Percutaneous Versus Open Hamstring Lengthening in Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopaedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


Background: Open hamstring lengthening (oHSL) is commonly performed to decrease knee contracture and improve
gait and posture for children with spastic diplegia. Furthermore, percutaneous hamstring lengthening (pHSL) is also
gaining popularity as an alternative to the open approach. This study aimed to compare the results of pHSL versus
oHSL and to determine the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous approach.
Methods: This retrospective included 54 patients (108 knees) with spastic diplegia operated for flexed knee gait with
either open or percutaneous HSL. The mean age of the participants at the time of surgery was 10.3±1.7 years (age
range: 5-25 years) for the open and 8.5±1.5 years (age range: 7-23 years) for the percutaneous group. Overall, 29 and
25 children were subjected to oHSL and pHSL, respectively.
Results: The mean durations of follow-up were 19.1 months (range: 12-49 months) and 18.3 months (range: 14-
45 months) for oHSL and pHSL groups, respectively. In the open group, the mean of preoperative popliteal angle
decreased from 64.3±3.6 to 28.4±4.3 (P<0.001), and in the percutaneous group from 63.8±2.7 to 29.5±2.3 (P<0.001).
The obtained results revealed no significant differences between the two approaches leading to a similar improvement
among the investigated patients (P=0.83).
Although the Gross Motor Function Class Score improved significantly within each group (P<0.001); this improvement
was insignificant between the groups (P=0.88). The mean of hospital stay for the percutaneous group was 1.6 days
(range:1-3 days) compared to 3.6 days (range: 2-6 days) for the open group, which indicated a significant difference
(P=0.001). The mean values of total cost were $333 and $473 in the percutaneous group and open group (P=0.001),
respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the complication rate (P=0.85).
Conclusion: Percutaneous HSL is a safe, easy, rapid, and brief procedure that is as effective as the open technique for
children with spastic diplegia in a short period of time. However, it is essential to examine the effects of this approach
during longer follow-ups to generalize the findings of the current study.
Level of evidence: III


Main Subjects

1. Lin CJ, Guo LY, Su FC, Chou YL, Cherng RJ. Common
abnormal kinetic patterns of the knee in gait in
spastic diplegia of cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2000;
2. Abel MF, Damiano DL, Pannunzio M, Bush J. Muscletendon
surgery in diplegic cerebral palsy: functional
and mechanical changes. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;
3. Chang WN, Tsirikos AI, Miller F, Lennon N, Schuyler
J, Kerstetter L, et al. Distal hamstring lengthening in
ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: primary
versus revision procedures. Gait Posture. 2004;
4. DeLuca PA, Ounpuu S, Davis RB, Walsh JH. Effect of
hamstring and psoas lengthening on pelvic tilt in
patients with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. J Pediatr
Orthop. 1998; 18(6):712-8.
5. Kay RM, Rethlefsen SA, Skaggs D, Leet A. Outcome of
medial versus combined medial and lateral hamstring
lengthening surgery in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr
Orthop. 2002; 22(2):169-72.
6. Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL. Atlas of pediatric
orthopaedic surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. P. 600-7.
7. Brunner R, Jaspers RT, Pel JJ, Huijing PA. Acute and
long-term effects on muscle force after intramuscular
aponeurotic lengthening. Clin Orthop. 2000; 378(1):
8. Westwell M, Deluca P, Ounpuu S. Effect of repeat
hamstring lengthenings in individuals with cerebral
palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004; 46(S99):14-5.
9. Bleck EE. Orthopedic management in cerebral palsy.
London, UK: MacKeith Press; 1987. P. 352-5.
10. Ahmed AA, Rafalla AA. Clinical outcome of hamstring
lengthening to correct flexed knee gait in patients
with spastic diplegia. Egyp Orthop J. 2016; 51(4):
11. Thompson N, Stebbins J, Seniorou M, Wainwright
AM, Newham DJ, Theologis TN. The use of minimally
invasive techniques in multi-level surgery for children
with cerebral palsy: preliminary results. J Bone Joint
Surg Br. 2010; 92(10):1442-8.
12. Hachache B, Eid T, Ghosn E, Sebaaly A, Kharrat K,
Ghanem I. Is percutaneous proximal gracilis tenotomy
as effective and safe as the open procedure? J Child
Orthop. 2015; 9(6):477-81.
13. Salamon ML, Pinney SJ, Van Bergeyk A, Hazelwood
S. Surgical anatomy and accuracy of percutaneous
achilles tendon lengthening. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;
14. El Hage S, Rachkidi R, Noun Z, Haidar R, Dagher F,
Kharrat K. Is percutaneous adductor tenotomy as
effective and safe as the open procedure? J Pediatr
Orthop. 2010; 30(5):485-8.
15. Nazareth A, Rethlefsen S, Ted C, Mueske NM, Wren
TA, Kay RM. Percutaneous hamstring lengthening
surgery is as effective as open lengthening in
children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;
16. Gordon AB, Baird GO, McMulkin ML, Caskey PM,
Ferguson RL. Gait analysis outcomes of percutaneous
medial hamstring tenotomies in children with
cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008; 28(3):324-9.
17. Mansour T, Derienne J, Daher M, Sarraf D, Zoghbi
Y, Ghanem I. Is percutaneous medial hamstring
myofascial lengthening as anatomically effective and
safe as the open procedure? J Child Orthop. 2017;
18. Saini R, Dhillon MS, Tripathy SK, Goyal T, Sudesh P,
Gill SS, et al. Regeneration of the Achilles tendon after
percutaneous tenotomy in infants: a clinical and MRI
study. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2010; 19(4):344-7.