Midterm Results of Arthroscopic Treatment for Recalcitrant Lateral Epicondylitis of the Elbow

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Orthopedic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

2 Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

3 Faculty of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran


Background: An effective treatment for the elbow recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis is arthroscopic surgery. This study
evaluated the midterm results of treating recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis with arthroscopic surgery.
Methods: A total of 40 subjects with recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis prepared for arthroscopic surgery on their elbows
participated in this study. The elbow function was evaluated using the Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand
(Quick DASH) score. Pain intensity was assessed before and after the surgery by the visual analog scale (VAS). Grip
and pinch strengths were assessed by a dynamometer.
Results: In this study, the mean age of the participants was 42.9±6.4 years. The average follow-up time was 42
months. The mean of VAS (pain intensities) were 7.05 and 3.20 before and after the surgery, respectively (P=0.001).
The Quick DASH score decreased from 63.18 to 25.68 from before to after the surgery (P=0.001). The mean grip
strength of the operated and nonoperated sides was not significantly different after the surgery.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgery seems to be an effective method with few complications in patients suffering from
an elbow recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis in the midterm follow-up.
Level of evidence: II


Main Subjects

1. Runge F. Zur genese und behandlung des
schreibekrampfes. Berl Klin Wochenschr. 1873;
2. Tisano BK, Estes AR. Overuse injuries of the
pediatric and adolescent throwing athlete. Med Sci
Sports Exerc. 2016; 48(10):1898-905.
3. Fox GM, Jebson PJ, Orwin JF. Overuse injuries of the
elbow. Phys Sportsmed. 1995; 23(8):58-66.
4. Pluim BM, Staal Jb, Windler Ge, Jayanthi N. Tennis
injuries: occurrence, aetiology, and prevention. Br J
Sports Med. 2006; 40(5):415-23.
5. Vicenzino B, Wright A. Lateral epicondylalgia I:
epidemiology, pathophysiology, aetiology and
natural history. Phys Ther Rev. 1996; 1(1):23-34.
6. Silverstein B, Welp E, Nelson N, Kalat J. Claims
incidence of work-related disorders of the upper
extremities: Washington state, 1987 through 1995.
Am J Public Health. 1998; 88(12):1827-33.
7. Feuerstein M, Miller VL, Burrell LM, Berger
R. Occupational upper extremity disorders in
the federal workforce: prevalence, health care
expenditures, and patterns of work disability. J
Occup Environ Med. 1998; 40(6):546-55.
8. Winston J, Wolf JM. Tennis elbow: definition, causes,
epidemiology. Tennis elbow. New York: Springer;
2015. P. 1-6.
9. Jansen CW, Olson SL, Hasson SM. The effect of use
of a wrist orthosis during functional activities on
surface electromyography of the wrist extensors in
normal subjects. J Hand Ther. 1997; 10(4):283-9.
10. Maffulli N, Wong J, Almekinders LC. Types and
epidemiology of tendinopathy. Clin Sports Med.
2003; 22(4):675-92.
11. Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Beller E. A
systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia.
Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39(7):411-22.
12. Smidt N, Assendelft W, Arola H, Malmivaara A, Green
S, Buchbinder R, et al. Effectiveness of physiotherapy
for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Ann
Med. 2003; 35(1):51-62.
13. Saremi H, Chamani V, Vahab-Kashani R. A newly
designed tennis elbow orthosis with a traditional
tennis elbow strap in patients with lateral
epicondylitis. Trauma Mon. 2016; 21(3):e35993.
14. Labelle H, Guibert R, Joncas J, Newman N, Fallaha 
M, Rivard C. Lack of scientific evidence for the
treatment of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow. An
attempted meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;
15. Yan H, Cui GQ, Liu YL, Xiao J, Yang YP, Ao YF. A
randomized comparison of open and arthroscopic
Nirschl debridement for refractory lateral
epicondylitis. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;
16. Matache BA, Berdusco R, Momoli F, Lapner PL,
Pollock JW. A randomized, double-blind shamcontrolled
trial on the efficacy of arthroscopic
tennis elbow release for the management of chronic
lateral epicondylitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.
2016; 17(1):239.
17. Kraushaar BS, Nirschl RP. Current concepts
review-tendinosis of the elbow (Tennis Elbow).
Clinical features and findings of histological,
immunohistochemical, and electron microscopy
studies. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999; 81(2):259-78.
18. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M.
Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain
(VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain),
mcgill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short‐form mcgill
pain questionnaire (SF‐MPQ), chronic pain grade
scale (CPGS), short form‐36 bodily pain scale (SF‐36
BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant
osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res.
2011; 63(Suppl 11):S240-52.
19. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity
Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH:
comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(5):1038-46.
20. Longo UG, Franceschi F, Loppini M, Maffulli N,
Denaro V. Rating systems for evaluation of the
elbow. Br Med Bull. 2008; 87(1):131-61.
21. Iordens GI, Den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer WE,
Eygendaal D, Schep NW, Verhofstad MH, et al.
Minimal important change and other measurement
properties of the Oxford Elbow Score and the Quick
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand in
patients with a simple elbow dislocation; validation
study alongside the multicenter FuncSiE trial. PloS
One. 2017; 12(9):e0182557.
22. Szekeres M, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R. The
relationship between the Patient-rated Ulnar Nerve 
Evaluation and the common impairment measures
of grip strength, pinch strength, and sensation. J
Hand Ther. 2015; 28(1):39-44.
23. Lam NW, Goh HT, Kamaruzzaman SB, Chin AV, Poi
PJ, Tan MP. Normative data for hand grip strength
and key pinch strength, stratified by age and gender
for a multiethnic Asian population. Singapore Med J.
2016; 57(10):578-84.
24. Solheim E, Hegna J, Øyen J. Arthroscopic versus
open tennis elbow release: 3-to 6-year results of
a case-control series of 305 elbows. Arthroscopy.
2013; 29(5):854-9.
25. Solheim E, Hegna J, Øyen J, Inderhaug E. Arthroscopic
treatment of lateral epicondylitis: tenotomy versus
debridement. Arthroscopy. 2016; 32(4):578-85.
26. Phorkhar T, Chanlalit C. Functional results in
arthroscopic treatment in patients with chronic
lateral elbow pain. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015; 98(Suppl
27. Szabo SJ, Savoie FH 3rd, Field LD, Ramsey JR,
Hosemann CD. Tendinosis of the extensor carpi
radialis brevis: an evaluation of three methods of
operative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;
28. Wada T, Moriya T, Iba K, Ozasa Y, Sonoda T, Aoki
M, et al. Functional outcomes after arthroscopic
treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Orthop Sci.
2009; 14(2):167-74.
29. Savoie FH 3rd, O’Brien MJ. Arthroscopic tennis elbow
release. Instr Course Lect. 2015; 64(1):225-30.
30. Verhaar J, Walenkamp G, Kester A, van Mameren H,
van der Linden T. Lateral extensor release for tennis
elbow. A prospective long-term follow-up study. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(7):1034-43.
31. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei
AR, Birjandinejad A. Validity and reliability of the
Persian version of shortened disabilities of the arm,
shoulder and hand questionnaire (Quick-DASH). Int
J Prev Med. 2015; 6(1):59.