The Present Situation of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty in the Management of Solitary Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis



Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain


Patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) is a somewhat predominant illness, affecting up to 24% of women and 11% of
men over the age of 55 years who suffer from symptomatic knee OA. The purposes of this narrative overview are to
summarize the present situation of patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in the treatment of solitary PF-OA, and to give
an account of the clinical results of PFA for the management of solitary PF degenerative OA of the knee. A Cochrane
Library and PubMed (MEDLINE) examination related to the position of PFA in PF-OA was carried out. A number of
publications have encountered that PFA is an efficacious treatment for solitary PF-OA. Additionally, a systematic review
described fairly good results of PFA survivorship and functional outcomes at short- and mid-run follow-up in the setting
of solitary PF-OA. Success of PFA depends on accurate patient selection rather than prosthetic failure or wear. In many
reports, the main cause of PFA failure is advancement of tibiofemoral OA. In contemporary times, encouraging results
have been accomplished by the association of PFA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). In conclusion,
patients with solitary PF-OA with severe anterior knee pain may be candidates for PFA. The success of the surgical
procedure and the long-run survivorship of PFA are related to a good surgical technique and observation to meticulous
indications and contraindications in patient selection. Newer prostheses have also played a part to ameliorated
outcomes. PFA is an alternative for younger patients with solitary PF-OA.
Level of evidence: III


1. Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM. Patellofemoral
arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee
replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(18):
2. Monk AP, van Duren BH, Pandit H, Shakespeare D,
Murray DW, Gill HS. In vivo sagittal plane kinematics
of the FPV patellofemoral replacement. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(6):1104-9.
3. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthopedics.
2010; 33(9):653.
4. Cannon A, Stolley M, Wolf B, Amendola A.
Patellofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty: literature
review and description of a novel technique. Iowa
Orthop J. 2008; 28(1):42-8.
5. Lustig S, Magnussen RA, Dahm DL, Parker D.
Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;
6. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: pros, cons,
and design considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
2004; 428(1):158-65.
7. Lotke PA, Lonner JH, Nelson CL. Patellofemoral
arthroplasty: the third compartment. J Arthroplasty.
2005; 20(4 Suppl 2):4-6.
8. Sreekumar R, Subramanian S, Mohammed A.
Patellar button dissociation in a mobile-bearing LCS
patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2009;
9. Gupta RR, Zywiel MG, Leadbetter WB, Bonutti P,
Mont MA. Scientific evidence for the use of modern
patellofemoral arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices.
2010; 7(1):51-66.
10. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Instr Course
Lect. 2010; 59(1):67-84.
11. Courtney J, Liebelt D, Nett MP, Cushner FD. Blood
loss and transfusion rates following patellofemoral
arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012; 43(5):
12. Akhbari P, Malak T, Dawson-Bowling S, East D, Miles
K, Butler-Manuel PA. The Avon patellofemoral joint
replacement: mid-term prospective results from
an independent centre. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;
13. Goh GS, Liow MH, Tay DK, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Fouryear
follow up outcome study of patellofemoral
arthroplasty at a single institution. J Arthroplasty.
2015; 30(6):959-63.
14. van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD. Why do
patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic
review. Knee. 2017; 24(1):2-8.
15. Christ AB, Baral E, Koch C, Shubin Stein BE, Gonzalez
Della Valle A, et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty
conversion to total knee arthroplasty: retrieval
analysis and clinical correlation. Knee. 2017;
16. Pisanu G, Rosso F, Bertolo C, Dettoni F, Blonna D,
Bonasia DE, et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: current
concepts and review of the literature. Joints. 2017;
17. Saffarini M, Müller JH, La Barbera G, Hannink G, Cho KJ,
Toanen C, et al. Inadequacy of computed tomography
for pre-operative planning of patellofemoral
arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
2018; 26(5):1485-92.
18. Reihs B, Reihs F, Labek G, Hochegger M, Leithner A,
Böhler N, et al. No bias for developer publications
and no difference between first-generation trochlearresurfacing
versus trochlear-cutting implants in
15,306 cases of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;
19. Middleton SW, Toms AD, Schranz PJ, Mandalia VI.
Mid-term survivorship and clinical outcomes of the
Avon patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee. 2018;
20. Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Kappel A,
Fabrin J. The mark Coventry award: patellofemoral
arthroplasty results in better range of movement
and early patient-reported outcomes than TKA. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 2018; 476(1):87-100.
21. van Jonbergen HW, Westerbeek RE. Femoral
component rotation in patellofemoral joint
replacement. Knee. 2018; 25(3):485-90.
22. Perrone FL, Baron S, Suero EM, Lausmann C, Kendoff
D, Zahar A, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures
(PROMs) in patients undergoing patellofemoral
arthroplasty and total knee replacement: a
comparative study. Technol Health Care. 2018;
23. Cuthbert R, Tibrewal S, Tibrewal SB. Patellofemoral
arthroplasty: current concepts. J Clin Orthop Trauma.
2018; 9(1):24-8.
24. Strickland SM, Bird ML, Christ AB. Advances in
patellofemoral arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet
Med. 2018; 11(2):221-30.
25. Metcalfe AJ, Ahearn N, Hassaballa MA, Parsons N,
Ackroyd CE, Murray JR, et al. The Avon patellofemoral 
joint arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(9):1162-7.
26. Ajnin S, Buchanan D, Arbuthnot J, Fernandes R.
Patellofemoral joint replacement - Mean five year
follow-up. Knee. 2018; 25(6):1272-7.
27. Bunyoz KI, Lustig S, Troelsen A. Similar postoperative
patient-reported outcome in both second generation
patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee
arthroplasty for treatment of isolated patellofemoral
osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports
Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(7):2226-37.
28. Godshaw B, Kolodychuk N, Williams GK Jr, Browning
B, Jones D. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Ochsner J.
2018; 18(3):280-7.
29. Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Bartsch E, Cotic M, Pogorzelski J.
High patient satisfaction with significant improvement
in knee function and pain relief after mid-term followup
in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay
arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
2018; 27(7):2251-8.
30. Tarassoli P, Punwar S, Khan W, Johnstone D.
Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review of
the literature. Open Orthop J. 2012; 6(1):340-7.
31. Odumenya M, McGuinness K, Achten J, Parsons N,
Spalding T, Costa M. The Warwick patellofemoral
arthroplasty trial: a randomised clinical trial of total
knee arthroplasty versus patellofemoral arthroplasty
in patients with severe arthritis of the patellofemoral
joint. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12(1):265.
32. Farr J 2nd, Barrett D. Optimizing patellofemoral
arthroplasty. Knee. 2008; 15(5):339-47.
33. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Am Acad
Orthop Surg. 2007; 15(8):495-506.
34. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact
of design on outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;
35. Sisto DJ, Sarin VK. Patellofemoral arthroplasty with a
customized trochlear prosthesis. Orthop Clin North
Am. 2008; 39(3):355-62.
36. Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM. Patellofemoral
arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee
replacement. Instr Course Lect. 2013; 62(1):363-71.
37. Lonner JH, Bloomfield MR. The clinical outcome of
patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am.
2013; 44(3):271-80.
38. Lustig S. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol
Surg Res. 2014; 100(1 Suppl):S35-43.