Department of Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA


Object: The gold standard for evaluating bone mineral density is dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).  Prior studies have shown poor reliability using analog wrist X-rays in diagnosing osteoporosis. Our goal was to investigate if there was improved diagnostic value to visual assessment of digital hand X-rays in osteoporosis screening. We hypothesized that similar to analog counterparts, digital hand X-rays have poor correlation and reliability in determining bone mineral density (BMD) relative to DEXA.
Methods: We prospectively evaluated female patients older than 65 years who presented to our hand clinic with digital hand and wrist X-rays as part of their evaluation over six months. Patients who had a fracture and were without DEXA scans within the past two years were excluded. Five fellowship-trained hand surgeons, blinded to DEXA T-scores, evaluated the x-rays over two assessments separated by four weeks and classified them as osteoporotic, osteopenic, or normal BMD.  Accuracy relative to DEXA T-score, interobserver and intraobserver rates were calculated.
Results: Thirty four patients met the inclusion criteria and a total of 340 x-rays reviews were performed.  The assessments were correct in 169 cases (49%) as compared to the DEXA T-scores. A mean weighted kappa coefficient of agreement between observers was 0.29 (range 0.02-0.41) reflecting a fair agreement. The first and second assessment for all five physicians was 0.46 (range 0.19-0.78) reflecting a moderate agreement.  Grouping osteoporosis and osteopenia together compared to normal, the accuracy, interobserver and intraobserver rates increased to 63%, 0.42 and 0.54 respectively.
Conclusion: Abnormally low BMD is a common occurrence in patients treated for upper extremity disorders. There is poor accuracy relative to DEXA scan and only fair agreement in diagnosing osteoporosis using visual assessments of digital x-rays. 


Main Subjects

1. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic
fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:S3–S7.
2. Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen
TV. Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and
men. J Bone Miner Res. 22.6 (2007): 781-788.
3. Miller PD, McClung M. Prediction of fracture risk, I:
bone density. Am J Med Sci. 1996;3 12:257-259.
4. Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of
fracture risk. The Lancet. 2002;359(9321):1929-36.
5. Mauck KF, Clarke BL. Diagnosis, Screening, Prevention,
and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;
6. Kanis JA, Glüer CC. An update on the diagnosis and
assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry.
Osteoporosis Int. 2000; 11(3):192-202.
7. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of
how well measures of bone mineral density predict
occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996;
8. Hayes BL, Curtis JR, Laster A, et al. Osteoporosis care
in the United States after declines in reimbursements
for DXA. J Clin Densitom. 2010; 13:352–360.
9. Lewiecki E, Baim S, Siris E. Osteoporosis care at risk
in the United States. Osteoporosis Int.2008; 19:1505–
1509. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0716-x.
10. Korner M, Weber CH, Wirth S, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser MF,
Treitl M. Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical
Principles and System Overview 1. Radiographics.
2007; 27(3):675-86.
11. Bansal GJ. Digital radiography. A comparison with
modern conventional imaging. Postgrad Med J. 2006;
82(969):425-428. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.038448.
12. Phillips JH, Albregts AE, Kling Jr TF, Cohen MJ. Digital
radiography in pediatric orthopaedics: a prospective,
controlled, and randomized trial. J Pediatr Orthop.
1994; 14(3):377-80.
13. Dalla Palma L, Grisi G, Cuttin R, Rimondini A. Digital vs
conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysis.
Eur radiol. 1999; 9(8):1682-92.
14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer
agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977:159-74.
15. Olschewski E, Murray P, Buckley R, Fennell C, Powell
JN. Assessment of osteoporosis using standard
radiographs of the wrist. J Trauma.2001; 51:912-916.
16. Barnett E, Nordin BE. The radiological diagnosis of
osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin radiol. 1960;
17. Mather J, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Athwal GS.
Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates
with bone mineral density and can clinically rule
out osteoporosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;
18. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski
D, Warner JJ. The cortical thickness of the proximal
humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of
the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;
19. Webber T, Patel SP, Pensak M, Fajolu O, Rozental TD,
Wolf JM. Correlation between distal radial cortical
thickness and bone mineral density. J Hand Surg Am.
2015; 40(3):493-9.
20. Damilakis J, Maris TG, Karantanas AH. An update
on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic
techniques. Eur radiol. 2007; 17(6):1591-602.
21. Heneghan JP, Kirke PN, Murphy BL et al. Evaluation
of quantitative CT vertebral bone mineral density
measurement and the singh index in elderly females
with hip fractures-a case control study. Br J Radiol
22. Bouxsein ML, Palermo L, Yeung C, Black DM. Digital
X-ray radiogrammetry predicts hip, wrist and
vertebral fracture risk in elderly women: a prospective
analysis from the study of osteoporotic fractures.
Osteoporosis Int. 2002;13(5):358-65.
23. Ward KA, Cotton J, Adams JE. A technical and
clinical evaluation of digital X-ray radiogrammetry.
Osteoporosis Int. 2003;14(5):389-95.
24. Dhainaut A, Rohde GE, Syversen U, Johnsen V,
Haugeberg G. The ability of hand digital X-ray
radiogrammetry to identify middle-aged and elderly
women with reduced bone density, as assessed by
femoral neck dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin
Densitom. 2010;13(4):418-25.