Document Type: RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 Orthopedic Surgery Ward, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

2 Orthopedic Surgery Ward, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the idiopathic congenital clubfoot deformity treated by Ponseti method to determine the different factors such as radiological investigations that may have relations with the risk of failure and recurrence in mid-term follow-up of the patients.
Methods: Since 2006 to 2011, 226 feet from 149 patients with idiopathic congenital clubfoot were treated with weekly castings by Ponseti method. Anteroposterior and lateral foot radiographies were performed at the final follow-up visit and the data from clinical and radiological outcomes were analysed.
Results: In our patients, 191(84.9%) feet required percutaneous tenotomy. The successful correction rate was 92% indication no need for further surgical correction. No significant correlation was found between the remained deformity rate and the severity of the deformity and compliance of using the brace (P=0.108 and 0.207 respectively). The remained deformity rate had an inverse association with the beginning age of treatment (P=0.049). No significant correlation was found between the percutaneous tetonomy and passive dorsiflexion range (P=0.356).
Conclusion: According to our results treatment with the Ponseti method resulted in poor or no correlation. The diagnosis of clubfoot is a clinical judgment; therefore, the outcome of the treatment must only be clinically evaluated. Although the Ponseti method can retrieve the normal shape of the foot, it fails to treat the bone deformities and eventually leads to remained radiologic deformity. Further studiesare suggested to define a different modification that can address the abnormal angles between the foot and ankle bones to minimize the risk of recurrence.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1. Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and aetiology of club
foot. J Med Genet. 1965; 2(4):227-32.
2. Saltzman HM. Foot focus: international initiative to
eradicate clubfeet using the Ponseti Method. Foot
Ankle Int. 2009; 30(5):468-71.
3. Dobbs MB, Morcuende JA, Gurnett CA, Ponseti IV.
Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: an historical review.
Iowa Orthop J. 2000; 20(1):59-64.
4. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment
of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;
62(1):23-31.
5. Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R, Tudisco C. Longterm
comparative results in patients with congenital
clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A(7):1286-94.
6. Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N. Ponseti versus
traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2002; 22(4):517-21.
7. Morcuende JA. Congenital idiopathic clubfoot:
prevention of late deformity and disability by
conservative treatment with the Ponseti technique.
Pediatr Ann. 2006; 35(2):128-30.
8. Besse JL, Leemrijse T, Themar-Noel C, Tourne
Y. Congenital club foot: treatment in childhood,
outcome and problems in adulthood. Rev Chir Orthop
Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006; 92(2):175-92.
9. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot.
A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1995; 77(10):1477-89.
10. Beyaert C, Haumont T, Paysant J, Lascombes P,
Andre JM. The effect of inturning of the foot on knee
kinematics and kinetics in children with treated
idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).
2003; 18(7):670-6.
11. Roche C, Mattingly B, Talwalkar V, Tylkowski C, Stevens
DB, Hardy PA, et al. Tarsal shape, size, and articulating
surface morphology in adolescent surgically treated
clubfoot and their contralateral normal foot. J Pediatr
Orthop. 2006; 26(3):329-35.
12. Farsetti P, De Maio F, Russolillo L, Ippolito E. CT 

study on the effect of different treatment protocols
for clubfoot pathology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;
467(5):1243-9.

13. Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet PH, Mazeau PH,
Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop
B. 1995; 4(2):129-36.
14. Vanderwilde R, Staheli LT, Chew DE, Malagon V.
Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal
infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;
70(3):407-15.
15. Spiegel DA, Shrestha OP, Sitoula P, Rajbhandary T,
Bijukachhe B, Banskota AK. Ponseti method for
untreated idiopathic clubfeet in Nepalese patients
from 1 to 6 years of age. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;
467(5):1164-70.
16. Radler C, Mindler GT, Riedl K, Lipkowski C, Kranzl
A. Midterm results of the Ponseti method in the
treatment of congenital clubfoot. Int Orthop. 2013;
37(9):1827–31.
17. Porecha MM, Parmar DS, Chavda HR. Mid-term results
of Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital
idiopathic clubfoot--(a study of 67 clubfeet with mean
five year follow-up). J Orthop Surg Res. 2011; 6(1):3.
18. Jowett CR, Morcuende JA, Ramachandran M. Management
of congenital talipesequinovarus using the
Ponseti method: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg
Br. 2011; 93(9):1160–4.
19. Ponseti IV. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74(3):448–54.
20. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical
reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery
for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics.
2004; 113(2):376–80.
21. Lehman WB, Mohaideen A, Madan S, Scher DM, Van
Bosse HJ, Iannacone M, et al. A method for the early
evaluation of the Ponseti (Iowa) technique for the
treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B.
2003; 12(2):133–40.
22. Sætersdal C, Fevang JM, Fosse L, Engesæter LB. Good
results with the Ponseti method: a multicenter study
of 162 clubfeet followed for 2–5 years. Acta Orthop.
2012; 83(3):288–93.
23. Matuszewski L, Gil L, Karski J. Early results of treatment
for congenital clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Eur
J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012; 22(5):403–6.
24. Ostadal M, Chomiak J, Dungl P, Frydrychova M,
Burian M. Comparison of the short-term and longterm
results of the Ponseti method in the treatment
of idiopathic pes equinovarus. Int Orthop. 2013;
37(9):1821-5.
25. Faizan M, Jilani LZ, Abbas M, Zahid M, Asif N.
Management of idiopathic clubfoot by Ponseti
technique in children presenting after one year of age.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 54(5):967-72.
26. Cosma DI, Vasilescu DE. Ponseti treatment for clubfoot
in Romania: a 9-year single-centre experience. J
Pediatr Orthop B. 2014; 23(6):512-6.
27. Khan SA, Kumar A. Ponseti’s manipulation in
neglected clubfoot in children more than 7 years of
age: a prospective evaluation of 25 feet with long-term
follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2010; 19(5):385-9.
28. Lourenco AF, Morcuende JA. Correction of neglected
idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone
Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(3):378-81.
29. Alves C, Escalda C, Fernandes P, Tavares D, Neves
MC. Ponseti method: does age at the beginning of
treatment make a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res.
2009; 467(5):1271-7.
30. O’Halloran CP, Halanski MA, Nemeth BA, Zimmermann
CC, Noonan KJ. Can radiographs predict outcome in
patients with idiopathic clubfeet treated with the
ponseti method? J Pediatr Orthop. 2015; 35(7):734-8.
31. Abulsaad M, Abdelgaber N. Correlation between
clinical outcome of surgically treated clubfeet and
different radiological parameters. Acta Orthop Belg.
2008; 74(4):489-95.