Cost Effectiveness of Laminar Flow Systems for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Filtering Money from the OR?

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: Laminar flow ventilation systems were developed to reduce surgical contamination in joint arthroplasty
to avoid periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The goals of this study are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and economic
viability of installing and maintaining a laminar flow system in an operating room.
Methods: A Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the cost effectiveness of laminar flow. The variables included
were cost to treat PJI, incidence of PJI, cost of laminar flow, years of operating room use, and arthroplasty volume as
the dependent variable.
Results: Laminar flow would be financially-justified when 1,217 (SD: 319) TSA cases are performed annually with
assumed 10% reduction in PJI from laminar flow and 487 (SD: 127) with assumed 25% reduction. In a high volume OR,
laminar flow costs $25.24 per case (assuming 10% reduction) and $8.24 per case (assuming 25% reduction). Laminar
flow would need to reduce the incidence of PJI by 35.1% (SD: 9.1) to be a cost-effective strategy.
Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates the substantial arthroplasty volume and large reduction in PJI rates required to
justify the installation and maintenance costs of this technology. This high cost of implementation should be considered
prior to installing laminar flow systems.
Level of evidence: II

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Virani NA, Williams CD, Clark R, Polikandriotis J,
Downes KL, Frankle MA. Preparing for the bundledpayment
initiative: the cost and clinical outcomes
of total shoulder arthroplasty for the surgical
treatment of glenohumeral arthritis at an average
4-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;
22(12):1601-11.
2. Virani NA, Williams CD, Clark R, Polikandriotis J,
Downes KL, Frankle MA. Preparing for the bundledpayment
initiative: the cost and clinical outcomes
of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the surgical
treatment of advanced rotator cuff deficiency at an
average 4-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2013; 22(12):1612-22.
3. Baghdadi YM, Maradit-Kremers H, Dennison T,
Ransom JE, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, et al. The hospital
cost of two-stage reimplantation for deep infection
after shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Open Access. 2017;
1(1):15-8.
4. Hatch MD, Daniels SD, Glerum KM, Higgins LD. The
cost effectiveness of vancomycin for preventing
infections after shoulder arthroplasty: a break-even
analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26(3):472-7.
5. Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Ramsey ML, Williams
GR, Parvizi J, Namdari S. Periprosthetic shoulder
infection in the United States: incidence and
economic burden. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;
24(5):741-6.
6. Zmistowski B, Karam JA, Durinka JB, Casper DS,
Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection increases the 
risk of one-year mortality. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2013;
95(24):2177-84.
7. Charnley J. Postoperative infection after total
hip replacement with special reference to air
contamination in the operating room. Clin Orthop.
1972; 87:167-87.
8. Charnley J. A sterile-air operating theatre enclosure.
Br J Surg. 1964; 51(1):195-202.
9. Charnley J, Eftekhar N. Postoperative infection in
total prosthetic replacement arthroplasty of the hipjoint
with special reference to the bacterial content
of the air of the operating room. Br J Surg. 1969;
56(9):641-9.
10. Gastmeier P, Breier AC, Brandt C. Influence of laminar
airflow on prosthetic joint infections: a systematic
review. J Hosp Infect. 2012; 81(2):73-8.
11. Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C, Wyatt MC. Does
the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early
deep infection after total hip and knee replacement?
The ten-year results of the New Zealand Joint
Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(1):85-90.
12. Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Ramsey ML, Williams
GR, Parvizi J, Namdari S. Periprosthetic shoulder
infection in the United States: incidence and
economic burden. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;
24(5):741-6.
13. Schairer WW, Zhang AL, Feeley BT. Hospital
readmissions after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(9):1349-55.
14. Villacis D, Sivasundaram L, Pannell WC, Heckmann N,
Omid R, Hatch GF 3rd. Complication rate and implant
survival for reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus
total shoulder arthroplasty: results during the initial
2 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(6):927-35.
15. Leijtens B, Koëter M, Kremers K, Koëter S. High
incidence of postoperative hypothermia in total knee
and total hip arthroplasty: a prospective observational
study. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(6):895-8.
16. Frisch NB, Pepper AM, Jildeh TR, Shaw J, Guthrie
T, Silverton C. Intraoperative hypothermia during
surgical fixation of hip fractures. Orthopedics. 2016;
39(6):e1170-7.
17. Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Cofield RH, Sperling JW,
Sanchez-Sotelo J, Osmon DR, et al. Microbiologic
diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection by
use of implant sonication. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;
47(6):1878-84.
18. Patel A, Calfee RP, Plante M, Fischer SA, Green A.
Propionibacterium acnes colonization of the human
shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(6):897-
902.
19. Singh JA, Sperling JW, Schleck C, Harmsen WS, Cofield
RH. Periprosthetic infections after total shoulder
arthroplasty: a 33-year perspective. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2012; 21(11):1534-41.
20. Sendi P, Rohrbach M, Graber P, Frei R, Ochsner PE,
Zimmerli W. Staphylococcus aureus small colony
variants in prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis.
2006; 43(8):961-7.