Document Type: RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

 
Background:
When non-operative treatment of tennis elbow fails; a surgical procedure can be performed to improve the associated symptoms. Different surgical techniques for treatment of lateral epicondylitis are prescribed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for tennis elbow based on small incision techniques.
 
Methods:
This technique was performed on 24 consecutive patients between June 2011 and July 2013. Outcomes were assessed using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), Nirschl’s staging system and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction criteria.
Results:
There were 15 female and 9 male patients in the study. The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 3.7 years. The average duration of follow-up was 34.8 months. The post-operative outcome was good to excellent in most patients. The mean VAS score improved from 7.2 to 3.5 points. The total PRTEE improved from 68.7 to 15.8 points.
Conclusion:
This procedure provides a low complication rate which is associated with a high rate of patient satisfaction. Therefore, we suggest this option after failed conservative management of tennis elbow.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1. Allander E. Prevalence, incidence, and remission
rates of some common rheumatic diseases or
syndromes. Scand J Rheumatol. 1974; 3(3):145-53.
2. Dorf ER, Chhabra AB, Golish SR, McGinty JL,
Pannunzio ME. Effect of elbow position on grip
strength in the evaluation of lateral epicondylitis. J
Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32(6):882-6.
3. Gruchow HW, Pelletier D. An epidemiologic
study of tennis elbow Incidence, recurrence, and
effectiveness of prevention strategies. Am J Sports
Med. 1979; 7(4):234-8.
4. Kraushaar BS, Nirschl RP. Tendinosis of the elbow
(tennis elbow). Clinical features and findings of
histological, immunohistochemical, and electron
microscopy studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;
81(2):259-78.
5. Major HP. Lawn-tennis elbow. Br Med J. 1883; 2(2):557.
6. Labelle H, Guibert R, Joncas J, Newman N, Fallaha M,
Rivard CH. Lack of scientific evidence for the treatment
of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow. An attempted metaanalysis.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74(5):646-51.
7. Coonrad RW, Hooper WR. Tennis elbow: its course,
natural history, conservative and surgical management.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973; 55(6):1177-82.
8. Boyd HB, Mcleod AC. Tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg
Am. 1973; 55(6):1183-7.
VAS improved from 9.2 before the operation to 0.64 after
the operation. On Nirschl’s scale, the patients presented
an improvement from a mean value of 6.5 before the
operation to approximately one. There were significant
differences between before to after the surgery for the
three used functional scores (P<0.01). No correlations
were observed using the Spearman test between the
results and age, gender, length of time with symptoms
before the operation or injury mechanism (P>0.05)
(26). Peart et al. compared the arthroscopic release
technique and the open technique. In their study, 54
patients underwent open release of the ECRB tendon
and 33 patients were operated arthroscopically. Of the
75 patients reviewed, there was no significant difference
in the functional results between the two groups.
However, the patients in the arthroscopic group were
able to return to work earlier and had fewer associated
postoperative treatments (27).
The limitation of this study was that an analysis was
not made based on a comparison with other methods of
anesthesia and surgical techniques. Such comparisons
should be performed in further studies.
24 elbows with lateral epicondylitis, which were
unresponsive to long-term conservative treatments, were
managed successfully with minimal incision technique
under general anesthesia. Overall, it is believed that this
procedure provides an effective treatment option that
reduces the time and expense required for conservative
treatments, and promotes a rapid return to work. In
addition, it is a relatively simple procedure, giving good
results for patients with chronic tennis elbow, with low
morbidity and early recovery.

9. Nirschl RP, Pettrone FA. Tennis elbow. The surgical
treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1979; 61(6):832-9.
10. Verhaar J, Walenkamp G, Kester A, van Mameren H, van
der Linden T. Lateral extensor release for tennis elbow.
A prospective long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 1993; 75(7):1034-43.
11. Bosworth DM. Surgical treatment of tennis elbow;
a follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965;
47(8):1533-6.
12. Moore Jr M. Radiohumeral synovitis, a cause of
persistent elbow pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1953;
33(5):1363-71.
13. Hughes ES. Acute deposition of calcium near the elbow.
Bone Joint J. 1950; 32(1):30-4.
14. Grundberg AB, Dobson JF. Percutaneous release of the
common extensor origin for tennis elbow. Clin Orthop
Relat Res. 2000; 376:137-40.
15. Baker CL Jr, Murphy KP, Gottlob CA, Curd DT.
Arthroscopic classification and treatment of lateral
epicondylitis: two-year clinical results. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2000; 9(6):475-82.
16. 16. Nirschl RP. Elbow tendinosis/tennis elbow. Clin
Sports Med. 1992; 11(4):851-70.
17. Gellman H. Tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis). Orthop
Clin North Am. 1992; 23(1):75-82.
18. 18. Kamien M. A rational management of tennis elbow.
Sports Med. 1990; 9(3):173-91.
19. Lo MY, Safran MR. Surgical treatment of lateral
epicondylitis: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat
Res. 2007; 463:98-106.
20. Szabo SJ, Savoie FH 3rd, Field LD, Ramsey JR, Hosemann
CD. Tendinosis of the extensor carpi radialis brevis: an
evaluation of three methods of operative treatment. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15(6):721-7.

21. Inhyeo R, Chaei C, Gu SB, Wo KB, Kyo PH. Arthroscopic
treatment of the refractory lateral epicondylitis
and associated synovitis. J Shoulder Elbow Soc. 2005;
5(2):86-7.
22. Kim SJ, Park BM, Oh KS. Arthroscopic treatment of
lateral epicondylitis. J Korean Orthop Sports Med. 2007;
6(2):105-9.
23. Pannier S, Masquelet AC. Treatment of epicondylitis by
deep fasciotomy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis
and supinator: a review of 18 cases. Rev Chir Orthop
Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002; 88(6):565-72
24. Leppilahti J, Raatikainen T, Pienimäki T, Hänninen
A, Jalovaara P. Surgical treatment of resistant tennis
elbow. A prospective, randomized study comparing
decompression of the posterior interosseous nerve
and lengthening of the tendon of the extensor carpi
radialis brevis muscle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;
121(6):329-32.
25. Cho BK, Kim YM, Kim DS, Choi ES, Shon HC, Park KJ, et
al. Mini-open muscle resection procedure under local
anesthesia for lateral and medial epicondylitis. Clin
Orthop Surg. 2009; 1(3):123-7.
26. Terra BB, Rodrigues LM, Filho AN, de Almeida GD,
Cavatte JM, De Nadai A. Arthroscopic treatment for
chronic lateral epicondylitis. Rev Bras Ortop. 2015;
50(4):395-402.
27. Peart RE, Strickler SS, Schweitzer Jr KM. Lateral
epicondylitis: a comparative study of open and
arthroscopic lateral release. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead
NJ). 2004; 33(11):565-7.
28. Kachooei AR, Talaei-Khoei M, Faghfouri A, Ring
D. Factors associated with operative treatment of
enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis
origin. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(4):666-70.