Five Year Follow up of Retrospective Cohort Comparing Structural and Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Single-row versus Double-row Suture Bridge Repair of Large Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients Less than or Equal to 70 Years

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India

2 Shoulder unit, Lairesse Kliniek, Valeriusplein, BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands


Background: High re-tear rates after repairing large-sized posterosuperior rotator cuff tears remain a significant
concern which may affect the clinical outcome. The most optimal type of repair (single versus double-row suture
bridge) suited for large size tear remains debatable.
Methods: In a retrospective cohort study with a minimum of five years follow up, the structural and functional outcome of
103 patients with large size cuff tear repaired with single row (SR) or double row suture bridge (DRSB) were evaluated.
The structural outcome was assessed with ultrasonography whereas functional outcome was evaluated with Constant
Murley (CM) and American shoulder elbow score (ASES).
Results: There were 55 patients in the SR group and 48 patients in the DRSB group with a mean follow-up of 74.2
months (range, 60-96 months). While comparing the structural integrity in two groups, we found significantly lower retear
rates in the DRSB group as compared to the SR group (10.4% vs. 32.7%; P=0.006). Also, there were more focal
defects in the SR group (25.4%) than the DRSB group (8.3%). Overall, there was no significant difference in CM and
ASES scores when the SR group was compared to DRSB. However, subgroup analysis between those with intact and
retorn tendon revealed significant difference (P=0.0001) in the clinical scores.
Conclusion: At a minimum of five years follow-up, the DRSB repair of large posterosuperior cuff tear resulted in
superior structural healing over SR repair. Nevertheless, overall there was no significant functional difference between
both the techniques. However, the functional outcome of the healed tendon subgroup was superior to retear tendon
Level of evidence: III


1. Nakamura H, Gotoh M, Mitsui Y, Honda H, Ohzono
H, Shimokobe H, et al. Factors Affecting Clinical
Outcome in Patients With Structural Failure After
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy.
2. Yang J, Jr., Robbins M, Reilly J, Maerz T, Anderson K.
The Clinical Effect of a Rotator Cuff Retear: A Metaanalysis
of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-
Row Repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(3):733-41.
3. Kim HM, Caldwell JM, Buza JA, Fink LA, Ahmad CS,
Bigliani LU, et al. Factors affecting satisfaction and
shoulder function in patients with a recurrent rotator
cuff tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(2):106-12.
4. Bisson L, Zivaljevic N, Sanders S, Pula D. A cost
analysis of single-row versus double-row and suture
bridge rotator cuff repair methods. Knee Surg Sports
Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(2):487-93.
5. Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M,
Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair
of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does
the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am.
6. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. Repair
integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic
double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome
study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(5):953-60.
7. Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Dahiya N, Keener JD, Yamaguchi
K, Galatz LM. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of
failed repairs of large or massive rotator cuff tears:
minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
8. Elia F, Azoulay V, Lebon J, Faraud A, Bonnevialle N,
Mansat P. Clinical and anatomic results of surgical
repair of chronic rotator cuff tears at ten-year
minimum follow-up. Int Orthop. 2017;41(6):1219-26.
9. Heuberer PR, Smolen D, Pauzenberger L, Plachel
F, Salem S, Laky B, et al. Longitudinal Long-term
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Follow-up
After Single-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair:
Clinical Superiority of Structural Tendon Integrity.
Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(6):1283-8.
10. Cho NS, Rhee YG. The factors affecting the clinical
outcome and integrity of arthroscopically repaired
rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Surg.
11. Le BT, Wu XL, Lam PH, Murrell GA. Factors
predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000
consecutive rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med.
12. Wu XL, Briggs L, Murrell GA. Intraoperative
determinants of rotator cuff repair integrity: an
analysis of 500 consecutive repairs. Am J Sports Med.
13. Agout C, Berhouet J, Bouju Y, Godeneche A, Collin P,
Kempf JF, et al. Clinical and anatomic results of rotator
cuff repair at 10 years depend on tear type. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(8):2490-7.
14. Lorbach O, Kieb M, Raber F, Busch LC, Kohn DM,
Pape D. Three-dimensional evaluation of cyclic
displacement in single-row and double-row rotator
cuff reconstructions under static external rotation.
Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):153-62.
15. Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons PG, Warner JJ.
Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction
method on three-dimensional repair site area.
Arthroscopy. 2002;18(5):519-26.
16. Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun
BJ, Lee TQ. Part II: Biomechanical assessment for a
footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator
cuff repair technique compared with a doublerow
repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
17. Koh KH, Kang KC, Lim TK, Shon MS, Yoo JC. Prospective
randomized clinical trial of single- versus doublerow
suture anchor repair in 2- to 4-cm rotator cuff
tears: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging
results. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(4):453-62.
18. Ma HL, Chiang ER, Wu HT, Hung SC, Wang ST, Liu CL,
et al. Clinical outcome and imaging of arthroscopic
single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair:
a prospective randomized trial. Arthroscopy.
19. Hantes ME, Ono Y, Raoulis VA, Doxariotis N,
Venouziou A, Zibis A, et al. Arthroscopic Single-
Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique
for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55
Years: A Prospective Comparative Study. Am J Sports
Med. 2018;46(1):116-21.
20. Jeong JY, Park KM, Sundar S, Yoo JC. Clinical and
radiologic outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff
repair: single-row versus transosseous equivalent
repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(6):1021-9.
21. Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH, Park HK, Yu JW, Seo JB.
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and
double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports
Med. 2008;36(7):1310-6.
22. Xu C, Zhao J, Li D. Meta-analysis comparing singlerow
and double-row repair techniques in the
arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(2):182-8.
23. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin
MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Preand
postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 1994;(304):78-83.
24. Lim HK, Hong SH, Yoo HJ, Choi J-Y, Kim SH, Choi J-A,
et al. Visual MRI grading system to evaluate atrophy
of the supraspinatus muscle. Korean journal of
radiology. 2014;15(4):501-7.
25. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber
C. Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator
cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus
magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
26. Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Retear patterns
after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row
versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med.
27. Duquin TR, Buyea C, Bisson LJ. Which method
of rotator cuff repair leads to the highest rate of
structural healing? A systematic review. Am J Sports
Med. 2010;38(4):835-41.
28. Gerhardt C, Hug K, Pauly S, Marnitz T, Scheibel M.
Arthroscopic single-row modified mason-allen repair
versus double-row suture bridge reconstruction for
supraspinatus tendon tears: a matched-pair analysis.
Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(12):2777-85.
29. Mihata T, Watanabe C, Fukunishi K, Ohue M,
Tsujimura T, Fujiwara K, et al. Functional and
structural outcomes of single-row versus doublerow
versus combined double-row and suturebridge
repair for rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med.
30. DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at
surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(4):563-7.
31. Gartsman GM, Drake G, Edwards TB, Elkousy HA,
Hammerman SM, O’Connor DP, et al. Ultrasound
evaluation of arthroscopic full-thickness supraspinatus
rotator cuff repair: single-row versus double-row
suture bridge (transosseous equivalent) fixation.
Results of a prospective, randomized study. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(11):1480-7.
32. Gwark JY, Sung CM, Na JB, Park HB. Outcomes of
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Who
Are 70 Years of Age or Older Versus Under 70 Years
of Age: A Sex- and Tear Size-Matched Case-Control
Study. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(7):2045-53.
33. Gilat R, Atoun E, Cohen O, Tsvieli O, Rath E,
Lakstein D, et al. Recurrent rotator cuff tear: is
ultrasound imaging reliable? J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
34. McCormick F, Gupta A, Bruce B, Harris J, Abrams
G, Wilson H, et al. Single-row, double-row, and
transosseous equivalent techniques for isolated
supraspinatus tendon tears with minimal atrophy: A
retrospective comparative outcome and radiographic
analysis at minimum 2-year followup. Int J Shoulder
Surg. 2014;8(1):15-20.
35. Choi S, Kim MK, Kim GM, Roh YH, Hwang IK, Kang
H. Factors associated with clinical and structural
outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
with a suture bridge technique in medium,
large, and massive tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
36. Jeong HY, Kim HJ, Jeon YS, Rhee YG. Factors Predictive
of Healing in Large Rotator Cuff Tears: Is It Possible
to Predict Retear Preoperatively? Am J Sports Med.
37. Hein J, Reilly JM, Chae J, Maerz T, Anderson K. Retear
Rates After Arthroscopic Single-Row, Double-Row,
and Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair at a Minimum
of 1 Year of Imaging Follow-up: A Systematic Review.
Arthroscopy. 2015;31(11):2274-81.
38. Mascarenhas R, Chalmers PN, Sayegh ET, Bhandari
M, Verma NN, Cole BJ, et al. Is double-row rotator
cuff repair clinically superior to single-row rotator
cuff repair: a systematic review of overlapping metaanalyses.
Arthroscopy. 2014;30(9):1156-65.
39. Noyes MP, Ladermann A, Denard PJ. Functional
Outcome and Healing of Large and Massive Rotator
Cuff Tears Repaired With a Load-Sharing Rip-Stop
Construct. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(9):1654-8.
40. Millett PJ, Warth RJ, Dornan GJ, Lee JT, Spiegl UJ.
Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic
single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I
randomized clinical trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
41. Kartus J, Kartus C, Rostgard-Christensen L, Sernert
N, Read J, Perko M. Long-term clinical and ultrasound
evaluation after arthroscopic acromioplasty in
patients with partial rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy.
42. Shi BY, Diaz M, Binkley M, McFarland EG, Srikumaran
U. Biomechanical Strength of Rotator Cuff Repairs:
A Systematic Review and Meta-regression
Analysis of Cadaveric Studies. Am J Sports Med.
43. Nicholas SJ, Lee SJ, Mullaney MJ, Tyler TF, Fukunaga
T, Johnson CD, et al. Functional Outcomes After
Double-Row Versus Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair:
A Prospective Randomized Trial. Orthop J Sports
Med. 2016;4(10):2325967116667398.
44. Carbonel I, Martinez AA, Calvo A, Ripalda J, Herrera
A. Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic
repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a
prospective randomized clinical study. Int Orthop.
45. Okoroha KR, Mehran N, Duncan J, Washington T,
Spiering T, Bey MJ, et al. Characterization of Rotator
Cuff Tears: Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance
Imaging. Orthopedics. 2017;40(1):e124-e30.
46. Lee SC, Williams D, Endo Y. The Repaired Rotator
Cuff: MRI and Ultrasound Evaluation. Curr Rev
Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(1):92-101.
47. Magee TH, Gaenslen ES, Seitz R, Hinson GA, Wetzel
LH. MR imaging of the shoulder after surgery. AJR
Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(4):925-8.
48. Motamedi AR, Urrea LH, Hancock RE, Hawkins RJ,
Ho C. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in
determining the presence and size of recurrent
rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;
49. Schroder FF, Huis In’t Veld R, den Otter LA, van Raak
SM, Ten Haken B, Vochteloo AJH. Metal artefacts
severely hamper magnetic resonance imaging of
the rotator cuff tendons after rotator cuff repair
with titanium suture anchors. Shoulder Elbow.
Volume 9, Issue 4
July and August 2021
Pages 391-398
  • Receive Date: 26 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 08 November 2020
  • First Publish Date: 15 November 2020