Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2 Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: The projected increase in revision shoulder arthroplasty has increased interest in the outcomes of these
procedures. Glenoid component removal and conversion to a hemiarthroplasty (HA) is an option for aseptic glenoid
loosening after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA).
Methods: We identified patients who had undergone revision shoulder arthroplasty over a 15-year period. 17 patients
met inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a retrospective chart review was conducted for pre-surgical and operative
data. We contacted patients at a mean follow-up of 70 months from revision surgery for implant survival, reoperations
and functional outcomes scores.
Results: Implant survival was estimated to be 88% at 2 years and 67% at 5 years. Mean ASES score for surviving
implants was 58 ± 22. Mean SANE score was 54 ± 24, and mean VAS pain score was 3.5 ± 2.8. Mean SF-12 Mental
and Physical scores were 46 ± 15 and 38 ± 10, respectively. Five patients (50% of those with surviving implants)
reported being either very satisfied or satisfied with the status of their shoulder. There were complications in 6 patients
(35%) and 5 patients (29%) required reoperation.
Conclusion: HA following failed aTSA due to glenoid loosening produced modest clinical results and satisfaction rates.
Reverse arthroplasty may be a more reliable treatment strategy in this patient population.
Level of evidence: IV

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Lazarus MD, Ramsey
ML, Williams GR, Namdari S. Future Patient Demand
for Shoulder Arthroplasty by Younger Patients:
National Projections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;
473(6):1860-7.
2. Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. Complications
of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2006; 88(10):2279-92.
3. Matsen FA 3rd, Clinton J, Lynch J, Bertelsen A,
Richardson ML. Glenoid component fail-ure in total
shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;
90(4):885-96.
4. Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM.
Glenoid revision surgery after total shoulder
arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;
10(3):217-24.
5. Dines JS, Fealy S, Strauss EJ, Allen A, Craig EV,
Warren RF, et al. Outcomes analysis of revision total
shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;
88(7):1494-500.
6. Neyton L, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Edwards 
TB. Glenoid corticocancellous bone graft-ing after
glenoid component removal in the treatment of
glenoid loosening. J Shoulder El-bow Surg. 2006;
15(2):173-9.
7. Phipatanakul WP, Norris TR. Treatment of glenoid
loosening and bone loss due to osteoly-sis with
glenoid bone grafting. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;
15(1):84-7.
8. Ahir SP, Walker PS, Squire-Taylor CJ, Blunn GW,
Bayley JI. Analysis of glenoid fixation for a reversed
anatomy fixed-fulcrum shoulder replacement. J
Biomech. 2004; 37(11):1699-708.
9. Patel DN, Young B, Onyekwelu I, Zuckerman JD,
Kwon YW. Reverse total shoulder ar-throplasty for
failed shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2012; 21(11):1478-83.
10. Walker M, Willis MP, Brooks JP, Pupello D, Mulieri
PJ, Frankle MA. The use of the reverse shoulder
arthroplasty for treatment of failed total shoulder
arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;
21(4):514-22.
11. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J.
Validation of a combined comorbidity in-dex. J Clin
Epidemiol. 1994; 47(11):1245-51.
12. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American
Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Stand-ardized
Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report
section: reliability, validity, and re-sponsiveness. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11(6):587-94.
13. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-
Form Health Survey: construction of scales and
preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med
Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33.
14. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the
Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Acute Pain.
Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(12):1153-7.
15. Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, Uhorchak JM,
Taylor DC. Comparison of the Single Assessment
Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder
rating scales. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27(2):214-21.
16. Werner BS, Böhm D, Abdelkawi A, Gohlke F. Glenoid
bone grafting in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
for long-standing anterior shoulder dislocation. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(11):1655-61.
17. Cheung EV, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Revision shoulder
arthroplasty for glenoid compo-nent loosening. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17(3):371-5.
18. Deutsch A, Abboud JA, Kelly J, Mody M, Norris T,
Ramsey ML,et al. Clinical results of revision shoulder
arthroplasty for glenoid component loosening. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(6):706-16.
19. Cheung EV, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Reimplantation
of a glenoid component following component
removal and allogenic bone-grafting. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 2007; 89(8):1777-83.
20. Melis B, Bonnevialle N, Neyton L, Lévigne C, Favard
L, Walch G, et al. Glenoid loosen-ing and failure in
anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: is revision
with a reverse shoulder ar-throplasty a reliable
option? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21(3):342-9.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 8, Issue 2
March 2020
Pages 147-153

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 October 2018
  • Revise Date: 28 January 2019
  • Accept Date: 30 January 2019
  • First Publish Date: 01 March 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics