Short Term Complications and Functional Results of Sarcoma Limb Salvage Surgeries

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER


1 Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Research Centre, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, Iran

3 Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, Iran

4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Imamreza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran


Background: Limb salvaging surgeries are current surgical treatment of extremity bone sarcomas. Resected bone
replacement consists of two main methods; tumor prosthesis versus structural allograft. Biological reconstruction with
an allograft is an economic cheap method in young sarcoma patients, however, the surgeons are more convinced with
tumor prosthesis replacement.
Methods: We evaluated the short-term complications and functional results of 40 patients with aggressive extremity
tumors in a retrospective cohort study. The mean age of cases was 25 and we followed them for 24 months. 17
patients underwent tumor prosthesis replacement after wide resection of limb sarcomas. 16 cases had structural
allograft reconstruction and 7 patients treated with amputation. We matched confounders including age, sex, blood
cell count and chemotherapy treatment in the study groups.
Results: We found 15 major complications (45.5%) in limb salvage surgeries composing infection, allograft nonunion,
allograft fracture, prosthesis fracture, prosthesis loosening and device failure that needed another surgery to be
resolved. We had 10 major complications in allograft group (62%) and 5 in tumor prosthesis group (29.4%). Although
the rate of complications was higher in allograft group, it didn’t statistically indicate strong correlation (Fisher’s exact:
0.084). Mean Musculo-Skeletal tumor rating Scale (MSTS) score was 25.8(73.7%) and 22.3(63.7%) in allograft
group and prosthesis cases respectively. MSTS score had a normal distribution in the different groups with no
significant difference between them.
Conclusion: Although complications were higher in the allograft group, allograft could be offered to bone sarcoma
patients, whom are predicted to have short life expectancy.
Level of evidence: III


Main Subjects

1. Fletcher CD. World Health Organization classification
of tumours pathology and genetics of tumours of soft
tissue and bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002.
2. Eilber FR, Mirra JJ, Grant TT, Weisenberger T, Morton
DL. Is amputation necessary for sarcomas? A sevenyear
experience with limb salvage. Ann Surg. 1980;
3. DiCaprio MR, Friedlaender GE. Malignant bone
tumors: limb sparing versus amputation. J Am Acad
Orthop Surg. 2003; 11(1):25-37.
4. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Longhi A, Donati D, Manfrini M,
Giacomini S, et al. Nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the
extremity with pathologic fracture at presentation,
local and systemic control by amputation or limb
salvage after preoperative chemotherapy. Acta Orthop
Scand. 2003; 74(4):449-54.
5. Han G, Bi WZ, Xu M, Jia JP, Wang Y. Amputation versus
limb-salvage surgery in patients with osteosarcoma:
a meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2016; 40(8):2016-27.
6. Albergo JI, Gaston CL, Aponte-Tinao LA, Ayerza
MA, Muscolo DL, Grimer RJ, et al. Proximal tibia
reconstruction after bone tumor resection: are
survivorship and outcomes of endoprosthetic
replacement and osteoarticular allograft similar? Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475(3):676-82.
7. Ayerza A, Farfalli G, Aponte-Tinao L, Muscolo D. Does
increased rate of limb-sparing surgery affect survival 
in osteosarcoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;
8. Bacci G, Forni C, Longhi A, Ferrari S, Mercuri M, Picci
P, et al. local recurrence and local control of nonmetastatic
osteosarcoma of the extremities: a 27-year
experience in a single institution. J Surg Oncol. 2007;
9. Eiser C, Darlington AS, Stride CB, Grimer R. Quality
of life implications as a consequence of surgery: limb
salvage, primary and secondary amputation. Sarcoma.
2001; 5(4):189-95.
10. Gundle KR, Cizik AM, Jones RL, Davidson DJ. Quality
of life measures in soft tissue sarcoma. Expert Rev
Anticancer Ther. 2015; 15(1):95-100.
11. Mavrogenis AF, Abati CN, Romagnoli C, Ruggieri
P. Similar survival but better function for patients
after limb salvage versus amputation for distal
tibia osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;
12. Mei J, Zhu XZ, Wang ZY, Cai XS. Functional outcomes
and quality of life in patients with osteosarcoma
treated with amputation versus limb-salvage surgery:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop
Trauma Surg. 2014; 134(11):1507-16.
13. Abed YY, Beltrami G, Campanacci DA, Innocenti M,
Scoccianti G, Capanna R. Biological reconstruction
after resection of bone tumors around the knee:
long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;
14. Campanacci L, Alì􀆰 N, Casanova JM, Kreshak J, Manfrini
M. Resurfaced allograft-prosthetic composite
for proximal tibial reconstruction in children:
intermediate-term results of an original technique. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(3):241-50.
15. Levin AS, Arkader A, Morris CD. Reconstruction
following tumor resections in skeletally immature
patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017; 25(3):204-13.
16. Wilson RJ, Sulieman LM, VanHouten JP, Halpern JL,
Schwartz HS, Holt GE, et al. Cost-utility of osteoarticular
allograft versus endoprosthetic reconstruction for
primary bone sarcoma of the knee: a Markova analysis.
J Surg Oncol. 2017; 115(3):257-65.
17. Gharedaghi M, Peivandi MT, Mazloomi M, Shoorin HR,
Hasani M, Seyf P, et al. Evaluation of clinical results and
complications of structural allograft reconstruction
after bone tumor surgery. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;