p. 646−655
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 656−660
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 61−667
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 668−674
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 675−681
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 682−688
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 689−695
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
20° were included andfollowed up to skeletal maturity or the time of spinal fusion. The Cobb angle was recorded at the time of diagnosisbefore the initiation of bracing, weaning time, brace discontinuation, and final follow-up. In addition, the maximum inbracecurve correction was measured.Results: Out of 87 patients with IIS, a total of 29 cases (19 males and 10 females) with the average curve magnitudeof 35.62° at the time of diagnosis were included in the study. The average best in-brace correction was 57.32% forsuccessfully treated patients and 36.97% for progression/surgery patients. Based on the results, brace treatment failedfor a total of 20 patients (69%), with a scoliosis curvature progress ≥ 45°. Of these patients, 12 cases (60%) reachedspinal fusion. Finally, four patients (13%) in the surgery-treated group underwent surgery before the age of 10.Conclusion: The results revealed that bracing was successful for more than two-thirds of patients with IIS curves,preventing surgery before the age of 10.Level of evidence: IV]]>
p. 696−702
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 703−709
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 710−715
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 716−721
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 722−728
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 729−733
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 734−738
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 739−743
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 744−747
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 748−756
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6
p. 757−759
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.6