Prevalence of Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome and its Correlation with the Severity of Pain and Disability in Patients with Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Neuroscience Research Center, Poorsina Hospital, Faculty of medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

2 Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Neurology, Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

3 Orthopedic Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, Poursina Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

4 Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

5 Department of Biology, Facility of science, university of Victoria, Victoria, Canada


Background: Nonspecific chronic neck pain is increasing according to work-related gestures and modern lifestyle. Myofascial pain syndrome is a common problem and may be a primary disease. This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of cervical myofascial pain syndrome in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain with normal MRI. We also examined the correlation between patients’ age as well as pain severity and duration. Methods: Patients with neck pain radiating to their upper extremity were examined despite normal MRI findings. We evaluated 10 different muscles based on myofascial pain syndrome criteria and also recorded pain intensity and functional ability using visual analogue scale and neck disability index, respectively. A physical therapist with at least 10 years of clinical experience with myofascial pain syndrome performed all physical examinations Results: A total of 126 patients (69 females and 57 males) participated in this study, out of whom, 14 patients (11.1%) had no muscular involvement, while 112 cases (88.9%) revealed at least one trigger point. The infraspinatus and scalene muscles were the most commonly involved muscles accounting for 38.9% and 34.9% of all the involvements, respectively. The severity of pain was significantly associated with the disability of the patients (r=0.64, p <0.001). However, the correlation between pain and the number of trigger points was not significant (r=-0.19, P=0.31). Finally, the least significantly correlated variables were disability and the number of trigger points (r=-0.17, P=0.05). Patient’s age was significantly correlated neither with the number of trigger points (r=-0.04, P=0.62), nor the pain duration (r=0.07, P=0.39). Conclusion: Myofascial pain syndrome is a common disorder in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain, despite normal MRI findings. Although, pain is not correlated with the number of trigger points in these patients, we demonstrated a small correlation between patients’ disability and the latter variable. Level of evidence: II


1. Hoy D, Protani M, De R, Buchbinder R. The
epidemiology of neck pain. Best Practice & Research
Clinical Rheumatology. 2010;24(6):783-92.
2. McLean SM, May S, Klaber-Moffett J, Sharp DM,
Gardiner E. Risk factors for the onset of non-specific 
neck pain: a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology
& Community Health. 2010;64(7):565-72.
3. Simons DG TJ, Simons LS. Myofascial pain and
dysfunction: the trigger point manual, vol 1. Upper
half of body: Baltimore, MA: Williams & Wilkins; 1999. 
4. Akhbari B, Salavati M, Ebarahimi I, Ezzati K,
Haghighat K. Association of ultrasonography findings
with pain, range of motion, disability, and pressure
pain threshold in subjects with upper trapezius
myofascial pain syndrome. Physical Treatments.
5. Salavati M, Akhbari B, Takamjani IE, Ezzati K,
Haghighatkhah H. Reliability of the Upper Trapezius
Muscle and Fascia Thickness and Strain Ratio
Measures by Ultrasonography and Sonoelastography
in Participants With Myofascial Pain Syndrome.
Journal of chiropractic medicine. 2017;16(4):316-23.
6. Dommerholt J. Myofascial trigger points:
pathophysiology and evidence-informed diagnosis
and management. Jones & Bartlett Learning. 2010.
7. Daub CW. A case report of a patient with upper extremity
symptoms: differentiating radicular and referred pain.
Chiropractic & osteopathy. 2007;15(1):10.
8. Daffner RH. Radiologic evaluation of chronic neck
pain. Am Fam Physician. 2010; 15;82(8):959-64.
9. Paul A, Lewis M, Saklatvala J, McCall I, Shadforth
M, Croft P, et al. Cervical spine magnetic resonance
imaging in primary care consulters with shoulder
pain: a case–control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;
10. Jaeger B. Are “cervicogenic” headaches due to
myofascial pain and cervical spine dysfunction?
Cephalalgia. 1989;9(3):157-64.
11. Marcus DA, Scharff L, Mercer S, Turk DC.
Musculoskeletal abnormalities in chronic headache:
a controlled comparison of headache diagnostic
groups. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain.
12. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Alonso-Blanco C,
Miangolarra J. Myofascial trigger points in subjects
presenting with mechanical neck pain: a blinded,
controlled study. Manual therapy. 2007;12(1):29-33.
13. Castaldo M, Ge H-Y, Chiarotto A, Villafane JH, Arendt-
Nielsen L. Myofascial trigger points in patients with
whiplash-associated disorders and mechanical neck
pain. Pain Medicine. 2014;15(5):842-9.
14. Ettlin T, Schuster C, Stoffel R, Brüderlin A, Kischka U. A
distinct pattern of myofascial findings in patients after
whiplash injury. Archives of physical medicine and
rehabilitation. 2008;89(7):1290-3.
15. Ö􀇆 ztürk G, Geler Külcü D, Aktaş İ􀇚, Aydoğ E. Coexistence
of Miyofascial Trigger Points and Cervical Disc
Herniation. Which One is the Main Source of Pain?.
16. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A,
Mobini B. The Oswestry disability index, the Roland-
Morris disability questionnaire, and the Quebec back
pain disability scale: translation and validation studies
of the Iranian versions. Spine. 2006;31(14):E454-E9.
17. Hsueh T, Yu S, Kuan T, Hong C. Association of active
myofascial trigger points and cervical disc lesions.
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association= Taiwan
yi zhi. 1998;97(3):174-80.
18. Jalil NA, Awang MS, Omar M. Scalene myofascial pain
syndrome mimicking cervical disc prolapse: a report of
two cases. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences:
MJMS. 2010;17(1):60.
19. Cannon DE, Dillingham TR, Miao H, Andary MT,
Pezzin LE. Musculoskeletal disorders in referrals for
suspected cervical radiculopathy. Archives of physical
medicine and rehabilitation. 2007;88(10):1256-9.
20. Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas C, Alonso‐Blanco C, Cuadrado
ML, Gerwin RD, Pareja JA. Myofascial trigger points
and their relationship to headache clinical parameters
in chronic tension‐type headache. Headache: The
Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2006;46(8):1264-72.
21. Hussaini SM, Karimi N, Ezzati K, Hossein Zadeh
S, Rahnama L, Arslan SA. Reliability of magnetic
resonance imaging findings inter-pretation in patients
with lumbar disc herniation. Physical Treatments-
Specific Physical Therapy Journal. 2015;5(2):103-8.
22. Kuijper B, Tans JTJ, Van Der Kallen BF, Nollet F, a
Nijeholt GJL, De Visser M. Root compression on MRI
compared with clinical findings in patients with recent
onset cervical radiculopathy. Journal of Neurology,
Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2011;82(5):561-3.
23. Sari H, Akarirmak U, Uludag M. Active myofascial
trigger points might be more frequent in patients with
cervical radiculopathy. European journal of physical
and rehabilitation medicine. 2012;48(2):237-44.
Volume 9, Issue 2
March 2021
Pages 230-234
  • Receive Date: 23 May 2020
  • Revise Date: 11 July 2020
  • Accept Date: 16 July 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 March 2021