The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery

Comparative Analysis of Arthroscopic Tight Rope ACL Reconstruction Using four Strand Isolated Semitendinosus Graft and Quadrupled Combined Hamstring Graft

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors
Ramesh Kumar 1
Dushyant Chouhan 2
Amit Narang 2
Mukesh Kalra 2
Ranjeet Choudhary 3
Ankush Kumar 2
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi
2 Department of Orthopedics, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi
3 Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur
10.22038/abjs.2021.49619.2463
Abstract
Background: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft is a quite a popular surgical procedure. 
But there is a conflict regarding the use of isolated semitendinosus graft or a combined hamstring graft. We did a 
comparative analysis of the functional outcome after ACL reconstruction performed with four strand semitendinosus 
graft and a combined hamstring graft over tightrope.
Methods: Two groups of 30 patients each with similar demographic profiles, presenting with symptoms of instability 
after chronic ACL tear were included. A standard single bundle arthroscopic ACL reconstruction was performed by using 
four-strand semitendinosus graft in Group A and combined hamstring graft in Group B patients. Clinical and functional 
outcome analysis was done using quantitative anterior tibial translation measurement and Lysholm score. 
Results: The mean age of subjects in group A was 29 years and in Group B was 28 years. The semitendinosus 
graft length was insufficient in 13.33% cases in group A. The improvement in Lysholm score and the decrease in the 
tibial translation were comparable in both the groups at one year of follow-up. No added comorbidities were noted in 
additional removal of gracilis tendon in group B patients.
Conclusion: Isolated semitendinosus four-strand autograft can be used for arthroscopic single bundle ACL 
reconstruction when adequate graft length is obtained. However, one should not be hesitant in additional removal of 
gracilis tendon when needed. In terms of functional outcome and patient satisfaction, both the graft configurations stand 
the same.
Level of evidence: I
Keywords
Combined Hamstring graft
Four-strand semitendinosus
Single bundle ACL reconstruction
  1. Lawhorn KW, Howell SM. Scientific justification and technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous and allogeneic soft-tissue grafts. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2003; 34(1):19-30.
  2. Muramatsu K, Hachiya Y, Izawa H. Serial evaluation of human anterior cruciate ligament grafts by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of allografts and autografts. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2008; 24(9):1038-44.
  3. Jost PW, Dy CJ, Robertson CM, Kelly AM. Allograft use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HSS Journal®. 2011; 7(3):251-6.
  4. Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Brown Jr CH, Hayes WC. Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation: comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. The American journal of sports medicine. 1994; 22(2):240-7.
  5. Gobbi A, Domzalski M, Pascual J, Zanazzo M. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is it necessary to sacrifice the gracilis? Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2005; 21(3):275-80.
  6. Makihara Y, Nishino A, Fukubayashi T, Kanamori A. Decrease of knee flexion torque in patients with ACL reconstruction: combined analysis of the architecture and function of the knee flexor muscles. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2006; 14(4):310-7.
  7. Gobbi A, Francisco R. Quadruple semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2005; 20(3):203-6.
  8. Henry BM, Tomaszewski KA, Pękala PA, Graves MJ, Pękala JR, Sanna B, et al. Oblique incisions in hamstring tendon harvesting reduce iatrogenic injuries to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2018; 26(4):1197-203.
  9. Lanternier H, de Cussac JB, Collet T. Short medial approach harvesting of hamstring tendons. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2016; 102(2):269-72.
  10. Vinagre G, Kennedy NI, Chahla J, Cinque ME, Hussain ZB, Olesen ML, et al. Hamstring graft preparation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy techniques. 2017; 6(6):e2079-84.
  11. Carmont MR, Scheffler S, Spalding T, Brown J, Sutton PM. Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine. 2011; 4(2):65-72.
  12. Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H. The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2000; 8(1):36-9.
  13. Yu B, Garrett WE. Mechanisms of non-contact ACL injuries. British journal of sports medicine. 2007; 41(suppl 1):i47-51.
  14. Millett PJ, Willis AA, Warren RF. Associated injuries in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament tears: does a delay in treatment increase the risk of meniscal tear? Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2002; 18(9):955-9.
  15. Chaudhari AM, Briant PL, Bevill SL, Koo S, Andriacchi TP. Knee kinematics, cartilage morphology, and osteoarthritis after ACL injury. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2008; 40(2):215-22.
  16. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P. Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The American journal of sports medicine. 1994; 22(2):211-8.
  17. Sinha S, Naik AK, Maheshwari M, Sandanshiv S, Meena D, Arya RK. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with tibial attachment preserving hamstring graft without implant on tibial side. Indian journal of orthopaedics. 2018; 52:170-6.
  18. Stergios PG, Georgios KA, Konstantinos N, Efthymia P, Nikolaos K, Alexandros PG. Adequacy of semitendinosus tendon alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft and prediction of hamstring graft size by evaluating simple anthropometric parameters. Anatomy research international. 2012; 2012.
  19. Fauno P, Kaalund S. Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2005; 21(11):1337-41.
  20. Papachristou G, Nikolaou V, Efstathopoulos N, Sourlas J, Lazarettos J, Frangia K, et al. ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon autograft without detachment of its tibial insertion: a histologic study in a rabbit model. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2007; 15(10):1175-80.
  21. Tetsumura S, Fujita A, Nakajima M, Abe M. Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in porcine tibial bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2006; 11(3):278-82.
  22. Harvey A, Thomas NP, Amis AA. Fixation of the graft in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 2005; 87(5):593-603.
  23. Magen HE, Howell SM, Hull ML. Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. The American journal of sports medicine. 1999; 27(1):35-43.
  24. Gobbi A. Double bundle ACL reconstruction using only the semitendinosus. ISAKOS Current concepts, Winter. 2007, vol 1: 8-9.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 10, Issue 5
May 2022
Pages 426-431

  • Receive Date 15 June 2020
  • Revise Date 27 November 2020
  • Accept Date 31 July 2021