Are We Training Surgeons or Supervisors? Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and the Future of Surgical Expertise in Orthopedics

Document Type : EDITORIAL

Authors

1 Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NSU, Miami, USA

2 Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

10.22038/abjs.2025.93815.4236

Abstract

Orthopedic surgery isn’t exactly magic, but it demands mastery: doing the right thing reliably, safely, and under pressure. For decades, training has relied on progressive responsibility observation, assistance, supervised performance, and independent practice within a stable environment. Artificial intelligence, computer vision, next-generation robotics, mixed reality, and generative tools are now reshaping that environment and raising a central concern: are we training future surgeons or future supervisors of automated systems? We describe “supervisor drift” in the modern OR as trainees spend more time with planning platforms, navigation, consoles, and overlays, while attendings increasingly verify system accuracy and maintain sterility amid expanding technology. We summarize educational benefits including personalized AI coaching, case vignettes, AR/VR simulation, and AI-assisted templating and preoperative planning, alongside barriers of cost and cultural resistance and early AI literacy courses. Finally, we outline recommendations to prevent deskilling: dual-competency milestones, documentation of AI use, bias and error recognition, protected low-tech cases, and clear governance and accountability.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Szatkowski JP, Druten E, Soni C, O’Neill DC. Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education: a narrative review. Ann Jt. 2025:10:34. doi: 10.21037/aoj-25-7.
  2. Parsa A, Ebrahimzadeh MH. ChatGPT in medicine; a disruptive innovation or just one step forward? Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(4):225-226. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2023.22042.
  3. Moldt JA, Festl-Wietek T, Madany Mamlouk A, Nieselt K, Fuhl W, Herrmann-Werner A. Chatbots for future docs: exploring medical students’ attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence and medical chatbots. Med Educ Online. 2023;28(1):2182659. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2182659.
  4. Yang W, Gao T, Liu X, et al. Clinical application of artificial intelligence-assisted three-dimensional planning in direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2024;48(3):773-783. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-06029-9.
  5. Levingston H, Anderson MC, Roni MA. From theory to practice: Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy course for first-year medical students. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e70706. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70706.
  6. Khani Y, Bisadi A, Salmani A, Namazi N, Vahed IE, Kianparsa J, Nouroozi M, Rad FM, Poursalehian M. Can Artificial Intelligence Reliably and Accurately Measure Lower Limb Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(7):383-394. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.84846.3864.
  7. Ebrahimpour A, Dolikhani M, Shakibamaram G. Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Catalyst for Orthopedic Residency Training. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(12):773-5.