p. 1−4
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 5−10
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 11−20
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 21−26
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 27−32
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 33−37
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 38−43
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
20/26. *Any patient scoring = 20/26 should be considered high risk of CA.Conclusion: Based on this data, CA fits the criteria of an anxiety based condition. The modified screening tool permits early identification of individuals at high risk of CA. Usage of the screening tool is encouraged prior to casting and for future research modifications. Early identification will allow consideration of an alternative treatment option, anticipatory conversation and could prevent the failure of treatment.Level of evidence: II]]>
p. 44−49
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 50−57
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 58−69
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 70−74
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
90˚).Methods: This was a retrospective, single institution study. Patients who underwent RSA or HA for CTA were included ifthey had preserved preoperative motion with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, or until complication/revision. ShoulderROM and functional outcomes scores were obtained.Results: Twenty-six HAs and 21 RSAs were evaluated at mean of 38.6 months (HA) and 36.3 months (RSA). Patientsin the RSA group were significantly older at surgery (73.9 versus 65.1 years; P=0.003). Postoperatively, the meanchange in active elevation was -15° for HA versus 26° for RSA, with RSA having significantly greater active elevation(153° versus 123°; P=0.01). There were no significant differences in final internal or external rotation between groups.Superior outcomes were seen for RSA versus HA for ASES score (84 vs. 66, P=0.003), Simple Shoulder Test (8.8 vs.7.3, P=0.3), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (85 vs. 70, P=0.017), and 100mm VAS pain (7 vs. 33, p <0.001).Conclusion: In patients with CTA and preserved preoperative forward elevation, RSA provided greater pain relief,superior functional outcomes, and better ROM compared with HA.Level of evidence: IV]]>
p. 75−82
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 83−88
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 89−93
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 94−98
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 99−111
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 112−116
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1
p. 117−120
2345-461X
Vol.8/No.1