A Comparison of the Postoperative Complications between Two Drainage Methods after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Document Type: RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

Urmia university of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Background: The role of wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty is still considered controversial as although
closed drainage systems have been believed to be effective in decreasing the post-operative complications, they could
also facilitate the bleeding and increase the rate of transfusion and infection. We have conducted the current study to
compare the outcomes superficial subcutaneous, one deep, and two deep drain techniques after total knee arthroplasty.
Methods: Between 2014 and 2015 sixty consecutive patients were prospectively selected and underwent primary
total knee arthroplasty. Patients randomized to receive one superficial, one deep and two deep drains at the end of
operation. Tourniquet was used and opened at the end of the surgery after dressing. Patients were studied for volume
of blood loss, hemoglobin drop, number of transfusion, and any complications. Knee range of motion and diameter
were measured and compared with contralateral side in all cases at the end of the third day.
Results: There was no statistical difference regarding red blood cell volume loss, Hb drop, and transfusion rate between
groups. Patients in one superficial group had the most sever post-operative ecchymosis. Knee flexion and swelling
were the same in all groups. Patients in one superficial drain group had the worst VAS for the pain. Need for early
blood transfusion was significantly higher in two deep drain group. In one deep drain group returned back to operating
room for sever hemarthrosis and wound dehiscence was occurred in a patient. One patient in one deep group had also
developed mild thrombo-emboli.
Conclusion: Regarding the blood volume loss after total knee arthroplasty there is no difference between
superficial drainage and even more effective intra-articular techniques. Outcome and complication rates are the
same.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Zhang XN, Wu G, Xu RZ, Bai XZ. [Closed suction
drainage or non-drainage for total knee arthroplasty:
a meta-analysis]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;
50(12):1119–25.
2. Sun JG, Zhai S, Yuan H. [Systematic review of the
earlier safety of closed suction drainage for knee
arthroplasty]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;
47(20):1544–9.
3. Chandratreya A, Giannikas K, Livesley P. To drain or
not drain: literature versus practice. J R Coll Surg
Edinb. 1998; 43(6):404–6.
4. Demirkale I, Tecimel O, Sesen H, Kilicarslan K,
Altay M, Dogan M. Nondrainage decreases blood
transfusion need and infection rate in bilateral total
knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(5):993–7.
5. Matziolis G, Roehner E, Windis C, Wagner A. The
volume of the human knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma
Surg. 2015; 135(10):1401-3.
6. Yamada K, Imaizumi T, Uemura M, Takada N, Kim
Y. Comparison between 1-hour and 24-hour drain
clamping using diluted epinephrine solution after
total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;
16(4):458-62
7. Larsson J, Lewis DH, Liljedahl SO, Löfström JB.
Early biochemical and hemodynamic changes after
operation in a bloodless field. Eur Surg Res. 1977;
9(5):311-20.
8. Yang JH, Yoon JR, Dahuja A, Song S. Subcutaneous
versus intraarticular closed suction indwelling
drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised
control trial. Indian J Orthop. 2016; 50(1):59-64
9. Drosos GI, Ververidis A, Valkanis C, Tripsianis G,
Stavroulakis E, Vogiatzaki T, et al. A randomized
comparative study of topical versus intravenous
tranexamic acid administration in enhanced recovery
after surgery (ERAS) total knee replacement. J
Orthop. 2016; 13(3):127-31.
10. Keyhani S, Esmailiejah AA, Abbasian MR, Safdari
F. Which route of tranexamic acid administration
is more effective to reduce blood loss following
total knee arthroplasty? Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;
4(1):65-9.
11. Goyal N, Kaul R, Harris IA, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ. Is
there a need for routine post-operative hemoglobin
level estimation in total knee arthroplasty with
tranexamic acid use? Knee. 2016; 23(2):310-3.
12. Ho D, Jagdeo J, Waldorf HA. is there a role for arnica
and bromelain in prevention of post-procedure
ecchymosis or edema? A systematic review of the
literature. Dermatol Surg. 2016; 42(4):445-63.
13. Kluger MT, Lewis G, Rice D, McNair P. Psychological
rather than pharmacological interventions
for effective prevetion of pain after knee joint
replacement? Br J Anaesth. 2016; 116(1):150.
14. Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SFMPQ-
2): A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation
Study of the Persian Version in Patients with Knee
Osteoarthritis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015; 3(1):45-50.
15. Si HB, Yang TM, Zeng Y, Shen B. No clear benefit or
drawback to the use of closed drainage after primary
total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;
17(1):183-91.
16. Abolghasemian M, Huether TW, Soever LJ, Drexler
M, MacDonald MP, Backstein DJ. The use of a closedsuction
drain in revision knee arthroplasty may not
be necessary: a prospective randomized study. J
Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(7):1544-8.
17. Yang JH, Yoon JR, Dahuja A, Song S. Subcutaneous
versus intraarticular closed suction indwelling
drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised
control trial. Indian J Orthop. 2016; 50(1):59-64.
18. Lee QJ, Mak WP, Hau WS, Yeung ST, Wong YC, Wai
YL. Short duration and low suction pressure drain
versus no drain following total knee replacement. J
Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015; 23(3):278-81.
19. Watanabe T, Muneta T, Yagishita K, Hara K, Koga H,
Sekiya I. Closed Suction drainage is not necessary
for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study on
simultaneous bilateral surgeries of a mean follow-up
of 5.5 years. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(3):641-5.