What Predicts Outstanding Orthopedic Residents among the Program?

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA

2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, USA


Background: An oversupply of qualified applicants leads to intense competition for the limited number of
first year orthopedic residency positions. Therefore, program directors can be more selective in choosing
their future residents. However, it is unclear if there are resident characteristics that correspond with trainee
Methods: We asked (1) what resident characteristics are associated with subjective residency performance
score? and (2) what resident characteristics are associated with Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE)
A total of 119 orthopedic residents accepted at the Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program from
1999 – 2009 were included in this study. The current program director together with two former program
directors in the selected time period defined the subjective residency performance score based on the
clinical skills of the residents during training.
Results: Former Olympic or varsity athlete (P=0.018) and Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) status (P=0.014)
were associated with a better subjective residency performance score. Higher USMLE step 1 score
(P=0.0038), known person within faculty prior to the residency (did a research rotation, or local medical
student) (P=0.041), and AOA (P=0.015) status were associated with a higher OITE score.
Conclusion: AOA status of the applicant for orthopedic residency is associated with both a higher OITE
score and a better subjective residency performance score.
Level of evidence: IV


Main Subjects

1. Bernstein AD, Jazrawi LM, Elbeshbeshy B, Della
Valle CJ, Zuckerman JD. An analysis of orthopaedic
residency selection criteria. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2002;
2. Clark R, Evans EB, Ivey FM, Calhoun JH, Hokanson
JA. Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful
applicants to orthopedic residency training programs.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 241(1):257-64.
3. Scherl SA, Lively N, Simon MA. Initial review of
electronic residency application service charts 
by orthopaedic residency faculty members. Does
applicant gender matter? J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2001; 83(1):65-70.
4. Wagoner NE, Suriano JR. Program directors’
responses to a survey on variables used to select
residents in a time of change. Acad Med. 1999;
5. Zagumny MJ, Rudolph J. Comparing medical students’
and residency directors’ ratings of criteria used to
select residents. Acad Med. 1992; 67(9):613.
6. Taylor CA, Mayhew HE, Weinstein L. Residency
directors’ responses to the concept of a proposed
electronic residency application service. Acad Med.
1994; 69(2):138-42.
7. Ross CA, Leichner P. Criteria for selecting residents:
a reassessment. Can J Psychiatry. 1984; 29(8):681-6.
8. Carmichael KD, Westmoreland JB, Thomas JA,
Patterson RM. Relation of residency selection factors
to subsequent orthopaedic in-training examination
performance. South Med J. 2005; 98(5):528-32.
9. Crane JT, Ferraro CM. Selection criteria for emergency
medicine residency applicants. Acad Emerg Med.
2000; 7(1):54-60.
10. Dorsey ER, Raphael BA, Balcer LJ, Galetta SL.
Predictors of future publication record and academic
rank in a cohort of neurology residents. Neurology.
2006; 67(8):1335-7.
11. Lawton MT, Narvid J, Quinones-Hinojosa A.
Predictors of neurosurgical career choice among
residents and residency applicants. Neurosurgery.
2007; 60(5):934-9.
12. Bilbey JH, Fache JS, Burhenne HJ. Are there predictors
for future academic radiologists? A Canadian survey.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1992; 43(5):369-73.
13. McCaffrey JC. Medical student selection of
otolaryngology-head and neck surgery as a specialty:
influences and attitudes. Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2005; 133(6):825-30.
14. Dirschl DR, Dahners LE, Adams GL, Crouch JH, Wilson
FC. Correlating selection criteria with subsequent
performance as residents. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
2002; 399(1):265-71.
15. Garden FH, Smith BS. Criteria for selection of physical
medicine and rehabilitation residents. A survey of
current practices and suggested changes. Am J Phys
Med Rehabil. 1989; 68(3):123-7.
16. Wagoner NE, Suriano JR, Stoner JA. Factors used by
program directors to select residents. J Med Educ.
1986; 61(1):10-21.
17. Sherry E, Mobbs R, Henderson A. Becoming an
orthopaedic surgeon: background of trainees and
their opinions of selection criteria for orthopaedic
training. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996; 66(7):473-7.
Volume 7, Issue 6
November 2019
Pages 478-483
  • Receive Date: 08 May 2018
  • Revise Date: 20 July 2018
  • Accept Date: 06 January 2019
  • First Publish Date: 01 November 2019