Protocols for Management of Underserved Patients Undergoing Arthroplasty: A National Survey of Safety Net Hospitals

Document Type : RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

1 University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, USA

2 Orthopaedic Surgery Resident: Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA

3 Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA

Abstract

Background: Although it has been shown that perioperative protocols enhance arthroplasty care and safety, it is
not known how prevalent their use is in safety net hospitals, which operate with a mandate to treat the poor and
underserved. Understanding the elements currently included in standard perioperative arthroplasty protocols at various
institutions may help guide future interventions and policy aimed at improving underserved patients’ outcomes.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, safety net hospitals were asked to complete a survey over the phone, via
email or in person regarding existence and elements of perioperative management protocols for total hip arthroplasty
(THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Implementation barriers were also addressed. Specifically, survey questions
sought to determine the total yearly number of arthroplasty procedures performed at each institution and better
understand, among other elements, the following: presence of preoperative pain management protocols, inpatient
care pathways, use of social workers and involvement of physical therapy services. Descriptive statistics were
calculated and reported.
Results: Over 90% of safety net hospitals performing arthroplasty utilized regional anesthetic techniques, inpatient
clinical care pathways and inpatient physical therapy. However, 16.7%, 20.0%, 23.3% and 73% lacked social services,
anesthesia preoperative clinics, inpatient pain management protocols and preoperative sobriety pathways, respectively.
Conclusion: Barriers to receiving arthroplasty care included lack of qualified surgical personnel and concerns about
surgical risk in vulnerable patient populations. These findings suggest that further effort is warranted to expand and
improve arthroplasty care for the underserved to ensure safety and high quality outcomes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Ibrahim MS, Khan MA, Nizam I, Haddad FS. Perioperative
interventions producing better functional
outcomes and enhanced recovery following total hip
and knee arthroplasty: an evidence-based review.
BMC Med. 2013; 11:37.
2. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster
JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total
knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic
review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;
86-A(5):963-974.
3. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-
Almazor ME. Health related quality of life outcomes
after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community
based population. J Rheumatol. 2000; 27(7):1745-52.
4. Clinical practice guidelines. American Academy of
Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Available at: URL:
https://www.aaos.org/guidelines/?ssopc=1; 2015.
5. Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ. AAOS Clinical Practice
Guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic
joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop
Surg. 2010; 18(12):771-2.
6. Mont MA, Jacobs JJ. AAOS clinical practice guideline:
preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients
undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am
Acad Orthop Surg. 2011; 19(12):777-8.
7. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Ong K, Chan V, Kurtz S, Vail TP, et al.
Risk factors for early revision after primary total hip
arthroplasty in Medicare patients. Clin Orthop Relat
Res. 2014; 472(2):449-54.
8. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Ong K, Chan V, Kurtz S, Vail TP, et
al. Risk factors for early revision after primary TKA
in Medicare patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;
472(1):232-7.
9. Husni ME, Losina E, Fossel AH, Solomon DH, Mahomed
NN, Katz JN. Decreasing medical complications for
total knee arthroplasty: effect of critical pathways
on outcomes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;
11(1):160.
10. Horlocker TT, Kopp SL, Pagnano MW, Hebl JR. Analgesia
for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a multimodal
pathway featuring peripheral nerve block. J Am Acad
Orthop Surg. 2006; 14(3):126-35.
11. Hebl JR, Dilger JA, Byer DE, Kopp SL, Stevens SR,
Pagnano MW, et al. A pre-emptive multimodal
pathway featuring peripheral nerve block improves
perioperative outcomes after major orthopedic
surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008; 33(6):510-7.
12. Jergesen HE, Yi PH. Early complications in hip and
knee arthroplasties in a safety Net hospital vs a
university center. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(4):754-8.
13. Arlas N, Jergesen H. Hip and knee replacement in
safety-net hospitals: recognizing the challenges. J
Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016; 27(1):238-51.
14. Van Citters AD, Fahlman C, Goldmann DA, Lieberman
JR, Koenig KM, DiGioia AM 3rd, et al. Developing
a pathway for high-value, patient-centered total
joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;
472(5):1619-35.
15. Zaman OS, Cummings LC, Spieler SS. America’s public
hospitals and health systems, 2008: results of the
annual NAPH hospital characteristics survey. New
York: National Association of Public Hospitals and
Health Systems; 2010.
16. Bade MJ, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Early high-intensity
rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty
improves outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;
41(12):932-41.
17. SooHoo NF, Lieberman JR, Ko CY, Zingmond DS.
Factors predicting complication rates following
total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;
88(3):480-5.
18. Best MJ, Buller LT, Gosthe RG, Klika AK, Barsoum
WK. Alcohol misuse is an independent risk factor for
poorer postoperative outcomes following primary
total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.
2015; 30(8):1293-8.
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Volume 6, Issue 4
July 2018
Pages 294-300

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 November 2017
  • Revise Date: 16 January 2018
  • Accept Date: 27 January 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics