The Perioperative Impact of Surgical Case Order in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Document Type : SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine a correlation between surgical case order and the length of
operative time, total length of time in the operating room, time until discharge from the hospital, and the incidence of
intraoperative complications for primary total shoulder arthroplasty cases.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of records for all individual primary total shoulder arthroplasty and
reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at a single hospital. In order to compare true parameters and minimize variables,
only the cases performed by one senior author were analyzed. Operative and hospital records were reviewed.
Results: There were 162 primary TSA and with the following order: 55 first order cases, 46 second order cases, 34
third order cases, 21 fourth order cases, and six fifth order cases. There were 71 primary rTSA patients included (27:
27:10:6:1). Length of stay was statistically increased for both female gender (8.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.5-
16.7%; P=0.0386) and fourth case order compared to first case (13.3%; 95% CI = 0.6%; 27.6%) P=0.041). For reverse
TSA, there was no analyzed predictor that was significant.
Conclusion: Even between anatomic TSA and reverse TSA patients, there was variability in what factors played a
part in case inpatient length of stay. As such, we believe that this study highlights that case order can have an effect
on operating room parameters for shoulder arthroplasty patients. The need for larger studies remains to better define
that effect.
Level of evidence: IV

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz
SM. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and
elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19(8):1115-20.
2. Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Lazarus MD, Ramsey
ML, Williams GR, Namdari S. Future patient demand
for shoulder arthroplasty by younger patients:
national projections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;
473(6):1860-7.
3. Poultsides LA, Ma Y, Della Valle AG, Chiu YL, Sculco
TP, Memtsoudis SG. In-hospital surgical site infections
after primary hip and knee arthroplasty--incidence
and risk factors. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(3):385-9.
4. Schimmel JJ, Horsting PP, de Kleuver M, Wonders
G, van Limbeek J. Risk factors for deep surgical site
infections after spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2010;
19(10):1711-9.
5. Schairer WW, Zhang AL, Feeley BT. Hospital
readmissions after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(9):1349-55.
6. Jain N, Pietrobon R, Hocker S, Guller U, Shankar
A, Higgins LD. The relationship between surgeon
and hospital volume and outcomes for shoulder
arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-
A(3):496-505.
7. Kreder HJ, Williams JI, Jaglal S, Hu R, Axcell T, Stephen
D. Are complication rates for elective primary total
hip arthroplasty in Ontario related to surgeon and
hospital volumes? A preliminary investigation. Can J
Surg. 1998; 41(6):431-7.
8. Kosashvili Y, Mayne IP, Trajkovski T, Lackstein D, Safir
O, Backstein D. Influence of sex on surgical time in
primary total knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2010;
53(4):256-60.
9. Neder JA, Nery LE, Silva AC, Andreoni S, Whipp BJ.
Maximal aerobic power and leg muscle mass and
strength related to age in non-athlethic males and 
females. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999;
79(6):522-30.
10. van der Esch M, Steultjens MP, Lems WF, Dekker
J. Gender difference in varus-valgus laxity in
osteoarthritis of the knee. Scand J Rheumatol. 2007;
36(2):157-9.
11. Felson DT, Zhang Y. An update on the epidemiology of
knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention.
Arthritis Rheum. 1998; 41(8):1343-55.
12. Menendez ME, Baker DK, Fryberger CT, Ponce BA.
Predictors of extended length of stay after elective
shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;
24(10):1527-33.
13. Matsen FA 3rd, Li N, Gao H, Yuan S, Russ SM, Sampson
PD. Factors affecting length of stay, readmission,
and revision after shoulder arthroplasty: a
population-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;
97(15):1255-63.
14. Husted H, Holm G, Jacobsen S. Predictors of length
of stay and patient satisfaction after hip and knee
replacement surgery: fast-track experience in 712
patients. Acta Orthop. 2008; 79(2):168-73.
15. Gruskay J, Kepler C, Smith J, Radcliff K, Vaccaro A. Is
surgical case order associated with increased infection
rate after spine surgery? Spine. 2012; 37(13):1170-4.
16. Petrigliano FA, Bezrukov N, Gamradt SC, SooHoo NF.
Factors predicting complication and reoperation
rates following surgical fixation of proximal humeral
fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(18):1544-51.
17. Singh JA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Ninety day mortality
and its predictors after primary shoulder arthroplasty:
an analysis of 4,019 patients from 1976-2008. BMC
Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12(12):231.
18. Voskuijl T, Hageman M, Ring D. Higher Carlson
comorbidity index scores are associated with
readmission after orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 2014; 472(5):1638-44.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 7, Issue 1
January and February 2019
Pages 12-18

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 July 2017
  • Accept Date: 16 July 2018
  • First Publish Date: 01 January 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics