Acromial Stress Fractures: A Systematic Review

Document Type: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

1 Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: Acromial stress fracture (ASF) is a unique complication of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) that
can have substantial influence on clinical results. The purpose of this review is to describe demographics, functional
outcomes, and union rates for cases of RSA complicated by ASF.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to identify studies that reported results of RSA complicated by ASF. Searches were
performed using PubMed and Scopus up to January 1, 2018. Five articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results: ASF occurred in 61 (6.9%) of 874 RSA cases identified. 82% of patients who sustained an ASF were female.
ASF cases were, on average, 7 years older than cases that were not complicated by ASF. While improved compared to
their preoperative state, patients who sustained an ASF demonstrated significantly less improvement in pain, function,
and ROM compared to RSA patients without ASF.
Conclusion: Women and older patients appear to be at greater risk for an ASF after RSA. Though nonunion rates are
high, fair outcomes can still be achieved in cases of ASF after RSA. Further study is needed to identify modifiable and
non-modifiable risk factors associated with the development of ASF.
Level of evidence: IV

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Dubrow S, Streit JJ, Muh S, Shishani Y, Gobezie
R. Acromial stress fractures: correlation with
acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and acromiohumeral
distance. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(12):e1074-9.
2. Mayne IP, Bell SN, Wright W, Coghlan JA. Acromial and
scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder
arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow. 2016; 8(2):90-100.
3. Hattrup SJ. The influence of postoperative acromial
and scapular spine fractures on the results of reverse
shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(5):4.
4. Kennon JC, Lu C, McGee-Lawrence ME, Crosby LA.
Scapula fracture incidence in reverse total shoulder
arthroplasty using screws above or below metaglene
central cage: clinical and biomechanical outcomes. J
Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26(6):1023-30.
5. Teusink MJ, Otto RJ, Cottrell BJ, Frankle MA. What is the
effect of postoperative scapular fracture on outcomes
of reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow
Surg. 2014; 23(6):782-90.
6. Levy JC, Anderson C, Samson A. Classification of
postoperative acromial fractures following reverse
shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(15):e104.

7. Hamid N, Connor PM, Fleischli JF, D’Alessandro DF.
Acromial fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Am J Orthop. 2011; 40(7):E125-9.
8. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner
B, Randall S, et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and
treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;
25(10):2359-81.
9. Nayak S, Greenspan SL. How can we improve
osteoporosis care? A systematic review and metaanalysis
of the efficacy of quality improvement
strategies for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;
33(9):1585-94.
10. Steen BM, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Hussey MM, Cusick
MC, Kumar AG, et al. Outcome and value of reverse
shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of glenohumeral
osteoarthritis: a matched cohort. J Shoulder Elbow
Surg. 2015; 24(9):1433-41.
11. Chalmers PN, Keener JD. Expanding roles for reverse
shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med.
2016; 9(1):40-8.