National Joint Registry of Iran

Document Type : PERSPECTIVE

Authors

1 Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Joint reconstruction research center, tehran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Joint replacement is currently on the rise with a high community burden. A registry was designed to evaluate the costs,
possible complications, and rate of revisions as well as finding the most effective techniques, risk factors associated
with poor results, indications for revision surgeries, and also demographic evaluation of patients undergoing joint
replacement surgery in Iran.
Level of evidence: V

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Bugała-Szpak J, Kusz D, Dyner-Jama I. Early evaluation of quality of life and clinical parameters after total knee arthroplasty. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2010;12(1):41-9.
2. Jones CA, Pohar S. Health-related quality of life after total joint arthroplasty: a scoping review. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012; 28(3):395-429.
3. Santini AJ, Raut V. Ten-year survival analysis of the PFC total knee arthroplasty-a surgeon’s first 99 replacements. Int Orthop. 2008; 32(4):459-65.
4. Maloney WJ. National joint replacement registries:has the time come? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A(10):1582-5.
5. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(7):1487-97.
6. Saleh KJ, Santos ER, Ghomrawi HM, Parvizi J, Mulhall KJ. Socioeconomic issues and demographics of total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 446(1):15-21.
7. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(4):780-5.
8. Owen DH, Russell NC, Smith PN, Walter WL. An estimation of the incidence of squeaking and revision surgery for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement: a meta-analysis and report from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(2):181-7.
9. Piggott RP, Lyons R, Murphy CG, Curtin W. Total hip replacement revision in a single brand small cementless stem–our experience after the findings of the national joint registry. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2018;6(6):501-7.
10. Serra-Sutton V, Allepuz A, Espallargues M, Labek G, Pons JM. Arthroplasty registers: a review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25(1):63-72.
11. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Söderman P. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84-A(suppl 2):2-20.
12. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian arthroplasty register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71(4):337-53.
13. Sibanda N, Copley LP, Lewsey JD, Borroff M, Gregg P, MacGregor AJ, et al. Revision rates after primary hip and knee replacement in England between 2003 and 2006. PLoS Med. 2008; 5(9):e179.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 7, Issue 1
January and February 2019
Pages 75-78

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 June 2018
  • Accept Date: 04 November 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics