ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in Orthopedics: A Helpful Tool to Improve Patient Care
An enormous technological improvement in Ultrasonography devices has occurred during last decade, providing excellent soft-tissue contrast and high spatial resolution images. Nowadays, musculoskeletal ultrasonography is going to be a stethoscope in the hand of orthopedic surgeons for the diagnosis of many musculoskeletal pathologies, as well as an accurate guide for therapeutic interventions. Therefore, it is wise for practicing orthopedic surgeons to learn musculoskeletal ultrasonography in collaboration with radiology colleagues as this would improve the patients' care .
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15744_ea17aa9b5954b585bd421fbb5b7c1648.pdf
2020-05-01
323
324
10.22038/abjs.2020.47207.2306
Ultrasonography
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Diagnosis
Orthopedic procedures
SM Javad
Mortazavi
smjmort@yahoo.com
1
Tehran University of Medical Sciences Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mohammad Hossein
Nabian
dr.nabian@gmail.com
2
Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Dussik KT, Fritch DJ, Kyriazidou M, Sear RS.
1
Measurements of articular tissues with ultrasound.
2
Am J Phys Med. 1958; 37(3):160-5.
3
2. Blankstein A. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of clinical
4
orthopedics: the orthopedic stethoscope. World J
5
Orthop. 2011; 2(2):13-24.
6
3. Shah AB, Bhatnagar N. Ultrasound imaging in
7
musculoskeletal injuries-What the orthopaedic
8
surgeon needs to know. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;
9
10(4):659-65.
10
4. Roberts CS, Beck DJ Jr, Heinsen J, Seligson D. Review
11
article: diagnostic ultrasonography: applications in
12
orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;
13
401(1):248-64.
14
5. Apard T. Ultrasonography for the orthopaedic
15
surgeon. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;
16
105(1S):S7-14.
17
6. Carter K, Nesper A, Gharahbaghian L, Perera P.
18
Ultrasound detection of patellar fracture and
19
evaluation of the knee extensor mechanism in the
20
emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2016;
21
17(6):814-6.
22
7. Balog TP, Rhodehouse BB, Turner EK, Slevin JM, Bush
23
LA, Grassbaugh JA, et al. Accuracy of ultrasoundguided
24
intra-articular hip injections performed in
25
the orthopedic clinic. Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):96-
26
8. Berkoff DJ, Miller LE, Block JE. Clinical utility
27
of ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee
28
injections: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2012;
29
7(1):89-95.
30
9. Wilson DJ, Scully WF, Rawlings JM. Evolving role of
31
ultrasound in therapeutic injections of the upper
32
extremity. Orthopedics. 2015; 38(11):e1017-24.
33
10. Amber KT, Landy DC, Amber I, Knopf D, Guerra
34
J. Comparing the accuracy of ultrasound versus
35
fluoroscopy in glenohumeral injections: a systematic
36
review and meta-analysis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014;
37
42(7):411-6.
38
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Present Situation of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty in the Management of Solitary Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis
Patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) is a somewhat predominant illness, affecting up to 24% of women and 11% ofmen over the age of 55 years who suffer from symptomatic knee OA. The purposes of this narrative overview are tosummarize the present situation of patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in the treatment of solitary PF-OA, and to givean account of the clinical results of PFA for the management of solitary PF degenerative OA of the knee. A CochraneLibrary and PubMed (MEDLINE) examination related to the position of PFA in PF-OA was carried out. A number ofpublications have encountered that PFA is an efficacious treatment for solitary PF-OA. Additionally, a systematic reviewdescribed fairly good results of PFA survivorship and functional outcomes at short- and mid-run follow-up in the settingof solitary PF-OA. Success of PFA depends on accurate patient selection rather than prosthetic failure or wear. In manyreports, the main cause of PFA failure is advancement of tibiofemoral OA. In contemporary times, encouraging resultshave been accomplished by the association of PFA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). In conclusion,patients with solitary PF-OA with severe anterior knee pain may be candidates for PFA. The success of the surgicalprocedure and the long-run survivorship of PFA are related to a good surgical technique and observation to meticulousindications and contraindications in patient selection. Newer prostheses have also played a part to amelioratedoutcomes. PFA is an alternative for younger patients with solitary PF-OA.Level of evidence: III
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15746_7c535b0caceb27f44e70a4dc63961ecf.pdf
2020-05-01
325
331
10.22038/abjs.2020.15746
Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis
management
patellofemoral arthroplasty
Results
E. Carlos
RODRIGUEZ-MERCHAN
ecrmerchan@hotmail.com
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM. Patellofemoral
1
arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee
2
replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(18):
3
2. Monk AP, van Duren BH, Pandit H, Shakespeare D,
4
Murray DW, Gill HS. In vivo sagittal plane kinematics
5
of the FPV patellofemoral replacement. Knee Surg
6
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(6):1104-9.
7
3. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthopedics.
8
2010; 33(9):653.
9
4. Cannon A, Stolley M, Wolf B, Amendola A.
10
Patellofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty: literature
11
review and description of a novel technique. Iowa
12
Orthop J. 2008; 28(1):42-8.
13
5. Lustig S, Magnussen RA, Dahm DL, Parker D.
14
Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?
15
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;
16
20(7):1216-26.
17
6. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: pros, cons,
18
and design considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
19
2004; 428(1):158-65.
20
7. Lotke PA, Lonner JH, Nelson CL. Patellofemoral
21
arthroplasty: the third compartment. J Arthroplasty.
22
2005; 20(4 Suppl 2):4-6.
23
8. Sreekumar R, Subramanian S, Mohammed A.
24
Patellar button dissociation in a mobile-bearing LCS
25
patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2009;
26
22(3):275-8.
27
9. Gupta RR, Zywiel MG, Leadbetter WB, Bonutti P,
28
Mont MA. Scientific evidence for the use of modern
29
patellofemoral arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices.
30
2010; 7(1):51-66.
31
10. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Instr Course
32
Lect. 2010; 59(1):67-84.
33
11. Courtney J, Liebelt D, Nett MP, Cushner FD. Blood
34
loss and transfusion rates following patellofemoral
35
arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012; 43(5):
36
12. Akhbari P, Malak T, Dawson-Bowling S, East D, Miles
37
K, Butler-Manuel PA. The Avon patellofemoral joint
38
replacement: mid-term prospective results from
39
an independent centre. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;
40
7(2):171-6.
41
13. Goh GS, Liow MH, Tay DK, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Fouryear
42
follow up outcome study of patellofemoral
43
arthroplasty at a single institution. J Arthroplasty.
44
2015; 30(6):959-63.
45
14. van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD. Why do
46
patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic
47
review. Knee. 2017; 24(1):2-8.
48
15. Christ AB, Baral E, Koch C, Shubin Stein BE, Gonzalez
49
Della Valle A, et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty
50
conversion to total knee arthroplasty: retrieval
51
analysis and clinical correlation. Knee. 2017;
52
24(5):1233-9.
53
16. Pisanu G, Rosso F, Bertolo C, Dettoni F, Blonna D,
54
Bonasia DE, et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: current
55
concepts and review of the literature. Joints. 2017;
56
5(4):237-45.
57
17. Saffarini M, Müller JH, La Barbera G, Hannink G, Cho KJ,
58
Toanen C, et al. Inadequacy of computed tomography
59
for pre-operative planning of patellofemoral
60
arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
61
2018; 26(5):1485-92.
62
18. Reihs B, Reihs F, Labek G, Hochegger M, Leithner A,
63
Böhler N, et al. No bias for developer publications
64
and no difference between first-generation trochlearresurfacing
65
versus trochlear-cutting implants in
66
15,306 cases of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty.
67
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;
68
26(9):2809-16.
69
19. Middleton SW, Toms AD, Schranz PJ, Mandalia VI.
70
Mid-term survivorship and clinical outcomes of the
71
Avon patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee. 2018;
72
25(2):323-8.
73
20. Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Kappel A,
74
Fabrin J. The mark Coventry award: patellofemoral
75
arthroplasty results in better range of movement
76
and early patient-reported outcomes than TKA. Clin
77
Orthop Relat Res. 2018; 476(1):87-100.
78
21. van Jonbergen HW, Westerbeek RE. Femoral
79
component rotation in patellofemoral joint
80
replacement. Knee. 2018; 25(3):485-90.
81
22. Perrone FL, Baron S, Suero EM, Lausmann C, Kendoff
82
D, Zahar A, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures
83
(PROMs) in patients undergoing patellofemoral
84
arthroplasty and total knee replacement: a
85
comparative study. Technol Health Care. 2018;
86
26(3):507-14.
87
23. Cuthbert R, Tibrewal S, Tibrewal SB. Patellofemoral
88
arthroplasty: current concepts. J Clin Orthop Trauma.
89
2018; 9(1):24-8.
90
24. Strickland SM, Bird ML, Christ AB. Advances in
91
patellofemoral arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet
92
Med. 2018; 11(2):221-30.
93
25. Metcalfe AJ, Ahearn N, Hassaballa MA, Parsons N,
94
Ackroyd CE, Murray JR, et al. The Avon patellofemoral
95
joint arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(9):1162-7.
96
26. Ajnin S, Buchanan D, Arbuthnot J, Fernandes R.
97
Patellofemoral joint replacement - Mean five year
98
follow-up. Knee. 2018; 25(6):1272-7.
99
27. Bunyoz KI, Lustig S, Troelsen A. Similar postoperative
100
patient-reported outcome in both second generation
101
patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee
102
arthroplasty for treatment of isolated patellofemoral
103
osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports
104
Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(7):2226-37.
105
28. Godshaw B, Kolodychuk N, Williams GK Jr, Browning
106
B, Jones D. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Ochsner J.
107
2018; 18(3):280-7.
108
29. Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Bartsch E, Cotic M, Pogorzelski J.
109
High patient satisfaction with significant improvement
110
in knee function and pain relief after mid-term followup
111
in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay
112
arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
113
2018; 27(7):2251-8.
114
30. Tarassoli P, Punwar S, Khan W, Johnstone D.
115
Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review of
116
the literature. Open Orthop J. 2012; 6(1):340-7.
117
31. Odumenya M, McGuinness K, Achten J, Parsons N,
118
Spalding T, Costa M. The Warwick patellofemoral
119
arthroplasty trial: a randomised clinical trial of total
120
knee arthroplasty versus patellofemoral arthroplasty
121
in patients with severe arthritis of the patellofemoral
122
joint. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12(1):265.
123
32. Farr J 2nd, Barrett D. Optimizing patellofemoral
124
arthroplasty. Knee. 2008; 15(5):339-47.
125
33. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Am Acad
126
Orthop Surg. 2007; 15(8):495-506.
127
34. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact
128
of design on outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;
129
39(3):347-54.
130
35. Sisto DJ, Sarin VK. Patellofemoral arthroplasty with a
131
customized trochlear prosthesis. Orthop Clin North
132
Am. 2008; 39(3):355-62.
133
36. Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM. Patellofemoral
134
arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee
135
replacement. Instr Course Lect. 2013; 62(1):363-71.
136
37. Lonner JH, Bloomfield MR. The clinical outcome of
137
patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am.
138
2013; 44(3):271-80.
139
38. Lustig S. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol
140
Surg Res. 2014; 100(1 Suppl):S35-43.
141
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Truly Existing or Hyped up? Unravelling the Current Knowledge Regarding the Anatomy, Radiology, Histology and Biomechanics of the Enigmatic Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Joint
Ever since its description, anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee joint remains as the hotspot of controversies.Though it has been described under various descriptions, the structure gained its limelight when it was christenedas anterolateral ligament by Claes in 2013. The main reason for the controversies around it is the lack of concreteevidences regarding its attachments, morphology, biomechanical aspects and radiological appearance. Similarly therole of ALL in pivot shift phenomenon also remains as a point of debate. The advocates of ALL suggest that becauseof its ability to modulate internal rotation and attachment to the lateral meniscus, ALL contributes to the pivot shiftphenomenon. Similarly, the orientation of ALL stands as the reason for varied documentation with respect to imagingtechniques. With the growing body of evidence, it is imperative to fix our stand regarding the structure because, iffound to be morphologically persistent, it can be used for concomitant anterolateral stabilization along with anteriorcruciate ligament reinforcement surgeries. The present review tries to systematically review the anatomy, variations inclassifications, descriptions, histology, radiology and biomechanical features of ALL. At the end of the review, we wouldlike to find the answer for the question: Is ALL a distinct ligamentous structure located at the anterolateral aspect of theknee? What is the contribution of it to the tibial internal rotation stability?Level of evidence: II
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15747_6d13df000dc4b434bc60ae6684978bba.pdf
2020-05-01
332
342
10.22038/abjs.2019.40067.2074
Anterolateral ligament
Anatomy
Arthroscopy
Biomechanics
Knee joint
lateral capsule
Dinesh
Kumar. V
dinesh.88560@gmail.com
1
Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
LEAD_AUTHOR
Yogesh
Ashok Sontakke
dryogeshas@rediffmail.com
2
Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
AUTHOR
Shishir
Suranigi Murugharaj
shishir100@gmail.com
3
Department of Orthopaedics, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India
AUTHOR
1. Loës M, Dahlstedt LJ, Thomée R. A 7-year study on
1
risks and costs of knee injuries in male and female
2
youth participants in 12 sports. Scand J Med Sci
3
Sports. 2000; 10(2): 90–7.
4
2. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB. Patellar
5
tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for
6
anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane
7
Database Syst Rev. 2011; 2011(9): CD005960.
8
3. Tanaka M, Vyas D, Moloney G, Bedi A, Pearle AD,
9
Musahl V. What does it take to have a high-grade pivot
10
shift? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;
11
20(4): 737–42.
12
4. Vincent JP, Magnussen RA, Gezmez F, Uguen A, Jacobi
13
M, Weppe F, et al. The anterolateral ligament of the
14
human knee: an anatomic and histologic study. Knee
15
Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(1): 147–52.
16
5. Haims AH, Medvecky MJ, Pavlovich R Jr.,Katz LD. MR
17
imaging of the anatomy of and injuries to the lateral
18
and posterolateral aspects of the knee. AJR Am J
19
Roentgenol. 2003; 180(3): 647-53.
20
6. Hughston JC, Andrews JR, Cross MJ, Moschi A.
21
Classification of knee ligament instabilities. Part II.
22
The lateral compartment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;
23
58(2):173-9
24
7. Johnson LL. Lateral capsular ligament complex:
25
anatomical and surgical considerations. Am J Sports
26
Med. 1979; 7(3): 156 -60
27
8. Campos JC, Chung CB, Lektrakul N, Pedowitz R, Trudell
28
D, Yu J, et al. Pathogenesis of the Segond fracture:
29
anatomic and MR imaging evidence of an iliotibial
30
tract or anterior oblique band avulsion. Radiology
31
2001; 219(2): 381-6.
32
9. Terry GC, Norwood LA, Hughston JC, Caldwell KM.
33
How iliotibial tract injuries of the knee combine with
34
acute anterior cruciate ligament tears to influence
35
abnormal anterior tibial displacement. Am J Sports
36
Med. 1993; 21(1):55–60
37
10. Vieira ELC, Vieira EA, da Silva RT, Berlfein PA, Abdalla
38
RJ, Cohen M. An anatomic study of the iliotibial tract.
39
Arthrosc. 2007; 23(3): 269–74.
40
11. Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, Victor J, Verdonk P,
41
Bellemans J. Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of
42
the knee. J Anat. 2013; 223(4): 321–328.
43
12. Van der Watt L, Khan M, Rothrauff BB, Ayeni OR,
44
Musahl V, Getgood A et al. The structure and function
45
of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: a systematic
46
review. Arthroscopy 2015; 31(3):569–82.
47
13. Spencer L, Burkhart TA, Tran MN, Rezansoff AJ, Deo S,
48
Caterine S et al. Biomechanical analysis of simulated
49
clinical testing and reconstruction of the anterolateral
50
ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43(9):
51
14. Kennedy MI, Claes S, Fuso FAF, Williams BT, Goldsmith
52
MT, Turnbull TL et al. The Anterolateral Ligament: an
53
Anatomic, Radiographic, and Biomechanical Analysis.
54
Am J Sports Med 2015; 43(7):1606–15
55
15. Dodds AL, Halewood C, Gupte CM, Williams A, Amis
56
AA. The anterolateral ligament: Anatomy, length
57
changes and association with the Segond fracture.
58
Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(3): 325–31
59
16. Helito CP, Demange MK, Bonadio MB, Tirico LEP,
60
Gobbi RG, Pecora JR et al. Anatomy and Histology of
61
the knee anterolateral ligament. Orthop J Sport Med
62
2013; 1(7): 2325967113513546
63
17. Lutz C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Niglis L, Freychet B, Clavert
64
P, Imbert P. Behavior of the anterolateral structures of
65
the knee during internal rotation. Orthop Traumatol
66
Surg Res. 2015; 101(5):523–28
67
18. Macchi V, Porzionato A, Morra A, Stecco C, Tortorella
68
C, Menegolo M et al. The anterolateral ligament of the
69
knee: a radiologic and histotopographic study. Surg
70
Radiol Anat. 2016; 38(3):341–8
71
19. Daggett M, Busch K, Sonnery-Cottet B. Surgical
72
dissection of the anterolateral ligament. Arthrosc
73
Tech. 2016; 5(1):e185– e188.
74
20. Potu BK, Salem AH, Abu-Hijleh MF. Morphology
75
of anterolateral ligament of the knee: a cadaveric
76
observation with clinical insight. Adv Med. 2016;
77
2016: 9182863.
78
21. Caterine S, Litchfield R, Johnson M, Chronik B, Getgood
79
A. A cadaveric study of the anterolateral ligament: reintroducing
80
the lateral capsular ligament. Knee Surg
81
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23(11):3186–95.
82
22. Stijak L, Bumbasirevic M, Radonjic V, Kadija M, Puskas
83
L, Milovanovic D et al. Anatomic description of the
84
anterolateral ligament of the knee. Knee Surg Sports
85
Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(7):2083–8.
86
23. Kosy JD, Sonui A, Venkatesh R, Mandalia VI. The
87
anterolateral ligament of the knee: unwrapping the
88
enigma. Anatomical study and comparison to previous
89
reports. J Orthopaed Traumatol 2016; 17(4):303–8
90
24. Runer A, Birkmaier S, Pamminger M, Reider S, Herbst
91
E, Kunzel KH et al. The anterolateral ligament of the
92
knee: a dissection study. Knee 2016; 23(1):8–12
93
25. Zens M, Niemeyer P, Ruhhammer J, Bernstein A,
94
Woias P, Mayr HO et al. Length changes of the
95
anterolateral ligament during passive knee motion:
96
a human cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;
97
43(10):2545–52.
98
26. Watanabe J, Suzuki D, Mizoguchi S, Yoshida S,
99
Fujimiya M. The anterolateral ligament in a Japanese
100
population: study on prevalence and morphology. J
101
Orthop Sci. 2016; 21(5):647–51.
102
27. Parker M, Smith HF. Anatomical variation in the
103
anterolateral ligament of the knee and a new dissection
104
technique for embalmed cadaveric specimens. Anat
105
Sci Int. 2018; 93(2):177-187
106
28. Fardin PBA, Lizardo JHF, Baptista JDS. Study of the
107
anterolateral ligament of the knee in formalin-
108
cadavers. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira.
109
2017; 25(2):89-92.
110
29. Farhan PHS, Sudhakaran R, Thilak J. Solving the
111
Mystery of the Antero Lateral Ligament. J Clin Diagn
112
Res. 2017; 11(3):AC01-AC04.
113
30. Olewnik Ł, Gonera B, Kurtys K, Podgórski M, Polguj
114
M, Sibiński M et al. The Anterolateral Ligament of the
115
Knee: A Proposed Classification System. Clin Anat.
116
2018;31(7): 966-73
117
31. Pomajzl R, Maerz T, Shams C, Guettler J, Bicos J. A
118
review of the anterolateral ligament of the knee:
119
Current knowledge regarding its incidence, anatomy,
120
biomechanics, and surgical dissection. Arthroscopy
121
2015; 31(3): 583-591.
122
32. Seebacher JR, Inglis AE, Marchall JL, Warren JF. The
123
structure of the posterolateral aspect of the knee. J
124
Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64(4):536–541
125
33. Shea KG, Polousky JD, Jacobs JC Jr, Yen YM, Ganley TJ.
126
The anterolateral ligament of the knee: an inconsistent
127
finding in paediatric cadaveric specimens. J Pediatr
128
Orthop 2016; 36(5):e51–e54
129
34. Sabzevari S, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Albers M, Linde
130
M, Smolinski P, Fu FH. Anatomic and histological
131
investigation of the anterolateral capsular complex in
132
the fetal knee. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45(6); 1383 –
133
35. Helito CP, Do prado torres JA, Bonadio MB, Aragao
134
JA, de Oliveira LN, Natalino RJM et al. Anterolateral
135
ligament of the fetal knee. Am J Sports Med. 2017;
136
45(1): 91–6.
137
36. Daggett M, Helito C, Cullen M, Ockuly A, Busch K,
138
Granite J et al. The Anterolateral Ligament: An
139
Anatomic Study on Sex-Based Differences. Orthop J
140
Sports Med. 2017; 5(2):2325967116689387. DOI:
141
10.1177/2325967116689387.
142
37. Zens M, Feucht MJ, Ruhhammer J, Bernstein A, Mayr
143
HO, Südkamp NP et al. Mechanical tensile properties
144
of the anterolateral ligament. J Exp Orthop 2015;
145
38. Helito CP, do Amaral C Jr, Nakamichi YD, Gobbi RG,
146
Bonadio MB, Natalino RJM et al. Why Do Authors
147
Differ with Regard to the Femoral and Meniscal
148
Anatomic Parameters of the Knee Anterolateral
149
Ligament? Orthop J Sports Med. 2016; 4(12),
150
2325967116675604.
151
39. Dombrowski ME, Costello JM, Ohashi B, Murawski
152
CD, Rothrauff BB, Arilla FV et al. Macroscopic
153
anatomical, histological and magnetic resonance
154
imaging correlation of the lateral capsule of the
155
knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;
156
24(9):2854–60.
157
40. Helito CP, Demange MK, Bonadio MB, Tirico LE,
158
Gobbi RG, Pecora JR et al. Radiographic landmarks for
159
locating the femoral origin and tibial insertion of the
160
knee anterolateral ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2014;
161
42(10):2356–62.
162
41. Rezansoff AJ, Caterine S, Spencer L, Tran MN, Litchfield
163
RB, Getgood AM. Radiographic landmarks for surgical
164
reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament of the
165
knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J
166
ESSKA 2015; 23(11):3196–201.
167
42. Heckmann N, Sivasundaram L, Villacis D, Kleiner
168
M, Yi A, White E et al. Radiographic landmarks for
169
identifying the anterolateral ligament of the knee.
170
Arthrosc J Arthrosc Related Surg Off Publ Arthrosc
171
Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 2016; 32(5):844–8.
172
43. Oshima T, Nakase J, Numata H, Takata Y, Tsuchiya
173
H. Ultrasonography imaging of the anterolateral
174
ligament using real-time virtual sonography. Knee
175
2016; 23(2):198–202.
176
44. Cavaignac E, Wytrykowski K, Reina N, Pailhe R, Murgier
177
J, Faruch M et al. Ultrasonographic Identification of
178
the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Arthroscopy
179
2015; 32(1):120–6.
180
45. Cianca J, John J, Pandit S, Chiou-Tan FY. Musculoskeletal
181
ultrasound imaging of the recently described
182
anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Phys Med
183
Rehabil Assoc Acad Physiatr 2014; 93(2):186
184
46. Capo J, Kaplan DJ, Fralinger DJ, Adler RS, Campbell KA,
185
Jazrawi LM et al. Ultrasonographic visualization and
186
assessment of the anterolateral ligament. Knee Surg
187
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2017; 25(10):
188
47. LaPrade RF, Gilbert TJ, Bollom TS, Wentorf F, Chaljub
189
G. The magnetic resonance imaging appearance of
190
individual structures of the posterolateral knee. A
191
prospective study of normal knees and knees with
192
surgically verified grade III injuries. Am J Sports Med.
193
2000; 28(2):191-9.
194
48. Van der Watt L, Khan M, Rothrauff BB, Ayeni OR,
195
Mushal V, Getgood A et al. The structure and function
196
of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: a systematic
197
review. Arthroscopy 2015; 31(3):569–82.
198
49. Helito CP, Helito PV, Costa HP, Bordalo-Rodrigues
199
M, Pecora JR, Camanho GL et al. MRI evaluation of
200
the anterolateral ligament of the knee: assessment
201
in routine 1.5-T scans. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;
202
43(10):1421–7
203
50. Claes S, Bartholomeeusen S, Bellemans J. High
204
prevalence of anterolateral ligament abnormalities
205
in magnetic resonance images of anterior cruciate
206
ligament-injured knees. Acta Orthop Belg 2014;
207
80(1):45–9
208
51. Taneja AK, Miranda FC, Braga CA, Gill CM, Hartmann
209
LG, Santos DC et al. MRI features of the anterolateral
210
ligament of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2015;44(3):
211
403–10
212
52. Kosy JD, Mandalia VI, Anaspure R. Characterization of
213
the anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee
214
using magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol
215
2015; 44(11):1647–53.
216
53. Porrino J, Maloney E, Richardson M, Mulcahy H, Ha A,
217
Chew FS. The anterolateral ligament of the knee: MRI
218
appearance, association with the segond fracture,
219
and historical perspective. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;
220
204(2):367–73
221
54. De Maeseneer M, Boulet C, Willekens I, Lenchik L, De
222
Mey J, Cattrysse E et al. Segond fracture: Involvement
223
of the iliotibial band, anterolateral ligament, and
224
anterior arm of the biceps femoris in knee trauma.
225
Skeletal Radiol. 2015; 44(3): 413-21.
226
55. Monaco E, Maestri B, Conteduca F, Mazza D, Iorio C,
227
Ferretti A et al. Extra-articular ACL reconstruction
228
and pivot shift: in vivo dynamic evaluation with
229
navigation. Am j Sports Med. 2014; 42(7): 1669-74.
230
56. Monaco E, Ferretti A, Labianca L, Maestri B, Speranza
231
A, Kelly MJ et al. Navigated knee kinematics after
232
cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint. Knee
233
Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 2012;
234
20(5):870–7.
235
57. Rasmussen MT, Nitri M, Williams BT, Moulton SG, Cruz
236
RS, Dornan GJ et al. An In Vitro robotic assessment of
237
the anterolateral ligament, part 1: secondary role of
238
the anterolateral ligament in the setting of an anterior
239
cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2016;
240
44(3):585–92.
241
58. Sonnery-Cottet B, Lutz C, Daggett M, Dalmay F,
242
Freychet B, Niglis L et al. The involvement of the
243
anterolateral ligament in rotational control of the
244
knee. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(5):1209–1214
245
59. Song GY, Zhang H, Wang QQ, Zhang J, Li Y, Feng H. Risk
246
factors associated with grade 3 pivot shift after acute
247
anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med.
248
2016, 44(2): 362–9
249
60. Parsons EM, Gee AO, Spiekerman C, Cavanagh PR. The
250
biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament
251
of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(3):669-674.
252
61. Zens M, Niemeyer P, Ruhhammer J, Bernstein A,
253
Woias P, Mayr HO et al. Length Changes of the
254
Anterolateral Ligament During Passive Knee Motion:
255
a Human Cadaveric Study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;
256
43(10):2545-52.
257
62. Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim
258
BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a combined
259
anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament
260
reconstruction technique with a minimum 2-year
261
follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(7):1598-1605
262
63. Guenther D, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Bell KM, Irarrazaval
263
S, Fu FH, Mushal V, et al. The anterolateral capsule of
264
the knee behaves like a sheet of fibrous tissue. Am J
265
Sports Med 2016; 45(4):849–55
266
64. Araujo PH, Kfuri Junior M, Ohashi B, Hoshino Y,
267
Zaffagnini S, Samuelsson K, et al. Individualized ACL
268
reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
269
2014; 22(9):1966–75.
270
65. Schon JM, Moatshe G, Brady AW, Serra Cruz R, Chahla
271
J, Dornan GJ, et al. Anatomic anterolateral ligament
272
reconstruction of the knee leads to over constraint
273
at any fixation angle. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44:
274
2546–56
275
66. Musahl V, Getgood A, Neyret P, Claes S, Burnham JM,
276
Batailler C, Sonnery-Cottet B, et al. Contributions
277
of the anterolateral complex and the anterolateral
278
ligament to rotatory knee stability in the setting of
279
ACL Injury: a roundtable discussion. Knee Surg Sports
280
Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(4): 997-1008
281
67. Zhang H, Qiu M, Zhou A, Zhang J, Jiang D. Anatomic
282
Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Improves
283
Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Combined with
284
Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
285
J Sports Sci Med. 2016; 15(4): 688-96.
286
68. Neri T, Palpacuer F, Testa R, Bergandi F, Boyer B,
287
Farizon F, et al. The anterolateral ligament: Anatomic
288
implications for its reconstruction. Knee. 2017;
289
24(5):1083-1089.
290
69. Levy BA, Sabbag OD. Editorial commentary: Is
291
Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee
292
Needed? The Debate Rages on. Arthroscopy 2017;
293
33(8): 1584-6.
294
70. Helito CP, Saithna A, Bonadio MB, Daggett M,
295
Monaco E, Demange MK et al. Anterolateral
296
Ligament Reconstruction: A Possible Option in
297
the Therapeutic Arsenal for Persistent Rotatory
298
Instability After ACL Reconstruction. Orthop J
299
Sports Med. 2018; 6(1):2325967117751348. DOI:
300
10.1177/2325967117751348.
301
71. Ferretti A, Monaco E, Ponzo A, Basiglini L, Iorio R,
302
Caperna L et al. Combined intra-articular and extraarticular
303
reconstruction in anterior cruciate ligamentdeficient
304
knee: 25 years later. Arthroscopy 2016;
305
32(10):2039-47.
306
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Effect of Ozone (O3) versus Hyaluronic Acid on Pain and Function in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Of the pharmacological modalities for knee osteoarthritis (OA), intra-articular injections including ozone(O3) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are commonly used for reducing pain and improving function. In this systematic reviewand meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the effect of O3 versus HA in reducing pain and increasing function in patientswith knee OA.Methods: After searching databases, we included 6 randomized controlled trials on patients with knee OA thatcompared the effects of intra-articular injection of ozone versus HA. The primary outcome was visual analogue scale(VAS) of pain. The secondary outcome was Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)score.Results: There was a total of 237 patients in the HA group and 230 patients in the Ozone group. Of 6 studies, 4 werein English, 1 was in Persian, and 1 was in German language. The overall Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) for VASpain did not show a significant difference between the groups although it favored HA injection (1.27 [95%CI: (-0.12)-2.66]). Total WOMAC score showed a significant difference over the time favoring HA injection (4.5 [95%CI: 1.1-8]).However, no single time point showed any significant difference between groups.Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed no significant difference between HA and ozone in reducing pain andimproving function in patients with knee OA, although the overall results favored HA over ozone. Since previous studieshave shown comparable results between HA and placebo, ozone seems to fall in the same category with more placeboeffect rather than a real disease-modifier.Level of evidence: I
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15749_704de05ee5c76f527451984a76eb84c0.pdf
2020-05-01
343
354
10.22038/abjs.2020.46925.2292
Hyaluronic acid
Knee Osteoarthritis
Ozone
Pain
WOMAC score
Javad
Javadi Hedayatabad
j.javadi.h1988@gmail.com
1
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Amir R.
Kachooei
arkachooei@gmail.com
2
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
AUTHOR
Negar
Taher Chaharjouy
negar.chaharjuy@gmail.com
3
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Niloufar
Vaziri
lnvaziri@gmail.com
4
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Hasan
Mehrad-Majd
mehradmajdh@mums.ac.ir
5
Clinical Research Development Unit, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Maryam
Emadzadeh
emadzadehm@mums.ac.ir
6
Clinical Research Development Unit, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Mansour
Abolghasemian
mabolghasemian@gmail.com
7
Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mohammad H.
Ebrahimzadeh
8
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
1. Bocci V, Borrelli E, Zanardi I, Travagli V. The
1
usefulness of ozone treatment in spinal pain. Drug
2
design, development and therapy. 2015;9:2677-85.
3
PubMed PMID: 26028964.
4
2. Miller LE, Block JE. US-Approved Intra-Articular
5
Hyaluronic Acid Injections are Safe and Effective
6
in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic
7
Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Saline-
8
Controlled Trials. Clinical medicine insights Arthritis
9
and musculoskeletal disorders. 2013;6:57-63.
10
PubMed PMID: 24027421.
11
3. Chang KV, Hung CY, Aliwarga F, Wang TG, Han DS,
12
Chen WS. Comparative effectiveness of platelet-rich
13
plasma injections for treating knee joint cartilage
14
degenerative pathology: a systematic review and
15
meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and
16
rehabilitation. 2014 Mar;95(3):562-75. PubMed
17
PMID: 24291594. Epub 2013/12/03. eng.
18
4. Raeissadat SA, Rayegani SM, Moridnia M, Dehgolan
19
SR. INTRA ARTICULAR OZONE OR HYALURONIC
20
ACID INJECTION: WHICH ONE IS SUPERIOR IN
21
PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS? A
22
6-MONTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Annals
23
of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2017 Jun;76:1547-8.
24
PubMed PMID: WOS:000413181404659.
25
5. Jevsevar DS. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee:
26
evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition. The Journal
27
of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
28
2013 Sep;21(9):571-6. PubMed PMID: 23996988.
29
Epub 2013/09/03. eng.
30
6. Elvis AM, Ekta JS. Ozone therapy: A clinical review.
31
Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine.
32
2011 Jan-Jun;2(1):66-70. PubMed PMID: 22470237.
33
7. Murphy K, Elias G, Steppan J, Boxley C,
34
Balagurunathan K, Victor X, et al. Percutaneous
35
Treatment of Herniated Lumbar Discs with Ozone:
36
Investigation of the Mechanisms of Action. Journal
37
of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR. 2016
38
Aug;27(8):1242-50.e3. PubMed PMID: 27363296.
39
Epub 2016/07/02. eng.
40
8. Zanardi I, Borrelli E, Valacchi G, Travagli V, Bocci V.
41
Ozone: A Multifaceted Molecule with Unexpected
42
Therapeutic Activity. Current medicinal chemistry.
43
2016;23(4):304-14. PubMed PMID: 26687830. Epub
44
2015/12/22. eng.
45
9. Invernizzi M, D S, Carda S, Grana E, Picelli A, Smania
46
N, et al. Safety of Intra-Articular Oxygen-Ozone
47
Therapy Compared to Intra-Articular Sodium
48
Hyaluronate in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized
49
Single Blind Pilot Study2017.
50
10. Kr S, Pramanik R, Das P, Pratim Das P, Kumar A,
51
Roy J, et al. Role of intra-articular ozone in osteoarthritis
52
of knee for functional and symptomatic
53
improvement2018.
54
11. Lopes de Jesus CC, Dos Santos FC, de Jesus LMOB,
55
Monteiro I, Sant’Ana MSSC, Trevisani VFM.
56
Comparison between intra-articular ozone and
57
placebo in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A
58
randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled
59
study. PloS one. 2017;12(7):e0179185-e. PubMed
60
PMID: 28738079.
61
12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred
62
reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses:
63
the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine.
64
2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. PubMed PMID:
65
19621072. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2707599.
66
Epub 2009/07/22. eng.
67
13. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds
68
DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports
69
of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
70
Controlled clinical trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12.
71
PubMed PMID: 8721797. Epub 1996/02/01. eng.
72
14. Lundh A, Gotzsche PC. Recommendations by
73
Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the
74
risk of bias in studies. BMC medical research
75
methodology. 2008 Apr 21;8:22. PubMed PMID:
76
18426565. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2375895.
77
Epub 2008/04/23. eng.
78
15. Higgins J, Green Se. Cochrane Handbook for
79
Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0
80
[updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration;
81
16. Wallace BC, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Trow P,
82
Schmid CH. Closing the Gap between Methodologists
83
and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End.
84
2012. 2012 2012-06-30;49(5):15. Epub 2012-06-30.
85
17. Giombini A, Menotti F, Di AC, Giovannangeli F, Rizzo
86
M, Moffa S, et al. Comparison between intrarticular
87
injection of hyaluronic acid, oxygen ozone, and
88
the combination of both in the treatment of knee
89
osteoarthrosis %J Journal of biological regulators
90
and homeostatic agents. 2016;30(2):621-5.
91
18. Auerbach B, Melzer C. [Cross-linked hyaluronic acid
92
in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee--results
93
of a prospective randomized trial]. Zentralblatt fur
94
Chirurgie. 2002 Oct;127(10):895-9. PubMed PMID:
95
12410458. Epub 2002/11/01. Die Behandlung der
96
Gonarthrose mit hochvernetzter Hyaluronsaure-
97
Ergebnisse einer prospektiven randomisierten
98
Studie. ger.
99
19. Duymus TM, Mutlu S, Dernek B, Komur B, Aydogmus
100
S, Kesiktas FN. Choice of intra-articular injection
101
in treatment of knee osteoarthritis: plateletrich
102
plasma, hyaluronic acid or ozone options.
103
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy.
104
2017;25(2):485‐92. PubMed PMID: CN-01368968.
105
20. Jevsevar DS, Shores PB, Mullen K, Schulte DM, Brown
106
GA, Cummins DS. Mixed Treatment Comparisons for
107
Nonsurgical Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A
108
Network Meta-analysis. The Journal of the American
109
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018 May
110
1;26(9):325-36. PubMed PMID: 29688920. Epub
111
2018/04/25. eng.
112
21. Borrelli E. disc herniation and knee arthritis as
113
chronic oxidative stress diseases: the therapeutic
114
role of oxygen ozone therapy. 2015;4:161-66.
115
22. Listrat V, Ayral X, Patarnello F, Bonvarlet JP, Simonnet
116
J, Amor B, et al. Arthroscopic evaluation of potential
117
structure modifying activity of hyaluronan (Hyalgan)
118
in osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis and
119
cartilage. 1997 May;5(3):153-60. PubMed PMID:
120
9219678. Epub 1997/05/01. eng.
121
23. Pasquali Ronchetti I, Guerra D, Taparelli F, Boraldi
122
F, Bergamini G, Mori G, et al. Morphological
123
analysis of knee synovial membrane biopsies from
124
a randomized controlled clinical study comparing
125
the effects of sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan) and
126
methylprednisolone acetate (Depomedrol) in
127
osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England).
128
2001 Feb;40(2):158-69. PubMed PMID: 11257152.
129
Epub 2001/03/21. eng.
130
24. Momenzadeh S, Poorfarrokh M, Hashemi M, Barikani
131
A. Comparison of intra-articular oxygen-ozone and
132
hyaluronic acid prolotherapy on pain and disability
133
of osteoarthritis patients. Research-in-Medicine.
134
2014;38(1):32-6.
135
25. Li Q, Qi X, Zhang Z. Intra-articular oxygen-ozone
136
versus hyaluronic acid in knee osteoarthritis: A
137
meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
138
International journal of surgery (London, England).
139
2018 Aug 29;58:3-10. PubMed PMID: 30170178.
140
Epub 2018/09/01. eng.
141
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Intra-articular versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can cause excessive blood loss requiring allogenic transfusions.Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been increasingly used for lowering blood loss. The present study aimed to comparethe efficacy of intravenous (IV) and intra-articular (IA) administrations of TXA in TKA patients who receive aspirin aschemoprophylaxis and uses no drain post-operative.Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 49 TKA patients were intravenously given 15 mg/kg dose ofTXA, and 49 patients intraarticularly received 15 mg/kg of TXA. Demographic information, pre-operative and postoperativehemoglobin values of the patients were used for assessing total perioperative blood loss by GOOD &NADLER formulae.Results: There was not any significant difference between the IV TXA and IA TXA groups concerning blood loss(P=0.102). However, the decrease in hemoglobin level at 48 hours post-operation compared to the preoperativelevel in the IV TXA group was significantly higher than that in the IA TXA group (-2.3 ±0.8 vs. -1.9 ±1.0 g/dL;P=0.038). No blood transfusion was needed, and the deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolization werenot observed in either of the groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: Our study showed that during TKA, the IA TXA is equally safe and effective as its IV infusion concerningdecreased blood loss and adverse effects. The use of TXA during TKA is safe for patients who receive less potentchemoprophylaxis agents such as aspirin.Level of evidence: I
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15750_c26f6ab7d80543e88801980ab84ef713.pdf
2020-05-01
355
362
10.22038/abjs.2019.39080.2039
Blood loss
Intra-articular
Intravenous
TKA
Tranexamic acid
SM Javad
Mortazavi
smjmort@yahoo.com
1
Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Babak
Sattartabar
b.sattartabar@gmail.com
2
Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Alireza
Moharrami
a.moharramy@gmail.com
3
Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
seyed hadi
Kalantar
hadikalantar4@gmail.com
4
Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
allogeneic blood during orthopedic surgery. Mt Sinai
1
J Med. 2002; 69(1-2):83-7.
2
11. Lemaire R. Strategies for blood management in
3
orthopaedic and trauma surgery. J Bone Joint Surg
4
Br. 2008; 90(9):1128-36.
5
12. Eubanks JD. Antifibrinolytics in major orthopaedic
6
surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010; 18(3):132-8.
7
13. Camarasa M, Ollé G, Serra-Prat M, Martín A, Sánchez
8
M, Ricós P, et al. Efficacy of aminocaproic, tranexamic
9
acids in the control of bleeding during total knee
10
replacement: a randomized clinical trial. Br J
11
Anaesth. 2006; 96(5):576-82.
12
14. Molloy DO, Archbold HA, Ogonda L, McConway J,
13
Wilson RK, Beverland DE. Comparison of topical
14
fibrin spray and tranexamic acid on blood loss after
15
total knee replacement: a prospective, randomised
16
controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;
17
89(3):306-9.
18
15. Vigna-Taglianti F, Basso L, Rolfo P, Brambilla R,
19
Vaccari F, Lanci G, et al. Tranexamic acid for reducing
20
blood transfusions in arthroplasty interventions: a
21
cost-effective practice. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol.
22
2014; 24(4):545-51.
23
16. Badeaux J, Hawley D. A systematic review of the
24
effectiveness of intravenous tranexamic acid
25
administration in managing perioperative blood loss
26
in patients undergoing spine surgery. J Perianesth
27
Nurs. 2014; 29(6):459-65.
28
17. Melvin JS, Stryker LS, Sierra RJ. Tranexamic acid in
29
hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.
30
2015; 23(12):732-40.
31
18. MacGillivray RG, Tarabichi SB, Hawari MF, Raoof NT.
32
Tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss after bilateral
33
total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized
34
double blind study. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(1):24-8.
35
19. Chen JY, Chin PL, Moo IH, Pang HN, Tay DKJ, Chia SL,
36
et al. Intravenous versus intra-articular tranexamic
37
acid in total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded
38
randomised controlled noninferiority trial. Knee.
39
1. Lin ZX, Woolf SK. Safety, efficacy, and costeffectiveness
40
of tranexamic acid in orthopedic
41
surgery. Orthopedics. 2016; 39(2):119-30.
42
2. Kagoma YK, Crowther MA, Douketis J, Bhandari M,
43
Eikelboom J, Lim W. Use of antifibrinolytic therapy to
44
reduce transfusion in patients undergoing orthopedic
45
surgery: a systematic review of randomized trials.
46
Thromb Res. 2009; 123(5):687-96.
47
3. Wind TC, Barfield WR, Moskal JT. The effect of
48
tranexamic acid on blood loss and transfusion rate
49
in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.
50
2013; 28(7):1080-3.
51
4. Quintero JI, Cárdenas LL, Navas M, Bautista
52
MP, Bonilla GA, Llinás AM, et al. Primary joint
53
arthroplasty surgery: is the risk of major bleeding
54
higher in elderly patients? A retrospective cohort
55
study. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(10):2264-8.
56
5. Bong MR, Patel V, Chang E, Issack PS, Hebert R, Di
57
Cesare PE. Risks associated with blood transfusion
58
after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;
59
19(3):281-7.
60
6. Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J.
61
Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing,
62
and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
63
2008; 466(7):1710-5.
64
7. Sarzaeem MM, Razi M, Kazemian G, Moghaddam
65
ME, Rasi AM, Karimi M. Comparing efficacy of
66
three methods of tranexamic acid administration
67
in reducing hemoglobin drop following total knee
68
arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(8):1521-4.
69
8. Rasouli MR, Gomes LS, Parsley B, Barsoum W,
70
Bezwada H, Cashman J, et al. Blood conservation. J
71
Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(2 Suppl):65-70.
72
9. Keyhani S, Esmailiejah AA, Abbasian MR, Safdari
73
F. Which route of tranexamic acid administration
74
is more effective to reduce blood loss following
75
total knee arthroplasty? Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;
76
4(1):65-9.
77
10. Rosenblatt MA. Strategies for minimizing the use of
78
allogeneic blood during orthopedic surgery. Mt Sinai
79
J Med. 2002; 69(1-2):83-7.
80
11. Lemaire R. Strategies for blood management in
81
orthopaedic and trauma surgery. J Bone Joint Surg
82
Br. 2008; 90(9):1128-36.
83
12. Eubanks JD. Antifibrinolytics in major orthopaedic
84
surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010; 18(3):132-8.
85
13. Camarasa M, Ollé G, Serra-Prat M, Martín A, Sánchez
86
M, Ricós P, et al. Efficacy of aminocaproic, tranexamic
87
acids in the control of bleeding during total knee
88
replacement: a randomized clinical trial. Br J
89
Anaesth. 2006; 96(5):576-82.
90
14. Molloy DO, Archbold HA, Ogonda L, McConway J,
91
Wilson RK, Beverland DE. Comparison of topical
92
fibrin spray and tranexamic acid on blood loss after
93
total knee replacement: a prospective, randomised
94
controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;
95
89(3):306-9.
96
15. Vigna-Taglianti F, Basso L, Rolfo P, Brambilla R,
97
Vaccari F, Lanci G, et al. Tranexamic acid for reducing
98
blood transfusions in arthroplasty interventions: a
99
cost-effective practice. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol.
100
2014; 24(4):545-51.
101
16. Badeaux J, Hawley D. A systematic review of the
102
effectiveness of intravenous tranexamic acid
103
administration in managing perioperative blood loss
104
in patients undergoing spine surgery. J Perianesth
105
Nurs. 2014; 29(6):459-65.
106
17. Melvin JS, Stryker LS, Sierra RJ. Tranexamic acid in
107
hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.
108
2015; 23(12):732-40.
109
18. MacGillivray RG, Tarabichi SB, Hawari MF, Raoof NT.
110
Tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss after bilateral
111
total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized
112
double blind study. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(1):24-8.
113
19. Chen JY, Chin PL, Moo IH, Pang HN, Tay DKJ, Chia SL,
114
et al. Intravenous versus intra-articular tranexamic
115
acid in total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded
116
randomised controlled noninferiority trial. Knee.
117
2016; 23(1):152-6.
118
20. Gomez-Barrena E, Ortega-Andreu M, Padilla-Eguiluz
119
NG, Pérez-Chrzanowska H, Figueredo-Zalve R.
120
Topical intra-articular compared with intravenous
121
tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss in primary
122
total knee replacement: a double-blind, randomized,
123
controlled, noninferiority clinical trial. J Bone Joint
124
Surg Am. 2014; 96(23):1937-44.
125
21. Seo JG, Moon YW, Park SH, Kim SM, Ko KR. The
126
comparative efficacies of intra-articular and IV
127
tranexamic acid for reducing blood loss during total
128
knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol
129
Arthrosc. 2013; 21(8):1869-74.
130
22. Goyal N, Chen DB, Harris IA, Rowden NJ, Kirsh
131
G, MacDessi SJ. Intravenous vs intra-articular
132
tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a
133
randomized, double-blind trial. J Arthroplasty. 2017;
134
32(1):28-32.
135
23. Lee SY, Chong S, Balasubramanian D, Na YG, Kim
136
TK. What is the ideal route of administration of
137
tranexamic acid in TKA? A randomized controlled
138
trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475(8):1987-96.
139
24. Mi B, Liu G, Zhou W, Lv H, Liu Y, Zha K, et al. Intraarticular
140
versus intravenous tranexamic acid
141
application in total knee arthroplasty: a metaanalysis
142
of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop
143
Trauma Surg. 2017; 137(7):997-1009.
144
25. Soni A, Saini R, Gulati A, Paul R, Bhatty S, Rajoli SR.
145
Comparison between intravenous and intra-articular
146
regimens of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss
147
during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;
148
29(8):1525-7.
149
26. Myers SP, Kutcher ME, Rosengart MR, Sperry JL,
150
Peitzman AB, Brown JB, et al. Tranexamic acid
151
administration is associated with an increased
152
risk of post-traumatic venous thromboembolism. J
153
Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019; 86(1):20-7.
154
27. Å stedt B. Clinical pharmacology of tranexamic acid.
155
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987; 22(137):22-5.
156
28. Heller S, Secrist E, Shahi A, Chen AF, Parvizi
157
J. Tranexamic acid can be administered to
158
arthroplasty patients who receive aspirin for venous
159
thromboembolic prophylaxis. J Arthroplasty. 2016;
160
31(7):1437-41.
161
29. Good L, Peterson E, Lisander B. Tranexamic acid
162
decreases external blood loss but not hidden blood
163
loss in total knee replacement. Br J Anaesth. 2003;
164
90(5):596-9.
165
30. Nadler SB, Hidalgo JU, Bloch T. Prediction of blood
166
volume in normal human adults. Surgery. 1962;
167
51(2):224-32.
168
31. Kirksey M, Chiu YL, Ma Y, Della Valle AG,
169
Poultsides L, Gerner P, et al. Trends in in-hospital
170
major morbidity and mortality after total joint
171
arthroplasty: United States 1998-2008. Anesth
172
Analg. 2012; 115(2):321-7.
173
32. Maniar RN, Kumar G, Singhi T, Nayak RM, Maniar PR.
174
Most effective regimen of tranexamic acid in knee
175
arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled
176
study in 240 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;
177
470(9):2605-12.
178
33. Patel JN, Spanyer JM, Smith LS, Huang J, Yakkanti
179
MR, Malkani AL. Comparison of intravenous versus
180
topical tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a
181
prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2014;
182
29(8):1528-31.
183
34. Alshryda S, Sarda P, Sukeik M, Nargol A, Blenkinsopp
184
J, Mason JM. Tranexamic acid in total knee
185
replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
186
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(12):1577-85.
187
35. Nawabi DH. Topical tranexamic acid was noninferior
188
to intravenous tranexamic Acid in controlling blood
189
loss during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg
190
Am. 2015; 97(4):343.
191
36. Ueno M, Sonohata M, Fukumori N, Kawano S, Kitajima
192
M, Mawatari M. Comparison between topical and
193
intravenous administration of tranexamic acid in
194
primary total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2016;
195
21(1):44-7.
196
37. Uğurlu M, Aksekili MA, Çağlar C, Yüksel K, Şahin
197
E, Akyol M. Effect of topical and intravenously
198
applied tranexamic acid compared to control
199
group on bleeding in primary unilateral total knee
200
arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2017; 30(02):152-7.
201
38. Aggarwal AK, Singh N, Sudesh P. Topical vs
202
intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss
203
after bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a prospective
204
study. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(7):1442-8.
205
39. Aguilera X, Martínez-Zapata MJ, Hinarejos P, Jordan
206
M, Leal J, Gonzalez J, et al. Topical and intravenous
207
tranexamic acid reduce blood loss compared to
208
routine hemostasis in total knee arthroplasty: a
209
multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Arch
210
Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135(7):1017-25.
211
40. Digas G, Koutsogiannis I, Meletiadis G, Antonopoulou
212
E, Karamoulas V, Bikos C. Intra-articular injection of
213
tranexamic acid reduce blood loss in cemented total
214
knee arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol.
215
2015; 25(7):1181-8.
216
41. Hamlin BR, DiGioia AM, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ.
217
Topical versus intravenous tranexamic acid in total
218
knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(3):384-6.
219
42. Ishida K, Tsumura N, Kitagawa A, Hamamura S,
220
Fukuda K, Dogaki Y, et al. Intra-articular injection of
221
tranexamic acid reduces not only blood loss but also
222
knee joint swelling after total knee arthroplasty. Int
223
Orthop. 2011; 35(11):1639-45.
224
43. Shemshaki H, Nourian SM, Nourian N, Dehghani M,
225
Mokhtari M, Mazoochian F. One step closer to sparing
226
total blood loss and transfusion rate in total knee
227
arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of different methods
228
of tranexamic acid administration. Arch Orthop
229
Trauma Surg. 2015; 135(4):573-88.
230
44. Wong J, Abrishami A, El Beheiry H, Mahomed NN,
231
Davey JR, Gandhi R, et al. Topical application of
232
tranexamic acid reduces postoperative blood loss
233
in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled
234
trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(15):2503-13.
235
45. Yang Y, Lv YM, Ding PJ, Li J, Ying-Ze Z. The reduction in
236
blood loss with intra-articular injection of tranexamic
237
acid in unilateral total knee arthroplasty without
238
operative drains: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J
239
Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(1):135-9.
240
46. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA,
241
Samama CM, Lassen MR, et al. Prevention of
242
venous thromboembolism: American College
243
of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical
244
practice guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;
245
133(6):381S-453S.
246
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Efficacy of Intravenous Versus Topical Use of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Blood Loss after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Blood loss during and immediately after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is among the most challengingconcerns. It has been demonstrated that Tranexamic acid (TXA) can help to reduce perioperative blood loss. TXAcan be used as an oral, topical or intravenous injection. Many studies evaluated the effectiveness of each route ofadministration but few works on a comparison between them. The current study aimed to compare the effectivenessof intravenous injection versus topical use of TXA in reducing perioperative blood loss after primary total kneearthroplasty.Methods: Eighty-five patients who were a candidate for total knee arthroplasty were randomized into two groups:one group received Intravenous injection of 15 mg/kg TXA, 10 min before tourniquet inflation while the other group received 1 g diluted TXA during wound closure. The postoperative blood loss was estimated by measuring thewhole drain output and also hemoglobin (HB) drops. Both groups compared based on the need for allogenic bloodtransfusion and also thromboembolic events.Results: Patients who received topical TXA had a higher total drain output (p <0.0001) compared to intravenousinjection. The hemoglobin drop also was more in the topical group although it was marginally significant (P=0.05).Conclusion: Intravenous injection of TXA is more effective in reducing postoperative blood loss after primary TKAcompared to topical administration.Level of evidence: I
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15751_604a0c333fd7983a0dc24073465edca9.pdf
2020-05-01
363
367
10.22038/abjs.2020.40528.2099
Blood loss
Intravenous
Topical
Total knee arthroplasty
Tranexamic acid
Ali
Torkaman
torkaman.a@iums.ac.ir
1
Department of Knee Surgery, Firouzgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran , Iran
AUTHOR
Amir
Rostami
amir.rostami4036@gmail.com
2
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Firouzgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mohammad Reza
Sarshar
mohammad.sarshar64@gmail.com
3
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Hamidreza
Yazdi
yazdi.hr@iums.ac.ir
4
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Firouzgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Hossein
Akbari Aghdam
akbariorthoped@gmail.com
5
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Isfahan, Iran - Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Paniz
Motaghi
paniz.motaqi@gmail.com
6
Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
1. Guo P, He Z, Wang Y, Gao F, Sun W, Guo W, et al. Efficacy
1
and safety of oral tranexamic acid in total knee
2
arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
3
Medicine. 2018; 97(18).
4
2. Guerreiro JP, Badaro BS, Balbino JR, Danieli MV, Queiroz
5
AO, Cataneo DC. Application of tranexamic acid in
6
total knee arthroplasty–prospective randomized trial.
7
The open orthopaedics journal. 2017; 11:1049.
8
3. Sun Q, Li J, Chen J, Zheng C, Liu C, Jia Y. Comparison of
9
intravenous, topical or combined routes of tranexamic
10
acid administration in patients undergoing total knee
11
and hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomised
12
controlled trials. BMJ open. 2019; 9(1).
13
4. Marra F, Rosso F, Bruzzone M, Bonasia DE, Dettoni
14
F, Rossi R. Use of tranexamic acid in total knee
15
arthroplasty. Joints. 2016; 4(04):202-13.
16
5. Hynes M, Calder P, Scott G. The use of tranexamic acid
17
to reduce blood loss during total knee arthroplasty.
18
The knee. 2003; 10(4):375-7.
19
6. Boyle JA, Soric MM. Impact of tranexamic acid in total
20
knee and total hip replacement. Journal of pharmacy
21
practice. 2017; 30(1):89-93.
22
7. Grosso MJ, Trofa DP, Danoff JR, Hickernell TR,
23
Murtaugh T, Lakra A, et al. Tranexamic acid increases
24
early perioperative functional outcomes after
25
total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty today. 2018;
26
4(1):74-7.
27
8. Xie J, Hu Q, Huang Z, Zhou Z, Pei F. Comparison of
28
three routes of administration of tranexamic acid in
29
primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty: Analysis
30
of a national database. Thrombosis research. 2019;
31
173:96-101.
32
9. Keyhani S, Esmailiejah AA, Abbasian MR, Safdari F.
33
Which route of tranexamic acid administration is
34
more effective to reduce blood loss following total
35
knee arthroplasty? Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery.
36
2016; 4(1):65.
37
10. Georgiev GP, Tanchev PP, Zheleva Z, Kinov P.
38
Comparison of topical and intravenous administration
39
of tranexamic acid for blood loss control during total
40
joint replacement: Review of literature. Journal of
41
orthopaedic translation. 2018; 13:7-12.
42
11. Adravanti P, Di Salvo E, Calafiore G, Vasta S, Ampollini
43
A, Rosa MA. A prospective, randomized, comparative
44
study of intravenous alone and combined intravenous
45
and intraarticular administration of tranexamic acid
46
in primary total knee replacement. Arthroplasty
47
today. 2018; 4(1):85-8.
48
12. Han X, Gong G, Han N, Liu M. Efficacy and safety of
49
oral compared with intravenous tranexamic acid in
50
reducing blood loss after primary total knee and hip
51
arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. BMC musculoskeletal
52
disorders. 2018; 19(1):430.
53
13. Tahmasebi MN, Bashti K, Ghorbani G, Sobhan MR.
54
Intraarticular administration of tranexamic acid
55
following total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study.
56
Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014; 2(3):141.
57
14. Sarzaeem MM, Razi M, Kazemian G, Moghaddam
58
ME, Rasi AM, Karimi M. Comparing efficacy of
59
three methods of tranexamic acid administration
60
in reducing hemoglobin drop following total knee
61
arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2014;
62
29(8):1521-4.
63
15. Abdel MP, Chalmers BP, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW,
64
Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, et al. Intravenous versus
65
topical tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty:
66
both effective in a randomized clinical trial of 640
67
patients. JBJS. 2018; 100(12):1023-9.
68
16. Jules-Elysee KM, Tseng A, Sculco TP, Baaklini LR,
69
McLawhorn AS, Pickard AJ, et al. Comparison of
70
topical and intravenous tranexamic acid for total
71
knee replacement: a randomized double-blinded
72
controlled study of effects on tranexamic acid levels
73
and thrombogenic and inflammatory marker levels.
74
JBJS. 2019; 101(23):2120-8.
75
17. Hamlin BR, DiGioia AM, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ.
76
Topical versus intravenous tranexamic acid in total
77
knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2015;
78
30(3):384-6.
79
18. Shin YS, Yoon JR, Lee HN, Park SH, Lee DH. Intravenous
80
versus topical tranexamic acid administration in
81
primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
82
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
83
2017; 25(11):3585-95.
84
19. Yazdi H, Klement MR, Hammad M, Inoue D, Xu C,
85
Goswami K, et al. Tranexamic Acid Is Associated With
86
Reduced Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Primary
87
Total JointArthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty
88
2020; 35:840–4. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.029.
89
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Reoperation Rate and Indication for Reoperation after Free Functional Muscle Transfers in Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury
plexus injury. Few studies report the rate of revision surgeries following free functional muscle transfers. We examinedthe reoperation rate and indication for reoperation after primary reconstruction of upper extremity function with a freegracilis transfer after brachial plexus injury.Methods: From 2003-2016, we identified 25 patients who underwent a free functional gracilis muscle transfer forrestoration of upper extremity function. We reviewed their medical charts to record patient, injury, and treatmentcharacteristics. Indication for reoperation and reoperative procedure were also identified.Results: Fourteen out of 25 patients (56%) had a reoperation after FFGT. Four flaps were re-explored for vascularcompromise, but there were no flap failures. The majority of reoperations involved adjustment of tendon excursion(8/14) which demonstrated that tenolysis was the main procedure.Conclusion: Despite promising results of free functional gracilis transfers, reoperation is relatively common and shouldbe discussed with the patient as a preoperative strategy. Early exploration of vascular compromise may decrease theflap failure. Poor tendon excursion is a common unpredicted consequence after FFMT and is the main indication forreoperation.Level of evidence: IV
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15753_d2658136a405b89a78e42524488a0941.pdf
2020-05-01
368
372
10.22038/abjs.2019.41123.2113
brachial plexus injury
free functional muscle transfers
indication
Reoperation rate
Pichitchai
Atthakomol
p.atthakomol@gmail.com
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
LEAD_AUTHOR
Sezai
Ozkan
s.ozkan@icloud.com
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
AUTHOR
Kyle R.
Eberlin
keberlin@mgh.harvard.edu
3
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
AUTHOR
Neal
Chen
nchen1@partners.org
4
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
AUTHOR
Jonathan
Winograd
jwinograd@mgh.harvard.edu
5
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
AUTHOR
Sang-Gil
Lee
splee@mgh.harvard.edu
6
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
AUTHOR
1. Barrie KA, Steinmann SP, Shin AY, Spinner RJ, Bishop
1
AT. Gracilis free muscle transfer for restoration of
2
function after complete brachial plexus avulsion.
3
Neurosurg Focus. 2004; 16(5):E8.
4
2. Chuang DC. Functioning free muscle transplantation
5
for brachial plexus injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
6
1995; 314(1):104-11.
7
3. Coulet B, Boch C, Boretto J, Lazerges C, Chammas
8
M. Free Gracilis muscle transfer to restore elbow
9
flexion in brachial plexus injuries. Orthop Traumatol
10
Surg Res. 2011; 97(8):785-92.
11
4. Chung DC, Carver N, Wei FC. Results of functioning
12
free muscle transplantation for elbow flexion. J Hand
13
Surg Am. 1996; 21(6):1071-7.
14
5. Doi K, Muramatsu K, Hattori Y, Otsuka K, Tan SH, Nanda
15
V, et al. Restoration of prehension with the double free
16
muscle technique following complete avulsion of the
17
brachial plexus. Indications and long-term results. J
18
Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(5):652-66.
19
6. Kay S, Pinder R, Wiper J, Hart A, Jones F, Yates A.
20
Microvascular free functioning gracilis transfer with
21
nerve transfer to establish elbow flexion. J Plast
22
Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63(7):1142-9.
23
7. Terzis JK, Kostopoulos VK. Free muscle transfer in
24
posttraumatic plexopathies part II: the elbow. Hand
25
(N Y). 2010; 5(2):160-70.
26
8. Adams JE, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Torchia ME,
27
Bishop AT, Shin AY. Complications and outcomes of
28
functional free gracilis transfer in brachial plexus
29
palsy. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009; 75(1):8-13.
30
9. Doi K, Sakai K, Ihara K, Abe Y, Kawai S, Kurafuji
31
Y. Reinnervated free muscle transplantation for
32
extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;
33
91(5):872-83.
34
10. Elzinga K, Zuo KJ, Olson JL, Morhart M, Babicki S,
35
Chan KM. Double free gracilis muscle transfer after
36
complete brachial plexus injury: First Canadian
37
experience. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2014; 22(1):26-9.
38
11. Estrella EP, Montales TD. Functioning free muscle
39
transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion in
40
brachial plexus injury patients. Injury. 2016;
41
47(11):2525-33.
42
12. Satbhai NG, Doi K, Hattori Y, Sakamoto S. Functional
43
outcome and quality of life after traumatic total
44
brachial plexus injury treated by nerve transfer or
45
single/double free muscle transfers: a comparative
46
study. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(2):209-17.
47
13. Yang Y, Yang JT, Fu G, Li XM, Qin BG, Hou Y, et al.
48
Functioning free gracilis transfer to reconstruct
49
elbow flexion and quality of life in global brachial
50
plexus injured patients. Sci Rep. 2016; 6(1):22479.
51
14. Giuffre JL, Bishop AT, Spinner RJ, Kircher MF, Shin
52
AY. Wrist, first carpometacarpal joint, and thumb
53
interphalangeal joint arthrodesis in patients with
54
brachial plexus injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;
55
37(12):2557-63.e1.
56
15. Terzis JK, Barmpitsioti A. Wrist fusion in
57
posttraumatic brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr
58
Surg. 2009; 124(6):2027-39.
59
16. Mackenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R. Prediction of
60
instability in distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg
61
Am. 2006; 88(9):1944-51.
62
17. Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara
63
BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment,
64
and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr
65
Surg. 2007; 119(7):2092-100.
66
18. Lim CM, Lim J, Loh KS, Tan LK. Early experience in
67
free tissue transfer in the reconstruction of head and
68
neck defects. Singapore Med J. 2007; 48(7):652-5.
69
19. Bonawitz SC, Schnarrs RH, Rosenthal AI, Rogers GK,
70
Newton ED. Free-tissue transfer in elderly patients.
71
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 87(6):1074-9.
72
20. Wettstein R, Schurch R, Banic A, Erni D, Harder Y.
73
Review of 197 consecutive free flap reconstructions
74
in the lower extremity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
75
2008; 61(7):772-6.
76
21. Doi K, Hattori Y, Yamazaki H, Wahegaonkar AL,
77
Addosooki A, Watanabe M. Importance of early
78
passive mobilization following double free gracilis
79
muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;
80
121(6):2037-45.
81
22. Vekris MD, Beris AE, Lykissas MG, Korompilias
82
AV, Vekris AD, Soucacos PN. Restoration of elbow
83
function in severe brachial plexus paralysis via
84
muscle transfers. Injury. 2008; 39(Suppl 3):S15-22.
85
23. Loeffler BJ, Lewis DR. Restoration of elbow flexion.
86
Hand Clin. 2016; 32(3):311-21.
87
24. Maldonado AA, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT,
88
Shin AY. The role of elective amputation in patients
89
with traumatic brachial plexus injury. J Plast
90
Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69(3):311-7.
91
25. Carlsen BT, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Late reconstruction
92
for brachial plexus injury. Neurosurg Clin N Am.
93
2009; 20(1):51-64.
94
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Angioleiomyoma of the Hand: A Case Series and Review of the Literature
Background: Angioleiomyomas are rare tumors arising from vascular tissue that can occasionally present in the hand.Reports of angioleiomyomas in this location are highly limited. Here, we describe the presentation and outcomes of aseries of cases of angioleiomyomas.Methods: A retrospective case review of five patients with angioleiomyomas arising in the hand was performed. Patientswere identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9 and ICD-10) diagnosiscodes and were reviewed through the electronic medical record for demographic information, tumor characteristics,management, and outcomes. A literature review was also conducted of angioleiomyomas.Results: Five patients were diagnosed with angioleiomyoma at our institution between 1992 and 2015. Patientspresented with a painful, slow-growing hand mass in all cases. The majority of patients were male and of middle-age.All of the patients were successfully treated with marginal excision and had full return to functional status withoutrecurrence.Conclusion: Angioleiomyomas are rare tumors that can arise in the hand and should be included in the differentialdiagnosis of a patient presenting with a painful hand mass. They can be successfully treated with marginal excision.Level of evidence: IV
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15754_81fd0e90cbeb7e296e3531d4facface5.pdf
2020-05-01
373
377
10.22038/abjs.2020.15754
Angioleiomyoma
Hand tumors
vascular tumor
Caleb M.
Yeung
cmyeungmd@gmail.com
1
Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
AUTHOR
Laura
Moore
lcmoore@bu.edu
2
Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
AUTHOR
Jonathan
Lans
jlans@mgh.harvard.edu
3
Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
AUTHOR
Santiago A.
Lozano-Calderón,
slozanocalderon@mgh.harvard.edu
4
Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Vandevender DK, Daley RA. Benign and malignant
1
vascular tumors of the upper extremity. Hand Clin.
2
1995; 11(2):161-81.
3
2. Hachisuga T, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Angioleiomyoma.
4
A clinicopathologic reappraisal of 562 cases. Cancer.
5
1984; 54(1):126-30.
6
3. Lawson GM, Salter DM, Hooper G. Angioleiomyomas
7
of the hand. A report of 14 cases. J Hand Surg Am.
8
1995; 20(4):479-83.
9
4. Houdek MT, Rose PS, Shon W, Kakar S. Angioleiomyoma
10
of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;
11
38(8):1579-83.
12
5. Kulkarni MS, Vijayan S, Naik M, Rao SK. A rare tumour
13
of hand: angioleiomyoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;
14
2017:bcr-2017-220005.
15
6. Freedman AM, Meland NB. Angioleiomyomas of
16
the extremities: report of a case and review of the
17
Mayo Clinic experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;
18
83(2):328-31.
19
7. Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Choi YJ, Chung EC, Rho
20
MH. Sonographic appearances of soft tissue
21
angioleiomyomas: differences from other
22
circumscribed soft tissue hypervascular tumors. J
23
Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31(10):1589-95.
24
8. Smith J, Wisniewski SJ, Lee RA. Sonographic and
25
clinical features of angioleiomyoma presenting as a
26
painful Achilles tendon mass. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;
27
25(10):1365-8.
28
9. Woo KS, Kim SH, Kim HS, Cho PD. Clinical Experience
29
with treatment of angioleiomyoma. Arch Plast Surg.
30
2014; 41(4):374-8.
31
10. Callé SC, Eaton RG, Littler JW. Vascular leiomyomas in
32
the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19(2):281-6.
33
11. Yoo HJ, Choi JA, Chung JH, Oh JH, Lee GK, Choi JY, et
34
al. Angioleiomyoma in soft tissue of extremities: MRI
35
findings. Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192(6):W291-4.
36
12. Hwang JW, Ahn JM, Kang HS, Suh JS, Kim SM, Seo JW.
37
Vascular leiomyoma of an extremity: MR imagingpathology
38
correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;
39
171(4):981-5.
40
13. Uchida M, Kojima T, Hirase Y, Lizuka T. Clinical
41
characteristics of vascular leiomyoma of the upper
42
extremity: report of 11 cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;
43
45(7):547-9.
44
14. Kanitakis J. Angioleiomyoma of the auricle: an unusual
45
tumor on a rare location. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2017;
46
2017:8289710.
47
15. Morimoto N. Angioleiomyoma [vascular leiomyoma]-a
48
clinicopathologic study. Med J Kagoshima Univ. 1974;
49
24(1):663-6.
50
16. Matsuyama A, Hisaoka M, Hashimoto H. Angioleiomyoma:
51
a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical
52
reappraisal with special reference to the correlation
53
with myopericytoma. Hum Pathol. 2007; 38(4):645-51.
54
17. Shafi M, Hattori Y, Doi K. Angioleiomyoma of distal
55
ulnar artery of the hand. Hand (N Y). 2010; 5(1):82-5.
56
18. Gombos Z, Zhang PJ. Glomus tumor. Arch Pathol Lab
57
Med. 2008; 132(9):1448-52.
58
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Fracture Surgery in Known COVID-19 Infected Patients: What Are the Challenges?
Background: Surgery in the time of COVID-19 pandemic is a challenging issue while treatment of affected fracturepatients is inevitable. The present study summarizes the challenges that an orthopedic surgeon is confronting duringthe surgical treatment of fracture patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection.Methods: Demographic and fracture related data of 13 fracture patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection whowere treated with surgery was collected from three trauma centers in Tehran and Kermanshah cities from 21, February2020 to April 3, 2020.Results: All patients were male with mean age of 38.6±19.5 years. Eight patients had high energy fracture and sevenpatients had multiple fractures and trauma. Wrist and hand were the common sites of fracture following hip and pelvis. Themean interval time period between the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection and surgery was 2.3±1.5 days. Before surgery, allpatients except one had been admitted to the corona dedicated wards, while two patients were admitted to the intensivecare unit (ICU). One of the ICU admitted patients died. All the 12 alive patients remained in home isolation after discharge.Conclusion: Fracture surgery in COVID-19 patients has many challenges such as lack of medical resources, delayof surgery, medial staff fear, and patient isolation. However, a multidisciplinary approach using all potential hospitalresources would lead to successful operation and acceptable outcome.Level of evidence: III
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15755_c23705b478b5a9e2e60519b4a071b2f1.pdf
2020-05-01
378
382
10.22038/abjs.2020.47899.2372
Coronavirus
COVID-19
Fracture
Orthopedic
Trauma
Mehrdad
Sadighi
mehrdad_1330@yahoo.com
1
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
SM Javad
Mortazavi
smjmort@yahoo.com
2
Joint Reconstruction Research Center (JRRC), Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Adel
Ebrahimpour
a.ebrahimpour@sbmu.ac.ir
3
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Alireza
Manafi-Rasi
drmanafi54@yahoo.com
4
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam Hossein Hospital,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mohammad H.
Ebrahimzadeh
ebrahimzadehmh@mums.ac.ir
5
Orthopedic Research Center, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Meisam
Jafari KafiAbadi
dr.jafari8567@yahoo.com
6
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Seyyed Saeed
Khabiri
saeed.khabiri@gmail.com
7
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah Iran
AUTHOR
Saber
Barazandeh Rad
saber.b.rad@gmail.com
8
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Monireh
Yaghoubi
monir.yaghoubi@gmail.com
9
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah Iran
AUTHOR
Mohammadreza
Chehrassan
morchehrasan@yahoo.com
10
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
1. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y,
1
Song B, Gu X, Guan L. Clinical course and risk factors
2
for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in
3
Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The
4
Lancet. 2020 Mar 11.
5
2. Bedford J, Enria D, Giesecke J, Heymann DL,
6
Ihekweazu C, Kobinger G, Lane HC, Memish Z, Oh
7
MD, Schuchat A, Ungchusak K. COVID-19: towards
8
controlling of a pandemic. The Lancet. 2020 Mar 17.
9
3. WHO official site. https://who.sprinklr.com
10
4. Shariyate MJ, Kachooei AR. Association of New
11
Coronavirus Disease with Fragility Hip and Lower
12
Limb Fractures in Elderly Patients. Arch Bone Jt
13
Surg. 2020; 8 (Supplement 1): 297-301.
14
5. Shahbazi F, Soori H, Khodakarim S, Ghadirzadeh MR,
15
Nazari SS. Analysis of mortality rate of road traffic
16
accidents and its trend in 11 years in Iran. Archives
17
of Trauma Research¦ Volume. 2019 Jan;8(1).
18
6. Ashford RU, Nichols JS, Mangwani J. Annotation: The
19
COVID-19 pandemic and clinical orthopaedic and
20
trauma surgery. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics &
21
Trauma. 2020 Apr 2.
22
7. Abolghasemian M, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Enayatollahi
23
M, et al. Iranian Orthopedic Association (IOA)
24
Response Guidance to COVID-19 Pandemic April
25
2020. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2020; 8 (Supplement 1):
26
8. Mahdavi A, Khalili N, Davarpanah AH, Faghihi T,
27
Mahdavi A, Haseli S, Sabri A, Kahkouee S, Kazemi
28
MA, Mehrian P, Falahati F. Radiologic management
29
of COVID-19: preliminary experience of the Iranian
30
Society of Radiology COVID-19 Consultant Group
31
(ISRCC). Iranian Journal of Radiology. 2020(In
32
9. Mi B, Chen L, Xiong Y, Xue H, Zhou W, Liu G.
33
Characteristics and Early Prognosis of COVID-19
34
Infection in Fracture Patients. JBJS. 2020 Apr 1.
35
10. Abdi R, Shojaeian R, Hajian S, Sheikh S. Surgical
36
practice in the shadow of COVID-19 outbreak.
37
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2020 Apr
38
1;8(Covid-19 Special Issue):0-.9.
39
11. Chua C, Wisniewski T, Ramos A, Schlepp M, Fildes JJ,
40
Kuhls DA. Multidisciplinary trauma intensive care
41
unit checklist: impact on infection rates. Journal of
42
Trauma Nursing. 2010 Jul 1;17(3):163-6.
43
12. Xie J, Tong Z, Guan X, Du B, Qiu H, Slutsky AS. Critical
44
care crisis and some recommendations during
45
the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Intensive care
46
medicine. 2020 Mar 2:1-4.
47
13. Khak M, Manafi-Rasi A, Oryadi Zanjani L, et
48
al. Orthopedic Trauma Surgeries in COVID-19
49
Pandemic; A Trauma Management Algorithm. Arch
50
Bone Jt Surg. 2020; 8 (Supplement 1): 286-290.
51
14. Kalantar SH, Farhoud AR, Mortazavi SMJ. Lockdown
52
of an Orthopedic Department During COVID-19
53
Epidemics, Our Experience in a General Hospital.
54
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2020; 8 (Supplement 1): 235-241.
55
15. Vallier HA, Wang X, Moore TA, Wilber JH, Como JJ.
56
Timing of orthopaedic surgery in multiple trauma
57
patients: development of a protocol for early
58
appropriate care. Journal of orthopaedic trauma.
59
2013 Oct 1;27(10):543-51.
60
16. Chehrassan M, Ebrahimpour A, Ghandhari H, et
61
al. Management of Spine Trauma in COVID-19
62
Pandemic: A Preliminary Report. Arch Bone Jt Surg.
63
2020; 8 (Supplement 1): 270-276.
64
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Equivalent PROMIS Scores after Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis
Background: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores can quantify symptomsand limitations after upper extremity surgery. Our objective was to determine how these scores compare amongstpatients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis treated either nonoperatively or operatively.Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, we compared PROMIS scores (upper extremity function [UEF],pain interference, and depression) between 43 patients who underwent nonoperative treatment (nonsteroidal antiinflammatorydrugs/splinting/injections) and 33 patients who underwent trapeziectomy with ligament reconstructionand tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (minimum 6-month recovery period) by 4 surgeons from2014–2018. PROMIS scores were compared across all patients by Eaton-Littler staging. We used linear regression toassess correlations between time-since-surgery and each PROMIS domain. Multivariable linear regression was usedto identify patient and disease factors independently associated with PROMIS scores.Results: Surgery was not associated with better UEF (37 vs. 40, P=0.23), less pain interference (58 vs. 56, P=0.42),or fewer symptoms of depression (47 vs. 46, P=0.59). Similarly, no differences were observed across all patient byEaton-Littler stage for UEF (P=0.49), pain (P=0.48), or depression (P=0.90). For the operative group, greater timesince-surgery, or patient recovery period, correlated moderately with worse UEF (R=0.41) and increased pain (R=0.37).Conclusion: In small retrospective comparative cohorts, surgery was not associated with better UEF, pain, ordepression scores compared with nonoperative treatment for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.Level of evidence: III
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15756_a733110f87128971a486cc92b58ee341.pdf
2020-05-01
383
390
10.22038/abjs.2019.41772.2128
ligament reconstruction tendon interposition
outcomes
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis
Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis
Suresh K.
Nayar
snayar2@jhmi.edu
1
Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
LEAD_AUTHOR
Rebecca
Glasser
rglasse4@jhmi.edu
2
Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
AUTHOR
Eugene
Deune
edeune1@jhmi.edu
3
Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
AUTHOR
John
Ingari
jingari1@jhmi.edu
4
Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
AUTHOR
Dawn
LaPorte
dlaport1@jhmi.edu
5
Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
AUTHOR
with ligament reconstruction? J Hand Surg Br. 1997;
1
22(6):689-94.
2
16. De Smet L, Sioen W, Spaepen D, van Ransbeeck H.
3
Treatment of basal joint arthritis of the thumb:
4
trapeziectomy with or without tendon interposition/
5
ligament reconstruction. Hand Surg. 2004; 9(1):5-9.
6
17. Gangopadhyay S, McKenna H, Burke FD, Davis
7
TR. Five- to 18-year follow-up for treatment of
8
trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective
9
comparison of excision, tendon interposition, and
10
ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J
11
Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(3):411-7.
12
18. Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. Surgery
13
for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis.
14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2(1):CD004631.
15
19. Bernstein DN, Houck JR, Gonzalez RM, Wilbur DM,
16
Miller RJ, Mitten DJ, et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores
17
predict postoperative PROMIS score improvement for
18
patients undergoing hand surgery. Hand (N Y). 2020;
19
15(2):185-93.
20
20. Kennedy CD, Manske MC, Huang JI. Classifications
21
in brief: the eaton-littler classification of thumb
22
carpometacarpal joint arthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat
23
Res. 2016; 474(12):2729-33.
24
21. Berger AJ, Momeni A, Ladd AL. Intra- and
25
interobserver reliability of the Eaton classification
26
for trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a systematic review.
27
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(4):1155-9.
28
22. Crijns TJ, Bernstein DN, Ring D, Gonzalez RM, Wilbur
29
D, Hammert WC. Depression and pain interference
30
correlate with physical function in patients recovering
31
from hand surgery. Hand (N Y). 2019; 14(6):830-5.
32
23. Kazmers NH, Hung M, Rane AA, Bounsanga J, Weng
33
C, Tyser AR. Association of physical function, anxiety,
34
and pain interference in nonshoulder upper extremity
35
patients using the PROMIS platform. J Hand Surg Am.
36
2017; 42(10):781-7.
37
24. 24- Talaei-Khoei M, Fischerauer SF, Jha R, Ring D,
38
Chen N, Vranceanu AM. Bidirectional mediation of
39
depression and pain intensity on their associations
40
with upper extremity physical function. J Behav Med.
41
2018; 41(3):309-17.
42
25. Ehrl D, Erne HC, Broer PN, Metz C, Falter E. Outcomes of
43
denervation, joint lavage and capsular imbrication for
44
painful thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J
45
Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016; 41(9):904-9.
46
26. Tuffaha SH, Quan A, Hashemi S, Parikh P, O’Brien-Coon
47
DM, Broyles JM, et al. Selective thumb carpometacarpal
48
joint denervation for painful arthritis: clinical
49
outcomes and cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;
50
44(1):64.e1-8.
51
27. Giesen T, Klein HJ, Franchi A, Medina JA, Elliot D.
52
Thumb carpometacarpal joint denervation for
53
primary osteoarthritis: a prospective study of 31
54
thumbs. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2017; 36(3):192-7.
55
28. Beleckas CM, Padovano A, Guattery J, Chamberlain AM,
56
Keener JD, Calfee RP. Performance of patient-reported
57
1. Becker SJ, Briet JP, Hageman MG, Ring D. Death, taxes,
58
and trapeziometacarpal arthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat
59
Res. 2013; 471(12):3738-44.
60
2. Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB. Prevalence
61
of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J
62
Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(12):2614-8.
63
3. Khorashadi L, Ha AS, Chew FS. Radiologic guide
64
to surgical treatment of first carpometacarpal
65
joint osteoarthritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;
66
198(5):1152-60.
67
4. Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Slatkowsky-Christensen
68
B, Mowinckel P, Uhlig T, Kvien TK, et al. Activity
69
limitations and participation restrictions in women
70
with hand osteoarthritis: patients’ descriptions and
71
associations between dimensions of functioning. Ann
72
Rheum Dis. 2005; 64(11):1633-8.
73
5. Matullo KS, Ilyas A, Thoder JJ. CMC arthroplasty of the
74
thumb: a review. Hand (N Y). 2007; 2(4):232-9.
75
6. Das De S, Vranceanu AM, Ring DC. Contribution of
76
kinesophobia and catastrophic thinking to upperextremity-
77
specific disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
78
2013; 95(1):76-81.
79
7. Lozano-Calderon SA, Souer JS, Jupiter JB, Ring D.
80
Psychological differences between patients that
81
elect operative or nonoperative treatment for
82
trapeziometacarpal joint arthrosis. Hand (N Y). 2008;
83
3(3):271-5.
84
8. Ring D, Kadzielski J, Fabian L, Zurakowski D, Malhotra
85
LR, Jupiter JB. Self-reported upper extremity health
86
status correlates with depression. J Bone Joint Surg
87
Am. 2006; 88(9):1983-8.
88
9. Hoffler CE 2nd, Matzon JL, Lutsky KF, Kim N,
89
Beredjiklian PK. Radiographic stage does not
90
correlate with symptom severity in thumb basilar
91
joint osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;
92
23(12):778-82.
93
10. Glickel SZ. Clinical assessment of the thumb
94
trapeziometacarpal joint. Hand Clin. 2001; 17(2):
95
11. Mahendira D, Towheed TE. Systematic review of nonsurgical
96
therapies for osteoarthritis of the hand: an
97
update. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17(10):1263-8.
98
12. Becker SJE, Bot AG, Curley SE, Jupiter JB, Ring DC. A
99
prospective randomized comparison of neoprene
100
vs thermoplast short opponens splinting for
101
trapeziometacarpal arthrosis: Level 2 evidence. J
102
Hand Surg. 2012; 37(8):6.
103
13. Aliu O, Davis MM, DeMonner S, Chung KC. The
104
influence of evidence in the surgical treatment of
105
thumb basilar joint arthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg.
106
2013; 131(4):816-28.
107
14. Vermeulen GM, Slijper H, Feitz R, Hovius SE, Moojen
108
TM, Selles RW. Surgical management of primary
109
thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic
110
review. J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36(1):157-69.
111
15. Davis TR, Brady O, Barton NJ, Lunn PG, Burke FD.
112
Trapeziectomy alone, with tendon interposition or
113
with ligament reconstruction? J Hand Surg Br. 1997;
114
22(6):689-94.
115
16. De Smet L, Sioen W, Spaepen D, van Ransbeeck H.
116
Treatment of basal joint arthritis of the thumb:
117
trapeziectomy with or without tendon interposition/
118
ligament reconstruction. Hand Surg. 2004; 9(1):5-9.
119
17. Gangopadhyay S, McKenna H, Burke FD, Davis
120
TR. Five- to 18-year follow-up for treatment of
121
trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective
122
comparison of excision, tendon interposition, and
123
ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J
124
Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(3):411-7.
125
18. Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. Surgery
126
for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis.
127
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2(1):CD004631.
128
19. Bernstein DN, Houck JR, Gonzalez RM, Wilbur DM,
129
Miller RJ, Mitten DJ, et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores
130
predict postoperative PROMIS score improvement for
131
patients undergoing hand surgery. Hand (N Y). 2020;
132
15(2):185-93.
133
20. Kennedy CD, Manske MC, Huang JI. Classifications
134
in brief: the eaton-littler classification of thumb
135
carpometacarpal joint arthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat
136
Res. 2016; 474(12):2729-33.
137
21. Berger AJ, Momeni A, Ladd AL. Intra- and
138
interobserver reliability of the Eaton classification
139
for trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a systematic review.
140
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(4):1155-9.
141
22. Crijns TJ, Bernstein DN, Ring D, Gonzalez RM, Wilbur
142
D, Hammert WC. Depression and pain interference
143
correlate with physical function in patients recovering
144
from hand surgery. Hand (N Y). 2019; 14(6):830-5.
145
23. Kazmers NH, Hung M, Rane AA, Bounsanga J, Weng
146
C, Tyser AR. Association of physical function, anxiety,
147
and pain interference in nonshoulder upper extremity
148
patients using the PROMIS platform. J Hand Surg Am.
149
2017; 42(10):781-7.
150
24. 24- Talaei-Khoei M, Fischerauer SF, Jha R, Ring D,
151
Chen N, Vranceanu AM. Bidirectional mediation of
152
depression and pain intensity on their associations
153
with upper extremity physical function. J Behav Med.
154
2018; 41(3):309-17.
155
25. Ehrl D, Erne HC, Broer PN, Metz C, Falter E. Outcomes of
156
denervation, joint lavage and capsular imbrication for
157
painful thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J
158
Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016; 41(9):904-9.
159
26. Tuffaha SH, Quan A, Hashemi S, Parikh P, O’Brien-Coon
160
DM, Broyles JM, et al. Selective thumb carpometacarpal
161
joint denervation for painful arthritis: clinical
162
outcomes and cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;
163
44(1):64.e1-8.
164
27. Giesen T, Klein HJ, Franchi A, Medina JA, Elliot D.
165
Thumb carpometacarpal joint denervation for
166
primary osteoarthritis: a prospective study of 31
167
thumbs. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2017; 36(3):192-7.
168
28. Beleckas CM, Padovano A, Guattery J, Chamberlain AM,
169
Keener JD, Calfee RP. Performance of patient-reported
170
outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)
171
upper extremity (UE) versus physical function (PF)
172
computer adaptive tests (CATs) in upper extremity
173
clinics. J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42(11):867-74.
174
29. Deyo RA, Katrina Ramsey, Buckley DI, Michaels L,
175
Kobus A, Eckstrom E, et al. Performance of a patient
176
reported outcomes measurement information system
177
(PROMIS) short form in older adults with chronic
178
musculoskeletal pain. Pain Med. 2016; 17(2):314-24.
