<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			<journal>
			<title>The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery</title>
			<title_fa></title_fa>
			<short_title>ABJS</short_title>
			<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
			<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/</web_url>
			<journal_hbi_system_id>0</journal_hbi_system_id>
			<journal_hbi_system_user></journal_hbi_system_user>
			<journal_id_issn>2345-4644</journal_id_issn>
			<journal_id_issn_online>2345-461X</journal_id_issn_online>
			<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
			<journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
			<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
			<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
			<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
			<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
			<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
			<language>en</language>
			<pubdate>
				<type>jalali</type>
				<year>0</year>
				<month>0</month>
				<day>1</day>
			</pubdate>
			<pubdate>
				<type>gregorian</type>
				<year>2022</year>
				<month>8</month>
				<day>1</day>
			</pubdate>
			<volume>10</volume>
			<number>8</number>
			<publish_type>online</publish_type>
			<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
			<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
			<articleset><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Short Stems and Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>CURRENT CONCEPTS REVIEW</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Historically, the shoulder arthroplasty humeral component has been designed for the management of infections, tumours and fractures. In all these cases the stem was needed as a scaffold. Original humeral components were not developed for use in shoulder arthritis, so these designs and derivates had a long stem. The newest humeral implants innovations consist in shortening of the implant, or even removing the whole stem, to rely on stemless fixation at the level of the metaphysis. This implies the advantages of preserved bone stock, less stress shielding, eliminating the diaphyseal stress riser, easier implant removal at revision, and humeral component placement independent from the humeral diaphyseal axis. Nowadays, surgeons try to balance the need for a stable fixation of the humeral component with the potential need for revision surgery. Complications of revision shoulder arthroplasty are related to the need for removing a well-fixed humeral stem, the length of the procedure, and the need to treat severe bone loss. Level of evidence: V]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>bone preservation, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, Revision surgery, shoulder resurfacing, Short  stems, stemless shoulder replacement, Total Shoulder Arthroplasty</keyword>
				<start_page>633</start_page>
				<end_page>647</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_17789.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Berta</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Buch</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>bertab33@gmail.com</email>
				<code>76396</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>1 Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc 
Ribas s/n, postcode: 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
2 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus Bellaterra, 
Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>María</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Vall</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>mariavall17@gmail.com</email>
				<code>76397</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>1 Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc 
Ribas s/n, postcode: 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
2 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus Bellaterra, 
Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Paolo</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Consigliere</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>paoloconsigliere@gmail.com</email>
				<code>76398</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Reading Shoulder Unit, Berkshire Independent 
Hospital, Reading, United Kingdom</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Josep</first_name>
				<middle_name>Antón</middle_name>
				<last_name>Guillén</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>luisgerardonatera@hotmail.com</email>
				<code>76399</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc 
Ribas s/n, postcode: 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Enric</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Cruz</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>lgnaterac@fphag.org</email>
				<code>76400</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc 
Ribas s/n, postcode: 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Luis</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Natera</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>luisgerardonaterac@gmail.com</email>
				<code>76401</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Hospital General de Granollers, Avinguda Francesc 
Ribas s/n, postcode: 08402, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Return to Sport Activities and Risk of Reinjury Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>CURRENT CONCEPTS REVIEW</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[This article examines the elements that affect the return to sport (RTS) and the peril and percentages of reinjury following a prior primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The prevalence of RTS following ACLR ranges from 71% to 83%. Concerning elements affecting RTS, a limb symmetry index score of 90 or more duplicates the likelihood of RTS and triplicates it when the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score is 95 or more, irrespective of age. Other elements recognized to be preindicative of RTS at 1 year include complete rehabilitation, age ≤25, and higher IKDC scores. The prevalence of reinjury following ACLR ranges from 1.5% to 37.5% (between 9% and 29% in the majority of reports). It has been published that 1 in 5 individuals suffers reinjury to either knee, and that male individuals are more prone to reinjure following ACLR. The highest percentage of ACLR reinjury happens in younger male (&lt;18 years), being substantially higher than in female of the same age. Passing a combination of functional tests with predetermined cut-off points utilized as RTS criteria are related diminished ACLR reinjury percentages.Level of evidence: III]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Primary, return to sport</keyword>
				<start_page>648</start_page>
				<end_page>660</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_19163.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>E. Carlos</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>RODRIGUEZ-MERCHAN</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>ecrmerchan@hotmail.com</email>
				<code>82589</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Leonard</first_name>
				<middle_name>A.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Valentino</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>whybloodclots@gmail.com</email>
				<code>82590</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>SYSTEMATIC REVIEW</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Background: The two techniques most utilized in the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures are open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN). Although there have been multiple comparative clinical studies comparing outcomes for these two treatments, studies have not suggested one approach to be superior to the other. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with either ORIF or intramedullary nail.Methods: We conducted this meta-analysis utilizing stricter inclusion and broader exclusion criteria to examine these two common approaches. We examined those articles which have compared first-time, closed fractures of the humeral diaphysis in adults in fracture patterns that could be treated equivalently by intramedullary nail or plate fixation. The primary outcome of interest was nonunion, and studies that did not report nonunion rates were excluded.Results: There were a total of 1,926 abstracts reviewed and a total of three articles were included in the final analysis after screening. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nonunion between plating (2/111, 1.8%) and nailing (4/104, 3.9%) (P&gt;0.05). The mean difference in average time to union for plated fractures and nailed fractures was 1.11 weeks (95% CI 0.82 to 1.40) which was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). There was a significant difference in the incidence of radial nerve palsy (12/111, 10.8%) for plating compared to nailing (0/104, 0%) (P=0.0004). There was no difference in incidence of post-operative infection between the two groups intramedullary nailing (P&gt;0.05).Conclusion: The results of this analysis demonstrate an increased risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury, and a significantly shorter time to union when treating humeral shaft fractures with plating as compared to intramedullary nailing. There was no difference in the rates of nonunion or delayed union. Based on the evidence, both plating and nailing can achieve a similar treatment effect on humeral shaft fractures.Level of evidence: II]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Humeral fractures, intramedullary nailing, internal fracture fixation, malunited fractures</keyword>
				<start_page>661</start_page>
				<end_page>667</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_18885.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Kamil</first_name>
				<middle_name>M.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Amer</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>kamil.amer@rutgers.edu</email>
				<code>81294</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New 
Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Adam</first_name>
				<middle_name>M.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Kurland</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>adam.kurland@rutgers.edu</email>
				<code>81295</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New 
Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Brendan</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Smith</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>bts72@scarletmail.rutgers.edu</email>
				<code>81296</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Luke’s University 
Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Zuhdi</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Abdo</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>za156@njms.rutgers.edu</email>
				<code>81297</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New 
Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Rami</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Amer</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>amerrami930@gmail.com</email>
				<code>81298</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Michael</first_name>
				<middle_name>M.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Vosbikian</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>vosbikmm@njms.rutgers.edu</email>
				<code>81299</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New 
Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Irfan</first_name>
				<middle_name>H.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Ahmed</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>ahmedi2@njms.rutgers.edu</email>
				<code>81300</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New 
Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Psychometric Properties of Full and Shortened Persian-version of Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index Questionnaires in Persian-speaking Patients with Shoulder Pain</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>RESEARCH PAPER</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Background: This study aimed to translate the shortened Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (Short-WORC) questionnaire into Persian and determine the psychometric features of WORC and Persian-Short-WORC in patients with shoulder pain.Methods: A total of 130 patients completed Persian-WORC and -Short-WORC, Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI), shortened Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH), WORC, as well as Short-Form health survey (SF-36), in the evaluation and re-evaluation sessions with an interval of 5-7 days to assess reliability and validity. To determine responsiveness, all patients completed questionnaires and a global rating of change scale before and after the 4-week physiotherapy. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for assessing reliability, two-tailed Pearson (r) forvalidity, as well as longitudinal validity, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for responsiveness.Results: The ICC was 0.95 (confidence interval: 0.93-0.96) for Short-WORC. A strong correlation was found between Short-WORC, SPADI (r=-0.82), Quick-DASH (r=-0.79), WORC (r=0.92), SF-36 physical (r=0.76), and SF-36 mental (r=0.71). Floor and ceiling effects were not detected. The responsiveness of Short-WORC and WORC was proven with an area under the curve of &gt;0.90, and their minimal important change was 28.56 and 26.28 points, respectively.Conclusion: The Persian version of WORC has good psychometric properties to measure disability and health-related quality of life in patients with shoulder pain. Level of evidence: IV]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Persian, Psychometrics, Short-WORC, WORC</keyword>
				<start_page>668</start_page>
				<end_page>676</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_20284.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Daghiani</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>maryamdaghiyani@gmail.com</email>
				<code>87726</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical 
Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 
Mashhad, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Hosein</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Negahban</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>negahbanh@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>87727</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>1 Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical 
Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 
Mashhad, Iran 
2 Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of 
Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Neda</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Mostafaee</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>neda_mostafaee@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>87728</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical 
Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 
Mashhad, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Mohammad H.</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Ebrahimzadeh</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>ebrahimzadehmh@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>87730</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of 
Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Ali</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Moradi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>moradial@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>87731</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of 
Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Amir R.</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Kachooei</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>kachooeiar@mums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>87732</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of 
Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Aref</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Saidi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>arefsaidi@ut.ac.ir</email>
				<code>87729</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Faculty Member, University of Lahore, Pakistan</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open or Endoscopic Release Surgery Method?</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>RESEARCH PAPER</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or median nerve neuropathy is among the causes of numbness, paresthesia, and sensory and motor dysfunction in the affected hand. The objective of this study was to compare open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) methods.Methods: A multicenter, historical cohort study was performed on 47 hands in 46 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CTS and a failed trial of conservative treatment. Samples were divided into two groups consisting of 23 patients receiving open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) and ECTR. Outcome measurements had been carried out six weeks after the operation and included handgrip strength, post-op pain, and missing job days. Results: Patients in both groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and handgrip strength. Both methods significantly improved handgrip strength. No significant difference was detected between the two groups concerning handgrip strength improvement (P=0.700) and sick leave days (P=0.564). Open carpal tunnel release resulted in more significant post-op pain (mean 5.91±1.24 compared to 2.43±0.73 after endoscopic release), which was significant (P=0.000). No complications were reported with any technique. Conclusion: This study revealed that apart from post-op pain, other investigated endpoints were similar in both groups. Although the small sample size has limited our ability to draw a conclusive statement, these data suggest that there is no need to utilize the endoscopic technique for the optimum result, especially when this method requires more advanced equipment and could increase surgery costs. Therefore, both approaches can result in good clinical outcomes.Level of evidence: III]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Carpal tunnel syndrome, Endoscopy, endoscopic carpal tunnel release, hand strength, open carpal tunnel release</keyword>
				<start_page>677</start_page>
				<end_page>682</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_19674.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Babak</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Hajibarati</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>babakhb@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>84884</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Imam 
Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical 
Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Hojjat</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Molaei</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>hmolaei@sina.tums.ac.ir</email>
				<code>84885</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 
Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University 
of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Alireza</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Hasanzadeh</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>alirezahasanzadeh75@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84886</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Medical School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 
Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Ali</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Ahmadzade</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>ali.ahmadzade788@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84887</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Medical School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Mirshahi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>m.mirshahi2000@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>84888</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 
Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Hosseinali</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Abdorrazzaghi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>hossein_abd54@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>84889</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Division of 
Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, 
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Translation, linguistic validation, and readability of the Spanish version of VISA-H scale in elite athletes</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>RESEARCH PAPER</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Object: Data regarding the diagnosis of Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy (PHT) is limited. There is a need for a standardized, valid, and reliable instrument for evaluating PHT among Spanish population. The purpose of this study was to linguistically validate and cross-culturally adapt the Spanish version of the VISA-H for Spanish population and to assess its readability, initial feasibility, appropriateness and acceptability. Methods: Cross-cultural adaptation was done according to established guidelines. Process included 5 steps: independent translations, synthesis of the translations, back-translations, expert committee, and pre-test. The linguistic validation of the questionnaire followed a standard methodology that included comprehension test interviews to assess the relevance, understanding and acceptability of the VISA-H. Comprehension was analyzed with cognitive interviews of 18 Spanish Professional basketball and soccer players (n = 8 male, n = 10 female end-users, healthy individuals at risk), using think-aloud and probing techniques. Results: All subjects (18/18) reported that the items were clear and did not cause upset. Additionally, every respondent had no difficulty in completing the form and found it fairly easy. No difficulties with the instructions were reported. Readability score resulted in adequate levels of understanding (Fernandez-Huerta score of 67.5), showing high level of acceptability.Conclusions: The results of the linguistic and semantic validation conducted with health risky population enable the identification that the Sp-VISA-H was well accepted and easily understood by the participants. Further testing on PHT patients is needed to corroborate these preliminary data.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Patient Outcome Assessment, Comprehension, Hamstring, Tendinopathy, Surveys, Questionnaires</keyword>
				<start_page>683</start_page>
				<end_page>694</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_19361.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Ivan</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Medina-Porqueres</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>imp@uma.es</email>
				<code>83498</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Daniel</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Rosado-Velazquez</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>dr_rosado2002@hotmail.com</email>
				<code>83499</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Medical Services. Malaga Football Club, Malaga</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Francisco</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Moya-Torrecilla</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>francisco.moya@xanit.net</email>
				<code>83500</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Vithas Xanit International Hospital. Benalmadena, Malaga</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Sakari</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Orava</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>sakari.orava@sairaalaneo.fi</email>
				<code>83501</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Vithas Xanit International Hospital. Benalmadena, Malaga</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Angelo</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Cacchio</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>angelo.cacchio@univaq.it</email>
				<code>83502</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, School of Medicine, University of L&amp;rsquo;Aquila, L&amp;rsquo;Aquila.</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Study with a Mean Follow-up of Two Years</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>RESEARCH PAPER</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Background: Peroneus longus tendon can be a suitable alternative autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcome and donor site morbidity in ACLR using peroneus longus tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft. Methods: In a comparative cross-sectional study, ACLR was performed with quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft in 65 patients between 2017 and 2018, and in another group, peroneus longus tendon autograft was used for ACLR in 65 patients between 2018 and 2019. The same surgical technique, fixation method, and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. The knee functional outcomes were assessed according to the Lysholm score and the International Knee Documentation Committee scale at preoperative and at the end of at least 2 years after the procedure. Moreover, graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Thigh circumference, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), The Foot &amp; Ankle Disability Index (FADI), and ankle range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate ankle donor site morbidities.Results: A total of 130 patients (65 patients in each group) were evaluated with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range 24–31 months). Both groups showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes and knee stability. The peroneus longus graft diameter was significantly larger than the hamstring diameter (P&lt;0.001). Assessment of AOFAS, FADI, and ankle ROM showed no apparent ankle joint dysfunction in the peroneus longus tendon group.Conclusion: Faster knee extensions, less anteromedial knee pain, and thigh hypotrophy were observed in peroneus longus tendon patients. Peroneus longus tendon autograft can be an appropriate autograft for ACLR due to its strength, larger graft diameter, and avoiding potential complications of hamstring autograft obtained from the knee region.Level of evidence: IV]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Hamstring Tendon Autograft, peroneus longus tendon autograft</keyword>
				<start_page>695</start_page>
				<end_page>701</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_19675.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Sohrab</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Keyhani</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>sohrab_keyhani4@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>84890</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Bone, Joint and Related Tissues Research Center, Akhtar 
Orthopedic Training and Research Hospital, Shahid 
Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Mohammad</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Qoreishy</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>qoreishy@sbmu.ac.ir</email>
				<code>84891</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Bone, Joint and Related Tissues Research Center, Akhtar 
Orthopedic Training and Research Hospital, Shahid 
Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Mousavi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>drmehransoleymanha@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84892</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Faculty of Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Hossein</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Ronaghi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>doctorronaghi@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84893</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Poursina Hospital Orthopaedic Research center, Guilan 
University of medical sciences, Rasht, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Mehran</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Soleymanha</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>drmehransoleymanha@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84894</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Poursina Hospital Orthopaedic Research center, Guilan 
University of medical sciences, Rasht, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Comparative CT Study on Syndesmosis Mobility after Static or Dynamic Fixation for Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Rupture: A Pilot Study</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>RESEARCH PAPER</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Background: The objective of this prospective randomized pilot study is to compare, by computed tomography (CT), the mobility of syndesmosis after static fixation (SF) or dynamic fixation (DF) in ankle fractures with syndesmotic rupture (AFSR) in adults, and to compare this mobility with that of healthy ankles.Methods: Forty-two patients with an AFSR were randomized to 2 groups: SF (N=21) or DF (N=21). Seven patients were lost to follow-up. Ultimately, 35 patients (SF, N=20; DF, N=15) were analyzed. The clinical results were assessed with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale. To assess syndesmosis mobility, CT in 30° of plantar flexion (PFlex) and 20° of dorsal flexion (DFlex) was performed on both ankles one year after the fracture. Four parameters were measured: anterior tibiofibular distance, posterior tibiofibular posterior distance, angle of fibular rotation (AFR), and anteroposterior fibular translation. Results: The AFR between DFlex and PFlex was more similar to the non-affected side in the DF group. The other three parameters showed no statistical differences between types of fixation. The mean loss of AFR compared with the non-affected side was 1.2° in the SF group and 0.1° in the DF group. No clinical differences between the SF group and the DF group were found. No correlation between clinical and radiological results was observed.Conclusions: The AFR was more similar to the non-affected side in the DF group. However, this finding did not correlate with a better clinical result. Keywords: Ankle; Fracture; Syndesmosis mobility; Static fixation; Dynamic fixation; CT scan Level of Evidence II: Prospective cohort study.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Ankle, CT Scan, Dynamic fixation, Fracture, Static fixation, Syndesmosis mobility</keyword>
				<start_page>702</start_page>
				<end_page>711</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_19679.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Aitor</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Ibarzabal-Gil</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>aitorib15@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84912</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University 
Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Elena</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Galvez-Srvent</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>elenagalvez26@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84913</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Infanta Elena 
University Hospital, Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Jose M.</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Martinez-Diez</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>jmmartinezdiez@yahoo.es</email>
				<code>84914</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University 
Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Javier</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Pallares-Sanmartí</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>jpallaressanmartin@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84915</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University 
Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Carlos</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Kalbakdij-Sanchez</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>carloskalbakdij@hotmail.com</email>
				<code>84916</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University 
Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Sarah</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Mills</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>sarahmillsg@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84917</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University 
Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Juan C.</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Rubio-Suarez</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>rubioj57@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84918</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University 
Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Enrique</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Gil-Garay</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>egilg@salud.madrid.org</email>
				<code>84919</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University 
Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>E. Carlos</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>RODRIGUEZ-MERCHAN</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>ecrmerchan@hotmail.com</email>
				<code>84911</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University 
Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain- Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz 
Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ (La Paz University 
Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, 
Spain</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Is a Complete Anatomical Fit of the Tomofix Plate Biomechanically Favorable? A Parametric Study Using the Finite Element Method</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>RESEARCH PAPER</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Background: The opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) fixation using the Tomofix system is at the risk of mechanical failure due to unstable fixation, lateral hinge fracture, and hardware breakage. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the level of anatomical fit (LOF) of the plate on the failure mechanisms of fixation.Methods: A finite element model of the HTO with a correction angle of 12 degrees was developed. The LOF of the TomoFix plate was changed parametrically by altering the curvature of the plate in the sagittal plane. The effect of the LOF on the fixation performance was studied in terms of the factor of safety (FOS) against failure mechanisms. The FOSs were found by 1) dividing the actual stiffness of the plate-bone construct by the minimum allowable one for unstable fixation, 2) dividing the compressive strength of the cortical bone by the actual maximum pressure at the lateral hinge for the lateral hinge fracture, and 3) the Soderberg criterion for fatigue fracture of the plate and screws.Results: The increase of the LOF by applying a larger bent to the plate changed the fixation stiffness slightly. However, it reduced the lateral hinge pressure substantially (from 182 MPa to 71 MPa) and increased the maximum equivalent stresses in screws considerably (from 187 MPa to 258 MPa). Based on the FOS-LOF diagram, a gap smaller than 2.3 mm was safe, with the highest biomechanical performance associated with a 0.5 mm gap size.Conclusion: Although a high LOF is necessary for the Tomofix plate fixation to avoid mechanical failure, a gap size of 0.5mm is favored biomechanically over complete anatomical fit. Level of evidence: V]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Failure mechanisms, Fixation stiffness, Hardware breakage, Lateral hinge pressure, Plate contouring</keyword>
				<start_page>712</start_page>
				<end_page>720</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_20587.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Zahra</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Hayatbakhsh</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>hayatbakhshm@yahoo.com</email>
				<code>88974</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Biomedical Engineering, Science and 
Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Farzam</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Farahmand</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>farahmand@sharif.edu</email>
				<code>88975</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University 
of Technology, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Morad</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Karimpour</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>m.karimpour@ut.ac.ir</email>
				<code>88976</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tehran, 
Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Medical Metaphors: Increasing Clarity but at What Cost?</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>RESEARCH PAPER</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Background: Clinicians often use metaphors to explain complex ideas. Metaphors also have the potential to reinforce unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms. We surveyed musculoskeletal specialists regarding use of metaphors in their daily practice and then assessed the contexts in which they are used, the themes of metaphors, and potential for reinforcement of common misconceptions (unhelpful thinking). Two primary research questions were posed: 1- What are the common characteristics of the medical metaphors used in patient-clinician communication by musculoskeletal specialists? And, 2- What percentage of medical metaphors used in patient-clinician communication have potential to induce unhelpful thinking and what are the characteristics of those metaphors? Methods: Eighty-one orthopedic and trauma specialists provided examples of metaphors they use in daily practice. Qualitative analysis of responses was performed through open coding of the data with the use of a constant-comparative technique involving several rounds of reading and rereading the data.Results: The 157 metaphors were categorized into 15 different themes. The most common themes were mechanical, objects, and sports and leisure. We also classified metaphors as addressing the natural history of the disease, treatment, mechanism, anatomy, or other. Thirty-five metaphors (22%) were identified as having the potential to reinforce unhelpful thinking. The most common purpose of these metaphors was for explaining the mechanism or natural history of the disease.Conclusion: Metaphors can either reinforce or reorient potentially unhealthy misconceptions. They can also reinforce despair and worry, or they can improve hope and sense of control. Orthopedic surgeons can be strategic and thoughtful in their use of metaphors, planning and practicing specific metaphors for optimal mental, social, and physical health. Level of evidence: N\A ]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Background: Clinicians often use metaphors to explain complex ideas. Metaphors also have the potential to reinforce unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms. We surveyed musculoskeletal specialists regarding use of metaphors in their daily practice and, the themes of metaphors, and potential for reinforcement of common misconceptions (unhelpful thinking). Two primary research questions were posed: 1- What are the common characteristics of the medical metaphors used in patient-clinician communication by musculoskeletal speci, 2- What percentage of medical metaphors used in patient-clinician communication have potential to induce unhelpful thinking and what are the characteristics of those metaphors? Methods: Eighty-one orthopedic and trauma specialists provided examples o, objects, and sports and leisure. We also classified metaphors as addressing the natural history of the disease, Treatment, Mechanism, Anatomy, or other. Thirty-five metaphors (22%) were identified as having the potential to reinforce unhelpful thinking. The most common purpose of these metaphors was for explaining the mechanism or natural history of the disease. Conclusion: Metaphors can ei, or they can improve hope and sense of control. Orthopedic surgeons can be strategic and thoughtful in their use of metaphors, planning and practicing specific metaphors for optimal mental, Social, and physical health. Level of evidence: NA</keyword>
				<start_page>721</start_page>
				<end_page>728</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_19673.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Amirreza</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Fatehi</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>amir.fatehi60@gmail.com</email>
				<code>84879</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell 
Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, 
Austin, Texas</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Billy</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Table</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>billy.table@austin.utexas.edu</email>
				<code>84880</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Population Health, University of Texas at 
Austin, Austin, Texas</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Sarah</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Peck</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>sarah.c.peck@outlook.com</email>
				<code>84881</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell 
Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, 
Austin, Texas</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Michael</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Mackert</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>mackert@utexas.edu</email>
				<code>84882</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Population Health, University of Texas at 
Austin, Austin, Texas</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>David</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Ring</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>david.ring@austin.utexas.edu</email>
				<code>84883</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell 
Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, 
Austin, Texas</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Total Hip Replacement Interrupted by Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest with a Final Component in Place: A Case Report</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>CASE REPORT</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[No consensus recommendations exist as to the management of implants exposed during an interrupted total hip arthroplasty (THA). Given the infrequency of such events, documentation of successful outcomes in single case reports aids in decision-making. A 71-year-old male with a history of coronary artery disease and a BMI of 39.5 went into ventricular fibrillation half-way through a THA, after placement of a cementless acetabular component but before femoral preparation could begin. Continuation of the planned arthroplasty was aborted, the patient’s wound was packed with sterile sponges and covered with an iodoform dressing, and he was flipped supine for CPR. He returned to the OR 6-hours following his arrest and his arthroplasty was completed with the original acetabular implant left in place. The patient was placed empirically on 2 weeks of IV vancomycin and 3 months of oral doxycycline based on infectious disease recommendations, and healed uneventfully. While validation of our strategy is challenging due to the infrequent nature of this event, it is hoped that this description and discussion may provide a template to those who encounter a similar challenging situation.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Intraoperative arrest, Arthroplasty, contaminated implants, Antibiotic Prophylaxis</keyword>
				<start_page>729</start_page>
				<end_page>732</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_19991.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Mitchell</first_name>
				<middle_name>Stephen</middle_name>
				<last_name>Fourman</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>mfourman@mgh.harvard.edu</email>
				<code>86310</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Orthopaedic Surgery Service
Department of Surgery
VA Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, PA USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Nina</first_name>
				<middle_name></middle_name>
				<last_name>Singh</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>nis5@pitt.edu</email>
				<code>86311</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Infectious Diseases Service, Department of Medicine, VA Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Patrick</first_name>
				<middle_name>J</middle_name>
				<last_name>McMahon</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>patrick.mcmahon2@va.gov</email>
				<code>86312</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, VA Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article><article>
				<language>en</language>
				<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
				<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
				<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
				<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
				<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
				<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
				<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
				<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
				<title_fa></title_fa>
				<title>Prevalence of Change in Orthopaedic Subspecialty Fellowship Preference During Residency Training: A Survey Study</title>
				<subject_fa></subject_fa>
				<subject></subject>
				<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
				<content_type>LETTER TO THE EDITOR</content_type>
				<abstract_fa><![CDATA[]]></abstract_fa>
				<abstract><![CDATA[Understanding how preferences for which orthopedic subspecialty to pursue a fellowship in is important for both trainees and training programs. Surveys were distributed to senior orthopedic residents in 145 orthopaedic residency programs. The participants were asked to rank the subspecialties they were most interested in as post graduate year (PGY) 1 residents, which fellowship they applied into, and if they changed preferences, when this change occurred. Of participants, 54.8% matched into the subspecialty they ranked highest as PGY1s, while 75% matched into one of their top three highest ranked. For those that changed top preference, this change occurred at the end of their PGY2 year (32%) or beginning of their PGY3 year (26%). Residency applicants should consider programs that are strong in their area of initial interest, as their preference is unlikely to change. Residency programs should expose residents to a wide variety of subspecialties prior to the PGY2/3 transition.]]></abstract>
				<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
				<keyword>Fellowship, Orthopaedic, Training, Preferences, Residency</keyword>
				<start_page>733</start_page>
				<end_page>734</end_page>
				<web_url>https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_20590.html</web_url>
			<author_list><author>
				<first_name>Ian</first_name>
				<middle_name>J.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Wellington</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>iwellington@uchc.edu</email>
				<code>88993</code>
				<coreauthor>Yes</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>University of Connecticut, Department of Orthopaedics, 
Farmington, Connecticut</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>John</first_name>
				<middle_name>W.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Stelzer</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>stelzer@uchc.edu</email>
				<code>88994</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>University of Connecticut, Department of Orthopaedics, 
Farmington, Connecticut</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>John</first_name>
				<middle_name>P.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Connors</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>jconnors@uchc.edu</email>
				<code>88995</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>University of Connecticut, Department of Orthopaedics, 
Farmington, Connecticut</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Patrick</first_name>
				<middle_name>M.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Garvin</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>pgarvin@uchc.edu</email>
				<code>88996</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>University of Connecticut, Department of Orthopaedics, 
Farmington, Connecticut</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author><author>
				<first_name>Lauren</first_name>
				<middle_name>E.</middle_name>
				<last_name>Geaney</last_name>
				<suffix></suffix>
				<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
				<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
				<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
				<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
				<email>lageaney@uchc.edu</email>
				<code>88997</code>
				<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
				<affiliation>University of Connecticut, Department of Orthopaedics, 
Farmington, Connecticut</affiliation>
				<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
				 </author></author_list>
				</article>
			</articleset>
			</journal>