Morphometric Assessment of the Residual Width of the Distal Hamate Articular Surface after Graft Harvest for Hemi-hamate Arthroplasty

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

3 New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, New York, USA


Background: The hemi-hamate arthroplasty (HHA) can restore joint congruity and stability in chronic fracturedislocations
of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ). Purpose of this study was to compare the width of the distal
hamate articular surface (DHAS) to the width of the base of the middle phalanges (P2) of the fingers. We hypothesized
the dimensions of the width of the DHAS would be similar to those of P2, leaving a small amount of residual DHAS
width after autograft harvest.
Methods: Fifty-nine CT scans of the hand without any bony pathology were evaluated. Three observers measured the
following parameters and compared: (a) Width of the DHAS in the axial and coronal planes; (b) Width of the P2 articular
bases of all four fingers; (c) Maximum capitate length (MaxCap) in the coronal plane.
Results: The residual DHAS on the coronal plane after graft harvest (bone remaining on the radial and ulnar aspects
each, not accounting for saw blade or osteotomy width thickness) among all patients was 1.3, 0.9, 1.4, and 2.4 mm for
the index, long, ring and small fingers respectively. There was a strong correlation between DHAS and MaxCap r=0.76.
Conclusion: There is likely to be a very small amount of residual hamate articular surface width left after the graft is
harvested if the entire base of P2 is reconstructed.
Level of evidence: III


Main Subjects

1. Hastings H, Carroll C. Treatment of closed articular
fractures of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal
interphalangeal joints. Hand Clin. 1988; 4(3):503–27.
2. Capo JT, Hastings H, Choung E, Kinchelow T, Rossy
W, Steinberg B. Hemicondylar Hamate Replacement
Arthroplasty for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint
Fracture Dislocations: An Assessment of Graft
Suitability. J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33(5):733–9.
3. Frueh FS, Calcagni M, Lindenblatt N. The hemi-hamate
autograft arthroplasty in proximal interphalangeal
joint reconstruction: a systematic review. J Hand Surg
Eur Vol. 2015; 40(1):24–32.
4. Calfee RP, Kiefhaber TR, Sommerkamp TG, Stern
PJ. Hemi-Hamate Arthroplasty Provides Functional
Reconstruction of Acute and Chronic Proximal
Interphalangeal Fracture–Dislocations. J Hand Surg
Am. 2009; 34(7):1232–41.
5. Afendras G, Abramo A, Mrkonjic A, Geijer M,
Kopylov P, TägiL M. Hemi-hamate osteochondral
transplantation in proximal interphalangeal dorsal 
fracture dislocations: a minimum 4 year followup
in eight patients. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010;
6. Calva D, Calotta N, Lopez J, Christopher A, Magid D,
Demehri S, et al. A simple pre-operative imaging
method to assess donor and recipient anatomy
in hemi-hamate arthroplasty for proximal
interphalangeal joint reconstruction. Surg Radiol
Anat. 2016; 38(6):699–704.
7. Shih J, Podolsky D, Binhammer P. Three-dimensional
remodelling to determine best fit for hemihamate
autograft arthroplasty. Plast Surg. 2014; 22(3):191–5.
8. Ten Berg P, Ring D. Quantitative 3D-CT Anatomy of
Hamate Osteoarticular Autograft for Reconstruction
of the Middle Phalanx Base. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
2012; 470(12):3492–8.
9. Nakamura K, Patterson RM, Viegas SF. The ligament
and skeletal anatomy of the second through fifth
carpometacarpal joints and adjacent structures. J
Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26(6):1016–29.
Volume 8, Issue 1
January 2020
Pages 70-74
  • Receive Date: 10 February 2019
  • Revise Date: 24 July 2019
  • Accept Date: 09 August 2019
  • First Publish Date: 01 January 2020