179
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Survival and Incidence Rate of Ewing Sarcoma; a National Population-based Study in Iran (2008-2015)
Background: The effect of race and ethnicity on some kind of malignant bone tumors including Ewing sarcomahas been proven in different studies. In order to evaluate the latter, national cancer registries may help to increaseunderstanding about potential cancer causes, prevention and control strategies, and apply these findings to controlhealth problems among populations with similar characteristics.Methods: A national population-based cancer registry study based on all patients affected by Ewing Sarcoma wasregistered in the Iran National Cancer Registry (INCR) between 2008 and 2015 was designed. Demographic data ofmicroscopically confirmed cases of bone Ewing sarcoma were registered. Patients with Ewing sarcoma were dividedin groups to describe the primary site of the tumor (including axial or appendicular bones) and analyzed. In order toanalyze the survival rate, randomized selection of the patient through the INCR data-base was performed.Results: A total of 678 cases of malignant Ewing sarcoma of the bone were identified through the INCR. The meanage of Ewing sarcoma in Iran was 21.53 years. Nearly half of patients were observed at the age group of 15-24. Thetotal crude incidence rate of Ewing sarcoma was 1.29 in 1 million. The mean 5 year survival rate was 47%. The Meansurvival rate for study population was 5.53.Conclusion: The crude incidence rate of Ewing sarcoma in Iran is relatively lower with respect to other registries. Themajority of patients are in 15-25 years group and shows affection by Ewing sarcoma in an older age. Socioeconomicfactors had direct influence on survival rate.Level of evidence: IV
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15757_2f69ebd1b48b8a9b7b781a079fc6439e.pdf
2020-05-01
391
399
10.22038/abjs.2020.44095.2206
Ewing sarcoma
Malignant bone tumors
Sarcoma
Adel
Ebrahimpour
a.ebrahimpour@sbmu.ac.ir
1
Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mohammadreza
Chehrassan
morchehrasan@yahoo.com
2
Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Mehrdad
Sadighi
mehradad_1330@yahoo.com
3
Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mehdi
Azizmohammad Looha
mehdi.looha@gmail.com
4
Department of Biostatics, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Amin
Karimi
aminkarimi79@yahoo.com
5
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Atieh
Akbari
akbari.atieh@yahoo.com
6
Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Alireza
Raeisi
dr.alirezaraeisi@gmail.com
7
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
AUTHOR
Mohammad Esmaeil
Akbari
profmeakbari@gmail.com
8
Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
1. Chakraborty D, Rangamani S, Kulothungan V,
1
Chaturvedi M, Stephen S, Das P,et all. Trends in
2
incidence of Ewing sarcoma of bone in India–
3
Evidence from the National Cancer Registry
4
Programme (1982–2011). Journal of bone oncology.
5
2018;12:49-53.
6
2. Whelan J, McTiernan A, Cooper N, Wong YK, Francis
7
M, Vernon S, Strauss SJ. Incidence and survival of
8
malignant bone sarcomas in England 1979–2007.
9
International Journal of Cancer. 2012;131(4):
10
3. Jawad MU, Cheung MC, Min ES, Schneiderbauer MM,
11
Koniaris LG, Scully SP. Ewing sarcoma demonstrates
12
racial disparities in incidence‐related and sexrelated
13
differences in outcome: an analysis of 1631
14
cases from the SEER database, 1973‐2005. Cancer:
15
Interdisciplinary International Journal of the
16
American Cancer Society. 2009;115(15):3526-36.
17
4. Rica C, Clara V, Island PE. Bone ( C40-41 ) - Both sexes
18
Percentage distribution of microscopically verified
19
cases by histological type Bone ( C40-41 ) - Both sexes
20
( contd ). Bone. X:40–2.
21
5. Worch J, Matthay KK, Neuhaus J, Goldsby R, DuBois
22
SG. Ethnic and racial differences in patients
23
with Ewing sarcoma. Cancer: Interdisciplinary
24
International Journal of the American Cancer Society.
25
2010;116(4):983-8.
26
6. Akbari A, Khayamzadeh M, Salmanian R, Motlagh AG,
27
Roshandel G, Nouri M, Akbari ME. National Cancer
28
Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio (MIR) in Iran (2005-
29
2014). International Journal of Cancer Management.
30
2019;12(6).
31
7. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L,
32
Parkin D, et al. International Classification of Diseases
33
for Oncology. 3th edition. Geneva, World Health
34
Organization; 2000. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.
35
who.int/publications/2000/9241545348_eng.pdf
36
8. Movahedi M, Haghighat S, Khayamzadeh M, Moradi
37
A, Ghanbari-Motlagh A, Mirzaei H, Esmail-Akbari M.
38
Survival rate of breast cancer based on geographical
39
variation in Iran, a national study. Iranian Red
40
Crescent Medical Journal. 2012;14(12):798..
41
9. Nafissi N, Khayamzadeh M, Zeinali Z, Mohammadi G,
42
Hosseini M, Akbari ME. Breast Cancer in Iran, from
43
Epidemiology, Clinicopathological and Biomarker
44
Feature. Advances in Bioresearch. 2017;8(2).
45
10. Solooki S, Vosoughi AR, Masoomi V. Epidemiology of
46
musculoskeletal tumors in Shiraz, south of Iran. Indian
47
journal of medical and paediatric oncology: official
48
journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric
49
Oncology. 2011;32(4):187.
50
11. Seker MM, Kos T, Ozdemir N, Seker A, Aksoy S, Uncu D,
51
Zengin N. Treatment and outcomes of Ewing sarcoma
52
in Turkish adults: a single centre experience. Asian
53
Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(1):327-30.
54
12. Bahgat G, Bahgat G. Saudi Arabia. Altern Energy
55
Middle East. 2013;33(4):78–92.
56
13. Qureshi A, Ahmad Z, Azam M, Idrees R. Epidemiological
57
data for common bone sarcomas. Asian Pac J Cancer
58
Prev. 2010;11(2):393-5.
59
14. Kutluk MT, Yalçın B, Akyüz C, Varan A, Ruacan Ş,
60
Büyükpamukçu M. Treatment results and prognostic
61
factors in Ewing sarcoma. Pediatric hematology and
62
oncology. 2004;21(7):597-610.
63
15. Obata H, Ueda T, Kawai A, Ishii T, Ozaki T, Abe S, Tanaka
64
K, Tsuchiya H, Matsumine A, Yabe H. Clinical outcome
65
of patients with Ewing sarcoma family of tumors of
66
bone in Japan: the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology
67
Group cooperative study. Cancer: Interdisciplinary
68
International Journal of the American Cancer Society.
69
2007;109(4):767-75.
70
16. Esiashvili N, Goodman M, Marcus RB. Changes in
71
incidence and survival of Ewing sarcoma patients over
72
the past 3 decades: Surveillance Epidemiology and
73
End Results data. Journal of pediatric hematology/
74
oncology. 2008;30(6):425-30.
75
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Anthropometric Measurements of Distal Femur to Design the Femoral Component of Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Iranian Population
Background: Acquiring knowledge about anatomic and geometric quantities of bones is among the most vitalparameters in orthopedic surgery that has a significant effect on the treatment of various disorders and subsequentoutcomes. The aim of this study was to obtain anthropometric information for distal femur in order to compare withsimilar dimensions of prosthesis used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery and to design more suitable and optimalcomponents.Methods: Morphological data of distal femur were measured in 132 knees (81 males and 51 females) using magneticresonance imaging (MRI). The data included anterior-posterior (AP) length, medial-lateral (ML) width, medial AP (MAP),lateral AP (LAP), MAP to LAP distance in the anterior distal femur namely anterior medial lateral (AML) width, medialand lateral condyle width, and intercondylar notch. The aspect ratio (ML/AP) was also calculated and the results werecompared with similar dimensions of currently used knee implants.Results: Our data showed that men are significantly larger in all dimensions than women. In the distal femur withsimilar AP lengths in both sexes, women had a smaller ML width than men (p <0.001). Comparison between the distalfemur and studied prostheses showed no high correlation and similarity between the femoral component and femoralcondyle prostheses in the resected surface of the bone.Conclusion: The results of this study can provide the data needed to design prostheses suitable for the Iranianpopulation.Level of evidence: III
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15758_e56b2ea9b078e50119b09620c01aaf54.pdf
2020-05-01
400
406
10.22038/abjs.2018.32420.1861
Anthropometric
Distal femur
knee
magnetic resonance imaging
Prosthesis
Ali
Birjandinejad
birjandinejada@mums.ac.ir
1
Orthopedic Research Center, Shahid Kamyab Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Reza
Zandi
reza.zandi.md@gmail.com
2
Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
elham
karimi
elham.karimi@sbmu.ac.ir
3
Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Lowe CJ, Barker KL, Dewey M, Sackley CM.
1
Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee
2
arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and
3
meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj.
4
2007; 335(7624):812.
5
2. Poitras S, Avouac J, Rossignol M, Avouac B, Cedraschi
6
C, Nordin M, Rousseaux C, Rozenberg S, Savarieau B,
7
Thoumie P, Valat JP. A critical appraisal of guidelines
8
for the management of knee osteoarthritis using
9
Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation
10
criteria. Arthritis research & therapy. 2007;
11
9(6):R126...
12
3. Chuang SH, Huang MH, Chen TW, Weng MC, Liu
13
CW, Chen CH. Effect of knee sleeve on static and
14
dynamic balance in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
15
The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2007;
16
23(8):405-11.
17
4. Divine JG, Hewett TE. Valgus bracing for degenerative
18
knee osteoarthritis: relieving pain, improving gait, and
19
increasing activity. The Physician and sportsmedicine.
20
2005; 33(2):40-6.
21
5. Mazzuca SA, Page MC, Meldrum RD, Brandt KD, Petty‐
22
Saphon S. Pilot study of the effects of a heat‐retaining
23
knee sleeve on joint pain, stiffness, and function in
24
patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care &
25
Research: Official Journal of the American College of
26
Rheumatology. 2004; 51(5):716-21.
27
6. Haim A, Rozen N, Dekel S, Halperin N, Wolf A. Control
28
of knee coronal plane moment via modulation of
29
center of pressure: a prospective gait analysis study.
30
Journal of biomechanics. 2008; 41(14):3010-6.
31
7. Goldberg VM, Figgie 3rd HE, Figgie MP. Technical
32
considerations in total knee surgery. Management
33
of patella problems. The Orthopedic clinics of North
34
America. 1989; 20(2):189-99.
35
8. Ranawat CS. The patellofemoral joint in total condylar
36
knee arthroplasty. Pros and cons based on five-to tenyear
37
follow-up observations. Clinical orthopaedics
38
and related research. 1986 (205):93-9.
39
9. Fehring TK, Valadie AL. Knee instability after total
40
knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related
41
research. 1994 (299):157-62.
42
10. Ho WP, Cheng CK, Liau JJ. Morphometrical
43
measurements of resected surface of femurs in
44
Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current
45
femoral implants. The Knee. 2006; 13(1):12-4.
46
11. Hitt K, Shurman JR, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J,
47
Hoeman T, Mont MA. Anthropometric measurements
48
of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of
49
current knee arthroplasty systems. JBJS. 2003;
50
85(suppl_4):115-22.
51
12. Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female
52
knee: anatomic variations. JAAOS-Journal of the
53
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007;
54
13. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE.
55
Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur
56
in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and
57
Related Research®. 1996; 331:35-46.
58
14. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Scott RD. Comparative
59
measurement of male and female distal femurs
60
during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg.
61
2002; 15:213-7.
62
15. Campbell WC, Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell’s
63
operative orthopaedics. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby.
64
16. Biau D, Mullins MM, Judet T, Piriou P. Is anyone too old
65
for a total knee replacement?. Clinical Orthopaedics
66
and Related Research®. 2006; 448:180-4.
67
17. Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt
68
MA, Mathis KB. Does total knee replacement restore
69
normal knee function? Clinical Orthopaedics and
70
Related Research®. 2005; 431:157-65.
71
18. Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, Tang T, Rubash HE,
72
Li G. Differences of knee anthropometry between
73
Chinese and white men and women. The Journal of
74
arthroplasty. 2011; 26(1):124-30.
75
19. Vaidya SV, Ranawat CS, Aroojis A, Laud NS.
76
Anthropometric measurements to design total knee
77
prostheses for the Indian population. The Journal of
78
arthroplasty. 2000; 15(1):79-85.
79
20. Cheng FB, Ji XF, Lai Y, Feng JC, Zheng WX, Sun YF, et
80
al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee
81
to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese
82
population. The Knee. 2009; 16(5):341-7.
83
21. Lim HC, Bae JH, Yoon JY, Kim SJ, Kim JG, Lee JM. Gender
84
differences of the morphology of the distal femur and
85
proximal tibia in a Korean population. The Knee.
86
2013; 20(1):26-30.
87
22. Mahfouz MR, Merkl BC, Abdel Fatah EE, Booth Jr R,
88
Argenson JN. Automatic methods for characterization
89
of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur.
90
Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical
91
engineering. 2007; 10(6):447-56.
92
23. Dargel J, Michael JW, Feiser J, Ivo R, Koebke J. Human
93
knee joint anatomy revisited: morphometry in the
94
light of sex-specific total knee arthroplasty. The
95
Journal of arthroplasty. 2011; 26(3):346-53.
96
24. Yue B, Wang J, Wang Y, Yan M, Zhang J, Zeng Y. How
97
the gender or morphological specific TKA prosthesis
98
improves the component fit in the Chinese population?.
99
The Journal of arthroplasty. 2014; 29(1):71-4.
100
25. Hussain F, Kadir A, Rafiq M, Zulkifly AH, Sa’at A, Aziz
101
AA, Hossain M, Kamarul T, Syahrom A. Anthropometric
102
measurements of the human distal femur: a study
103
of the adult Malay population. BioMed research
104
international. 2013; 2013.
105
26. Chaichankul C, Tanavalee A, Itiravivong P. Anthropometric
106
measurements of knee joints in Thai
107
population: correlation to the sizing of current knee
108
prostheses. The Knee. 2011; 18(1):5-10.
109
27. Moghtadaei M, Moghimi J, Farahini H, Jahansouz A.
110
Morphology of proximal tibia in Iranian population
111
and its correlation with available prostheses. Medical
112
journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2015; 29:225.
113
28. Merchant AC, Arendt EA, Dye SF, Fredericson M,
114
Grelsamer RP, Leadbetter WB, Post WR, Teitge RA.
115
The female knee: anatomic variations and the femalespecific
116
total knee design. Clinical orthopaedics and
117
related research. 2008; 466(12):3059-65.
118
29. Baker K, Goggins J, Xie H, Szumowski K, LaValley M,
119
Hunter DJ, Felson DT. A randomized crossover trial of
120
a wedged insole for treatment of knee osteoarthritis.
121
Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2007; 56(4):1198-203.
122
30. Fehring TK, Murphy JA, Hayes TD, Roberts DW,
123
Pomeroy DL, Griffin WL. The Coventry Award Paper:
124
Factors Influencing Wear and Osteolysis in Press-
125
Fit Condylar Modular Total Knee Replacements.
126
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2004;
127
428:40-50.
128
31. Himanen AK, Belt E, Nevalainen J, Hämäläinen M,
129
Lehto MU. Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty
130
is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis:
131
Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8 467
132
operations carried out between 1985 and 1999. Acta
133
orthopaedica. 2005; 76(1):85-8.
134
32. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total
135
knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of
136
9200 total knee arthroplasties. The Journal of bone
137
and joint surgery. American volume. 1991; 73(3):397-
138
33. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS.
139
Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee
140
prostheses. JBJS. 2003; 85(2):259-65.
141
34. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The
142
Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997:
143
an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees
144
operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthopaedica
145
Scandinavica. 2001; 72(5):503-13.
146
35. Booth RE. The gender-specific (female) knee.
147
Orthopedics. 2006; 29(9):768-9.
148
36. Barrett WP. The need for gender-specific prostheses
149
in TKA: does size make a difference?. Orthopedics.
150
2006; 29(9):S53.
151
37. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total
152
knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related
153
research. 1986 (205):5-11.
154
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Application of Oscillating Saw for Lumbar en Bloc Laminectomy: A Case Series
Background: An oscillating bone saw is rarely used to perform laminectomy. The purpose of this study was to describea relatively quick and harmless technique for multilevel laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) usingan oscillating bone saw to find out how this instrument affects the time of surgery and rate of complications.Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 45 patients with LSS who required multilevel laminectomy. Thebones were cut using an oscillating sagittal saw equipped with a fine 1-cm blade. Posterolateral fusion was performed ifany evidence of spinal instability occurred, or the correction of deformity was addressed. The time spent for laminectomyfrom initial cutting to the whole bone removal (T1) and the duration of laminectomy (i.e., from initiation to the end ofdecompression; T2) were recorded for the corresponding level. The volume of harvested autograft was also measured,and any dural injuries were reported.Results: Posterolateral fusion was performed on 32 (71.1%) patients. The mean T1 and T2 per level were estimated at70.5±5.4 and 157.5±12.1 sec, respectively. In addition, the mean volume of harvested autograft per level was obtainedas 3.5±1.2 cc. No durotomy was observed during laminectomy using an oscillating bone saw. However, a dural tearoccurred in one patient when a Kerisson punch was utilized for ligamentum flavum removal and foraminotomy.Conclusion: Based on the findings, it can be concluded that laminectomy by means of the oscillating bone saw is asafe procedure that provides a sufficient volume of harvested autograft for fusion. This technique could also induce aremarkable reduction in the time of surgery.Level of evidence: IV
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15759_9eb92e7cb22f88ba7abed059c2626114.pdf
2020-05-01
407
412
10.22038/abjs.2020.15759
decompression
laminectomy
lumbar spine
oscillating saw
Stenosis
Farshad
Nikouei
farshadnikouei@yahoo.com
1
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2 Faculty of Medicine,
AUTHOR
Naveed
Nabizadeh
nnabi94@gmail.com
2
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Elham
Mirzamohammadi
mirzamohammadi.e@iums.ac.ir
3
Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Maryam
Ameri
m59_ameri@yahoo.com
4
Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Saeed
Sabbaghan
saeed.sabbaghan@gmail.com
5
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Behrooz
Givehchian
behroozgivehchian22@gmail.com
6
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Farshad
Safdari
f.safdari.to@gmail.com
7
Bone and Joint Related Tissue Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman
1
DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications,
2
and charges associated with surgery for lumbar
3
spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;
4
303(13):1259-65.
5
2. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A,
6
et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with
7
symptoms: the framingham study. Spine J. 2009;
8
9(7):545-50.
9
3. Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN, Fessler RG.
10
A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior
11
element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis:
12
comparison of a minimally invasive approach with
13
two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine. 2009;
14
34(1):17-23.
15
4. Overdevest G, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Jacobs W,
16
Thomé C, Gunzburg R, Peul W. Effectiveness of
17
posterior decompression techniques compared with
18
conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis. Eur
19
Spine J. 2015; 24(10):2244-63.
20
5. Postacchini F. Surgical management of lumbar spinal
21
stenosis. Spine. 1999; 24(10):1043-7.
22
6. Gunzburg R, Szpalski M. The conservative surgical
23
treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.
24
Eur Spine J. 2003;12(Suppl 2):S176-80.
25
7. Ramani PS, Shoda M, Zileli M, Dohrmann GJ. Surgical
26
management of cervical disc herniation. New Delhi,
27
India: Jaypee Brothers Publishers; 2013.
28
8. Ray CD. New techniques for decompression of lumbar
29
spinal stenosis. Neurosurgery. 1982; 10(5):587-92.
30
9. Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Dimar
31
JR. Contemporary management of symptomatic
32
lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;
33
41(2):183-91.
34
10. Guerin P, El Fegoun AB, Obeid I, Gille O, Lelong
35
L, Luc S, et al. Incidental durotomy during spine
36
surgery: incidence, management and complications.
37
A retrospective review. Injury. 2012; 43(4):397-401.
38
11. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for
39
lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of
40
the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(1):1-8.
41
12. Kalevski SK, Peev NA, Haritonov DG. Incidental Dural
42
Tears in lumbar decompressive surgery: incidence,
43
causes, treatment, results. Asian J Neurosurg. 2010;
44
5(1):54-9.
45
13. Papavero L, Engler N, Kothe R. Incidental durotomy
46
in spine surgery: first aid in ten steps. Eur Spine J.
47
2015; 24(9):2077-84.
48
14. Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Use of an
49
ultrasonic osteotome device in spine surgery:
50
experience from the first 128 patients. Eur Spine J.
51
2013; 22(12):2845-9.
52
15. Rama B, Markakis E, Kolenda H, Jansen J.
53
Reconstruction instead of resection: laminotomy
54
and laminoplasty. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1990;
55
33(Suppl 1):36-9.
56
16. Mimatsu K, Yoshida T, Namba K, Kasai T. Laminectomy
57
performed using a micro bone saw. Int Orthop. 2000;
58
24(1):54-7.
59
17. Padanyi C, Vajda J, Banczerowski1 P. Para-Split
60
laminotomy: a rescue technique for split laminotomy
61
approach in exploring intramedullary midline
62
located pathologies. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur
63
Neurosurg. 2014; 75(4):310-6.
64
18. Adachi K, Futami T, Ebihara A, Yamaya T, Kasai
65
N, Nakazawa T, et al. Spinal canal enlargement
66
procedure by restorative laminoplasty for the
67
treatment of lumbar canal stenosis. Spine J. 2003;
68
3(6):471-8.
69
19. Hara M, Takayasu M, Takagi T, Yoshida J. En bloc
70
laminoplasty performed with threadwire saw.
71
Neurosurgery. 2001; 48(1):235-9.
72
20. O’Leary PF, McCance SE. Distraction laminoplasty
73
for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin
74
Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 384(1):26-34.
75
21. Dujovny M, Agner C. The use of high power drills
76
for laminectomy in spinal stenosis: technical report.
77
Neurol Res. 1997; 19(2):219-21.
78
22. Matthes M, Pillich DT, El Refaee E, Schroeder
79
HW, Müller JU. Heat generation during bony
80
decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis using a
81
high-speed diamond drill with or without automated
82
irrigation and an ultrasonic bone-cutting knife: a
83
single-blinded prospective randomized controlled
84
study. World Neurosurg. 2018; 111(1):e72-81.
85
23. Tomita K, Toribatake Y, Kawahara N, Ohnari H, Kose
86
H. Total en bloc spondylectomy and circumspinal
87
decompression for solitary spinal metastasis. Spinal
88
Cord. 1994; 32(1):36-46.
89
24. Hazer DB, Yaşar B, Rosberg HE, Akbaş A. Technical
90
aspects on the use of ultrasonic bone shaver in spine
91
surgery: experience in 307 patients. Biomed Res Int.
92
2016; 2016:8428530.
93
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Effect of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Hindfoot Alignment in Patients with Severe Genu Varum and Genu Valgum
Background: The maintenance of deformity in the ankle and hindfoot after correction of knee deformity following kneearthroplasty may cause abnormal tension in the knee and patient dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to determinethe effect of knee arthroplasty on the hindfoot alignment in patients with severe genu varum and valgum.Methods: A total of 84 patients with primary osteoarthritis, were enrolled in the study. The knee deformity was measuredusing a long leg film before surgery. The long axial radiographic view of hindfoot was taken in the standing position forall patients, before and six months after surgery. Comparisons were made on changes in the hindfoot angles measuredbefore and after surgery.Results: A total of 84 patients with mean age of 62.28 ± 7.77 years, 77 (92%) and seven patients (eight percent)had knee varus and valgus deformity, respectively. In the knee varus group, the mean preoperative hindfoot anglewas + 5.32 ± 6.12 ° (valgus) which was changed to - 0.25 ± 4.91 ° (varus) in the postoperative phase. In the kneevalgus group, the mean pre and postoperative hindfoot angles were - 7.71 ± 7.06° (varus) and - 2.14 ± 5.92 ° (varus),respectively. The mean preoperative hindfoot angle in severe and very severe varus knee groups were + 5.45 ± 3.30and + 5.28 ± 6.86 °, respectively. These angles were changed to + 0.21± 5.17 and -1.60 ± 3.89° six months aftersurgery, respectively. The mean preoperative hindfoot angle in severe and very severe valgus knee deformity groupswere - 7.00 ± 4.69 and -8.66 ± 10.69 °, respectively. These angles were changed to - 2.00 ± 5.71 and - 2.33 ± 7.50°after surgery, respectively. There was no significant difference between patients with severe and very severe deformityin terms of pre and post-operative hindfoot angle.Conclusion: The hindfoot alignment is significantly corrected after knee arthroplasty. The severity of knee deformitydoes not correlate with the severity of the hindfoot deformity before and after surgery.Level of evidence: I
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15760_98a5624e562877456e323675b7c2443c.pdf
2020-05-01
413
419
10.22038/abjs.2019.33735.1883
Genu valgum
genu varum
Hindfoot alignment
Knee arthroplasty
Hosseinali
Hadi
hosseinali_hadi@yahoo.com
1
Orthopedic Department, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
AUTHOR
Mahmood
Jabal Amoli
jabalamolimd@yahoo.com
2
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Yahyaian Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Abolfazl
Bagherifard
bagherifd@gmail.com
3
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Yahyaian Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Ahmadreza
Behrouzi
behrouzi_ahmadreza@yahoo.com
4
Valiasr Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
AUTHOR
Fatemeh
Safi
safiarak@yahoo.com
5
Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
AUTHOR
Amir
Azimi
dr.amir2011@yahoo.com
6
Orthopedic Department, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
AUTHOR
Mahtab
Ghanbari
mahtab.ghanbari68@yahoo.com
7
Nursing Department, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
AUTHOR
Gholamreza
Azarnia Samarin
razarnia65@gmail.com
8
Orthopedic Department, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Johnson F, Leitl S, Waugh W. The distribution of load
1
across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic
2
measurements. The Journal of bone and joint
3
surgery. British volume. 1980;62(3):346-9.
4
2. Andriacchi TP, Koo S, Scanlan SF. Gait mechanics
5
influence healthy cartilage morphology and
6
osteoarthritis of the knee. The Journal of Bone and
7
Joint Surgery. American volume.. 2009;91(Suppl
8
3. Desai SS, Shetty GM, Song HR, Lee SH, Kim TY, Hur CY.
9
Effect of foot deformity on conventional mechanical
10
axis deviation and ground mechanical axis deviation
11
during single leg stance and two leg stance in genu
12
varum. The Knee. 2007;14(6):452-7.
13
4. Tsai LC, Yu B, Mercer VS, Gross MT. Comparison
14
of different structural foot types for measures of
15
standing postural control. Journal of Orthopaedic &
16
Sports Physical Therapy. 2006;36(12):942-53..
17
5. Van Gheluwe B, Kirby KA, Hagman F. Effects of
18
simulated genu valgum and genu varum on ground
19
reaction forces and subtalar joint function during
20
gait. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical
21
Association. 2005;95(6):531-41.
22
6. Zech A, Hübscher M, Vogt L, Banzer W, Hänsel F,
23
Pfeifer K. Balance training for neuromuscular control
24
and performance enhancement: a systematic review.
25
Journal of athletic training. 2010;45(4):392-403.
26
7. Hayashi K, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Takakura
27
Y. Correlation of compensatory alignment of
28
the subtalar joint to the progression of primary
29
osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot & ankle international.
30
2008;29(4):400-6.
31
8. Brouwer GM, Tol AV, Bergink AP, Belo JN, Bernsen
32
RM, Reijman M, Pols HA, Bierma‐Zeinstra SM.
33
Association between valgus and varus alignment and
34
the development and progression of radiographic
35
osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis & rheumatism.
36
2007;56(4):1204-11.
37
9. Hunter DJ, Sharma L, Skaife T. Alignment and
38
osteoarthritis of the knee. JBJS. 2009;91 (Supplement_
39
10. Tew M, Waugh W. Tibiofemoral alignment and the
40
results of knee replacement. The Journal of bone and
41
joint surgery. British volume. 1985;67(4):551-6.
42
11. Giza E, Cush G, Schon LC. The flexible flatfoot in the
43
adult. Foot and ankle clinics. 2007;12(2):251-71.
44
12. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating
45
EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. The Chetranjan
46
Ranawat Award: tibial component failure mechanisms
47
in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and
48
Related Research®. 2004;428:26-34.
49
13. Thomas R, Daniels TR, Parker K. Gait analysis and
50
functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for
51
isolated ankle arthritis. JBJS. 2006;88(3):526-35.
52
14. Ahn JH, Back YW. Comparative study of two techniques
53
for ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty for
54
severe varus knee: medial soft tissue release vs. bony
55
resection of proximal medial tibia. Knee surgery &
56
related research. 2013;25(1):13.
57
15. Rahm S, Camenzind RS, Hingsammer A, Lenz C,
58
Bauer DE, Farshad M, Fucentese SF. Postoperative
59
alignment of TKA in patients with severe preoperative
60
varus or valgus deformity: is there a difference
61
between surgical techniques?. BMC musculoskeletal
62
disorders. 2017;18(1):272.
63
16. Sorrells RB, Murphy JA, Sheridan KC, Wasielewski
64
RC. The effect of varus and valgus deformity on
65
results of cementless mobile bearing TKA. The Knee.
66
2007;14(4):284-8.
67
17. Reilingh ML, Beimers L, Tuijthof GJ, Stufkens SA,
68
Maas M, van Dijk CN. Measuring hindfoot alignment
69
radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable
70
than the hindfoot alignment view. Skeletal radiology.
71
2010;39(11):1103-8.
72
18. Norton AA, Callaghan JJ, Amendola A, Phisitkul P,
73
Wongsak S, Liu SS, Fruehling-Wall C. Correlation
74
of knee and hindfoot deformities in advanced
75
knee OA: compensatory hindfoot alignment and
76
where it occurs. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related
77
Research®. 2015;473(1):166-74.
78
19. Keenan MA, Peabody TD, Gronley JK, Perry J. Valgus
79
deformities of the feet and characteristics of gait
80
in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. The
81
Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
82
1991;73(2):237-47.
83
20. Chandler JT, Moskal JT. Evaluation of knee and
84
hindfoot alignment before and after total knee
85
arthroplasty: a prospective analysis. The Journal of
86
arthroplasty. 2004 Feb 1;19(2):211-6.
87
21. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM, Berend
88
ME, Malinzak RA. The planovalgus foot: a harbinger
89
of failure of posterior cruciate-retaining total knee
90
replacement. JBJS. 2005;87(suppl_2):59-62.
91
22. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of
92
reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and
93
total ankle arthroplasty. JBJS. 2007;89(10):2143-9.
94
23. Van DB, Sangeorzan BJ. Biomechanics and
95
pathophysiology of flat foot. Foot and ankle clinics.
96
2003;8(3):419-30.
97
24. Jeong BO, Baek JH, Song W. Changes in the Ankle
98
Joint and Hindfoot Alignment Following Varus
99
Deformity Correction of the Knee with Total
100
Knee Arthroplasty. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics.
101
2017;2(3):2473011417S000051.
102
25. Gao F, Ma J, Sun W, Guo W, Li Z, Wang W. Radiographic
103
assessment of knee–ankle alignment after total knee
104
arthroplasty for varus and valgus knee osteoarthritis.
105
The Knee. 2017;24(1):107-15.
106
26. Nakada I, Nakamura I, Juji T, Ito K, Matsumoto T.
107
Correlation between knee and hindfoot alignment
108
in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: The effects of
109
subtalar joint destruction. Modern rheumatology.
110
2015 3;25(5):689-93.
111
27. Duggal N, Paci GM, Narain A, Bournissaint LG,
112
Nazarian A. A computer assessment of the effect of
113
hindfoot alignment on mechanical axis deviation.
114
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.
115
2014;113(1):126-32.
116
28. Mullaji A, Shetty GM. Persistent hindfoot valgus
117
causes lateral deviation of weightbearing axis after
118
total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and
119
Related Research®. 2011;469(4):1154-60.
120
29. Hara Y, Ikoma K, Arai Y, Ohashi S, Maki M, Kubo T.
121
Alteration of hindfoot alignment after total knee
122
arthroplasty using a novel hindfoot alignment view.
123
The Journal of arthroplasty. 2015;30(1):126-9.
124
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Modified Camitz versus BRAND Procedures for the Treatment of Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Comparative Trial Study
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is characterized by complications such as pain, paresthesia, andnumbness in the fingers. There are some surgical therapies for the management of severe carpal tunnel, but differencesexist between the treatments available for creating the opposition. The current study was conducted to compare theeffect of modified Camitz and BRAND techniques on thumb opposition in patients with severe CTS.Methods: A total of 40 patients with severe CTS who were candidates for opponensplasty were enrolled in this clinicaltrial study at Alzahra and Kashani hospitals, Isfahan, Iran, from 2014 to 2018. The patients were divided into two groupsof modified Camitz and BRAND. Quick DASH-9 and Kapandji scores as well as pulp and side pinch and pronationangle were assessed before and after the surgeries.Results: Quick DASH-9 score, Kapandji score, pulp and side pinch and pronation angle significantly improved postoperatively(P=0.0XXX, P=0.0XXX, P=0.0XXX, P=0.0XXX, and P=0.0XXX, respectively). But, no significant differenceswere seen in the mentioned variables between both groups pre and post-operative (P>0.05, for all the studied variables).No postsurgical complications were seen in any of the groups.Conclusion: The findings of the present study demonstrated that, both Modified Camitz and BRAND techniquesare effective and safe techniques, yielding high improvements, but no serious complications. Both techniques can beconsidered for treatment of patients with severe CTS.Level of evidence: II
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15761_239012321c91542eb9c016a24f78768c.pdf
2020-05-01
420
425
10.22038/abjs.2020.15761
BRAND
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Modified Camitz
Opposition
Mohammad
Dehghani
m_dehghani@med.mui.ac.ir
1
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
AUTHOR
Behrooz
Fadaei
drbfadaei@yahoo.com
2
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Shirvan
Rastegar
rastegar@med.mui.ac.ir
3
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
AUTHOR
Abolghasem
Zarezadeh
zarezadeh@med.mui.ac.ir
4
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
AUTHOR
Keyvan
Ghadimi
keyvanghadimi@yahoo.com
5
School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
AUTHOR
Roham
Nikkhah
rnik101@yahoo.com
6
School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
AUTHOR
Sepehr
Eslami
abeee67@yahoo.com
7
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
AUTHOR
1. Bland JD. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Curr Opin Neurol.
1
2005; 18(5):581-5.
2
2. Abbasi S, Ghasemi M, Khorvash F, Ghadimi K,
3
Madahian P. Evaluation of clinical symptoms in
4
patients with different severities of carpal tunnel
5
syndrome. Casp J Neurol Sci. 2017; 3(10):143-50.
6
3. Vasiliadis HS, Nikolakopoulou A, Shrier I, Lunn MP,
7
Brassington R, Scholten RJ, et al. Endoscopic and
8
open release similarly safe for the treatment of
9
carpal tunnel syndrome. A systematic review and
10
meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0143683.
11
4. Hattori Y, Doi K, Sakamoto S, Kumar K, Koide S.
12
Camitz tendon transfer using flexor retinaculum as
13
a pulley in advanced carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand
14
Surg Am. 2014; 39(12):2454-9.
15
5. Skie MC, Parent T, Mudge K, Dai Q. Kinematic
16
analysis of six different insertion sites for FDS
17
opponensplasty. Hand. 2010; 5(3):261-6.
18
6. Moriya K, Yoshizu T, Maki Y. Immediate thumb
19
opposition following extensor indicis proprius
20
opponensplasty using the wide-awake approach.
21
Plast Surg Case Stud. 2016; 2(2):27-30.
22
7. de Roode CP, James MA, McCarroll HR Jr. Abductor digit
23
minimi opponensplasty: technique, modifications, and
24
measurement of opposition. Tech Hand Up Extrem
25
Surg. 2010; 14(1):51-3.
26
8. Al-Qattan MM. Extensor indicis proprius
27
opponensplasty for isolated traumatic low median
28
nerve palsy: a case series. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;
29
20(4):255-7.
30
9. Rymer B, Thomas PB. The Camitz transfer and its
31
modifications: a review. J Hand Surg EurVol. 2016;
32
41(6):632-7.
33
10. Kato N, Yoshizawa T, Sakai H. Simultaneous modified
34
Camitz opponensplasty using a pulley at the radial
35
side of the flexor retinaculum in severe carpal tunnel
36
syndrome. J Hand Surg EurVol. 2014; 39(6):632-6.
37
11. Kozin SH, Ezaki M. Flexor digitorum superficialis
38
opponensplasty with ulnar collateral ligament
39
reconstruction for thumb deficiency. Tech Hand Up
40
Extrem Surg. 2010; 14(1):46-50.
41
12. Anderson GA, Lee V, Sundararaj GD. Opponensplasty
42
by extensor indicis and flexor digitorum superficialis
43
tendon transfer. J Hand Surg Br. 1992; 17(6):611-4.
44
13. Sammer DM, Chung KC. Tendon transfers part II:
45
transfers for ulnar nerve palsy and median nerve
46
palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(3):212e-21e.
47
14. Wong JY, Fung BK, Chu MM, Chan RK. The use
48
of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand
49
questionnaire in rehabilitation after acute traumatic
50
hand injuries. J Hand Ther. 2007; 20(1):49-55.
51
15. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei
52
AR, Birjandinejad A. Validity and reliability of the
53
persian version of shortened disabilities of the arm,
54
shoulder and hand questionnaire (Quick-DASH). Int
55
J Prev Med. 2015; 6(1):59.
56
16. Kapandji A. Clinical test of apposition and counterapposition
57
of the thumb. Ann Chir Main. 1986;
58
5(1):67-73.
59
17. Baluch N, Borschel GH. Use of adjunctive palmaris
60
longus abductorplasty (Camitz) tendon transfer
61
in pediatric median nerve injury. J Plast Reconstr
62
Aesthet Surg. 2013; 66(5):726-8.
63
18. Park IJ, Kim HM, Lee SU, Lee JY, Jeong C.
64
Opponensplasty using palmaris longus tendon and
65
flexor retinaculum pulley in patients with severe
66
carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.
67
2010; 130(7):829-34.
68
19. Naeem R, Lahiri A. Modified Camitz opponensplasty
69
for severe thenar wasting secondary to carpal
70
tunnel syndrome: case series. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;
71
38(4):795-8.
72
20. Nobuta S, Sato K, Itoi E. Effects of modified camitz
73
opponensplasty to restore thumb opposition for
74
severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Phys Med
75
Rehabil. 2017; 5(444):2.
76
21. Wan SH, Wong TC, Yip TH, Ip FK. Clinical experience
77
of open carpal tunnel release and Camitz operation
78
in elderly Chinese patients. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;
79
13(5):348-52.
80
22. Terrono AL, Rose JH, Mulroy J, Millender LH. Camitz
81
palmaris longus abductorplasty for severe thenar
82
atrophy secondary to carpal tunnel syndrome. J
83
Hand Surg Am. 1993; 18(2):204-6.
84
23. Foucher G, Malizos C, Sammut D, Braun FM,
85
Michon J. Primary palmaris longus transfer as an
86
opponensplasty in carpal tunnel release: a series of
87
73 cases. J Hand Surg Br. 1991; 16(1):56-60.
88
24. Mondelli M, Reale F, Padua R, Aprile I, Padua L. Clinical
89
and neurophysiological outcome of surgery in
90
extreme carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol.
91
2001; 112(7):1237-42.
92
25. Kamiya H, Kimura M, Hoshino S, Kobayashi M, Sonoo
93
M. Prognosis of severe carpal tunnel syndrome with
94
absent compound muscle action potential. Muscle
95
Nerve. 2016; 54(3):427-31.
96
26. Uemura T, Hidaka N, Nakamura H. Clinical outcome
97
of carpal tunnel release with and without opposition
98
transfer. J Hand Surg EurVol. 2010; 35(8):632-6.
99
27. de Kraker M, Selles RW, Zuidam JM, Molenaar HM,
100
Stam HJ, Hovius SE. Outcome of flexor digitorum
101
superficialis opponensplasty for type II and IIIA
102
thumb hypoplasia. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016;
103
41(3):258-64.
104
28. Lee YS, Cheon HJ, Kim YW, Woo SH. Primary ring flexor
105
digitorum superficialis transfer with open carpal
106
tunnel release in extreme carpal tunnel syndrome. J
107
Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2017; 22(1):34-40.
108
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Autogenous Osteochondral Grafting for Treatment of Knee Osteochondritis Dissecans: A Case Series Study
Background: Although some surgical techniques have been described for the operative treatment of unstableOsteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee, outcomes are variable and are not satisfying totally. The aim of thepresent study is to evaluate the outcomes of autogenous osteochondral grafting for OCD of the knee.Methods: In a case series study, from June 2014 to July 2015, 16 patients with stage II-IV OCD (International CartilageRepair Society (ICRS)) of the femoral condyle were investigated. Surgical intervention considered in cases of stage III(4 cases) and IV (2 cases) and in stage II (10 cases) ones that were nonresponsive to conservative treatment. At theinitial and final visits, the IKDC, Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale were evaluated.Results: The mean preoperative IKDC score (53.4) increased significantly following surgery (84.3) (p <0.001).Based on the IKDC grading system, before the operation, the knee status was graded as nearly normal, abnormal,and severely abnormal in 4, 10, and 2 patients, respectively. At final post-surgical follow up, 15 normal and 1abnormal knee were documented (p <0.001). The mean Lysholm score increased from 44.3 per operatively to 86.3(p <0.001).Tegner activity score improved from 2.8±1 pre operatively to 5.6 ±2 (p <0.001).Conclusion: Surgical treatment of unstable OCD using autogenous osteochondral graft shows successful outcomes.In addition to reliable fixation, it can enhance healing and convert an uncontained lesion to contained one appropriatefor autogenous osteochondral grafting with healthy cartilage.Level of evidence: IV
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15762_b7bd2f988a6565e5205a49e4e45ce548.pdf
2020-05-01
426
431
10.22038/abjs.2019.39026.2038
Autogenous Osteochondral Grafting
healing enhancement
OCD
Osteochondritis dissecans
Sohrab
Keyhani
sohrab_keyhani4@yahoo.com
1
Orthopedic Department Chair, Akhtar Orthopedic Training and Research Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mehran
Soleymanha
drmehransoleymanha@gmail.com
2
Orthopaedic Research center, Department of Orthopaedic, Poursina Hospital and School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
AUTHOR
Rene
Verdonk
rene.verdonk@ugent.be
3
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
AUTHOR
Mohammadreza
Abbasian
mohammadreza.abbasian@gmail.com
4
Akhtar Orthopedic Training and Research Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Gunton MJ, Carey JL, Shaw CR, Murnaghan ML.
1
Drilling juvenile osteochondritis dissecans: retroor
2
transarticular? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related
3
Research®. 2013; 1; 471(4):1144-51.
4
2. Sasaki K, Matsumoto T, Matsushita T, Kubo S,
5
Ishida K, Tei K, Akisue T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R.
6
Osteochondral autograft transplantation for juvenile
7
osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: a series of
8
twelve cases. International orthopaedics. 2012; 1;
9
36(11):2243-8.
10
3. Clanton TO, DeLee JC. Osteochondritis dissecans.
11
History, pathophysiology and current treatment
12
concepts. Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
13
1982; (167):50-64.
14
4. Aichroth P. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: a
15
clinical survey. The Journal of bone and joint surgery.
16
British volume. 1971; 53(3):440-7.
17
5. Magnussen RA, Carey JL, Spindler KP. Does operative
18
fixation of an osteochondritis dissecans loose body
19
result in healing and long-term maintenance of knee
20
function? The American journal of sports medicine.
21
2009; 37(4):754-9.
22
6. Cahill BR, Phillips MR, Navarro R. The results
23
of conservative management of juvenile osteochondritis
24
dissecans using joint scintigraphy: a
25
prospective study. The American journal of sports
26
medicine. 1989; 17(5):601-6.
27
7. Miniaci A, Tytherleigh-Strong G. Fixation of unstable
28
osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee using
29
arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral grafting
30
(mosaicplasty). Arthroscopy: The Journal of
31
Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2007; 23(8):845-51.
32
8. Kobayashi T, Fujikawa K, Oohashi M. Surgical fixation
33
of massive osteochondritis dissecans lesion using
34
cylindrical osteochondral plugs. Arthroscopy: The
35
Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2004;
36
20(9):981-6.
37
9. Lyon R, Liu XC, Kubin M, Schwab J. Does
38
extracorporeal shock wave therapy enhance healing
39
of osteochondritis dissecans of the rabbit knee?
40
A pilot study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related
41
Research®. 2013; 471(4):1159-65.
42
10. Shimada K, Yoshida T, Nakata K, Hamada M, Akita S.
43
Reconstruction with an osteochondral autograft for
44
advanced osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow.
45
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2005;
46
435:140-7.
47
11. Wall E, Von DS. Juvenile osteochondritis dissecans.
48
The Orthopedic clinics of North America. 2003;
49
34(3):341-53.
50
12. Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB, Coulam C. Antegrade
51
curettement, bone grafting and pinning of
52
osteochondritis dissecans in the skeletally mature
53
knee. The American journal of sports medicine.
54
1990; 18(3):254-61.
55
13. Anderson AF, Richards DB, Pagnani MJ, Hovis WD.
56
Antegrade drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of
57
the knee. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic
58
& Related Surgery. 1997; 13(3):319-24.
59
14. Bradley J, Dandy DJ. Results of drilling osteochondritis
60
dissecans before skeletal maturity. The Journal
61
of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 1989;
62
71(4):642-4.
63
15. Robertson W, Kelly BT, Green DW. Osteochondritis
64
dissecans of the knee in children. Current opinion in
65
pediatrics. 2003; 15(1):38-44.
66
16. Nakagawa T, Kurosawa H, Ikeda H, Nozawa M,
67
Kawakami A. Internal fixation for osteochondritis
68
dissecans of the knee. Knee Surgery, Sports
69
Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2005; 13(4):317-22.
70
17. Hayan R, Phillipe G, Ludovic S, Claude K, Jean-Michel
71
C. Juvenile osteochondritis of femoral condyles:
72
treatment with transchondral drilling. Analysis of
73
40 cases. Journal of children’s orthopaedics. 2010;
74
4(1):39-44.
75
18. Steinhagen J, Bruns J, Deuretzbacher G, Ruether W,
76
Fuerst M, Niggemeyer O. Treatment of osteochondritis
77
dissecans of the femoral condyle with autologous
78
bone grafts and matrix-supported autologous
79
chondrocytes. International orthopaedics. 2010;
80
34(6):819-25.
81
19. DC C. Safran MR. Osteochondritis dissecans of the
82
knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14(2):90-100.
83
20. Flynn JM, Kocher MS, Ganley TJ. Osteochondritis
84
dissecans of the knee. Journal of Pediatric
85
Orthopaedics. 2004; 24(4):434-43.
86
21. Goyal D, Keyhani S, Goyal A, Lee EH, Hui JH, Vaziri
87
AS. Evidence-based status of osteochondral cylinder
88
transfer techniques: a systematic review of level I and
89
II studies. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic
90
& Related Surgery. 2014; 30(4):497-505.
91
22. Berlet GC, Mascia A, Miniaci A. Treatment of unstable
92
osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee using
93
autogenous osteochondral grafts (mosaicplasty).
94
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related
95
Surgery. 1999; 15(3):312-6.
96
23. Kocher MS, Czarnecki JJ, Andersen JS, Micheli
97
LJ. Internal fixation of juvenile osteochondritis
98
dissecans lesions of the knee. The American journal
99
of sports medicine. 2007; 35(5):712-8.
100
24. Tuompo P, Arvela V, Partio EK, Rokkanen P.
101
Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee fixed with
102
biodegradable self-reinforced polyglycolide and
103
polylactide rods in 24 patients. International
104
orthopaedics. 1998; 21(6):355-60.
105
25. Victoroff BN, Marcus RE, Deutsch A. Arthroscopic
106
bone peg fixation in the treatment of osteochondritis
107
dissecans in the knee. Arthroscopy. 1996; 12(4):506-9.
108
26. Navarro R, Cohen M, Carneiro Filho M, da Silva RT.
109
The arthroscopic treatment of osteochondritis
110
dissecans of the knee with autologous bone sticks.
111
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related
112
Surgery. 2002; 18(8):840-4.
113
27. Webb JE, Lewallen LW, Christophersen C, Krych AJ,
114
McIntosh AL. Clinical outcome of internal fixation of
115
unstable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans lesions
116
of the knee. Orthopedics. 2013; 36(11):e1444-9.
117
28. Camathias C, Gögüs U, Hirschmann MT, Rutz E,
118
Brunner R, Haeni D, Vavken P. Implant failure after
119
biodegradable screw fixation in osteochondritis
120
dissecans of the knee in skeletally immature patients.
121
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related
122
Surgery. 2015; 31(3):410-5.
123
29. Camathias C, Gögüs U, Hirschmann MT, Rutz E,
124
Brunner R, Haeni D, Vavken P. Implant failure after
125
biodegradable screw fixation in osteochondritis
126
dissecans of the knee in skeletally immature patients.
127
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related
128
Surgery. 2015; 31(3):410-5.
129
30. Friederichs MG, Greis PE, Burks RT. Pitfalls associated
130
with fixation of osteochondritis dissecans fragments
131
using bioabsorbable screws. Arthroscopy: The
132
Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2001;
133
17(5):542-5.
134
31. Scioscia TN, Giffin JR, Allen CR, Harner CD. Potential
135
complication of bioabsorbable screw fixation for
136
osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Arthroscopy:
137
The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2001;
138
17(2):1-5.
139
32. Miura K, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Sato H, Toh S. Results
140
of arthroscopic fixation of osteochondritis dissecans
141
lesion of the knee with cylindrical autogenous
142
osteochondral plugs. The American journal of sports
143
medicine. 2007; 35(2):216-22.
144
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Prevalence, Zone, and Type of the Meniscus Tear in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury; Does Delayed ACL Reconstruction Affects the Meniscal Injury?
Background: Meniscus tear is a common finding in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and may affectthe natural history of the injury and the outcomes of treatment. In the current study, the characteristics of meniscus tearsin patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were investigated.Methods: The hospital records of 1022 patients were reviewed. The measured variables included the presence ofmeniscus tear, ramp and root injury, the zone of injury based on the Cooper classification, and the type of tear. The ACLtears with delay more than 3 months for ACLR were recorded as chronic injuries.Results: The incidence of meniscus tear was 44.4%; among whom, bucket-handle injury was the most common type(30.4%) and the ramp lesion was found in 20.5%. The meniscus was repaired in 56.6%. The incidence of medialmeniscus injury was significantly higher in chronic ACL tears and vice versa (p <0.001). The incidence of ramp lesion(9.1% Vs 20.5%) and root tear (1.3% Vs 2.9%) were significantly higher in the chronic and acute tears, respectively(p <0.001).Conclusion: Delay more than 3 months in ACLR was associated with the increased incidence of meniscal injury,specially the medial meniscus, and ramp lesion. It seems that early ACLR may be more helpful for the patients.Level of evidence: IV
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15763_27c7db74e426c698e820d23d977c7077.pdf
2020-05-01
432
438
10.22038/abjs.2019.39084.2076
anterior cruciate ligament
Arthroscopy
chronic injury
Meniscus
ramp lesion
Sohrab
Keyhani
sohrab_keyhani4@yahoo.com
1
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Ali Akbar
Esmailiejah
aliakesmailiejah@gmail.com
2
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mohamad Sajad
Mirhoseini
smirortho@gmail.com
3
Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Seyyed-Mohsen
Hosseininejad
hosseininejad.s.mohsen@gmail.com
4
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Naser
Ghanbari
naser.ghanbari.orth@gmail.com
5
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
1. Cain Jr EL, Fleisig GS, Ponce BA, Boohaker HA,
1
George MP, McGwin Jr G, Andrews JR, Lemak LJ,
2
Clancy Jr WG, Dugas JR. Variables associated with
3
chondral and meniscal injuries in anterior cruciate
4
ligament surgery. The journal of knee surgery.
5
2017;30(07):659-67.
6
2. Michalitsis S, Vlychou M, Malizos KN, Thriskos
7
P, Hantes ME. Meniscal and articular cartilage
8
lesions in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient
9
knee: correlation between time from injury and
10
knee scores. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,
11
Arthroscopy. 2015;23(1):232-9.
12
3. Bellabarba C, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach JB. Patterns of
13
meniscal injury in the anterior cruciate-deficient
14
knee: a review of the literature. American journal of
15
orthopedics (Belle Mead, NJ). 1997; 26(1):18-23.
16
4. Warren RF, Levy IM. Meniscal lesions associated
17
with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Clinical
18
orthopaedics and related research. 1983(172):32-7.
19
5. Forkel P, Herbort M, Sprenker F, Metzlaff S, Raschke
20
M, Petersen W. The biomechanical effect of a lateral
21
meniscus posterior root tear with and without
22
damage to the meniscofemoral ligament: efficacy
23
of different repair techniques. Arthroscopy: The
24
Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2014;
25
30(7):833-40.
26
6. LaPrade CM, Jansson KS, Dornan G, Smith SD,
27
Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF. Altered tibiofemoral
28
contact mechanics due to lateral meniscus posterior
29
horn root avulsions and radial tears can be restored
30
with in situ pull-out suture repairs. JBJS. 2014;
31
96(6):471-9..
32
7. Ode GE, Van Thiel GS, McArthur SA, Dishkin-Paset J,
33
Leurgans SE, Shewman EF, Wang VM, Cole BJ. Effects
34
of serial sectioning and repair of radial tears in the
35
lateral meniscus. The American journal of sports
36
medicine. 2012; 40(8):1863-70.
37
8. Schillhammer CK, Werner FW, Scuderi MG,
38
Cannizzaro JP. Repair of lateral meniscus posterior
39
horn detachment lesions: a biomechanical
40
evaluation. The American journal of sports medicine.
41
2012; 40(11):2604-9.
42
9. Papageorgiou CD, Gil JE, Kanamori A, Fenwick JA,
43
Woo SL, Fu FH. The biomechanical interdependence
44
between the anterior cruciate ligament replacement
45
graft and the medial meniscus. The American journal
46
of sports medicine. 2001; 29(2):226-31.
47
10. Jin Hwan A, Lee YS, Yoo JC, Chang MJ, Koh KH, Kim MH.
48
Clinical and Second-Look Arthroscopic Evaluation
49
of Repaired Medial Meniscus in Anterior Cruciate
50
Ligament—Reconstructed Knees. The American
51
journal of sports medicine. 2010; 38(3):472-7.
52
11. Melton JT, Murray JR, Karim A, Pandit H, Wandless
53
F, Thomas NP. Meniscal repair in anterior cruciate
54
ligament reconstruction: a long-term outcome study.
55
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
56
2011; 19(10):1729.
57
12. Stein T, Mehling AP, Welsch F, von Eisenhart-Rothe
58
R, Jäger A. Long-term outcome after arthroscopic
59
meniscal repair versus arthroscopic partial
60
meniscectomy for traumatic meniscal tears.
61
The American journal of sports medicine. 2010;
62
38(8):1542-8.
63
13. Ahn JH, Bae TS, Kang KS, Kang SY, Lee SH.
64
Longitudinal tear of the medial meniscus posterior
65
horn in the anterior cruciate ligament–deficient
66
knee significantly influences anterior stability.
67
The American journal of sports medicine. 2011;
68
39(10):2187-93.
69
14. Demirağ B, Aydemir F, Daniş M, Ermutlu C. Incidence
70
of meniscal and osteochondral lesions in patients
71
undergoing delayed anterior cruciate ligament
72
reconstruction. Acta orthopaedica ET traumatologica
73
turcica. 2011;45(5):348-52.
74
15. Keene GC, Bickerstaff D, Rae PJ, Paterson RS. The
75
natural history of meniscal tears in anterior cruciate
76
ligament insufficiency. The American journal of
77
sports medicine. 1993; 21(5):672-9.
78
16. Cerabona F, Sherman MF, Bonamo JR, Sklar J.
79
Patterns of meniscal injury with acute anterior
80
cruciate ligament tears. The American journal of
81
sports medicine. 1988; 16(6):603-9.
82
17. Gadeyne S, Besse JL, Galand-Desme S, Lerat JL,
83
Moyen B. Analysis of meniscal lesions accompanying
84
anterior cruciate ligament tears: a retrospective
85
analysis of 156 patients. Revue de chirurgie
86
orthopedique ET reparatrice de l’appareil moteur.
87
2006;92(5):448-54.
88
18. Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Lee SH, Yoon YC. Increasing incidence
89
of medial meniscal tears in nonoperatively treated
90
anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency patients
91
documented by serial magnetic resonance imaging
92
studies. The American journal of sports medicine.
93
2009;37(8):1478-83.
94
19. Liu X, Feng H, Zhang H, Hong L, Wang XS, Zhang
95
J. Arthroscopic prevalence of ramp lesion in
96
868 patients with anterior cruciate ligament
97
injury. The American journal of sports medicine.
98
2011;39(4):832-7.
99
20. Di Vico G, Di Donato SL, Balato G, Correra G, D’Addona
100
A, Maffulli N, Rosa D. Correlation between time from
101
injury to surgery and the prevalence of ramp and
102
hidden lesions during anterior cruciate ligament
103
reconstruction. A new diagnostic algorithm. Muscles,
104
ligaments and tendons journal. 2017;7(3):491.
105
21. Rao AJ, Erickson BJ, Cvetanovich GL, Yanke AB,
106
Bach Jr BR, Cole BJ. The meniscus-deficient
107
knee: biomechanics, evaluation, and treatment
108
options. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.
109
2015;3(10):2325967115611386.
110
22. Smith III JP, Barrett GR. Medial and lateral meniscal
111
tear patterns in anterior cruciate ligament-
112
deficient knees: a prospective analysis of 575 tears.
113
The American journal of sports medicine. 2001;
114
29(4):415-9.
115
23. Indelicato PA, Bittar ES. A perspective of lesions
116
associated with ACL insufficiency of the knee. A
117
review of 100 cases. Clinical orthopaedics and
118
related research. 1985; (198):77-80.
119
24. Pujol N, Beaufils P. Healing results of meniscal
120
tears left in situ during anterior cruciate ligament
121
reconstruction: a review of clinical studies. Knee
122
Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2009;
123
17(4):396-401.
124
25. Ahn JH, Wang JH, Yoo JC. Arthroscopic all-inside
125
suture repair of medial meniscus lesion in anterior
126
cruciate ligament—deficient knees: results of
127
second-look arthroscopies in 39 cases. Arthroscopy:
128
The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2004;
129
20(9):936-45.
130
26. Fok AW, Yau WP. Delay in ACL reconstruction is
131
associated with more severe and painful meniscal
132
and chondral injuries. Knee Surgery, Sports
133
Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013; 21(4):928-33.
134
27. Thaunat M, Fayard JM, Guimaraes TM, Jan N, Murphy
135
CG, Sonnery-Cottet B. Classification and surgical
136
repair of ramp lesions of the medial meniscus.
137
Arthroscopy techniques. 2016; 5(4):e871-5.
138
28. van der Hart CP, van den Bekerom MP, Patt TW. The
139
occurrence of osteoarthritis at a minimum of ten
140
years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate
141
ligament. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and
142
research. 2008; 3(1):24.
143
29. Neuman P, Englund M, Kostogiannis I, Friden T,
144
Roos H, Dahlberg LE. Prevalence of tibiofemoral
145
osteoarthritis 15 years after nonoperative treatment
146
of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective
147
cohort study. The American journal of sports
148
medicine. 2008; 36(9):1717-25.
149
30. Sonnery-Cottet B, Conteduca J, Thaunat M, Gunepin
150
FX, Seil R. Hidden lesions of the posterior horn of
151
the medial meniscus: a systematic arthroscopic
152
exploration of the concealed portion of the knee.
153
The American journal of sports medicine. 2014 Apr;
154
42(4):921-6.
155
31. Pan F, Hua S, Ma Z. Surgical treatment of combined
156
posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus and ACL
157
tears. Medical science monitor: international medical
158
journal of experimental and clinical research. 2015;
159
32. Forkel P, Petersen W. Posterior root tear fixation of
160
the lateral meniscus combined with arthroscopic
161
ACL double-bundle reconstruction: technical note
162
of a transosseous fixation using the tibial PL tunnel.
163
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2012;
164
132(3):387-91.
165
33. Feucht MJ, Bigdon S, Bode G, Salzmann GM, Dovi-
166
Akue D, Südkamp NP, Niemeyer P. Associated tears
167
of the lateral meniscus in anterior cruciate ligament
168
injuries: risk factors for different tear patterns.
169
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.
170
2015;10(1):34.
171
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Surgical Excision as the First Therapeutic Choice in Single-muscle Hemangiomas: a Case Series
Background: Conservative management is generally the primary treatment for intramuscular hemangimas. However,many patients will require surgery later in their life, after suffering a long period of pain. We aimed to evaluate theoncologic and functional outcomes of surgery as the initial treatment of single-muscle hemangiomas.Methods: Medical profiles of 17 patients with hemangiomas of vastus medialis for whom surgery was selected asthe initial treatment were reviewed. The indication for surgery was a bothersome pain. Postoperative muscle strengthwas assessed with manual muscle testing (range 0-5). The postoperative pain was measured by a visual analog scale(VAS) for pain (range 0-10). Lyshölm-Tegner knee scoring scale was used for the evaluation of knee function.Results: The mean age of the patients was 25.9±8.6 years. Surgery was performed as wide resection in 13 cases andas marginal resection in 4 cases. At a mean follow-up of 55.76±30 months, two local recurrences (11.8%) were observed.At the last evaluation session, muscle strength grade was 5/5 in 13 patients and 4/5 in four patients. Postoperativepain was noticed in four patients (VAS=1). Knee function was excellent in 13 patients and good in four patients. Bothof the local recurrences occurred in marginally resected lesions. Three out of four cases with reduced muscle strength,postoperative pain, and reduced function were also treated with marginal resection.Conclusion: If a wide surgical margin is achievable without compromising the limb function, surgical resection couldbe considered as the primary choice of treatment for single-muscle hemangiomas.Level of evidence: IV
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15764_610201691ce31c195c14d1e29989c702.pdf
2020-05-01
439
444
10.22038/abjs.2019.40674.2098
conservative treatment
Intramuscular hemangiomas
Surgery
Khodamorad
Jamshidi
jamshidi_k@yahoo.com
1
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Milad
Haji Agha Bozorgi
mld_bozorgi86@yahoo.com
2
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Hassan
Assad Kassir
hhmkaseer@gmail.com
3
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Alireza
Mirzaei
mirzaei.ar@iums.ac.ir
4
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Enzinger F. Benign tumors and tumorlike lesions of
1
blood vessels. Soft tissue tumors. St. Louis: Mosby;
2
2. Wojcicki P, Wojcicka K. Epidemiology, diagnostics and
3
treatment of vascular tumours and malformations.
4
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2014; 23(3):475-84.
5
3. Sami SH, Jamshidi K, Shoushtarizadeh T.
6
Intraarticular synovial cavernous hemangioma:
7
a case report and review of the literature. Shafa
8
Orthop J. 2014; 1(2):26-8.
9
4. Marchuk DA. Pathogenesis of hemangioma. J Clin
10
Invest. 2001; 107(6):665-6.
11
5. Wierzbicki JM, Henderson JH, Scarborough MT,
12
Bush CH, Reith JD, Clugston JR. Intramuscular
13
hemangiomas. Sports Health. 2013; 5(5):448-54.
14
6. Bella GP, Manivel JC, Thompson RC Jr, Clohisy DR,
15
Cheng EY. Intramuscular hemangioma: recurrence
16
risk related to surgical margins. Clin Orthop Relat
17
Res. 2007; 459(1):186-91.
18
7. Tang P, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, Cates J, Mankin
19
HJ. Surgical treatment of hemangiomas of soft tissue.
20
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 399(1):205-10.
21
8. Cohen AJ, Youkey JR, Clagett GP, Huggins M, Nadalo
22
L, d’Avis JC. Intramuscular hemangioma. JAMA. 1983;
23
249(19):2680-2.
24
9. Allen P, Enzinger F. Hemangioma of skeletal muscle.
25
An analysis of 89 cases. Cancer. 1972; 29(1):8-22.
26
10. Beham A, Fletcher C. Intramuscular angioma:
27
a clinicopathological analysis of 74 cases.
28
Histopathology. 1991; 18(1):53-9.
29
11. Jamshidi K, Jafari D, Shirazi MR, Pahlevansabagh
30
A, Shoushtaryzadeh T. An unusual presentation of
31
ossified intramuscular hemangioma: a case report.
32
Acta Med Iran. 2014; 52(4):319-22.
33
12. Fergusson I. Haemangiomata of skeletal muscle. Br J
34
Surg. 1972; 59(8):634-7.
35
13. Jamshidi K, Karimi A, Bagherifard A, Mirzaei A.
36
Aneurysmal bone cysts of the clavicle: a comparison
37
of extended curettage and segmental resection with
38
bone reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;
39
28(9):1654-7.
40
14. Jamshidi K, Mirkazemi M, Izanloo A, Mirzaei A.
41
Locking plate and fibular strut-graft augmentation
42
in the reconstruction of unicameral bone cyst of
43
proximal femur in the paediatric population. Int
44
Orthopaedics. 2018; 42(1):169-74.
45
15. Jamshidi K, Bagherifard A, Mirzaei A, Bahrabadi M.
46
Giant cell tumor of the sacrum: series of 19 patients
47
and review of the literature. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017;
48
5(6):443-50.
49
16. Mendell JR, Florence J. Manual muscle testing. Muscle
50
Nerve. 1990; 13(S1):S16-20.
51
17. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M.
52
Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain
53
(Vas Pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS Pain),
54
mcgill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short‐form mcgill
55
pain questionnaire (SF‐MPQ), chronic pain grade
56
scale (CPGS), short form‐36 bodily pain scale (SF‐36
57
BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant
58
osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res.
59
2011; 63(Suppl 11):S240-52.
60
18. Negahban H, Mostafaee N, Sohani SM, Mazaheri M,
61
Goharpey S, Salavati M, et al. Reliability and validity
62
of the Tegner and Marx activity rating scales in
63
Iranian patients with anterior cruciate ligament
64
injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33(22-23):2305-10.
65
19. Brozzetti S, Polistena A, De Angelis M, Bononi M, Miccini
66
M, Mazzoni G, et al. Treatment of giant intramuscular
67
hemangioma: a multistep approach in three patients.
68
Anticancer Res. 2005; 25(3C):2417-21.
69
20. Wu JL, Wu CC, Wang SJ, Chen YJ, Huang GS, Wu SS.
70
Imaging strategies in intramuscular haemangiomas: an
71
analysis of 20 cases. Int Orthop. 2007; 31(4):569-75.
72
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Effect of Suspension and Conventional Core Stability Exercises on Characteristics of Intervertebral Disc and Chronic Pain in Office Staff Due to Lumbar Herniated Disc
Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of eight weeks of conventional and suspension corestability exercises by use of the designed device on characteristic of intervertebral discs in low back pain.Methods: A total of 27 men with chronic low back (CLB) pain due to lumbar disc herniation in L4-L5 and L5-S1 regionswere enrolled in this quasi-experimental study. After assessing the pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS) anddetermining the disc herniation index using MRI, each group of patients were asked to perform either conventionalor suspension exercises for eight weeks, each week consisting of three training sessions. The pain intensity wasassessed at the end of the first, second, third, fourth and eighth weeks and the disc hernia index was determined againat the end of the eight weeks of exercises.Results: The results indicated significant changes in the intensity of pain in both groups through the period of eightweeks of exercise with a remarkable pain relief. In relation to the structural characteristics of the intervertebral disc, dataanalysis did not reveal any significant change between the pre- and post-test.Conclusion: Considering the beneficial effects of the stability exercises and specially suspension stability exerciseswith respect to pain alleviation and reduced use of sedatives and anti-inflammatory drugs, this method can be helpfulat early stages of treatment for chronic pains.Level of evidence: I
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15765_0f5a089543124361771d5a278ab4c245.pdf
2020-05-01
445
453
10.22038/abjs.2019.40758.2102
core stability exercises
Disc herniation
Pain
suspension core stability exercises
Reza
khanzadeh
r.khanzadeh84@spr.ui.ac.ir
1
Department of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
AUTHOR
Reza
Mahdavinejad
r.mahdavinejad@spr.ui.ac.ir
2
Department of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Ali
Borhani
aliborhani@gmail.com
3
Department of radiology, Medical Sciences University of Tehran , Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
1. Chan SC, Ferguson SJ, Gantenbein-Ritter B. The
1
effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc.
2
European Spine Journal. 2011;20(11):1796.
3
2. Choobineh A, Rajaeefard AR, Neghab M. Perceived
4
demands and musculoskeletal disorders among
5
hospital nurses. Hakim research journal. 2007;
6
10(2):70-5.
7
3. Sokas RK, Levy BS, Wegman DH, Baron SL. Recognizing
8
and preventing occupational and environmental
9
disease and injury. Oxford University Press, New York;
10
4. Aghilinejad M, Choobineh AR, Sadeghi Z, Nouri MK,
11
Ahmadi AB. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders
12
among Iranian steel workers. Iranian Red Crescent
13
Medical Journal. 2012;14(4):198.
14
5. Oha K, Viljasoo V, Merisalu E. Prevalence of
15
musculoskeletal disorders, assessment of parameters
16
of muscle tone and health status among office
17
workers. Agron Res. 2010;8(1):192-200.
18
6. Das SM, Dowle P, Iyengar R. Effect of spinal
19
mobilization with leg movement as an adjunct to
20
neural mobilization and conventional therapy in
21
patients with lumbar radiculopathy: Randomized
22
controlled trial. J Med Sci Res. 2018;6(1):11-9.
23
7. Embleton J, Lines L. Spinal decompression therapy:
24
Vibroseis of the body. InSEG Technical Program
25
Expanded Abstracts 2018 (pp. 4787-4791). Society
26
of Exploration Geophysicists.
27
8. Koçak FA, Tunç H, Sütbeyaz ST, Akkuş S, Köseoğlu BF,
28
Yılmaz E. Comparison of the short-term effects of the
29
conventional motorized traction with non-surgical
30
spinal decompression performed with a DRX9000
31
device on pain, functionality, depression, and quality
32
of life in patients with low back pain associated with
33
lumbar disc herniation: A single-blind randomizedcontrolled
34
trial. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine
35
and Rehabilitation. 2018;64(1):17.
36
9. Wegner I, Widyahening IS, van Tulder MW, Blomberg
37
SE, de Vet HC, Brønfort G, et al. Traction for low‐back
38
pain with or without sciatica. Cochrane Database of
39
Systematic Reviews. 2013(8).
40
10. Eklund JA, Corlett EN. Shrinkage as a measure of the
41
effect of load on the spine. Spine. 1984;9(2):189-94.
42
11. Sorkin JD, Muller DC, Andres R. Longitudinal change
43
in the heights of men and women: consequential
44
effects on body mass index. Epidemiologic reviews.
45
1999;21(2):247-60.
46
12. Weiner DK, Kim YS, Bonino P, Wang T. Low back pain
47
in older adults: are we utilizing healthcare resources
48
wisely?. Pain Medicine. 2006;7(2):143-50.
49
13. van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes
50
BW. Exercise therapy for low‐back pain. Cochrane
51
Database of Systematic Reviews. 2000(2).
52
14. Cleland J, Schulte C, Durall C. The role of therapeutic
53
exercise in treating instability-related lumbar
54
spine pain: a systematic review. Journal of back and
55
musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2002;16(2-3):105-15.
56
15. Kolar K. Lumbar-Disk Herniations: Conservative
57
Clinical Applications. Athletic Therapy Today. 2005;
58
16. Gibbs BB, Hergenroeder AL, Perdomo SJ, Kowalsky RJ,
59
Delitto A, Jakicic JM. Reducing sedentary behaviour
60
to decrease chronic low back pain: the stand back
61
randomised trial. Occupational and environmental
62
medicine. 2018;75(5):321-7.
63
17. Benoist M. The natural history of lumbar disc
64
herniation and radiculopathy. Joint Bone Spine.
65
2002;69(2):155-60.
66
18. Billy GG, Lemieux SK, Chow MX. Changes in lumbar
67
disk morphology associated with prolonged sitting
68
assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. PM&R.
69
2014;6(9):790-5.
70
19. GHAEINI S, KASHI A. THE EFFECT OF TRAINING
71
MICROPAUSES ON FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY OF
72
CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN AFFECTED EMPLOYEES.
73
20. Mens JM, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ. Diagonal trunk muscle
74
exercises in peripartum pelvic pain: a randomized
75
clinical trial. Physical Therapy. 2000;80(12):1164-73.
76
21. Kang JI, Jeong DK, Choi H. Effect of spinal decompression
77
on the lumbar muscle activity and disk height in
78
patients with herniated intervertebral disk. Journal of
79
physical therapy science. 2016;28(11):3125-30.
80
22. Fagerlund MK, Thelander U, Friberg S. Size of lumbar
81
disc hernias measured using computed tomography
82
and related to sciatic symptoms. Acta radiologica.
83
1990;31(6):555-8.
84
23. Ham P, Leiber JD. Chapter 11 - Physical Examination
85
of the Lumbar Spine. In: Seidenberg PH, Beutler
86
AI, editors. The Sports Medicine Resource Manual.
87
Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2008. p. 100-9.
88
24. Huang YP, Bruijn SM, Lin JH, Meijer OG, Wu WH,
89
Abbasi-Bafghi H, et al. Gait adaptations in low
90
back pain patients with lumbar disc herniation:
91
trunk coordination and arm swing. Eur Spine J.
92
2011;20(3):491-9.
93
25. Jeong DK, Choi HH, Kang JI, Choi H. Effect of lumbar
94
stabilization exercise on disc herniation index, sacral
95
angle, and functional improvement in patients with
96
lumbar disc herniation. Journal of physical therapy
97
science. 2017;29(12):2121-5.
98
26. Van Deursen DL, Goossens RH, Evers JJ, Van der
99
Helm FC, Van Deursen LL. Length of the spine while
100
sitting on a new concept for an office chair. Applied
101
Ergonomics. 2000;31(1):95-8.
102
27. Lis AM, Black KM, Korn H, Nordin M. Association
103
between sitting and occupational LBP. European
104
Spine Journal. 2007;16(2):283-98.
105
28. Simmerman SM, Sizer PS, Dedrick GS, Apte GG,
106
Brismée JM. Immediate changes in spinal height and
107
pain after aquatic vertical traction in patients with
108
persistent low back symptoms: a crossover clinical
109
trial. PM&R. 2011;3(5):447-57.
110
29. Boocock MG, Garbutt G, Linge K, Reilly T, Troup JD.
111
Changes in stature following drop jumping and postexercise
112
gravity inversion. Medicine and science in
113
sports and exercise. 1990;22(3):385-90.
114
30. Podein RJ, Iaizzo PA. Applied forces and associated
115
physiologic responses induced by axial spinal
116
unloading with the LTX 3000™ lumbar rehabilitation
117
system. Archives of physical medicine and
118
rehabilitation. 1998;79(5):505-13.
119
31. Krause M, Refshauge KM, Dessen M, Boland R.
120
Lumbar spine traction: evaluation of effects and
121
recommended application for treatment. Manual
122
therapy. 2000;5(2):72-81.
123
32. Janda V. Muscles, central nervous motor regulation
124
and back problems. InThe neurobiologic mechanisms
125
in manipulative therapy 1978 (pp. 27-41). Springer,
126
Boston, MA.
127
33. Jorgensson A. The iliopsoas muscle and the
128
lumbar spine. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy.
129
1993;39:125-.
130
34. Hellsing A, Nordgren B, Schele R, Ahlborg B, editors.
131
Predictability of back pain around the age of 20.
132
Reproducibility of examination variables: Proceedings
133
of the Tenth International Conference of the World
134
Confederation for Physical Therapy Sydney; 1987.
135
35. Abbott EE, Lobo B, Benzel EC. Biomechanics of the
136
Lumbar Degenerative Intervertebral Disk. Advanced
137
Concepts in Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease:
138
Springer; 2016. p. 305-10.
139
36. Gringmuth RH, Jackson C. Therapeutic exercise for
140
spinal segmental stabilization in low back pain:
141
scientific basis and clinical approach. The Journal of the
142
Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2000;44(2):125.
143
37. Oh HJ, Jeon CB, Jeong MG, Choi SJ. The Effects of Spinal
144
Decompression Therapy on Pain and Disability in
145
Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. The Journal of
146
Korean Physical Therapy. 2017;29(6):299-302.
147
38. Steele J, Bruce-Low S, Smith D, Osborne N, Thorkeldsen
148
A. Can specific loading through exercise impart
149
healing or regeneration of the intervertebral disc?.
150
The Spine Journal. 2015;15(10):2117-21.
151
39. Marshall PW, Murphy BA. Core stability exercises on
152
and off a Swiss ball. Archives of physical medicine and
153
rehabilitation. 2005;86(2):242-9.
154
40. Karimi N, Akbarov P, Rahnama L. Effects of segmental
155
traction therapy on lumbar disc herniation in patients
156
with acute low back pain measured by magnetic
157
resonance imaging: A single arm clinical trial.
158
Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
159
2017;30(2):247-53.
160
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Primary Synovial Sarcoma Presenting as a Huge Mass: A Report of a Rare Case and Review of Literature
Primary synovial sarcoma of mediastinum is very rare among soft tissue sarcomas. Only a few cases have been reportedin the literatures. The best treatment is still unclear, but, surgical resection is the main therapy. In this article we reporta case of a 20*20 cm (2000gr) primary giant mediastinal synovial sarcoma in a 42 year-old man. We performed radicalexcision of the tumor and the metastasis.Level of evidence: V
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15766_8e3a67f1b060dd477bd8f147092f3948.pdf
2020-05-01
454
456
10.22038/abjs.2020.15766
chemotherapy
Mediastinal Mass
Soft tissue sarcoma
Synovial sarcoma
Seyed Hosein
Fattahi Masoum
fattahih@mums.ac.ir
1
Lung Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Amir Hossein
Jafarian
jafarianah@mums.ac.ir
2
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Alireza
Sharifian Attar
sharifiana@mums.ac.ir
3
Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences,Mashhad,Iran
AUTHOR
Fatemeh Sadat
Abtahi Mehrjardi
nazy.abtahi@yahoo.com
4
Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
Mehrdad
Fakhlaei
mehrdad.fakhlaei@gmail.com
5
Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
AUTHOR
Leila.
S Arani
leila.arani@gmail.com
6
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
AUTHOR
Sharifeh
Kamalimotlagh
sharifehkamalimotlagh@gmail.com
7
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
AUTHOR
Asieh Sadat
Fattahi
beigolis1@mums.ac.ir
8
Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Salter DM. Pulmonary and thoracic sarcomas. Curr
1
Diagn Pathol . 2006 Dec 1;12(6):409-17.
2
2. Ducimetière F, Lurkin A, Ranchère-Vince D,
3
Decouvelaere AV, Péoc’h M, Istier L, et al . Incidence
4
of sarcoma histotypes and molecular subtypes in
5
a prospective epidemiological study with central
6
pathology review and molecular testing. PloS one.
7
2011 Aug 3;6(8):e20294.
8
3. Fletcher CD, Unni KK, Mertens F. Pathology and genetics
9
of tumours of soft tissue and bone: Iarc; 2002.
10
4. Ferrari A, De Salvo GL, Dall’Igna P, Meazza C, De
11
Leonardis F, Manzitti C, et al. Salvage rates and
12
prognostic factors after relapse in children and
13
adolescents with initially localised synovial sarcoma.
14
Eur J Cancer . 2012;48(18):3448-55.
15
5. Burt M, Ihde JK, Hajdu SI, Smith JW, Bains MS, Downey
16
R, et al. Primary sarcomas of the mediastinum:
17
results of therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg . 1998;
18
115(3):671-80.
19
6. Deshmukh R, Mankin HJ, Singer S. Synovial sarcoma:
20
the importance of size and location for survival. Clin
21
Orthop Relat Res . 2004;419:155-61.
22
7. Ulusan S, Kizilkilic O, Yildirim T, Hurcan C, Bal N, Nursal
23
T. Radiological findings of primary retroperitoneal
24
synovial sarcoma. Br J Radiol . 2005;78(926):166-9.
25
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Anticoagulation Strategies for the Orthopaedic Surgeon: Reversal and Timelines
Article Highlights: 1) This article provides a full anticoagulant reference for the practicing orthopaedic surgeon which can be used in any clinical scenario, whether urgent or elective surgical intervention is required 2) A comprehensive list of anticoagulant reversal agents and drugs with short half-lives (for bridging) are described with the intention to provide the data needed to safely manage a patient peri-operatively during urgent orthopaedic surgical care (i.e. fracture or infection) 3) Half-life and method of excretion for all drugs are included with the intention to accurately guide decisions regarding the appropriate timing of scheduling elective orthopaedic surgical care with regards to anticoagulant metabolism and effect 4) The practicing orthopaedic surgeon using this guide should always consider medical co-management of these complex patients as their medical co-morbidities may not be amenable to anticoagulant reversal or peri-operative cessation of therapy, even for a short period 5) The data contained in this article stands to serve as a foundation upon which institution-specific guidelines regarding the peri-operative management of orthopedic patients on long-term anticoagulation can be developed
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15767_4f8ef7ecf6d200710788d4b4a9c9cf81.pdf
2020-05-01
457
460
10.22038/abjs.2019.44803.2222
anticoagulation
surgical outcomes
surgical timing
perioperative safety
orthopaedic surgery
Matthew D.
Riedel
mdriedel@gmail.com
1
Yale University Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA
LEAD_AUTHOR
Ian T.
Watkins
ian.itw.watkins@gmail.com
2
University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami FL, USA
AUTHOR
Johnathon R.
McCormick
jrmccormick13@gmail.com
3
University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami FL, USA
AUTHOR
Hans P.
Van Lancker
hans.vanlancker@steward.org
4
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Elizabeth Medical Center, Brighton MA, USA- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
AUTHOR
1. Baek GH. Are we prepared for geriatric orthopedics?
1
Clinics in orthopedic surgery. 2010; 2(3):129.
2
2. Mann NC, Cahn RM, Mullins RJ, Brand DM, Jurkovich
3
GJ. Survival among injured geriatric patients during
4
construction of a statewide trauma system. Journal of
5
Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2001; 50(6):1111-6.
6
3. Barnes GD, Lucas E, Alexander GC, Goldberger ZD.
7
National trends in ambulatory oral anticoagulant
8
use. The American journal of medicine. 2015;
9
128(12):1300-5.
10
4. Raji MA, Lowery M, Lin YL, Kuo YF, Baillargeon
11
J, Goodwin JS. National utilization patterns of
12
warfarin use in older patients with atrial fibrillation:
13
a population-based study of Medicare Part D
14
beneficiaries. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2013;
15
47(1):35-42.
16
5. Schoof N, Schnee J, Schneider G, Gawlik M, Zint K,
17
Clemens A, Bartels DB. Characteristics of patients
18
with non-valvular atrial fibrillation using dabigatran
19
or warfarin in the US. Current medical research and
20
opinion. 2014; 30(5):795-804.
21
6. Pean CA, Goch A, Christiano A, Konda S, Egol K. Current
22
practices regarding perioperative management of
23
patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy: a
24
survey of orthopedic surgeons. Geriatric orthopaedic
25
surgery & rehabilitation. 2015; 6(4):289-94.
26
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Reply to “A Critical Review of Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis”
Proximal fibular osteotomy is a surgical procedure that has evoked significant interest and controversy in the recent past. Vaishya et al have made a significant effort in compiling the available evidence on the topic. However, we would like to make some significant suggestions and additions to the findings in their manuscript.
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15768_645d61e6500de2f6b355e6fe2a05ee15.pdf
2020-05-01
461
462
10.22038/abjs.2019.44398.2215
Medial osteoarthritis
PFO
knee pain
Samundeeswari
Saseendar
shreesamu@gmail.com
1
CARE Sports Injury, India
AUTHOR
Saseendar
Shanmugasundaram Saseendar
ssaseendar@yahoo.co.in
2
Apollo Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
LEAD_AUTHOR
Srinivas BS
Kambhampati
kbssrinivas@gmail.com
3
Sri Dhaatri Orthopaedic, Maternity and Gynaecology Center, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
AUTHOR
1. Vaish A, Kathiriya YK, Vaishya R. A Critical Review of
1
Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis.
2
Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2019; 7(5):453.
3
2. Shanmugasundaram S, Kambhampati SB, Saseendar
4
S. Proximal fibular osteotomy in the treatment of
5
medial osteoarthritis of the knee–A narrative review
6
of literature. Knee Surgery & Related Research. 2019;
7
31(1):1-7.
8
3. Yang ZY, Chen W, Li CX, Wang J, Hou ZY, et al. Medial
9
compartment decompression by fibular osteotomy to
10
treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: a pilot
11
study. Orthopedics. 2015;38(12):e1110-4
12
4. Dong T, Chen W, Zhang F, Yin B, Tian Y, Zhang Y.
13
Radiographic measures of settlement phenomenon in
14
patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.
15
Clinical rheumatology. 2016; 35(6):1573-8.
16
5. Huang W, Lin Z, Zeng X, Ma L, Chen L, Xia H, Zhang
17
Y. Kinematic characteristics of an osteotomy of the
18
proximal aspect of the fibula during walking: a case
19
report. JBJS case connector. 2017; 7(3):e43.
20
6. Qin D, Chen W, Wang J, Lv H, Ma W, Dong T, Zhang
21
Y. Mechanism and influencing factors of proximal
22
fibular osteotomy for treatment of medial
23
compartment knee osteoarthritis: a prospective
24
study. Journal of International Medical Research.
25
2018; 46(8):3114-23.
26
7. Xie W, Zhang Y, Qin X, Song L, Chen Q. Ground reaction
27
vector re-adjustment–the secret of success in
28
treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis
29
by novel high fibular osteotomy. Journal of
30
orthopaedics. 2018; 15(1):143-5.
31
8. Guo J, Zhang L, Di Qin WC, Dong W, Hou Z, Zhang Y.
32
Changes in ankle joint alignment after proximal
33
fibular osteotomy. PloS one. 2019; 14(3).
34
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Distal Femoral Valgus Cut Errors in Total Knee Replacement
The causes of malalignment in total knee arthroplasty can be categorized into three different groups; 1) Errors in bone cuts 2) Errors in implant fixations, and 3) The method of setting down the cutting guides (1). We would like to announce that more several distal femoral valgus cut errors may occur during total knee replacement.
https://abjs.mums.ac.ir/article_15769_8dde197251e598de01df640cd3d34821.pdf
2020-05-01
463
464
10.22038/abjs.2020.46578.2280
valgus dut
distal femoral cut
cut error
Total knee replacement
Hamidreza
Yazdi
yazdi.hr@iums.ac.ir
1
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Centre, Firoozgar Hospital, Department of Knee Surgery, Iran Univesity of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
Mohammad Taher
Ghaderi
dr.ghaderim@yahoo.com
2
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Lampart M, Behrend H, Moser LB, Hirschmann MT.
1
Due to great variability fixed HKS angle for alignment
2
of the distal cut leads to a significant error in coronal
3
TKA orientation. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,
4
Arthroscopy. 2019; 27(5):1434-41.
5
2. Dorr LD, editor. The knee: papers of the First Scientific
6
Meeting of the Knee Society. Univ Park Pr; 1985.
7
3. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment
8
after total knee replacement. The Journal of bone and
9
joint surgery. British volume. 1991; 73(5):709-14.
10
4. Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Chung BJ, Cho HJ, Seong
11
SC. Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant
12
fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total
13
knee arthroplasty. The Knee. 2010; 17(1):23-8.
14
5. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee
15
arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related
16
research. 1988 (226):49-64.
17
6. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB.
18
Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement.
19
Its effect on survival. Clinical orthopaedics and related
20
research. 1994 (299):153-6.
21
7. Mont MA, Urquhart MA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA.
22
Intramedullary goniometer can improve alignment in
23
knee arthroplasty surgery. The Journal of arthroplasty.
24
1997; 12(3):332-6.
25
8. Nakahara H, Matsuda S, Moro-oka TA, Okazaki K,
26
Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y. Cutting error of the distal femur
27
in total knee arthroplasty by use of a navigation system.
28
The Journal of arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6):1119-22.
29
9. Reed SC, Gollish J. The accuracy of femoral
30
intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. The
31
Journal of arthroplasty. 1997; 12(6):677-82.
32
10. Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE. Cutting errors in
33
preparation of femoral components in total knee
34
arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 1993;
35
8(5):503-10.
36
11. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, McGraw RW. Bone
37
cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. The Journal
38
of arthroplasty. 2002; 17(6):698-705.
39
12. Yazdi H, Nazarian A, Wu JS, Amiri A, Hafezi P, Babikian
40
M, et al. Different references for valgus cut angle in
41
Total Knee Arthroplasty. Archives of Bone and Joint
42
Surgery. 2018; 6(4):289.
43