were a few incidences of superficial pin tract 
infection following surgery.
Conclusion: Where AICS was used, it was consistently effective at infection eradication, despite variation in causative 
organism and location of bead placement. Wound drainage varied and was higher in papers regarding tibial cases alone.
Level of evidence: III

Keywords

References

  1. Dellinger EP, Miller SD, Wertz MJ, Grypma M, Droppert B, Anderson PA. Risk of infection after open fracture of the arm or leg. Archives of surgery. 1988;123(11):1320-7.
  2. Lew DP, Waldvogel FA. Osteomyelitis. The Lancet. 2004;364(9431):369-79.
  3. Buchman J, Blair JE. Penicillin in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: A preliminary report. Archives of Surgery. 1945;51(2):81-92.
  4. Orr HW. The treatment of acute osteomyelitis by drainage and rest. JBJS. 1927;9(4):733-9.
  5. Trueta J. Treatment of war wounds and fractures. British medical journal. 1942;1(4245):616.
  6. Stark WJ. The use of pedicled muscle flaps in the surgical treatment of chronic osteomyelitis resulting from compound fractures. JBJS. 1946;28(2):343-50.
  7. Cierny Iii G, Mader JT, Penninck JJ. The classic: a clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2003;414:7-24.
  8. Pincher B, Fenton C, Jeyapalan R, Barlow G, Sharma HK. A systematic review of the single-stage treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2019;14(1):1-8.
  9. Wahl P, Guidi M, Benninger E, Rönn K, Gautier E, Buclin T, et al. The levels of vancomycin in the blood and the wound after the local treatment of bone and soft-tissue infection with antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate as carrier material. The bone & joint journal. 2017;99(11):1537-44.
  10. Walenkamp GH, Kleijn LL, de Leeuw M. Osteomyelitis treated with gentamicin-PMMA beads: 100 patients followed for 1–12 years. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1998;69(5):518-22.
  11. Boyd D, Towler MR. The processing, mechanical properties and bioactivity of zinc based glass ionomer cements. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2005;16(9):843-50.
  12. Abosala A, Ali M. The use of calcium sulphate beads in periprosthetic joint infection, a systematic review. Journal of bone and joint infection. 2020;5(1):43-9.
  13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
  14. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2009;62(10):e1-34.
  15. Zhou CH, Ren Y, Ali A, Meng XQ, Zhang HA, Fang J, et al. Single-stage treatment of chronic localized tibial osteomyelitis with local debridement and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation: a retrospective study of 42 patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2020;15:1-0.
  16. McNally MA, Ferguson JY, Lau AC, Diefenbeck M, Scarborough M, Ramsden AJ, et al. Single-stage treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with a new absorbable, gentamicin-loaded, calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite biocomposite: a prospective series of 100 cases. The bone & joint journal. 2016;98(9):1289-96.
  17. Ferguson JY, Dudareva M, Riley ND, Stubbs D, Atkins BL, McNally MA. The use of a biodegradable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate carrier containing tobramycin for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a series of 195 cases. The bone & joint journal. 2014;96(6):829-36.
  18. Humm G, Noor S, Bridgeman P, David M, Bose D. Adjuvant treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the tibia following exogenous trauma using OSTEOSET®-T: a review of 21 patients in a regional trauma centre. Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction. 2014;9(3):157-61.
  19. Ferrando A, Part J, Baeza J. Treatment of cavitary bone defects in chronic osteomyelitis: bioactive glass S53P4 vs. calcium sulphate antibiotic beads. Journal of bone and joint infection. 2017;2(4):194-201.
  20. Chan YS, Ueng SW, Wang CJ, Lee SS, Chao EK, Shin CH. Management of small infected tibial defects with antibiotic-impregnated autogenic cancellous bone grafting. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 1998;45(4):758-64.
  21. Qiu XS, Chen YX, Qi XY, Shi HF, Wang JF, Xiong J. Outcomes of cement beads and cement spacers in the treatment of bone defects associated with post-traumatic osteomyelitis. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2017;18(1):1-6.
  22. Sun PQ, Ma Y, Zhang YC, Cheng MG. Application of antibiotic impregnated beads on the patients with tibial chronic osteomyelitis. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018;31(6):2783–6.
  23. Sancineto CF, Barla JD. Treatment of long bone osteomyelitis with a mechanically stable intramedullar antibiotic dispenser: nineteen consecutive cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2008;65(6):1416-20.
  24. McHale KA, Ross AE. Treatment of infected tibial nonunions with debridement, antibiotic beads, and the Ilizarov method. Military medicine. 2004;169(9):728-34.
  25. Kallala R, Haddad FS. Hypercalcaemia following the use of antibiotic-eluting absorbable calcium sulphate beads in revision arthroplasty for infection. The bone & joint journal. 2015;97(9):1237-41.
  26. McPherson E, Dipane M, Sherif S. Dissolvable antibiotic beads in treatment of periprosthetic joint infection and revision arthroplasty-the use of synthetic pure calcium sulfate (Stimulan®) impregnated with vancomycin & tobramycin. Reconstructive Review. 2013;3(1).
  27. Lum ZC, Pereira GC. Local bio-absorbable antibiotic delivery in calcium sulfate beads in hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedics. 2018;15(2):676-8.
  28. Kallala R, Harris WE, Ibrahim M, Dipane M, McPherson E. Use of Stimulan absorbable calcium sulphate beads in revision lower limb arthroplasty: safety profile and complication rates. Bone & joint research. 2018;7(10):570-9.
  29. Menon A, Soman R, Rodrigues C, Phadke S, Agashe VM. Careful interpretation of the wound status is needed with use of antibiotic impregnated biodegradable synthetic pure calcium sulfate beads: Series of 39 cases. Journal of bone and joint infection. 2018;3(2):87-93.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 10, Issue 4
April 2022
Pages 320-327

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 26 November 2020
  • Revise Date: 08 April 2021
  • Accept Date: 24 July 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics