Reliability of Postoperative Radiographies in Ankle Fractures

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akhtar Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran- Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, BIDMC, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Orthopedics ,Shohada Tajrish Hospital ,School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran ,Iran


Background: The accuracy of reduction of ankle fractures using postoperative plain radiographies (x-ray) remains
widely controversial. Some authors have demonstrated that postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan can be
useful for these patients. In current study, the efficacy of x-rays after fixation of ankle fractures was investigated based
on the CT scan findings.
Methods: A total of 73 patients with ankle fractures who were subjected to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were
enrolled. After surgery, if the reduction was acceptable based on the x-rays according to standard measurements, the
patient was referred for CT scanning. Forty four patients were included in the study. Undesirable CT scan findings
including malreduction of fragments or articular surfaces, device malpositioning, missed fractures, and undetected
intra-articular fragments were documented.
Results: Undesirable CT findings were seen in 25 patients (56.8%). CT scan showed acceptable reduction without
device malpositioning in 19 patients. The most prevalent findings in CT images were malreduction and device
malpositioning in 17 and 16 patients, respectively. There was no abnormal finding in CT imaging of lateral malleolar
fractures. In two thirds of the injured syndesmosis, device malpositioning, and malreduction were detected in CT scan.
Conclusion: Despite acceptable postoperative x-rays, a considerable number of patients with ankle fractures had
inappropriate reduction or undesirable findings in their postoperative CT scan. It seems necessary to use CT scan after
ORIF of ankle fractures in order to examine the accuracy of reduction. Further validation of postoperative CT scan in
ankle fracture surgery should be investigated.
Level of evidence: IV


1. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Jrvinen
M. Increasing number and incidence of low-trauma
ankle fractures in elderly people: Finnish statistics
during 1970–2000 and projections for the future.
Bone. 2002; 31(3):430-3.
2. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult
fractures: a review. Injury. 2006; 37(8):691-7.
3. Zhang Y. Clinical epidemiology of orthopedic trauma.
Thieme; 2012.
4. Ostrum RF, Avery MC. Open reduction internal
fixation of a bimalleolar ankle fracture with
syndesmotic injury. Journal of orthopaedic trauma.
2016; 30:S43-4.
5. Gonzalez TA, Macaulay AA, Ehrlichman LK, Drummond
R, Mittal V, DiGiovanni CW. Arthroscopically assisted
versus standard open reduction and internal fixation
techniques for the acute ankle fracture. Foot & ankle
international. 2016; 37(5):554-62.
6. Mak MF, Stern R, Assal M. Repair of syndesmosis
injury in ankle fractures: Current state of the art.
EFORT Open Reviews. 2018; 3(1):24-9.
7. Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, Ebramzadeh
E, Bakshian S. The effect of fibular malreduction on
contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion
model. JBJS. 1997; 79(12):1809-5.
8. Pretterklieber ML. Anatomy and kinematics of the
human ankle joint. Der Radiologe. 1999; 39(1):1-7.
9. Mont MA, Sedlin ED, Weiner LS, Miller AR.
Postoperative radiographs as predictors of clinical 
outcome in unstable ankle fractures. Journal of
orthopaedic trauma. 1992; 6(3):352-7.
10. Ono A, Nishikawa S, Nagao A, Irie T, Sasaki M,
Kouno T. Arthroscopically assisted treatment of
ankle fractures: arthroscopic findings and surgical
outcomes. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic
& Related Surgery. 2004; 20(6):627-31.
11. Chen Y, Zhang K, Qiang M, Li H, Dai H. Comparison
of plain radiography and CT in postoperative
evaluation of ankle fractures. Clinical radiology.
2015; 70(8):e74-82.
12. Miniaci-Coxhead SL, Martin EA, Ketz JP. Quality and
utility of immediate formal postoperative radiographs
in ankle fractures. Foot & Ankle International. 2015;
13. Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet
DL, Lorich DG. Malreduction of the tibiofibular
syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot & ankle
international. 2006; 27(10):788-92.
14. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H, Mekhail AO, Yeasting
RA. Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular
syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot & ankle
international. 1997; 18(11):693-8.
15. Palmanovich E, Brin YS, Kish B, Nyska M, Hetsroni I.
Value of early postoperative computed tomography
assessment in ankle fractures defining joint congruity
and criticizing the need for early revision surgery. The
Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2016; 55(3):465-9.
16. Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional 
consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a
minimum 2-year follow-up. Journal of orthopaedic
trauma. 2012; 26(7):439-43.
17. Goergen TG, Danzig LA, Resnick D, Owen CA.
Roentgenographic evaluation of the tibiotalar joint.
JBJS. 1977; 59(7):874-7.
18. Kragh Jr JF, Ward JA. Radiographic indicators of ankle
instability: changes with plantarflexion. Foot & ankle
international. 2006; 27(1):23-8.
19. Pneumaticos SG, Noble PC, Chatziioannou SN, Trevino
SG. The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation
of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot & ankle
international. 2002; 23(2):107-11.
20. Saldua NS, Harris JF, LeClere LE, Girard PJ, Carney JR.
Plantar flexion influences radiographic measurements
of the ankle mortise. JBJS. 2010; 92(4):911-5.
21. Li H, Chen Y, Qiang M, Zhang K, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, et al.
Evaluation of computed tomography post-processing
images in postoperative assessment of Lisfranc
injuries compared with plain radiographs. Journal of
orthopaedic surgery and research. 2017; 12(1):91.
22. Leung KH, Fang CX, Lau TW, Li Leung FK. Preoperative
radiography versus computed tomography for
surgical planning for ankle fractures. Journal of
Orthopaedic Surgery. 2016; 24(2):158-62.
23. Phisitkul P, Ebinger T, Goetz J, Vaseenon T, Marsh JL.
Forceps reduction of the syndesmosis in rotational
ankle fractures: a cadaveric study. JBJS. 2012;
24. Tang CW, Roidis N, Vaishnav S, Patel A, Thordarson
DB. Position of the distal fibular fragment in pronation
and supination ankle fractures: a CT evaluation. Foot
& ankle international. 2003; 24(7):561-6.
25. Pettrone FA, Gail M, Pee D, Fitzpatrick T, Van Herpe 
LB. Quantitative criteria for prediction of the results
after displaced fracture of the ankle. JBJS. 1983;
26. Liu X, Yu G. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of
distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Zhongguo xiu
fu chong jian wai ke za zhi= Zhongguo xiufu chongjian
waike zazhi= Chinese journal of reparative and
reconstructive surgery. 2012; 26(5):612-6.
27. Dikos GD, Heisler J, Choplin RH, Weber TG. Normal
tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial
CT imaging. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2012;
28. Mukhopadhyay S, Metcalfe A, Guha AR, Mohanty
K, Hemmadi S, Lyons K, et al. Malreduction of
syndesmosis—are we considering the anatomical
variation?. Injury. 2011; 42(10):1073-6.
29. Magid D, Michelson JD, Ney DR, Fishman EK. Adult
ankle fractures: comparison of plain films and
interactive two-and three-dimensional CT scans.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1990;
30. Grigoryan M, Lynch JA, Fierlinger AL, Guermazi A,
Fan B, MacLean DB, et al. Quantitative and qualitative
assessment of closed fracture healing using computed
tomography and conventional radiography1.
Academic radiology. 2003; 10(11):1267-73.
31. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Carley JC, Fishman
EK. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral
CT data: theory and method. Radiographics. 1999;
32. Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Bliss DF, Fishman EK. Skeletal
3-D CT: advantages of volume rendering over surface
rendering. Skeletal radiology. 1996; 25(3):207-14.
Volume 8, Issue 5
September 2020
Pages 598-604
  • Receive Date: 17 September 2019
  • Revise Date: 14 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 26 April 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 September 2020